Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide for Treatment of Parkinsonism in Patients With Dementia With Lewy Bodies: An Open-Label Extension of a Phase three Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of zonisamide, an antiepileptic agent, in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). DESIGN: Phase three clinical trial with 12 week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, and subsequent 40 week, open-label, extension periods. SETTING: A total of 109 centers in Japan between April 2015 and November 2017. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients diagnosed with probable DLB. INTERVENTION: Outpatients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (P) or zonisamide 25 or 50 mg/day for 12 weeks. In the subsequent open-label 40 week period, all patients initially received zonisamide 25 mg/day for at least 2 weeks followed by optional flexible dosing with zonisamide 25 or 50 mg/day for the remaining period. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was efficacy on motor symptoms, assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III) score, over the total 52 week trial period. Effects on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia and cognitive function, and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 335 patients were included in the long-term analysis: 106, 117, and 112 in the P-, 25mg-, and 50mg-Flex groups, respectively. UPDRS-III score continued to improve for an additional 12 to 16 weeks in the open-label period (mean [standard deviation] change from baseline at Week 28: -5.1 [7.3] and -6.3 [8.2] in the 25mg- and 50mg-Flex groups) and remained almost constant thereafter. No unexpected neurological or psychiatric adverse events occurred, and no adverse events increased in incidence in the open-label period. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with zonisamide was well tolerated and yielded sustained improvement in motor symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-152839 (Registered on 9 March 2015) https://www.clinicaltrials.jp/cti-user/trial/ShowDirect.jsp?japicId=JapicCTI-152839.

Effect of zonisamide on parkinsonism in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies: A phase 3 randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Zonisamide is approved in Japan for treating motor dysfunction in Parkinson's disease, and might also be effective for parkinsonism in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Our study evaluated the safety and efficacy of zonisamide for treating parkinsonism in patients with DLB. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial was conducted in Japan between April 2015 and November 2017. Following a 4-week run-in period, outpatients diagnosed with probable DLB who had developed parkinsonism were randomized to receive oral zonisamide (25 or 50 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks, followed by a 40-week open-label extension. The primary endpoint was the change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III total score at Week 12. RESULTS: Of 351 patients randomized, 346 (mean age, 77.2 years; 188 males) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. At Week 12, the group difference (least squares mean ± SEM) for changes from baseline (vs placebo) in UPDRS part III total score was -2.7 ± 0.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.4, -0.9, P = 0.005) in the zonisamide 25-mg group and -2.6 ± 0.9 (95% CI: -4.4, -0.8, P = 0.005) in the zonisamide 50-mg group. Adverse events were reported in 47.1%, 48.7%, and 54.5% of patients in the placebo and zonisamide 25- and 50-mg groups, and led to treatment discontinuation in 5.0%, 4.3%, and 9.8% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Daily administration of 25- or 50-mg zonisamide significantly improved motor function compared with placebo; both doses were safe and well tolerated in patients with DLB.

Comparison of zonisamide with non-levodopa, anti-Parkinson's disease drugs in the incidence of Parkinson's disease-relevant symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience various symptoms, both from the disease progression itself and the medication. Few large-scale studies have investigated the associations between zonisamide and these symptoms. This study compared zonisamide and other anti-PD drugs by analyzing their associations with the incidence of PD-relevant symptoms. METHODS: This was a cohort study based on claims data from Diagnosis Procedure Combination hospitals between 2008 and 2014 in Japan. Patients were included in the cohort if they were diagnosed with PD, aged ≥40 years, and were prescribed anti-PD drugs from the same single class without switching to/combination use with other classes excepting levodopa. The outcomes were the incidence of PD-relevant symptoms from the following categories; mental/psychiatric, autonomic nervous system, motor-related, and gastric symptoms. The associations between the incidence of these symptoms and the prescriptions of 8 different classes of anti-PD drugs were explored by the survival analysis. RESULTS: In the final cohort, 9157 patients were included. The zonisamide use was significantly associated with a lower risk of dementia, insomnia, and gastric ulcers than 3 of 7 other classes without levodopa (p < .05). CONCLUSION: There may be a potential clinical impact of zonisamide on some of the PD-relevant symptoms.

Adjunct zonisamide to levodopa for DLB parkinsonism: A randomized double-blind phase 2 study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of zonisamide as an adjunct to levodopa therapy for parkinsonism in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). METHODS: This phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study consisted of run-in (placebo, 4 weeks) and treatment (placebo or zonisamide 25 or 50 mg once daily, 12 weeks) periods. Outpatients diagnosed with probable DLB were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part 3 total score at week 12. Cognitive function, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), caregiver burden, other UPDRS parts as secondary endpoints, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 158 patients with DLB received the study drug; 21 discontinued during treatment and 137 completed treatment. Improvement in UPDRS part 3 total score at week 12 was significantly greater in the zonisamide 50 mg group compared with placebo (between-group difference -4.1; 95% confidence interval -6.8 to -1.4; p = 0.003). Zonisamide did not worsen cognitive function, BPSD, or caregiver burden. The overall incidence of adverse events was higher in the zonisamide 50 mg than the 25 mg and placebo groups (65.3%, 43.1%, and 50.0%, respectively); similar rates of serious adverse events were observed among all groups. CONCLUSION: Zonisamide (adjunctive to levodopa) improved parkinsonism accompanying DLB without worsening cognitive function or psychiatric symptoms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-122040. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that zonisamide (adjunctive to levodopa) improves parkinsonism and is well-tolerated in patients with DLB.

Overcoming Obstacles to Drug Repositioning in Japan.

Drug repositioning (DR) is the process of identifying new indications for existing drugs. DR usually focuses on drugs that have cleared phase-I safety trials but has yet to show efficacy for the intended indication. Therefore, DR can probably skip the preclinical and phase-I study, which can reduce the cost throughout drug development. However, the expensive phase-II/III trials are required to establish efficacy. The obstacles to DR include identification of new indications with a high success rate in clinical studies, obtaining funding for clinical studies, patent protection, and approval systems. To tackle these obstacles, various approaches have been applied to DR worldwide. In this perspective, we provide representative examples of DR and discuss the ongoing efforts to overcome obstacles to DR in Japan.

Blonanserin, a novel atypical antipsychotic agent not actively transported as substrate by P-glycoprotein.

Although blonanserin, a novel atypical antipsychotic agent with dopamine D(2)/serotonin 5-HT(2A) antagonistic properties, displays good brain distribution, the mechanism of this distribution has not been clarified. P-glycoprotein [(P-gp) or multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1)] is an efflux transporter expressed in the brain and plays an important role in limiting drug entry into the central nervous system (CNS). In particular, P-gp can affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of antipsychotics, and exacerbate or soothe their adverse effects. In this study, we conducted in vitro and in vivo experiments to determine whether blonanserin is a P-gp substrate. Risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone, both of which are P-gp substrates, were used as reference drugs. Affinity of blonanserin, risperidone, and 9-hydroxyrisperidone for P-gp was evaluated by in vitro transcellular transport across LLC-PK1, human MDR1 cDNA-transfected LLC-PK1 (LLC-MDR1), and mouse Mdr1a cDNA-transfected LLC-PK1 (LLC-Mdr1a). In addition, pharmacokinetic parameters in the brain and plasma (B/P ratio) of test compounds were measured in mdr1a/1b knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice. The results of in vitro experiments revealed that P-gp does not actively transport blonanserin as a substrate in humans or mice. In addition, blonanserin displayed comparable B/P ratios in KO and WT mice, whereas B/P ratios of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone differed markedly in these animals. Our results indicate that blonanserin is not a P-gp substrate and therefore its brain distribution is unlikely to be affected by this transporter.

Specific brain processing of facial expressions in people with alexithymia: an H2 15O-PET study.

Alexithymia is a personal trait characterized by a reduced ability to identify and describe one's own feelings and is known to contribute to a variety of physical and behavioural disorders. To elucidate the pathogenesis of stress-related disorders and the normal functions of emotion, it is important to investigate the neurobiology of alexithymia. Although several neurological models of alexithymia have been proposed, there is very little direct evidence for the neural correlates of alexithymia. Using PET, we studied brain activity in subjects with alexithymia when viewing a range of emotional face expressions. Twelve alexithymic and 12 non-alexithymic volunteers (all right-handed males) were selected from 247 applicants on the basis of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured with H(2)(15)O-PET while the subjects looked at angry, sad and happy faces with varying emotional intensity, as well as neutral faces. Brain response in the subjects with alexithymia significantly differed from that in the subjects without alexithymia. The alexithymics exhibited lower rCBF in the inferior and middle frontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, inferior parietal cortex and occipital cortex in the right hemisphere than the non-alexithymics. Additionally, the alexithymics showed higher rCBF in the superior frontal cortex, inferior parietal cortex and cerebellum in the left hemisphere when compared with the non-alexithymics. A covariance analysis revealed that rCBF in the inferior and superior frontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex and parietal cortex in the right hemisphere correlated negatively with individual TAS-20 scores when viewing angry and sad facial expressions, and that no rCBF correlated positively with TAS-20 scores. Moreover, the anterior cingulate cortex and insula were less activated in the alexithymics' response to angry faces than their response to neutral faces. These results suggest that people with alexithymia process facial expressions differently from people without alexithymia, and that this difference may account for the disorder of affect regulation and consequent peculiar behaviour in people with alexithymia.

The effects of a sedative antihistamine, d-chlorpheniramine, on visuomotor spatial discrimination and regional brain activity as measured by positron emission tomography (PET).

Although most people taking antihistamines have experienced sedation and impaired performance, the neural correlates of these sedative properties are not well understood in man. Brain imaging can be used to demonstrate how regional brain activities are altered during such sedative effects. The aim of this study was to visualize the brain mechanism of impaired visuomotor spatial cognition with orally administered d-chlorpheniramine, a first-generation sedative antihistamine, using H(2) (15)O and positron emission tomography (PET). Normal subjects were randomly assigned to two groups (chlorpheniramine and placebo) and performed a spatial discrimination task after the oral administration of 6 mg d-chlorpheniramine or a placebo. The administration of d-chlorpheniramine impaired visuomotor spatial discrimination and altered cortical and subcortical activity. Decreased and increased activities were observed in the right parietal cortex (BA 40) which is related to visuomotor spatial cognition and the posterior cingulate cortex which constitutes the attention system of the brain, respectively. In particular, the brain activities of BA 40 were negatively and positively correlated to those of bilateral caudate nuclei and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, respectively. These findings clearly suggest that the alteration in the cortical and subcortical activity contributes to impaired spatial cognition caused by treatment with d-chlorpheniramine.

Differential cognitive effects of ebastine and (+)-chlorpheniramine in healthy subjects: correlation between cognitive impairment and plasma drug concentration.

AIMS: It has been widely recognized that classical antihistamines induce sedation as an adverse effect, while second-generation antihistamines have few if any sedative effects. In order to evaluate the sedative properties of ebastine, a second-generation antihistamine, its effect on cognitive performance in healthy subjects was compared with placebo and (+)-chlorpheniramine. METHODS: Twelve healthy male subjects were instructed to perform six types of attention-demanding cognitive tasks, and objective measurements of reaction times and accuracy was made before and after drug administration. Their sleepiness levels were also monitored. Test drugs were ebastine 10 mg, placebo and two doses of (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg and 6 mg, as positive controls. Plasma drug concentrations at the end of the study were analysed. RESULTS: After treatments with (+)-chlorpheniramine, the reaction times of the tasks were significantly prolonged (e.g. ratios of after/before dosing: placebo (0.998 +/- 0.113) vs (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg (1.103 +/- 0.083; P<0.05) or (+)-chlorpheniramine 6 mg (1.170 +/- 0.139; P<0.001) in a 7 ms visual discrimination time task) and the accuracy was significantly decreased (e.g. ratios: placebo (1.038 +/- 0.158) vs (+)-chlorpheniramine 2 mg (0.792 +/- 0.202; P<0.01) or (+)-chlorpheniramine 6 mg (0.837 +/- 0.222; P<0.05) in a 7 ms task). On the other hand, performance was not affected by ebastine or placebo treatment (e.g. ebastine 10 mg (reaction time ratio; 1.014 +/- 0.067 and accuracy ratio; 0.990 +/- 0.146) in a 7 ms task). Subjective sleepiness was also not affected by ebastine but (+)-chlorpheniramine significantly increased sedation. With respect to the relationship between plasma drug concentrations and task performance, the latter deteriorated with an increase in plasma (+)-chlorpheniramine concentration (e.g. r=0.439 (P=0.007) in a 5 ms and r = 0.352 (P=0.039) in a 7 ms task), but it did not correlate with the plasma concentration of carebastine, an active metabolite of ebastine. CONCLUSIONS: Ebastine 10 mg did not cause any cognitive impairment or subjective sleepiness. On the other hand, (+)-chlorpheniramine impaired cognitive function and induced sleepiness even at 2 mg, the recommended dose in over-the-counter medication. In addition, impaired CNS performance was significantly correlated with plasma (+)-chlorpheniramine concentration.