Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Wound Care ; 24(11): 498, 500-3, 506-10, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26551642

ABSTRACT

The presence of non-viable tissue in a chronic wound presents a barrier against effective wound healing, hence removal facilitates healing and reduces areas where microorganisms can attach and form biofilms, effectively reducing the risk of infection. Wound debridement is a necessary process in those wounds that have evidence of cellular debris and non-viable tissue. As slough is a form of non-viable tissue we hypothesise that it will support the attachment and development of biofilms. Biofilms are entities that have serious implications in raising the risk of infection and delaying wound healing. In those wounds that contain only slough, high-risk debridement methods are not considered necessary for its removal. The use of mechanical techniques for removing the slough is regarded as posing a much lower risk to the patient and the wound bed. The process of removing slough from a wound is referred to as 'desloughing'. We propose that mechanical desloughing is a low-risk method of debridement to aid the specific removal of slough. Slough in a wound is a recurrent issue for a large majority of patients. Consequently, desloughing should not be deemed a one-off process but an on-going procedure referred to as 'maintenance desloughing'. Maintenance desloughing will help to achieve and maintain a healthy wound bed and aid the removal of wound biofilms, facilitating wound healing.


Subject(s)
Burns/nursing , Debridement/nursing , Practice Patterns, Nurses' , Pressure Ulcer/nursing , Skin Care/nursing , Bandages , Biofilms , Burns/pathology , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/pathology , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL