Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of daridorexant in Japanese subjects: Results from phase 1 and 2 studies.

Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist for the treatment of insomnia. We report results from the first two randomised, double-blind clinical studies of daridorexant in Japanese subjects. In the Phase 1 study, daridorexant (10, 25, 50 mg) or placebo were administered in the morning for 4 days in 24 young (mean age 26.9 years) and 24 older (mean age 69.7 years) healthy Japanese adults. Daridorexant reached a peak plasma concentration within 1.0 h across every dose and age group. For all doses, the mean plasma concentration of daridorexant showed a similar change between the age groups. Exposure parameters increased dose-dependently with minimal/no accumulation upon repeated dosing. The terminal half-life was ~8 h. In the Phase 2, four-period, four-way crossover study, 47 Japanese subjects (mean age 50.4 years) with insomnia disorder were randomised to receive four treatments (daridorexant 10, 25, 50 mg, placebo) during four treatment periods, each consisting of two treatment nights (5-12 day washout between treatment periods). Subjects continued their fourth treatment for 12 further days. A statistically significant dose-response relationship (multiple-comparison procedure-modelling, p < 0.0001) was found in the reduction of polysomnography-measured wake after sleep onset (WASO; primary endpoint) and latency to persistent sleep (secondary endpoint) from baseline to days 1/2. Statistically significant dose-response relationships were also observed for secondary subjective endpoints from baseline to days 1/2 (sWASO, latency to sleep onset). All daridorexant doses were well tolerated, with no treatment discontinuations and no next-morning residual effects. These results supported further investigation of daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder.

Clinical benefit of 1-year certolizumab pegol (CZP) add-on therapy to methotrexate treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis was observed following CZP discontinuation: 2-year results of the C-OPERA study, a phase III randomised trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical impact of 1-year certolizumab pegol (CZP) therapy added to the first year of 2-year methotrexate (MTX) therapy, compared with 2-year therapy with MTX alone. METHODS: MTX-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognostic factors were eligible to enter Certolizumab-Optimal Prevention of joint damage for Early RA (C-OPERA), a multicentre, randomised, controlled study, which consisted of a 52-week double-blind (DB) period and subsequent 52-week post treatment (PT) period. Patients were randomised to optimised MTX+CZP (n=159) or optimised MTX+placebo (PBO; n=157). Following the DB period, patients entered the PT period, receiving MTX alone (CZP+MTX→MTX; n=108, PBO+MTX→MTX; n=71). Patients who flared could receive rescue treatment with open-label CZP. RESULTS: 34 CZP+MTX→MTX patients and 14 PBO+MTX→MTX patients discontinued during the PT period. From week 52 through week 104, significant inhibition of total modified total Sharp score progression was observed for CZP+MTX versus PBO+MTX (week 104: 84.2% vs 67.5% (p<0.001)). Remission rates decreased after CZP discontinuation; however, higher rates were maintained through week 104 in CZP+MTX→MTX versus PBO+MTX→MTX (41.5% vs 29.3% (p=0.026), 34.6% vs 24.2% (p=0.049) and 41.5% vs 33.1% (p=0.132) at week 104 in SDAI, Boolean and DAS28(erythrocyte sedimentation rate) remission. CZP retreated patients due to flare (n=28) showed rapid clinical improvement. The incidence of overall adverse events was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In MTX-naïve patients with early RA with poor prognostic factors, an initial 1 year of add-on CZP to 2-year optimised MTX therapy brings radiographic and clinical benefit through 2 years, even after stopping CZP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01451203.

Post-hoc analysis showing better clinical response with the loading dose of certolizumab pegol in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) with and without loading dose (LD) in a post-hoc analysis of two Japanese clinical studies. METHODS: Data from the double-blind trials (DBT) J-RAPID and HIKARI, and their open-label extension (OLE) studies, were used. Patients randomized to CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) groups starting with LD (400 mg Weeks 0/2/4; LD group; J-RAPID: n = 82, HIKARI: n = 116) and patients randomized to placebo groups who subsequently started CZP Q2W without LD in the OLEs (No-LD group; J-RAPID: n = 61, HIKARI: n = 99) were analyzed. Efficacy and pharmacokinetics were assessed during 24 weeks. Adverse events were reported from all studies. RESULTS: In both trials, the LD groups showed more rapid initial ACR20/50/70 kinetics, and maintained higher ACR50/70 responses until 24 weeks, compared with the No-LD groups. Anti-CZP antibody development was less frequent in the LD groups (J-RAPID: 1.2% versus 4.9%; HIKARI: 17.2% versus 27.3%). Similar safety profiles were reported between LD and No-LD groups (any AEs: 281.8 versus 315.7 [J-RAPID], 282.6 versus 321.3 [HIKARI] [incidence rate/100 patient-years]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations, including comparing DBT and OLE studies, these results suggest that a CZP LD improves clinical response in active rheumatoid arthritis without altering the safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of olokizumab in Asian patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis, previously exposed to anti-TNF therapy: Results from a randomized phase II trial.

OBJECTIVES: This phase II, dose-ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (NCT01463059) evaluated efficacy and safety of olokizumab (OKZ), a humanized anti-interleukin 6 monoclonal antibody, in Asian patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had previously failed anti-TNF therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized to one of six treatment arms: placebo or OKZ (60 mg/120 mg/240 mg every four weeks [Q4W]; or 60 mg/120 mg every two weeks [Q2W]); stratified by country and number of prior anti-TNFs. Primary efficacy variable was Week 12 change from baseline (CFB) in DAS28 CRP for 4-week cumulative dose groups of OKZ and placebo; secondary efficacy variables were Week 12 ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 response rates. Patients continued MTX treatment from baseline, without additional csDMARDs. RESULTS: Of 119 randomized patients, 88.2% completed the study. Greater improvements in DAS28(CRP) mean CFB at Week 12 were observed in all OKZ 4-week cumulative dose groups (60 mg/120 mg/240 mg) versus placebo (p < 0.0001). Week 12 ACR20/ACR50 response rates were higher in all OKZ cumulative dose groups versus PBO (p < 0.05). Incidences of adverse events were similar across OKZ 4-week cumulative dose groups (76.9-84.4%) and placebo (82.8%) with no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: OKZ demonstrated improvements in efficacy variables versus placebo in Asian patients with moderately-to-severely active RA who had previously failed anti-TNF therapy. The safety profile was as expected for this class of drug.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of epratuzumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus: Results from a phase 1/2 randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: This 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 1/2 study (NCT01449071) assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of epratuzumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus despite standard of care. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to placebo or one of four epratuzumab dose regimens (100 mg every other week [Q2W], 400 mg Q2W, 600 mg every week [QW], or 1200 mg Q2W) administered during an initial 4-week dosing period. Adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed. RESULTS: Nineteen of 20 patients completed the study. All placebo patients and 13 of 16 epratuzumab patients reported ≥1 AE, 2 of 16 epratuzumab patients reported a serious AE. C(max) and AUC(τ) increased proportionally with dose after first and last infusion, t(1/2) was similar across groups (∼13 days). Epratuzumab treatment was associated with decreased CD22 mean fluorescence intensity in total B cells (CD19(+)CD22(+)) and unswitched memory B cells (CD19(+)IgD(+)CD27(+)). Small-to-moderate decreases were observed in total B cell (CD20(+)) count. CONCLUSIONS: Epratuzumab was well-tolerated, with no new safety signals identified. The pharmacokinetics appeared linear after first and last infusions. Treatment with epratuzumab was associated with CD22 downregulation and with small-to-moderate decreases in total B cell count.

Daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: This Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder. PATIENTS/METHODS: 490 patients with insomnia disorder from 95 sites in Japan were randomized to daridorexant 50 mg (n = 163), 25 mg (n = 163) or placebo (n = 164) for 4 weeks, followed by a 7-day placebo run-out and a 30-day safety follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoints, in hierarchical order, were change from baseline at Week 4 in subjective total sleep time (sTST) and subjective latency to sleep onset (sLSO), for daridorexant 50 mg vs placebo. sTST and sLSO were also evaluated (secondary endpoints) for daridorexant 25 mg vs placebo. Safety endpoints included adverse events and next-morning sleepiness (Visual Analog Scale, VAS). RESULTS: Daridorexant 50 mg significantly increased sTST and decreased sLSO versus placebo at Week 4 (least-squares mean difference [LSMD]: sTST 20.3 min [95 % CI 11.4, 29.2] p < 0.001; sLSO -10.7 min [-15.8, -5.5] p < 0.001). Daridorexant 25 mg also significantly improved both endpoints versus placebo (LSMD: sTST 9.2 min [0.3, 18.1] p = 0.042; sLSO -7.2 min [-12.3, -2.0] p = 0.006). Overall incidence of adverse events was similar across groups (50 mg: 22 %; 25 mg: 18 %; placebo 23 %); somnolence, the most common event, increased with increasing dose (50 mg: 6.8 %; 25 mg: 3.7 %; placebo 1.8 %). However, daridorexant did not increase VAS next-morning sleepiness. No rebound or withdrawal-related symptoms were observed after treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with insomnia disorder, daridorexant (25 and 50 mg) was well tolerated and significantly improved subjective sleep outcomes, with no evidence of residual effects.

Long-term safety and efficacy of daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The short-term efficacy and safety of daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, has been demonstrated in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder. The objective of this study was to evaluate, in a non-overlapping patient population to the short-term study, the long-term safety and efficacy of daridorexant in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder. PATIENTS/METHODS: In this Phase 3 open-label study conducted in Japan, 154 patients with insomnia disorder were randomized to daridorexant 50 mg (n = 102) or 25 mg (n = 52) for 52 weeks. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of daridorexant for up to 1 year. Secondary exploratory objectives were to evaluate the long-term efficacy of daridorexant on subjective sleep parameters (total sleep time, latency to sleep onset and wake after sleep onset) and daytime functioning (Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire). RESULTS: The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 74 % and 58 % in the 50 mg and 25 mg groups respectively. No serious drug-related TEAEs were reported. Both doses improved next-morning sleepiness (Visual Analog Scale) throughout the study. Five adjudicated adverse events of special interest were reported; excessive daytime sleepiness (n = 1, 25 mg; n = 2, 50 mg), sleep paralysis (n = 1, 50 mg) and nightmare (n = 1, 25 mg). Improvements in sleep and daytime functioning were maintained from Week 2 (first assessment) through to Week 52 in both dose groups. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 52-weeks, daridorexant was well tolerated with sustained improvement in sleep onset, sleep maintenance and daytime functioning, supporting its long-term use in Japanese patients with insomnia disorder.

Effects of clazosentan on cerebral vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: two randomized phase 3 trials in Japanese patients.

OBJECTIVE: Clazosentan has been investigated globally for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The authors evaluated its effects on vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality following aSAH in Japanese patients. METHODS: Two similar double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies were conducted in 57 Japanese centers in patients with aSAH, after aneurysms were secured by endovascular coiling in one study and surgical clipping in the other. In each study, patients were randomly administered intravenous clazosentan (10 mg/hr) or placebo (1:1) starting within 48 hours of aSAH and for up to 15 days after aSAH. Stratified randomization based on World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade was performed using a centralized interactive web response system. Vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality within 6 weeks post-aSAH, including new cerebral infarcts and delayed ischemic neurological deficits as well as all-cause mortality, were the first primary endpoint in each study. The second primary endpoint was all-cause morbidity (new cerebral infarct or delayed ischemic neurological deficit from any causes) and all-cause mortality (all-cause morbidity/mortality) within 6 weeks post-aSAH. The incidence of individual components of the primary morbidity/mortality endpoints within 6 weeks and patient outcome at 12 weeks post-aSAH (including the modified Rankin Scale scores) were also evaluated. The above analyses were also performed in the population pooled from both studies. RESULTS: In each study, 221 patients were randomized and 220 were included in the full analysis set of the primary analysis (109 in each clazosentan group, 111 in each placebo group). Clazosentan significantly reduced the incidence of vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality after aneurysm coiling (from 28.8% to 13.6%; relative risk reduction 53%; 95% CI 17%-73%) and after clipping (from 39.6% to 16.2%; relative risk reduction 59%; 95% CI 33%-75%). All-cause morbidity/mortality and poor outcome (dichotomized modified Rankin Scale scores) were significantly reduced by clazosentan after preplanned study pooling. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar to those reported previously. CONCLUSIONS: Clazosentan significantly reduced the combined incidence of vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality post-aSAH with no unexpected safety findings. Clinical trial registration nos.: JapicCTI-163368 and JapicCTI-163369 (https://www.clinicaltrials.jp).