Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to adapt the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) questionnaire into a simplified Chinese version and to assess its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) disorders. METHODS: The simplified Chinese version of the IdFAI (SC-IdFAI) questionnaire was developed with a five-step procedure involving cross-cultural translation and adaptation. Three questionnaires, including the SC-IdFAI, Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), were administered to the recruited patients. Then, the Cronbach's alpha value, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), Spearman's correlation coefficient (rs), effect size (ES), and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the SC-IdFAI questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 131, 119, and 86 patients with CAI successfully completed the first, second, and third rounds of the questionnaires, respectively. Good or excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability were found for the overall scale and subscales of the SC-IdFAI questionnaire. The values for the SEM (1.346) and MDC (3.73) were low, indicating that small clinical changes can be detected by the SC-IdFAI questionnaire. The correlations of the SC-IdFAI with FAAM and SF-36 were generally in agreement with the a priori hypotheses (85%, 34/40), suggesting the SC-IdFAI questionnaire has good construct validity. Moreover, the results suggest that the SC-IdFAI (ES = 1.123 and SRM = 1.554) has an acceptable level of responsiveness. CONCLUSION: The SC-IdFAI scale may be an effective tool, and it is responsive, reliable and valid for the assessment of Chinese patients suffering from CAI.

Development and evaluation of an adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing-based prognostic model for survival prediction of bladder cancer patients.

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing (ATIRE) is a common form of ribonucleic acid (RNA) editing, which has highlighted the importance of ATIRE in tumors. However, its role in bladder cancer (BLCA) remains poorly understood. To study ATIRE impact on BLCA patient prognosis, we obtained ATIRE, gene expression, and clinical data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database for 251 patients, randomly dividing them into training and testing groups. Univariate proportional hazards model (COX) regression identified prognosis-associated ATIRE loci, while the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) selected final loci to construct prognostic models and generate ATIRE scores. We developed a nomogram to predict BLCA patients' overall survival (OS) and analyzed the effect of ATIRE editing levels on host gene expression. We also compared immune cell infiltration and drug treatment between patients with high and low ATIRE scores. The ATIRE prognostic prediction model was constructed using ten ATIRE loci that are closely associated with BLCA survival. Patients with high ATIRE scores showed significantly worse OS than those with low ATIRE scores. Furthermore, the nomogram, which incorporates the ATIRE score, can better predict the prognosis of patients. Multiple functional and pathway changes associated with immune responses, as well as significant differences in immune cell infiltration levels and response to drug therapy were observed between patients with high and low ATIRE scores. This study represented the first comprehensive analysis of the role of ATIRE events in BLCA patient prognosis and provided new insights into potential prognostic markers for BLCA research.