ABSTRACT
Persistent fatigue is often reported in those with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Separately, both chronic pain and chronic fatigue contribute to physical and cognitive decline in older adults. Concurrent pain and fatigue symptoms may increase disability and diminish quality of life, though little data exist to show this. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between self-reported pain and fatigue, both independently and combined, with cognitive and physical function in middle-older-aged adults with chronic knee pain. Using a cross-sectional study design participants (n = 206, age 58.0 ± 8.3) completed questionnaires on pain and fatigue, a physical performance battery to assess physical function, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Hierarchical regressions and moderation analyses were used to assess the relationship between the variables of interest. Pain and fatigue both predicted physical function (ß = -0.305, p < 0.001; ß = -0.219, p = 0.003, respectively), however only pain significantly predicted cognitive function (ß = -0.295, p <0.001). A centered pain*fatigue interaction was a significant predictor of both cognitive function (ß = -0.137, p = 0.049) and physical function (ß = -0.146, p = 0.048). These findings indicate that self-reported fatigue may contribute primarily to decline in physical function among individuals with chronic pain, and less so to decline in cognitive function. Future studies should examine the impact of both cognitive and physical function decline together on overall disability and health.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Quality of Life , Self Report , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression , CognitionABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a global health crisis that disproportionately burdens non-Hispanic Black (NHB) individuals, compared with those who identify as non-Hispanic White (NHW). Despite the growing personal and societal impact of cLBP, its biological underpinnings remain poorly understood. To elucidate the biological factors that underlie the racial disparities in cLBP, this study sought to determine whether inflammatory mediators associated with pain interference (PI), pain at rest (PAR), and movement-evoked pain (MEP) differ as a function of racial identity. Blood samples were collected from 156 individuals with cLBP (n = 98 NHB participants, n = 58 NHW participants). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and multiplex assays were used to quantify concentrations of proinflammatory (fibrinogen, C-reactive protein [CRP], serum amyloid A, tumor necrosis factor α [TNF-α], and interleukin [IL]-1α, IL-1ß, and IL-6) and anti-inflammatory markers (IL-4 and IL-13). Spearman rho correlations were used to assess associations among markers of inflammation and PI, PAR, and MEP using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Analyses revealed that for NHW patients, CRP, serum amyloid A, and IL-6 were positively associated with cLBP outcomes and IL-4 was inversely associated with PAR and MEP. However, for NHB patients, only IL-1α was positively associated with PAR. Our findings suggest that, while there are associations between inflammation and cLBP outcomes, the biomarkers that underlie the inflammation could very well differ as a function of racialized minority group. However, more research with racially inclusive samples is needed to elucidate the mechanisms that may contribute to racial disparities in cLBP.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Low Back Pain , White People , Humans , Male , Low Back Pain/blood , Low Back Pain/ethnology , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Chronic Pain/blood , Chronic Pain/ethnology , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Black or African American , Biomarkers/blood , Pain Measurement/methods , Aged , Inflammation/bloodABSTRACT
Chronic low back pain (cLBP) remains a major health crisis worldwide. Current conceptualizations of cLBP utilize the biopsychosocial model, yet research on social factors remains limited. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are a risk factor for a variety of chronic health problems, including cLBP. However, the extent to which socioeconomic context might influence associations between ACEs and cLBP remains unclear. Socioeconomic factors such as healthcare access and living conditions, which cluster at the neighborhood level, may affect how ACEs relate to cLBP in adulthood. This study examined (1) the relationship between ACEs and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and (2) the moderating effect of area-level deprivation index (ADI) in a sample of community-dwelling adults with cLBP. 183 adults with cLBP (53% female, 62.8% non-Hispanic Black) reported on ACEs, ADI, sociodemographics, and completed experimental testing of conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Greater ACEs were associated with a less efficient CPM response for individuals residing in low neighborhood deprivation (p < 0.01). ACEs were not significantly associated with CPM for those residing in average (p = 0.31) or high deprivation (p = 0.15). Our findings suggest that a history of ACEs is associated with diminished ability to inhibit pain, especially among individuals living in less deprived neighborhoods. The association between ACEs and CPM was weakest for the portion of our sample residing in neighborhoods with the most deprivation. People from disadvantaged backgrounds may experience numerous psychosocial stressors that hinder CPM, making it difficult to assess the specific impact of ACEs on CPM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study utilized baseline data collected as part of a parent trial titled "Examining Racial and SocioEconomic Disparities in Chronic Low Back Pain" (ERASED - ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03338192). PERSPECTIVE: This study demonstrates that early life adversity is associated with abnormal endogenous pain modulation, particularly for participants who live in neighborhoods characterized by less deprivation.
ABSTRACT
Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is characterized by biopsychosocial determinants that collectively result in a substantial burden at the individual, community, and health care system levels. A growing body of literature suggests that childhood adversity is longitudinally associated with the development and maintenance of various chronic pain conditions in adulthood. Little research has investigated the psychological processes that might underlie the association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and cLBP. Emotion regulation comprises a substantive part of the subjective experience of pain and may be a potential mechanism through which ACEs contribute to cLBP etiology and maintenance. Thus, the current study examined the extent to which emotion dysregulation mediated the relationship between ACEs and pain severity (pain at rest and movement-evoked pain) in adults with cLBP. Participants included 183 adults (53.0% female, 62.5% non-Hispanic Black) between the ages of 18 and 85 with cLBP. Participants self-reported on ACEs, pain, difficulties in emotion regulation (DER), depression, and completed brief physical function tasks. In data analytic models, sociodemographic variables were included as covariates. Analyses revealed that emotion regulation mediated the relationship between ACEs and cLBP severity at rest (indirect effect = .15 [95% CI {.06-.25}]) and with movement (indirect effect = 1.50 [95% CI {.69-2.57}]). Findings suggest ACEs are linked to cLBP severity in adulthood through DER. This aligns with research demonstrating that childhood maltreatment can lead to DER, which perpetuate over the lifespan to impact adult health outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: This study presents emotion dysregulation as a psychological pathway through which childhood adversity may contribute to cLBP in adulthood. This work may bolster our understanding of social experiences as risk factors for chronic pain, while identifying targets for clinical intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study utilized baseline data collected as part of a parent trial titled "Examining Racial and SocioEconomic Disparities in Chronic Low Back Pain" (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03338192).
Subject(s)
Adverse Childhood Experiences , Chronic Pain , Emotional Regulation , Low Back Pain , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Chronic Pain/psychology , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Emotional Regulation/physiology , Low Back Pain/psychologyABSTRACT
CONTEXT: This scoping review examines the current research on the effect of cannabis upon pain intensity in spinal cord injury (SCI) pain. Chronic pain is a significant secondary condition following SCI, and traditional treatments (e.g. opioids, NSAIDs) are often criticized for providing inadequate relief. As a result, there is increasing interest in and use of cannabis and cannabinoid-based medications as an alternative means of pain control. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to examine the scientific evidence on the effect of cannabis/cannabinoids upon pain intensity in SCI by mapping the current literature. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-two studies were identified by searching electronic databases for articles published through February 2020. In addition, reviewers scanned the reference lists of identified articles and examined clinicaltrials.gov for unpublished data in this area. Title, abstract, and full-text reviews were completed by two independent reviewers. Data extraction was performed by a single reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. RESULTS: Six articles covering five treatment studies were included. Studies yielded mixed findings likely due to large variability in methodology, including lack of standardized dosing paradigms, modes of use, and duration of trial. CONCLUSIONS: The current quality and level of evidence is insufficient to draw reliable conclusions of the efficacy of cannabis upon SCI-related pain itensity. We identify specific limitations of past studies and present guidelines for future research.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: Nct01606202..