Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
Versicherungsmedizin ; 63(4): 180-5, 2011 Dec 01.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22486049

ABSTRACT

Medical advances in diagnosis and therapy, especially in medical technology, lead to differenciated and more complex strategies in therapy with higher risks. Patients show higher expectations concerning the results of a therapy and claim more often that a mistake in treatment has been made. This makes patients turn to arbitration boards more often. They may also want to bring civil action against physicians and hospitals, claiming for compensation and damages. Personal liability insurances have to pay more for damages. Medical insurances have more recourse demands due to mistake in treatment. Hospital and especially operative medicine do have high chances of risks and mistakes. The implementation of a modern risk management system in the hospitals is becoming more and more important, for patients as well as for the surgical departments. A structured reporting system of critical incidents can produce indicators of potential sources of mistakes, which appears to be a successful approach to reduce or avoid typical risks and mistakes in medical treatment. Risk management in medical treatment must be more than just a trendy word, because its roots are in the medical principles of "primum nihil nocere". It is a challenge to today's and tomorrow's medicine. This article is a general overview of current strategies for avoiding mistakes: It is meant to be the basis of a new culture of mistake avoidance as a part of a future quality competition.


Subject(s)
General Surgery/organization & administration , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Risk Management/organization & administration , Germany , Guilt , Shame
2.
Schmerz ; 20(4): 327-33, 2006 Aug.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16254722

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of the survey was to elucidate the significance of postoperative pain therapy for the patient and its influence on the choice of hospital. METHODS: This prospective, anonymous survey of consecutive patients in a general surgical clinic was performed by an independent study nurse. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were included; 90% of the surgical patients considered "good pain therapy" as a highly important factor, and three of four patients would admit themselves more likely to a clinic well known for "good pain therapy." If the patients could choose their hospital, factors such as "medical care by the physicians" are most important (rank 1; rank 1 most important, rank 10 most unimportant) followed by quality of "nursing care" (mean rank 2.6) and "good pain therapy" (mean rank 3.6). Older patients (> or = 60 years) preferred a hospital with known "good pain therapy" more often for surgical therapy than younger patients (< 60 years). CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that postoperative pain relief is an important factor for the patients' selection of a clinic and is influenced by an age of > or = 60 years.


Subject(s)
Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Health Surveys , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL