Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy and blood cell autografts for high-risk primary breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled studies have reported encouraging outcomes for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare standard-dose chemotherapy with the same therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes after primary breast surgery or patients with four or more positive lymph nodes after four cycles of primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy were eligible. All patients were to receive eight cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cyclophosphamide (FAC). Patients were stratified by stage and randomly assigned to receive two cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support or no additional chemotherapy. Tamoxifen was planned for postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors and chest wall radiotherapy was planned for all. All P values are from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (48 after primary surgery and 30 after primary chemotherapy) were registered. Thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned to FAC and 39 to FAC followed by high-dose chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, there have been 41 relapses. In intention-to-treat analyses, estimated 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 62% and 48% for FAC and FAC/high-dose chemotherapy, respectively (P =.35), and 3-year survival rates were 77% and 58%, respectively (P =.23). Overall, there was greater and more frequent morbidity associated with high-dose chemotherapy than with FAC; there was one septic death associated with high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: No relapse-free or overall survival advantage was associated with the use of high-dose chemotherapy, and morbidity was increased with its use. Thus, high-dose chemotherapy is not indicated outside a clinical trial.

Locoregional recurrence patterns after mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: implications for postoperative irradiation.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine locoregional recurrence (LRR) patterns after mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy to define subgroups of patients who might benefit from adjuvant irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,031 patients were treated with mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy without irradiation on five prospective trials. Median follow-up time was 116 months. Rates of isolated and total LRR (+/- distant metastasis) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The 10-year actuarial rates of isolated LRR were 4%, 10%, 21%, and 22% for patients with zero, one to three, four to nine, or >/= 10 involved nodes, respectively (P <.0001). Chest wall (68%) and supraclavicular nodes (41%) were the most common sites of LRR. T stage (P <.001), tumor size (P <.001), and >/= 2-mm extranodal extension (P <.001) were also predictive of LRR. Separate analysis was performed for patients with T1 or T2 primary disease and one to three involved nodes (n = 404). Those with fewer than 10 nodes examined were at increased risk of LRR compared with those with >/= 10 nodes examined (24% v 11%; P =.02). Patients with tumor size greater than 4.0 cm or extranodal extension >/= 2 mm experienced rates of isolated LRR in excess of 20%. Each of these factors continued to significantly predict for LRR in multivariate analysis by Cox logistic regression. CONCLUSION: Patients with tumors >/= 4 cm or at least four involved nodes experience LRR rates in excess of 20% and should be offered adjuvant irradiation. Additionally, patients with one to three involved nodes and large tumors, extranodal extension >/= 2 mm, or inadequate axillary dissections experience high rates of LRR and may benefit from postmastectomy irradiation.

Impact of systemic treatment on local control for patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer treated with breast-conservation therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of tamoxifen and chemotherapy on local control for breast cancer patients treated with breast-conservation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data from 484 breast cancer patients who were treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation were analyzed. Only patients with lymph node-negative disease were studied to provide comparative groups with a similar stage of disease and a similar competing risk for distant metastases. Actuarial local control rates of the 277 patients treated with systemic therapy (128, chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen; 149, tamoxifen alone) were compared with the rates for the 207 patients who received no systemic treatment. Only 10% of the patients had positive (2%), close (3%), or unknown margin status (5%). RESULTS: Patients treated with systemic therapy had improved 5-year (97.5% v 89.8%) and 8-year (95.6% v 85.2%) local control rates compared with those that did not receive systemic treatment (P =.004, log-rank test). There was no statistical difference in local control between patients treated with chemotherapy and patients treated with tamoxifen alone (P =.219). Systemic treatment, margin status, young patient age, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and primary tumor size were analyzed in a Cox regression analysis. The use of systemic treatment was the most powerful predictor of local control: patients who did not receive systemic treatment had a relative risk of local recurrence of 3.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 7.5; P =.004). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, systemic therapy appears to contribute to long-term local control in patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer treated with breast-conservation therapy.

Postmastectomy irradiation: rationale for treatment field selection.

The goal of postmastectomy irradiation is to eliminate residual viable tumor in tissue remaining after standard mastectomy. Because this subclinical disease is, by definition, not detectable by current technology, the choice of patients and treatment volumes for postmastectomy irradiation must be inferred from a variety of data sources. The absolute risk of locoregional recurrence is related to the stage of disease, the extent of lymphatic involvement, and other treatment received. Patterns of failure analyses consistently identify the chest wall as the most important target for treatment with radiation therapy in high-risk patients. When patients with multiple locoregional sites of recurrence are included, the chest wall may be involved in as many as 60% to 80% of patients. The second most common place for locoregional failure is the undissected lymphatics of the paraclavicular region. The cumulative probability of failure in this region ranges from 10% to 35% of the patients treated for locoregional recurrence. Microscopic tumor metastases in the internal mammary chain are theorized to represent a potential source for distant metastases. Each of the prospective trials of postmastectomy irradiation that have shown survival benefit included the internal mammary chain within their target volume. Nonetheless, local failure in the internal mammary nodes is an uncommon finding. Similarly, after a level I and II axillary dissection, axillary failure is a minor component of local recurrence risk, and it is probable that only a subset of patients may benefit from axillary irradiation.

The influence of pathologic tumor characteristics on locoregional recurrence rates following mastectomy.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of pathologic factors other than tumor size and number of involved axillary nodes on the risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) following mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 1031 patients treated with mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy without radiation on 5 prospective clinical trials. Median follow-up was 116 months (range, 6-262 months). RESULTS: Patients with gross multicentric disease were at increased risk of LRR (37% at 10 years). However, patients with multifocal disease and those with microscopic multicentric disease did not experience higher rates of LRR than those with single lesions (17% at 10 years). Patients with lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) or involvement of the skin or nipple also experienced high rates of LRR (25%, 32%, and 50%, respectively). The presence of close (<5 mm) or positive margins was associated with an increased risk of LRR (45%). The increased risk of LRR observed for patients with pectoral fascial invasion (33%) was not reduced when negative deep margins were obtained. On multivariate analysis, the presence of 4 or more involved axillary nodes, tumor size of greater than 5 cm, close or positive surgical margins, and gross multicentric disease were found to be independent predictors of LRR (all, p < 0.01). In a separate analysis including only patients with 1-3 involved axillary nodes, microscopic invasion of the skin or nipple, pectoral fascial invasion, and the presence of close or positive margins were significant predictors of LRR. CONCLUSION: In addition to the extent of primary and nodal disease, other factors that predict for high rates of LRR include the presence of LVSI, involvement of the skin, nipple or pectoral fascia, close or positive margins, or gross multicentric disease. These factors predict for high LRR rates regardless of the number of involved axillary nodes.

Locoregional irradiation for inflammatory breast cancer: effectiveness of dose escalation in decreasing recurrence.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of radiation dose escalation on locoregional control, overall survival, and long-term complication in patients with inflammatory breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1977 to December 1993, 115 patients with nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer were treated with curative intent at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The usual sequence of multimodal treatment consisted of induction FAC or FACVP chemotherapy, mastectomy (if the tumor was operable), further chemotherapy, and radiation therapy to the chest wall and draining lymphatics. Sixty-one patients treated from September 1977 to September 1985 received a maximal radiation dose of 60 Gy to the chest wall and 45-50 Gy to the regional lymph nodes, 22 treated once a day at 2 Gy per fraction, and 35 were treated b.i.d. (32 after mastectomy and all chemotherapy was completed, and 2 immediately after mastectomy; one patient had distant metastases discovered during b.i.d. irradiation, and treatment was stopped). Four additional patients received preoperative radiation with standard fractionation. Based on the analysis of the failure patterns of the patients, the dose was increased for the b.i.d. patients in the new series, with 51 Gy delivered to the chest wall and regional nodes, followed by a 15-Gy boost to the chest wall with electrons. From January 1986 to December 1993, 39 patients were treated b.i.d. to this higher dose after mastectomy and all the chemotherapy was completed; and 8 additional patients received preoperative irradiation with b.i.d. fractionation to 51 Gy. During this period, another 7 patients were treated using standard daily doses of 2 Gy per fraction to a total of 60 Gy, either because they had a complete response or minimal residual disease at mastectomy or because their work schedule did not permit the b.i.d. regimen. Comparison was made between the groups for locoregional control, disease-free and overall survival, and complication rates. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 5.7 years (range, 1.8-17.6 years). For the entire patient group, the 5- and 10-year local control rates were 73.2% and 67.1%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 32.0% and 28.8%, respectively, and the overall survival rates for the entire group were 40.5% and 31.3%, respectively. To evaluate the effectiveness of dose escalation, a specific comparison of patients who received b.i.d. radiation after mastectomy and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. There were 32 patients treated b.i.d. to 60 Gy in the old series versus 39 patients treated b.i.d. to 66 Gy in the new series. There was an significant improvement in the rate of locoregional control for the b.i.d. patients for the old vs. new series, from 57.8% to 84.3% and from 57.8% to 77.0% (p = 0.028) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Chemotherapy regimens did not change significantly during this time period.Long-term complications of radiation, such as arm edema more than 3 cm (7 patients), rib fracture (10 patients), severe chest wall fibrosis (4 patients), and symptomatic pneumonitis (5 patients), were comparable in the two groups, indicating that the dose escalation did not result in increased morbidity. Significant differences in the rates of locoregional control (p = 0.03) and overall survival (p = 0.03), and a trend of better disease-free survival (p = 0.06) were also observed that favored the recently treated patients receiving the higher doses of irradiation. CONCLUSION: Twice-daily postmastectomy radiation to a total of 66 Gy for patients with inflammatory breast cancer resulted in improved locoregional control, disease free survival, and overall survival, and was well tolerated.

Results of mastectomy and postoperative irradiation in the management of locoregionally advanced carcinoma of the breast.

Between 1955 and 1984, 376 patients with locoregionally advanced breast carcinoma were treated at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center with mastectomy and irradiation and without adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with inflammatory carcinoma or synchronous bilateral primary tumors were excluded. There were 202 patients with Stage IIIA disease and 174 patients with Stage IIIB disease (AJC Staging--1983). In 124 patients the surgical management was confined to the breast only--total mastectomy (BR) and in 252 dissection of the axilla was performed--extended total, modified radical, or classic radical mastectomy (BR + AX). All patients had postoperative irradiation. The follow-up period ranged between 8 and 34 years. At 10 years, the actuarial disease-specific, relapse-free survival (DSRFS) rate for the entire group was 40%, and the actuarial locoregional control rate was 82%. For patients with Stage IIIA disease the DSRFS was 48% and locoregional control rate was 88%. For those with Stage IIIB disease, the figures were 30% and 74%, respectively. Most of the failures occurred within 5 years of the mastectomy and essentially all occurred within 10 years. When analyzed by type of surgery, both the locoregional control and DSRFS rates were improved by the axillary dissection, the difference being largely caused by fewer axillary node recurrences after dissection of both the breast and axilla than after removal of the breast alone. In the 252 patients in whom the axilla was assessed, the number of positive nodes was a powerful predictor of both locoregional control and survival. The DSRFS rates at 10 years for patients with 0, 1-3, and greater than or equal to 4 positive nodes were 63%, 48%, and 30%, respectively. The actuarial locoregional control rates at 10 years exceeded 95% for patients with 0-3 positive nodes and 75% for those with greater than or equal to 4 nodes. These results show that locoregionally advanced breast cancer is not a uniformly fatal disease when treated without chemotherapy and provide a baseline upon which to assess the value of adjuvant systemic therapy for this stage of disease.

Local-regional control of recurrent breast carcinoma after mastectomy: does hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy improve local control?

PURPOSE: Hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (HART) has been advocated for patients with local-regionally recurrent breast cancer because it is believed to enhance treatment effects in rapidly proliferating or chemoresistant tumors. This report examines the value of HART in patients with local-regionally recurrent breast cancer treated with multimodality therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included 148 patients with local-regionally recurrent breast cancer after mastectomy, who were treated with definitive local irradiation and systemic therapy consisting of either tamoxifen, cytotoxic chemotherapy, or both, along with excision of the recurrent tumor when possible. Patients with distant metastases were excluded, except for two patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular nodal metastases. Patients received comprehensive irradiation to the chest wall and regional lymphatics to a median dose of 45 Gy, with a boost to 60 Gy to areas of recurrence. Sixty-eight patients (46%) were treated once daily at 2 Gy/fraction (fx), and 80 (54%) were treated twice daily at 1.5 Gy/fx. Forty-eight patients (32%), who had palpable gross disease that was unresponsive to systemic therapy and/or unresectable, were irradiated. The median follow-up time of surviving patients was 78 months. RESULTS: Overall actuarial local-regional control (LRC) rates at 5 and 10 years were 68% and 55%, respectively. Five- and ten-year actuarial overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 50% and 35%, 39% and 29%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that LRC was adversely affected by 1. advanced initial American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (p = 0.001), 2. clinically evident residual disease at time of treatment (p < 0.0001), 3. more than three positive nodes at initial mastectomy (p = 0.014), 4. short interval from mastectomy to recurrence (< 24 months, p = 0.0007), 5. nuclear grade (III vs. I or II, p = 0.045), and 6. number of recurrent nodules (1 vs. > 1, p = 0.02). Patient age at time of recurrence (< 40 vs. > or = 40 years), recurrence location on the chest wall, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status or menopausal status did not adversely affect LRC. On multivariate analysis, only clinically evident residual disease at the time of treatment and short interval from mastectomy to recurrence remained significant. When once-a-day irradiation was compared to the twice-a-day schedule, no significant differences were seen in LRC (67% vs. 68%), OS (47% vs. 52%), or DFS (42% vs. 36%) for the entire group of patients at 5 years. Pairwise comparison of the two fractionation schedules in each of the adverse outcome subgroups identified above showed no clinically significant differences in LRC at 5 years. For the 48 patients who began radiotherapy with measurable gross local recurrence, the complete response rate to radiotherapy was 73%, with no difference seen between the two fractionation schedules. The incidence of acute and chronic radiation-related complications was similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy, although well tolerated by patients with local-regionally recurrent breast cancer, did not result in superior local-regional control rates when compared to daily fractionated regimens. Alternative strategies, such as dose escalation or chemoradiation, may be required to improve control.

A custom three-dimensional electron bolus technique for optimization of postmastectomy irradiation.

PURPOSE: Postmastectomy irradiation (PMI) is a technically complex treatment requiring consideration of the primary tumor location, possible risk of internal mammary node involvement, varying chest wall thicknesses secondary to surgical defects or body habitus, and risk of damaging normal underlying structures. In this report, we describe the application of a customized three-dimensional (3D) electron bolus technique for delivering PMI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A customized electron bolus was designed using a 3D planning system. Computed tomography (CT) images of each patient were obtained in treatment position and the volume to be treated was identified. The distal surface of the wax bolus matched the skin surface, and the proximal surface was designed to conform to the 90% isodose surface to the distal surface of the planning target volume (PTV). Dose was calculated with a pencil-beam algorithm correcting for patient heterogeneity. The bolus was then fabricated from modeling wax using a computer-controlled milling device. To aid in quality assurance, CT images with the bolus in place were generated and the dose distribution was computed using these images. RESULTS: This technique optimized the dose distribution while minimizing irradiation of normal tissues. The use of a single anterior field eliminated field junction sites. Two patients who benefited from this option are described: one with altered chest wall geometry (congenital pectus excavatum), and one with recurrent disease in the medial chest wall and internal mammary chain (IMC) area. CONCLUSION: The use of custom 3D electron bolus for PMI is an effective method for optimizing dose delivery. The radiation dose distribution is highly conformal, dose heterogeneity is reduced compared to standard techniques in certain suboptimal settings, and excellent immediate outcome is obtained.

Recursive partitioning analysis of locoregional recurrence patterns following mastectomy: implications for adjuvant irradiation.

PURPOSE: Postmastectomy irradiation improves overall survival for breast cancer patients at high risk for locoregional recurrence (LRR). The objective of this study was to use recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to define patient subgroups at high risk for LRR following mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 1031 patients treated on prospective trials with mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy without irradiation was analyzed. The variables considered in the RPA were tumor size, number of involved nodes, number of nodes examined, and percentage of nodes involved (nodes involved/nodes examined). The endpoint was LRR +/- distant metastasis. Only patients with complete data were analyzed (n = 913). Median follow-up was 8 years (range, 0.7-22 years). RESULTS: Involvement of 20% or more of the lymph nodes examined was the most significant variable predicting LRR. Three risk categories were defined. Patients with 20% or more involved nodes and tumors of 3.5 cm or more were at greatest risk for LRR (41% at 8 years). An intermediate-risk group included patients with 20% or more involved nodes and tumors of less than 3.5 cm as well as those with less than 20% involved nodes and tumor size of 5 cm or greater (18% at 8 years). Patients with less than 20% involved nodes and tumor size of less than 5 cm were at lowest risk for LRR (10% at 8 years). CONCLUSION: Tumor size and extent of nodal involvement play interrelated roles in predicting LRR following mastectomy and systemic therapy. Patients with 20% or greater involved nodes and those with less than 20% nodes and tumors of 5.0 cm or greater are at significant risk of LRR and should be considered for postoperative irradiation.

Local-regional control in breast cancer patients with a possible genetic predisposition.

PURPOSE: Local control rates for breast cancer in genetically predisposed women are poorly defined. Because such a small percentage of breast cancer patients have proven germline mutations, surrogates, such as a family history for breast cancer, have been used to examine this issue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate local-regional control following breast conservation therapy (BCT) in patients with bilateral breast cancer and a breast cancer family history. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed records of all 58 patients with bilateral breast cancer and a breast cancer family history treated in our institution between 1959 and 1998. The primary surgical treatment was a breast-conserving procedure in 55 of the 116 breast cancer cases and a mastectomy in 61. The median follow-up was 68 months for the BCT patients and 57 months for the mastectomy-treated patients. RESULTS: Eight local-regional recurrences occurred in the 55 cases treated with BCT, resulting in 5- and 10-year actuarial local-regional control rates of 86% and 76%, respectively. In the nine cases that did not receive radiation as a component of their BCT, four developed local-regional recurrences (5- and 10-year local-regional control rates of BCT without radiation: 49% and 49%). The 5- and 10-year actuarial local-regional control rates for the 46 cases treated with BCT and radiation were 94% and 83%, respectively. In these cases, there were two late local recurrences, developing at 8 years and 9 years, respectively. A log rank comparison of radiation versus no radiation actuarial data was significant at p = 0.009. In the cases treated with BCT, a multivariate analysis of radiation use, patient age, degree of family history, margin status, and stage revealed that only the use of radiation was associated with improved local control (Cox regression analysis p = 0.021). The 10-year actuarial rates of local-regional control following mastectomy with and without radiation were 91% and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a possible genetic predisposition to breast cancer had low 5-year rates of local recurrence when treated with breast conserving surgery and radiation, but the local failure rate exceeded 50% when radiation was omitted. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that patients with an underlying genetic predisposition develop cancers with radiosensitive phenotypes.

Importance of radiation therapy for breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplant.

PURPOSE: To determine local-regional failure rates in breast cancer patients treated with surgery and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant and to relate local-regional failure to the use and timing of radiation treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 165 breast cancer patients treated on institutional protocols with surgery and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant. All patients had either Stage III disease, 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 4 or more positive axillary lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twelve patients had inflammatory breast cancer. Thirteen patients treated with breast preservation and 5 patients who died from toxicity within 30 days of transplant were excluded from the analyses of local-regional recurrences. In the remaining 147 patients, 108 were treated with adjuvant radiation and 39 were not. The disease stage distribution for these two groups was comparable. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 35 months. RESULTS: The 3- and 5-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) for the entire group was 60% and 51%, respectively. The 5-year rates of freedom from isolated local-regional recurrence were 95% in the patients treated with adjuvant radiation and 86% in the patients who did not receive radiation (p = 0.014, log rank comparison). The 5-year rates of any local-regional recurrence as a first event (isolated recurrences plus those with simultaneous local-regional and distant recurrences) were 92% versus 82%, respectively for patients whose treatment did and did not include radiation (p = 0.038). We could not demonstrate a correlation of the timing of radiation with the risk of local-regional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that high-dose chemotherapy does not negate the importance of radiation in optimizing local-regional control in patients with high-risk breast cancer. Given the results of recent randomized trials studying postmastectomy radiation, which show that improving local-regional control improves overall survival (OS), we believe that all breast cancer patients with high-risk primary breast cancer who are treated with high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant should receive radiation as a component of their treatment.

Relationship of sentinel and axillary level I-II lymph nodes to tangential fields used in breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the volume of nodal irradiation associated with breast-conserving therapy, we defined the anatomic relationship of sentinel lymph nodes and axillary level I and II lymph nodes in patients receiving tangential breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis of 65 simulation fields in women with breast cancer treated with sentinel lymph node surgery and 39 women in whom radiopaque clips demarcated the extent of axillary lymph node dissection was performed. We measured the relationship of the surgical clips to the anatomic landmarks and calculated the percentage of prescribed dose delivered to the sentinel lymph node region. RESULTS: A cranial field edge 2.0 cm below the humeral head the sentinel lymph node region was included or at the field edge in 95% of the cases and the entire extent of axillary I and II dissection in 43% of the axillary dissection cases. In the remaining 57%, this field border encompassed an average of 80% of cranial/caudal extent of axillary level I and II dissection. In 98.5% of the cases, all sentinel lymph nodes were anterior to the deep field edge and 71% were anterior to the chest wall-interface, whereas 61% of the axillary dissection cohort had extension deep to the chest wall-lung interface. If the deep field edge had been set 2 cm below the chest wall-lung interface, the entire axillary dissection would have been included in 82% of the cases, and the entire sentinel lymph node would have been covered with a 0.5-cm margin. The median dose to the sentinel lymph node region was 98% of the prescribed dose. CONCLUSIONS: By extending the cranial border to 2 cm below the humeral head and 2 cm deep to the chest wall-lung interface, the radiotherapy fields used to treat the breast can include the sentinel lymph node region and most of axillary levels I and II.

Primary chemotherapy for early and advanced breast cancer.

While locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) represents a small fraction of patients with breast cancer in industrialized nations, in developing countries it might constitute up to 50% of incident cases. The definition includes patients with stage IIB, III, and some with limited stage IV breast cancer. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is part of LABC, but it is often reported separately, because of its dismal prognosis. LABC can be considered technically operable (stage II and IIIA), or inoperable (stage IIIB, IV and IBC). For the last two decades, patients with inoperable LABC and IBC have been treated with increasing frequency with systemic therapy first, followed by regional therapy, either surgical resection or radiotherapy. Most treatment programs also included adjuvant systemic therapy. The majority of patients with LABC and IBC respond to primary chemotherapy, and most can be rendered disease-free initially. Local control rates exceed 80% with modern combined-modality treatment strategies. Since most tumors are downstaged, some patients can be treated with breast-conserving treatments. The optimal sequence of local and systemic treatments has not been defined. Combined-modality therapies improve the treatment and the outcome for patients with LABC. Whether the sequence of utilization of various treatments influences outcome remains to be established. The administration of systemic therapies first also provides a useful biological model to assess the effects of systemic treatments on the primary tumor and regional metastases, since these are available for serial non-invasive evaluation and sampling of tumor tissue.

Combined-modality treatment of inflammatory breast carcinoma: twenty years of experience at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: To review the 20 years of experience at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center with a combined-modality approach against inflammatory breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 178 patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma were treated in the past 20 years at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center by a combined-modality approach under four different protocols. Each protocol included induction chemotherapy, then local therapy (radiotherapy or mastectomy), then adjuvant chemotherapy, and, if mastectomy was performed, adjuvant radiotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) with or without vincristine and prednisone (VP). In protocol D, patients received an alternate adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, methotrexate and vinblastine (MV), if they did not have a complete response (CR) to induction chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up of live patients in group A was 215 months, in group B 186 months, in group C 116 months, and in group D 45 months. An estimated 28% of patients were currently free of disease beyond 15 years. At the time of analysis, 50 patients were alive without any evidence of disease. A further 12 patients died of intercurrent illness, and 15 patients were followed beyond 10 years without recurrence of disease. Among initial recurrence, 20% of patients had local failure, 39% systemic failure, and 9% CNS recurrence. Initial response to induction chemotherapy was an important prognostic factor. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 15 years was 44% in patients who had a CR to induction chemotherapy, 31% in those who had a partial response (PR), and 7% in those who had less than a PR. There was no improvement in overall survival (OS) or DFS among patients who underwent alternate chemotherapy (MV) compared with those who did not. Using surgery and radiotherapy as opposed to radiotherapy alone as local therapy did not have an impact on the DFS or OS rate. CONCLUSION: These long-term follow-up data show that with a combined-modality approach a significant fraction of patients (28%) remained free of disease beyond 15 years. In contrast, single-modality treatments yielded a DFS of less than 5%. Thus, using combined-modality treatment (chemotherapy, then mastectomy, then chemotherapy and radiotherapy) is recommended as a standard of care for inflammatory breast carcinoma.

Fetal dose estimates for electron-beam treatment to the chest wall of a pregnant patient.

The purpose of this report is to discuss dosimetry and shielding for electron-beam radiotherapy of pregnant patients. Specifically, we have determined fetal dose for a pregnant patient considering electron radiotherapy for a chest wall recurrence of breast cancer. The treatment was simulated using an anthropomorphic phantom, and the measured dose to the unshielded fetus for this plan was 5.3 cGy, a level at which risk to the fetus is uncertain. Therefore abdominal shielding, consisting of 6.6 cm of lead, was used to reduce the dose to the fetus to less than 1.5 cGy, a level considered to be of little risk. We further found that using the lower (instead of upper) variable trimmer bars to define the field edge closest to the fetus resulted in approximately 30% lower dose to the fetus. These results show that it is possible to reduce fetal dose to acceptable limits in electron-beam radiotherapy of the chest wall using the general principles recommended for photon-beam radiotherapy.

Synchronous primary cancers of the breast and cervix: planning multidisciplinary primary treatment [clinico-pathological conference].

Multiple metachronous primary malignancies are becoming increasingly frequent; however, multiple synchronous primary malignancies are still unusual. We report the case of a 61-year-old woman with synchronous stage IIIB ductal carcinoma of the left breast and FIGO stage IB2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. The patient was treated initially every 4 weeks with a 24-h intravenous infusion of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) followed by a 1-h infusion of carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 mg/ml x min) with concurrent irradiation of the pelvis. Significant toxic reactions including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea required hospitalization or outpatient intravenous fluids and antiemetics. After four cycles of chemotherapy, the breast cancer was in complete clinical remission, and the patient underwent a modified radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Pathologic findings revealed a few microscopic foci of residual infiltrating ductal carcinoma exhibiting a marked treatment effect; none of the 14 axillary lymph nodes removed showed evidence of metastatic tumor. A near-complete pathologic response of the breast cancer and a complete clinical response of the cervical cancer were obtained. Adjuvant chemotherapy for the breast cancer was then initiated, followed by radiation and hormonal therapy.

Serum antibody responses in human periodontitis to cellular components of Capnocytophaga.

Serum levels of IgM, IgG and IgG-antibody subclasses directed against cell envelopes, lipopolysaccharides and cytoplasmic fractions from Capnocytophaga sputigena, C. gingivalis and C. ochracea were examined in age-, race- and sex-matched periodontally healthy (n = 25) subjects and subjects with adult periodontitis (n = 25). The envelopes and cytoplasmic fractions were obtained by ballistic disintegration of the cells and ultracentrifugation. Cell envelopes were treated with DNase, RNase and lysozyme. Lipopolysaccharides were obtained by hot phenol-water extraction and treated with DNase and RNase. The relative levels of the antibodies in response to the cell fractions were measured by the streptavidinbiotin micro enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Both groups showed IgM and IgG antibodies to each fraction of the three Capnocytophaga species, but the frequency of positive IgG subclass responses varied. The IgG4 responses were lower than the other subclasses. There were no significant differences between the IgM antibody levels of the two groups. However, the adult periodontitis group had significantly lower IgG antibody titres to the cell envelopes and cytoplasmic fractions of C. gingivalis and C. ochracea, and lipopolysaccharide of C. gingivalis. These results were reflected in the depressed levels of IgG1 and/or IgG2 to these cellular fractions from the same bacterial species. The adult periodontitis group also showed a lower level of IgG1 to the cytoplasmic fractions of C. sputigena without any depression in the total IgG antibody level. There were no significant differences between the groups in IgG3 and IgG4 antibody levels to any of the cellular fractions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Accelerated partial-breast irradiation using intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy: do uncertainties outweigh potential benefits?

OBJECTIVE: Passive scattering proton beam (PSPB) radiotherapy for accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) provides superior dosimetry for APBI three-dimensional conformal photon radiotherapy (3DCRT). Here we examine the potential incremental benefit of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) for APBI and compare its dosimetry with PSPB and 3DCRT. METHODS: Two theoretical IMPT plans, TANGENT_PAIR and TANGENT_ENFACE, were created for 11 patients previously treated with 3DCRT APBI and were compared with PSPB and 3DCRT plans for the same CT data sets. The impact of range, motion and set-up uncertainties as well as scanned spot mismatching between fields of IMPT plans was evaluated. RESULTS: IMPT plans for APBI were significantly better regarding breast skin sparing (p<0.005) and other normal tissue sparing than 3DCRT plans (p<0.01) with comparable target coverage (p=ns). IMPT plans were statistically better than PSPB plans regarding breast skin (p<0.002) and non-target breast (p<0.007) in higher dose regions but worse or comparable in lower dose regions. IMPT plans using TANGENT_ENFACE were superior to that using TANGENT_PAIR in terms of target coverage (p<0.003) and normal tissue sparing (p<0.05) in low-dose regions. IMPT uncertainties were demonstrated for multiple causes. Qualitative comparison of dose-volume histogram confidence intervals for IMPT suggests that numeric gains may be offset by IMPT uncertainties. CONCLUSION: Using current clinical dosimetry, PSPB provides excellent dosimetry compared with 3DCRT with fewer uncertainties compared with IMPT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: As currently delivered in the clinic, PSPB planning for APBI provides as good or better dosimetry than IMPT with less uncertainty.