Italian Rett database and biobank.

Rett syndrome is the second most common cause of severe mental retardation in females, with an incidence of approximately 1 out of 10,000 live female births. In addition to the classic form, a number of Rett variants have been described. MECP2 gene mutations are responsible for about 90% of classic cases and for a lower percentage of variant cases. Recently, CDKL5 mutations have been identified in the early onset seizures variant and other atypical Rett patients. While the high percentage of MECP2 mutations in classic patients supports the hypothesis of a single disease gene, the low frequency of mutated variant cases suggests genetic heterogeneity. Since 1998, we have performed clinical evaluation and molecular analysis of a large number of Italian Rett patients. The Italian Rett Syndrome (RTT) database has been developed to share data and samples of our RTT collection with the scientific community (http://www.biobank.unisi.it). This is the first RTT database that has been connected with a biobank. It allows the user to immediately visualize the list of available RTT samples and, using the "Search by" tool, to rapidly select those with specific clinical and molecular features. By contacting bank curators, users can request the samples of interest for their studies. This database encourages collaboration projects with clinicians and researchers from around the world and provides important resources that will help to better define the pathogenic mechanisms underlying Rett syndrome.

MECP2 deletions and genotype-phenotype correlation in Rett syndrome.

Rett syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder that represents one of the most common genetic causes of mental retardation in girls. MECP2 point mutations in exons 2-4 account for about 80% of classic Rett cases and for a lower percentage of variant patients. We investigated the genetic cause in 77 mutation-negative Rett patients (33 classic, 31 variant, and 13 Rett-like cases) by searching missed MECP2 defects. DHPLC analysis of exon 1 and MLPA analysis allowed us to identify the defect in 17 Rett patients: one exon 1 point mutation (c.47_57del) in a classic case and 16 MECP2 large deletions (15/33 classic and 1/31 variant cases). One identical intragenic MECP2 deletion, probably due to gonadal mosaicism, was found in two sisters with discordant phenotype: one classic and one "highly functioning" preserved speech variant. This result indicates that other epigenetic or genetic factors, beside MECP2, may contribute to phenotype modulation. Three out of 16 MECP2 deletions extend to the adjacent centromeric IRAK1 gene. A putative involvement of the hemizygosity of this gene in the ossification process is discussed. Finally, results reported here clearly indicate that MECP2 large deletions are a common cause of classic Rett, and MLPA analysis is mandatory in MECP2-negative patients, especially in those more severely affected (P = 0.044).

Mutational screening of the RB1 gene in Italian patients with retinoblastoma reveals 11 novel mutations.

Retinoblastoma (RB, OMIM#180200) is the most common intraocular tumour in infancy and early childhood. Constituent mutations in the RB1 gene predispose individuals to RB development. We performed a mutational screening of the RB1 gene in Italian patients affected by RB referred to the Medical Genetics of the University of Siena. In 35 unrelated patients, we identified germline RB1 mutations in 6 out of 9 familial cases (66%) and in 7 out of 26 with no family history of RB (27%). Using the single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) technique, 11 novel mutations were detected, including 3 nonsense, 5 frameshift and 4 splice-site mutations. Only two of these mutations (1 splice site and 1 missense) were previously reported. The mutation spectrum reflects the published literature, encompassing predominately nonsense or frameshift and splicing mutations. RB1 germline mutation was detected in 37% of our cases. Gross rearrangements outside the investigated region, altered DNA methylation, or mutations in non-coding regions, may be the cause of disease in the remainder of the patients. Some cases, e.g. a case of incomplete penetrance, or variable expressivity ranging from retinoma to multiple tumours, are discussed in detail. In addition, a case of pre-conception genetic counselling resolved by rescue of banked cordonal blood of the affected deceased child is described.

Autosomal recessive Alport syndrome: an in-depth clinical and molecular analysis of five families.

BACKGROUND: Alport syndrome (ATS) is a progressive inherited nephropathy characterized by irregular thinning, thickening and splitting of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) often associated with hearing loss and ocular symptoms. ATS has been shown to be caused by COL4A5 mutations in its X-linked form and by COL4A3 and COL4A4 mutations in its autosomal forms. METHODS: Five families with a suspicion of ATS were investigated both from a clinical and molecular point of view. COL4A3 and COL4A4 genes were analysed by DHPLC. Automated sequencing was performed to identify the underlying mutation. RESULTS: Molecular analysis indicated that in all 5 cases the correct diagnosis was autosomal recessive ATS. In three families in which parental consanguinity clearly pinpointed to autosomal recessive ATS, we found COL4A4 homozygous mutations in two of them and COL4A3 homozygous mutation in the other one. In the remaining two families a differential diagnosis including X-linked ATS, autosomal recessive ATS and thin basement membrane nephropathy was considered. The molecular analysis demonstrated that the probands were genetic compounds for two different mutations in the COL4A4 gene pinpointing to the correct diagnosis of autosomal recessive ATS. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical evaluation of probands and their relatives of the five families carrying mutations in either the COL4A3 or the COL4A4 gene was carried out to underline the natural history of the autosomal recessive ATS. In addition, this paper stresses the complexity of the clinics and genetics of ATS and how a correct diagnosis is based on a combination of: (i) an in-depth clinical investigation; (ii) a detailed formal genetic analysis; (iii) a correct technical choice of the gene to be investigated; (iv) a correct technical choice of the family member to be included in the mutational screening. A correct diagnosis is the basis for an appropriate genetic counselling dealing with both the correct prognosis and the accurate recurrence risk for the patients and family members.