Professional burnout in European young oncologists: results of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Young Oncologists Committee Burnout Survey.

BACKGROUND: Burnout in health care professionals could have serious negative consequences on quality of patient care, professional satisfaction and personal life. Our aim was to investigate the burnout prevalence, work and lifestyle factors potentially affecting burnout amongst European oncologists ≤40 (YOs). METHODS: A survey was conducted using the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and additional questions exploring work/lifestyle factors. Statistical analyses were carried out to identify factors associated with burnout. RESULTS: Total of 737 surveys (all ages) were collected from 41 European countries. Countries were divided into six regions. Results from 595 (81%) YOs were included (81% medical oncologists; 52% trainees, 62% women). Seventy-one percent of YOs showed evidence of burnout (burnout subdomains: depersonalization 50%; emotional exhaustion 45; low accomplishment 35%). Twenty-two percent requested support for burnout during training and 74% reported no hospital access to support services. Burnout rates were significantly different across Europe (P < 0.0001). Burnout was highest in central European (84%) and lowest in Northern Europe (52%). Depersonalization scores were higher in men compared with women (60% versus 45% P = 0.0001) and low accomplishment was highest in the 26-30 age group (P < 0.01). In multivariable linear regression analyses, European region, work/life balance, access to support services, living alone and inadequate vacation time remained independent burnout factors (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest burnout survey in European Young Oncologists. Burnout is common amongst YOs and rates vary across Europe. Achieving a good work/life balance, access to support services and adequate vacation time may reduce burnout levels. Raising awareness, support and interventional research are needed.

Circulating endothelial cells in oncology: pitfalls and promises.

Adequate blood supply is a prerequisite in the pathogenesis of solid malignancies. As a result, depriving a tumour from its oxygen and nutrients, either by preventing the formation of new vessels, or by disrupting vessels already present in the tumour, appears to be an effective treatment modality in oncology. Given the mechanism by which these agents exert their anti-tumour activity together with the crucial role of tumour vasculature in the pathogenesis of tumours, there is a great need for markers properly reflecting its impact. Circulating endothelial cells (CEC), which are thought to derive from damaged vasculature, may be such a marker. Appropriate enumeration of these cells appears to be a technical challenge. Nevertheless, first studies using validated CEC assays have shown that CEC numbers in patients with advanced malignancies are elevated compared to healthy controls making CEC a potential tool for among other establishing prognosis and therapy-induced effects. In this review, we will address the possible clinical applications of CEC detection in oncology, as well as the pitfalls encountered in this process.

A new approach for rapid and reliable enumeration of circulating endothelial cells in patients.

BACKGROUND: Mature circulating endothelial cells (CECs) are surrogate markers of endothelial damage/dysfunction. A lack of standardized assays and consensus on CEC phenotype has resulted in a wide variation of reported CEC numbers (4-1300 per mL). OBJECTIVES: Given the need for a quick, reliable, robust and validated CEC assay at an affordable price, we present a novel approach to enumerate CECs using a multi-parameter flow cytometric (FCM) method without immunological pre-enrichment. METHODS: CECs were defined as CD34+, CD45neg, CD146+ and DNA+ events based on the immunophenotype of endothelial cells from vein-wall dissections. As CECs express high levels of CD34, we based our assay on absolute CD34 counts after analyzing all CD34 positive events in a total blood volume of 4 mL needed for a precise enumeration of CECs at a frequency of < 1 cell µL(-1). RESULTS: The endothelial origin of CECs was confirmed by morphology, immunohistochemistry and gene expression. The new FCM assay was tested in parallel with a validated assay (i.e. CellSearch). CEC levels ranged from 4 to 79 CEC mL(-1) in healthy individuals and were significantly higher in patients with advanced solid malignancies (P = 0.0008) and in patients with hematological malignancies (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This flow cytometric method should be useful as a fast and economical assay to enumerate and characterize CECs.

Circulating tumour cells and circulating endothelial cells as biomarkers in oncology.

Circulating tumour cells (CTC) and circulating endothelial cells (CEC) are considered promising biomarkers for tumour aggressiveness and vascular damage. Their number in the blood of cancer patients has already demonstrated to be of prognostic and predictive value in several studies. In addition, the molecular characterization of these cells may provide novel insight in the growth and dissemination of cancer, and help the development of new anti-neoplastic drugs. Therefore, many attempts have been made to reliably detect these extremely rare cells in the blood. In this review, we address the detection, applicability and results from clinical trials for both CTC and CEC.

Circulating endothelial cells, circulating tumour cells, tissue factor, endothelin-1 and overall survival in prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether serum markers of angiogenesis endothelin-1 (ET-1) and tissue factor (TF), and/or markers of vascular damage such as circulating endothelial cells (CECs), or their relative changes during treatment, were prognostic for overall survival (OS) in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. Additionally, we combined these markers with circulating tumour cells (CTCs) to construct a predictive nomogram for treatment outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty two CRPC patients treated with a docetaxel containing regimen had blood drawn before and at 2-5 weeks and 6-8 weeks after treatment start. Prospectively determined CTC and CEC levels, and retrospectively measured serum concentrations of ET-1 (pg/mL) and TF (pg/mL) were evaluated to determine their prognostic value for OS. RESULTS: Baseline CEC, TF and ET-1 were not prognostic for OS. A > or = 3.8-fold increase in CEC 2-5 weeks after treatment initiation was associated with decreased OS (median 10.9 versus 16.8 months; P=0.015), as was any decrease in TF levels compared to baseline levels (median 11.9 versus 21.5 months; P=0.0005). As previously published, baseline and CTC counts > or = 5 at 2-5 weeks were also predictive of decreased OS. Combining CTC with changes in TF and CEC 2-5 weeks after treatment initiation yielded four groups differing in OS (median OS 24.2 versus 16.0 versus 11.4 versus 6.1 months; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: CEC, CTC and TF levels alone and combined can predict early on OS in CRPC patients treated with docetaxel-based therapy. A prospective study to confirm the use of these markers for patient management is needed.