Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 14(4): e0215385, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30978264

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ambulance services play a crucial role in providing pre-hospital emergency care. In order to ensure quick responses, the location of the bases, and the distribution of available ambulances among these bases, should be optimized. In mixed urban-rural areas, this optimization typically involves a trade-off between backup coverage in high-demand urban areas and single coverage in rural low-demand areas. The aim of this study was to find the optimal distribution of bases and ambulances in the Vestfold region of Norway in order to optimize ambulance coverage. METHOD: The optimal location of bases and distribution of ambulances was estimated using the Maximum Expected Covering Location Model. A wide range of parameter settings were fitted, with the number of ambulances ranging from 1 to 15, and an average ambulance utilization of 0, 15, 35 and 50%, corresponding to the empirical numbers for night, afternoon and day, respectively. We performed the analysis both conditioned on the current base structure, and in a fully greenfield scenario. RESULTS: Four of the five current bases are located close to the mathematical optimum, with the exception of the northernmost base, in the rural part of the region. Moving this base, along with minor changes to the location of the four other bases, coverage can be increased from 93.46% to 97.51%. While the location of the bases is insensitive to the workload of the system, the distribution of the ambulances is not. The northernmost base should only be used if enough ambulances are available, and this required minimum number increases significantly with increasing system workload. CONCLUSION: As the load of the system increases, focus of the model shifts from providing single coverage in low-demand areas to backup coverage in high-demand areas. The classification rule for urban and rural areas significantly affects results and must be evaluated accordingly.


Subject(s)
Ambulances/supply & distribution , Rural Health Services/supply & distribution , Urban Health Services/supply & distribution , Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services , Humans , Mathematical Concepts , Models, Theoretical , Norway , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population , Time Factors , Travel/statistics & numerical data , Urban Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL