Cilnidipine, a Dual L/N-type Ca2+ Channel Blocker in Hypertension Management: A Review.

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used antihypertensive agents due to their effectiveness in reducing blood pressure (BP), along with their good tolerability and evidence of reducing hypertension (HTN)-related cardiovascular and renal diseases. Cilnidipine, a unique dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, exhibits potent inhibitory action on both N-type and L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels. With excellent oral absorption and a prolonged duration of action, it demonstrates a significant antihypertensive effect. It effectively reduces BP both systolic and diastolic while providing renal, neurological, and cardiovascular protection. Unlike L-type CCBs, cilnidipine does not increase pulse rates (PRs) and is associated with reduced occurrence of pedal edema. Cilnidipine is an effective treatment choice for individuals with mild to moderate essential HTN, whether it is administered alone or in conjunction with other treatment modalities.

A Review of Olmesartan-based Therapy in Targeting Effective Blood Pressure Control and Achieving Blood Pressure Goals.

For >3 decades now, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) have been used in the management of hypertension (HTN) and HTN-related cardiovascular (CV) diseases. Olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) is an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist (or blocker) that binds tightly to the AT1 receptor with long-lasting efficacy over the 24-hour period and safety demonstrated in several trials. It is well tolerated and effective in reducing blood pressure (BP) in mono and combination therapy with thiazide diuretics or calcium channel blockers across a wide range of patient subgroups. The effectiveness and safety of OLM-based combination therapies have good and tolerable profiles with high adherence in the fixed single-pill formulation. Consistent antihypertensive efficacy and good tolerability when used as monotherapy or as a combined therapy make OLM a valuable treatment option for adults with HTN. In this review, we discuss the important clinical implications of OLM as an optimal choice as monotherapy and combination therapy in managing patients with HTN.

Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy and Semaglutide: What is This All About?

Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) was first documented by a French physician Jean-Pierre Saint-Yves in 1817 (19th century). The clinical description of NAION was not known until 1935 when C. Miller Fischer thoroughly described it. Briefly, NAION is a rare (2.5-11.8 per 1,00,000 cases in men above 50 years) but serious condition that causes sudden painless loss of vision due to ischemia of the optic nerve.1 It is more common in Caucasians compared with Asians and is associated with various risk factors such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes (T2D), smoking, hyperlipidemia, obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, small optic nerve cup ("disk at risk"), optic nerve drusen, and certain drugs, especially phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5I), amiodarone, and cabergoline.2 Although the clinical development programs and real-world studies of semaglutide [a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) approved for the treatment of T2D and obesity] did not report any significant increase in the risk of NAION, a recent retrospective cohort study suggested a possible link between NAION and semaglutide.3 This editorial briefly summarizes the current knowledge about NAION and its relation to metabolic disorders, cardiovascular, and antidiabetes drugs and puts a perspective concerning semaglutide.

Screening for Lung Cancer in India: Expert Opinion Statement.

Lung cancer (LC) has the highest rate of disability-adjusted life years (DALY) of all cancers in India. A large majority of patients with LC present with advanced disease, resulting in poor survival rates. Early diagnosis can improve survival outcomes as the patients can be treated with curative intent. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), in 53,454 persons at high risk for LC in the US, showed a 20% (95% confidence interval of 6.8-26.7; p = 0.004) relative reduction in LC-specific mortality in the patients screened with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) compared with chest X-ray. To date, India does not have a formal LC screening (LCS) program. As a panel of experts, we reviewed a synthesis of a targeted literature search on the burden of LC, the current status of diagnosis of LC, barriers to early diagnosis, current referral pathways, LC risk patterns, use of artificial intelligence (AI) and risk calculators for risk assessment, and a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to diagnosis LC. We used the existing international LCS guidelines, data from published literature, and clinical experience to depict the characteristics of the population at risk of LC in India-young age (<40 years), smoking, especially the predominance of bidi smoking (an indigenous form of tobacco smoking), exposure to biomass fuel smoke, especially in rural women, and air pollution being the prominent features. LC in India is characterized by a higher rate of driver mutations and adenocarcinomatous histology. Here, we present the expert opinion on risk-based LCS in India and discuss the challenges, facilitators, and research priorities for the effective rollout of LCS in India.

Diabetes Mellitus and Fluid Imbalance: The Need for Adequate Hydration.

The effect of hydration in modulating metabolic disease risk is a comparatively recent concept. Diabetic patients are at increased risk of dehydration due to osmotic diuresis. Undiagnosed or undertreated hyperglycemia may lead to electrolyte imbalance and elevated renal burden of glucose excretion, which may alter fluid reabsorption in the kidney. Also, the presence of one or more contributory factors, such as inadequate fluid intake, strenuous exercise, high temperatures, alcohol consumption, diarrhea, acute illnesses, fever, nausea, and vomiting, may put diabetic patients at increased risk of dehydration and electrolyte imbalance. Certain antidiabetic agents used by diabetic patients may cause fluid retention/deficits and/or electrolyte abnormalities in a few patients. Thus, drinking ample amounts of water and fluids with appropriate electrolyte composition is important to prevent dehydration. Successful management of dehydration in patients with diabetes is an unmet need and can best be accomplished by maintaining adequate hydration status.

Defeating the Silent Enemy: Antimicrobial Resistance Looming as the Next Global Pandemic.

Antibiotics are the magic bullets that have saved millions worldwide. Enormous and irresponsible use of antibiotics has led to resistance to antibiotics, which is a matter of global health concern. The superbugs are responsible for life-threatening infections, treatment failure, and high mortality worldwide. The urgent healthcare threat caused by antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria is being increasingly acknowledged worldwide. Antibiotic resistance found in organisms in hospital settings is now increasingly found in the community. Although antimicrobial stewardship requiring a multidisciplinary approach is developing rapidly at the hospital level, it needs more attention at the community level. New therapeutics are certainly required, but the major challenge is rapidly identifying resistant infections and tailoring treatment. This review highlights the crisis that reflects the current scenario of AMR, common resistant pathogens, and the major challenges in the fight against AMR. It also discusses potential methods and strategies to address the intricacies of antibiotic resistance.

A Retrospective Study to Evaluate Real-world Evidence of Azelnidipine in Indian Patients (REDEFINE Study).

INTRODUCTION: Azelnidipine, a selective calcium channel blocker, effectively lowers blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in hypertensive patients, as demonstrated in a retrospective real-world evidence (RWE) study in Indian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included 882 patients aged 18 years or older who had been on azelnidipine treatment for the last 3 months for mild to moderate hypertension (HTN). A structured proforma was utilized to gather data from prescribing physicians to assess the efficacy of azelnidipine (8 and 16 mg) as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. The primary endpoints of the study were to capture changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) from baseline to the subsequent visits (4 and 12 weeks), while the secondary endpoints were to measure similar changes in the diabetic group and to estimate the proportion of patients achieving target BP of <130/80 mm Hg and <140/90 mm Hg, respectively. RESULTS: The overall mean reduction of systolic/diastolic BP from baseline to 12 weeks was 13.92/7.91 mm Hg (p-value < 0.0001). The mean reduction of systolic/diastolic BP from baseline to 12 weeks was 11.77/7.43 mm Hg (p-value < 0.0001) in newly diagnosed HTN patients, while in known cases of HTN, it was 16.50/8.48 mm Hg (p-value < 0.0001). In the diabetic group, the mean reduction was 15.35/8.69 mm Hg (p-value < 0.0001). Overall the study showed that in 44 (4.99%) and 408 (46.26%) patients, target BP of <130/80 mm Hg and <140/90 mm Hg, respectively was achieved. The mean change in HR from baseline was a reduction of 5.22 beats/minute. CONCLUSION: Azelnidipine can be an effective antihypertensive drug to treat mild to moderate HTN in Indian patients.

Evolution of Metabolic Syndrome in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Asian-Indian Patients Over the Last 15 Years using Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program, World Health Organization, and International Diabetes Federation Criterion.

AIM: A retrospective observational study was undertaken to assess the changing trends in the incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Asian-Indian patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) using Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP-ATP III), World Health Organization (WHO), and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria. The overall and gender-wise pattern of MetS and its components were also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed T2D patients (n = 10,950)visiting Dr Panikar's Diabetes Care Centre from 2004 to 2019 with retrievable electronic medical records were selected. The incidence of MetS in these patients was studied using NCEP-ATP III, WHO, and IDF criteria in three separate timelines, namely, group I (2004-2008), group II (2009-2013), and group III (2014-2019). Overall and gender-wise, the incidence of various components of the MetS was also studied and compared across the three groups. All data were analyzed by using the Statistical Software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 10.0. Continuous variables were summarized by the number of observations (mean, standard deviation or median with minimum and maximum) and categorical values (calculating frequencies with percentages). Chi-square was used to estimate the incidence of MetS using different criteria and gender-wise patterns of the MetS components for the three periods. Other variables, such as mean body mass index (BMI), were assessed by applying variance analysis (ANOVA test). All values were reported based on a two-sided ANOVA test, and all the statistical tests were interpreted at a 5% level of significance. RESULTS: In the current study, the overall incidence of MetS observed among the study population was 80.9, 65.4, and 69.8% using NCEP-ATP III, WHO, and IDF criteria, respectively. The incidence of MetS across the three timelines (i.e., from 2004 to 2019) with all the diagnostic criteria showed a steady increase. An analysis of the individual components of MetS revealed a high incidence of central obesity across all subgroups, followed by hypertension and dyslipidemia. Central obesity was prevalent in nearly 85.9% of patients in 2014-2019 vs 78.6% in the 2004-2008 subgroup. Similarly, the incidence of hypertension and overall dyslipidemia [i.e., high triglycerides (TGs) and low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C)] was 77.8% and 68.2% in the former vs 67.9% and 59.6% in the latter, respectively. The incidence of all three MetS components, along with fasting sugar, showed a statistically significant and progressive increase over the years, with prevalence in group III (2014-2019) being the highest. Women were found to be more centrally obese and more dyslipidemic compared to men, whereas men were found to be more hypertensive. CONCLUSION: The study shows a high incidence of MetS in Asian-Indian patients with newly diagnosed T2D. The incidence of MetS was significantly higher with the NCEP-ATP III diagnostic criteria than with WHO and IDF criteria. A steady rise in the incidence of MetS was observed over the study period of 2004-2019. Among the components of MetS, the incidence of central obesity, elevated TG levels, and low HDL-C were found to be higher in the female population than in males, whereas the incidence of hypertension was higher in males. Stringent lifestyle measures, along with appropriate pharmacological management, might help mitigate the risks associated with MetS.

Torsemide in Edema Associated with Hepatic Impairment.

Hepatic edema is caused by decreased hepatic protein synthesis, a consequence of decompensated liver cirrhosis. Fluid accumulation occurs when there is an increase in hydrostatic pressure in the hepatic sinusoids and splanchnic capillaries, as well as low albumin. The first-line treatment for cirrhosis-related ascites is an aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone); however, in severe and recurring ascites, a combination of aldosterone antagonists and loop diuretics (torsemide, furosemide, and bumetanide) is preferable. Torsemide outperformed furosemide in terms of natriuretic and diuretic effects at an equivalent dose. Pharmacological features of torsemide, such as lesser hypokalemia effect, longer duration of action, higher bioavailability, and extended half-life, make it a better alternative than furosemide. In clinical studies, it is considered a safer and more acceptable choice with fewer complications.

Association of Physicians of India: National Expert Opinion and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Primary Care Cough Management in India.

INTRODUCTION: Pathological cough in primary care is a significant concern. With a prevalence ranging from 5 to 10% in India, cough is the second most common symptom seen by general practitioners (GPs). The existing algorithms and tools that are available are generally meant for cough categorization in specialized fields; their limited adoption by GPs results in insufficient screening and categorization of cough, which results in the use of irrational fixed drug combination formulations. OBJECTIVES: Formulation of recommendations for GPs to enable them to appropriately screen and categorize cough for efficient management and avoid irrational treatments. METHODS: An expert panel (seven experts specializing in pulmonology and internal medicine) held a virtual discussion to assess the necessity for cough categorization and develop user-friendly tools, along with a simplified format for history taking in cough evaluation and management. Panel discussions were based on a questionnaire that contained items related to the categorization of cough, assessment tools, and approaches to treating cough. RESULTS: After deliberations, simplified clinical practice recommendations and assessment tools were developed by the experts to facilitate the categorization of cough into wet or dry categories, thereby helping in the symptom-based management of cough. CONCLUSION: By adhering to these principles and using assessment tools, primary care practitioners can optimize cough management, avoid irrational drug combinations, minimize potential risks, and improve patient well-being.

Navigating Cardiovascular Risk and Lipid Management in Indian Patients: Key Messages from the Lipid Association of India 2024 Consensus Statement IV.

Effective lipid management is crucial for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The Western lipid guidelines may not apply to Indian subjects because of the vast differences in cardiovascular (CV) disease epidemiology. To overcome this challenge, the Lipid Association of India (LAI) in 2016 proposed an ASCVD risk stratification algorithm. The appropriate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for various risk groups were proposed, with an LDL-C target of <50 mg/dL recommended for the first time globally for patients in the very high-risk group. Subsequently, in 2020, an extreme risk group was added because of observations that patients with more severe or extensive ASCVD, along with multiple risk factors and comorbidities, had increased rates of adverse CV events and could benefit from more intensive LDL-C lowering. The extreme risk group was subdivided into categories A and B, with LDL-C targets as low as 30 mg/dL or lower. The availability of further evidence regarding the significance of novel risk factors and the availability of new LDL-C lowering therapies necessitated refining the ASCVD risk assessment algorithm, defining LDL-C targets for subjects with these risk factors, and incorporating recommendations for attaining very low LDL-C levels in a defined, select group of patients. Accordingly, the LAI expert group recently published the Consensus Statement IV, which is a comprehensive document addressing several key issues about risk stratification and dyslipidemia management in Indian subjects. LDL-C and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) are not only primary and co-primary targets for lipid-lowering therapy but also risk factors for ASCVD risk stratification. Apolipoprotein B is a secondary target. The risk assessment algorithm has been updated to incorporate several nonconventional yet relevant CV risk factors. Additionally, the role of subclinical atherosclerosis has been highlighted. The CV risk due to subclinical atherosclerosis has been considered equivalent to that of established ASCVD, and hence, similar LDL-C targets have been recommended. Furthermore, a new risk category-extreme risk group category C has been added for the small subgroup of patients who continue to experience ASCVD sequelae despite achieving LDL-C levels of 30 mg/dL or lower. An ultralow LDL-C target (10-15 mg/dL) has been recommended along with optimal control of risk factors and guideline-directed management of comorbidities. Dyslipidemia management should be effective with sustained LDL-C lowering. In high-risk situations (e.g., acute coronary syndrome), the LDL-C target should be achieved as early as possible, preferably within the first 2 weeks. The present document summarizes the key messages from the LAI Consensus Statement IV.

Unique Pharmacological Properties and Safety Profiles of Loop Diuretics.

Loop diuretics are regarded as essential for the treatment of edematous conditions in heart failure, cirrhosis, and renal disease. The principal mechanism of action involves inhibiting the reabsorption of ions (Na+, 2Cl-, and K+) from the ascending loop of Henle. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) features of the commonly used diuretics (torsemide, furosemide, and bumetanide) influence the selection of diuretics in various disease states and dosing regimens. However, torsemide demonstrates superior PK and PD qualities, making it the preferred choice. Genetic polymorphisms must be explored to better understand the diversity of PK and PD parameters of loop diuretics between individuals.

Loop Diuretics: An Overview of Its History and Evolution.

The loop of Henle plays a key role in kidney function, especially in retaining solutes and concentrating urine. Diuretic agents, crucial for managing fluid overload and related conditions like hypertension and heart failure (HF), enhance water and electrolyte excretion. The history of diuretics dates back to 1775 with the discovery of Digitalis, evolving significantly with the introduction of chlorothiazide in 1957, which revolutionized diuretic therapy. Loop diuretics, developed in the 1950s and including drugs like torsemide, furosemide, and ethacrynic acid, are potent agents acting on the loop of Henle. They are vital for treating severe fluid overload conditions and require careful monitoring to manage potential side effects.

Torsemide as a Primary Choice in Edema Associated with Heart Failure.

Heart failure (HF) is the fastest-growing disease with a higher fatality rate. The most differentiating feature of HF is pulmonary or peripheral edema, which is characterized by a gradient between intravascular and extravascular pressure. Loop diuretics were chosen as the primary treatment for edema associated with HF due to their efficacy and early onset of action. If an oral dose had not been provided, intravenous (IV) administration of torsemide, or equal doses of furosemide and bumetanide, was preferred. However, the key variables for selecting and administering loop diuretics are their pharmacological qualities as well as their clinical efficacy. Torsemide has greater bioavailability, a higher rate of absorption, a longer duration of action, and lesser ototoxicity, making it the primary choice in the management of edematous HF.

Torsemide in the Management of Essential Hypertension.

Torsemide, a loop diuretic, is increasingly recognized for its role in managing essential hypertension. Its mechanism of action involves inhibiting the reabsorption of sodium and chloride ions in the ascending loop of Henle in the kidneys. By doing so, torsemide promotes diuresis, which refers to increased urine production, and subsequently lowers blood pressure. Studies have shown that torsemide is comparably effective to other antihypertensive agents in lowering blood pressure, with the added benefit of potentially improving renal function. However, while torsemide shows promise in hypertensive management, further research is necessary to fully understand its long-term effects and to establish optimal dosing strategies. Future research should focus on clarifying its role in long-term blood pressure control and refining its use in clinical practice to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse effects.

Prevalence and Association of Risk Factors According to Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis Stages among Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in India: A Cross-sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are linked to the global diabetes epidemic, leading to increased disease progression and adverse health outcomes. The renaming of NAFLD to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) at the 2023 European Association for the Study of the Liver Congress highlights the complex relationship between metabolic disorders and liver health. Taking this into consideration, we aimed this study to identify prevalence and risk factors associated with the stages of NAFLD in individuals with T2DM in the Indian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,521 T2DM patients at Dr Panikar's Speciality Care Centre, Mumbai, between September 1, 2022 and October 31, 2022. Demographic parameters such as age, gender, height, weight, and anthropometric parameters such as body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference were measured. Liver fibrosis and steatosis stages were identified by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) using FibroScan®. RESULTS: The prevalence of liver steatosis was 75.1% among the 1,521 diabetes cases [S0 (24.9%), S1 (15.1%), S2 (24%), and S3 (36%)], whereas the prevalence of liver fibrosis was 28.0% [F0 (72%), F1 (19%), F2 (5%), F3 (1.5%), and F4 (3.4%)]. The S1 (p = 0.012), S3 (p = 0.001), F1 (p = 0.001), and F2 (p = 0.001) grades showed significant gender-related changes, demonstrating a positive connection. Furthermore, waist circumference was associated with disease severity in both liver steatosis and fibrosis stages (p = 0.001), but BMI was solely associated with the degree of steatosis (p = 0.001). The mean age differences between these categories, however, did not reach statistical significance (p-values of 0.149 and 0.078, respectively, for the steatosis and fibrosis grades). CONCLUSION: The study reveals a high prevalence of NAFLD (steatosis and fibrosis) in T2DM patients, increasing the risk of advanced fibrosis. In T2DM patients with risk factors including waist circumference and BMI, appropriate screening and intervention are required.

Fortifying Micronutrient Supplementation in India: Indian Expert consensus.

Micronutrients play a key role in human health, being involved in energy metabolism, immunity, cellular functioning, growth, and development. Deficiencies in micronutrients occur in individuals of all ages due to several factors, including inadequate diets, disease states, and overweight/obesity. Guidelines from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) Expert Group on Nutrient Requirements for Indians (2023) have specified the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) for macronutrients and micronutrients. In addition, a healthy diet is crucial for overall health and should be the first step toward addressing micronutrient deficiencies. When diet is inadequate, micronutrient supplements can be provided to compensate. An expert panel of Indian doctors was convened to develop a pathway toward micronutrient supplementation among the Indian population. This Consensus Statement recognizes that different populations have varying needs for specific micronutrients, and ensuring adequate intake of such micronutrients can improve health outcomes. The panel provided recommendations for dietary practices and micronutrient supplementation when diet is inadequate. Addressing micronutrient deficiencies at the primary care level can prevent chronic deficiencies and their consequences. This Consensus Statement can serve as a primer for physicians to monitor and address deficiencies and thus help individuals maintain their health.

Management of Hypertension in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Indian Guideline 2024 by Association of Physicians of India and Indian College of Physicians.

In India and the Southeast Asian population, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are the leading lifestyle-related diseases, responsible for a majority burden of morbidity and mortality. Multiple population-spanning studies have revealed the staggering prevalence of both diseases in India, and the prevalence of both will only increase further due to factors such as an aging population, rapid urbanization, increased obesity, and sedentary lifestyles. More than 50 percent of hypertensive patients in India are also diagnosed with T2DM, and a detailed management protocol for the same is required, especially when a major portion of the disease is managed at the primary care level. The Association of Physicians of India (API) guidelines for the management of hypertension in patients with T2DM have been formulated based on consultation with leading physicians, cardiologists, diabetologists, and endocrinologists of India and Southeast Asia, keeping in mind the challenges faced by the patients in these countries and the appropriate management protocols that will be beneficial. While standard office-based blood pressure (BP) measurement forms the cornerstone of hypertension diagnosis and demands a uniform methodology to be followed, home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is recommended for long-term follow-up with validated devices. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) offers comprehensive insights crucial for cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification. The complications of diabetic hypertension can span from increased CV risk, heart failure (HF), and renal dysfunction, and nonpharmacological and pharmacological management should be aimed toward not only control of the BP values but also protecting the end organs. While nonpharmacological measures include a focus on nutrition and diet, they also focus on approaches to weight loss, including a novel section covering the benefits of yoga. The guideline also focuses on a novel section of factors influencing CV risk, especially in the Indian population. For the pharmacological management, the guidelines address each of the categories of antihypertensive drugs, emphasizing the significance of combination therapies in the management of diabetic hypertension. In line with leading global guidelines for the management of hypertension in T2DM, for diabetic patients who often struggle with BP management and carry a high CV risk, the recommended dual combination antihypertensive therapy is particularly crucial and should be considered as first-line management therapy. While angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) play a highly beneficial role in the management of diabetic hypertension, a combination of ACEi or ARB with dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCBs) is recommended to reduce the risk of complications and enhance patient adherence. To achieve the target of effective BP control and end-organ protection, it is beneficial and recommended to include newer CCBs (e.g., cilnidipine) in the management protocol in combination with ACEi/ARBs. Combination therapy including ARBs and DHP-CCBs should be preferred over ß-blockers and thiazides. Among the CCBs, cilnidipine, a novel molecule, is a more effective and safer option for diabetic hypertensive patients in India. ß-blockers should be used if there is a history of myocardial infarction (MI), HF, coronary artery disease (CAD), or stable angina along with the initial hypertensive regimen. The guideline also focuses on the novel reno- and cardioprotective molecules such as finerenone and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and their benefits in the management of diabetic hypertension.

Responsible Use of Oral Corticosteroids in People with Comorbid Diabetes: An Expert Consensus.

Globally, diabetes mellitus (DM) is a substantial contributor to morbidity and mortality. Comorbidities and intercurrent illnesses in people with diabetes may necessitate the use of steroids. Acute as well as chronic use of steroids contributes substantially to the development of various complications. Despite this, there are no standard guidelines or consensus to provide a unified approach for the rational use of steroids in people with diabetes. Also, there is scant harmonization among clinicians with the use of different steroids in routine practice. To address the inconsistencies in this clinical arena, the consensus working group (CWG) formulated a unified consensus for steroid use in people with diabetes. In people with diabetes, the use of steroids causes hyperglycemia and may precipitate diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). An increase in weight is directly related to the dose and duration of the steroid therapy. Steroid-related alterations in hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension (HTN) add to the increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. The risk of complications such as infections, osteoporosis, myopathy, acne, cataracts, and glaucoma may increase with the use of steroids. Appropriate and timely monitoring of these complications is necessary for early detection and treatment of such complications. Given the systemic effects of various antihyperglycemic drugs, there is a possibility of aggravating or diminishing the specific complications. Preference to a safer steroid is required matching the steroid dose equivalence and individualizing patient management. In conclusion, short-, intermediate-, or long-term use of steroids in people with diabetes demands their rational use and holistic approach to identify, monitor, and treat the complications induced or aggravated by the steroids.

Edema India: Executive Summary of Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Edema.

The management of edema requires a systematic approach to screening, diagnosis, and treatment, with an essential initial assessment to differentiate between generalized and localized edema. The Association of Physicians of India (API) aimed to develop the first Indian Edema Consensus (Edema India), offering tailored recommendations for screening, diagnosing, and managing edema based on the insights from the expert panel. The panel suggested when evaluating edema symptoms, important factors to consider include the patient's current illness, medical history, risk factors, family history, and medications. Key diagnostic investigations for edema include complete blood count, cardiovascular imaging and markers, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) assessment, along with renal, hepatic, and thyroid function tests. Edema management involves a combination of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, including limb elevation, physiotherapy, compression therapy, fluid removal, diuretics (loop diuretics: first-line therapy), and a sodium-restricted diet. The panel believed that educating patients could foster a preventive mindset, helping to prevent the worsening of edema.