ABSTRACT
Syphilis, one of the earliest diseases to be discovered in humans, still remains an enigma when it comes to its myriad manifestations and changing epidemiological profiles. There has been a surge in cases in the last few decades due to various factors. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemics, global travel, increased incidence of male to male sexually transmitted diseases, online relationships culminating in casual sex are few of the important factors. Increased awareness could also be a factor for increased diagnosis. The multitude of clinical features especially when it comes to secondary syphilis and the rare tertiary manifestations, which can mimic various systemic disorders still pose a diagnostic challenge to the best of venereologists and physicians. This review aims to discuss the causes of resurgence in syphilis and few recent developments in pathogenesis, which could have led to this resurgence.
ABSTRACT
Background: Vigorous administration of COVID-19 vaccines to tackle the ongoing pandemic has led to increasing research on adverse effects including both systemic and cutaneous. Objective: A prospective observational study to delineate the cutaneous adverse effects of two vaccines, namely Covishield and Covaxin, administered in two doses in northern India. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in northern India wherein patients were asked to report voluntarily any cutaneous adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination to the dermatology department. The data were collected using excel sheets and later analyzed taking into consideration the age, vaccine types, and duration of onset of adverse effects. Results: Of the 19,672 vaccination jabs, 296 (1.5%) developed cutaneous adverse effects of which the incidence was higher in Covishield vaccine group compared to Covaxin vaccine group. The incidence of side effects was more with the first dose of either vaccine compared to the second dose. All the side effects were benign and were managed symptomatically or were self-limiting. Limitations: The number of vaccine recipients was limited and there was a considerable overlap of adverse effects with both vaccines. Voluntary reporting of cases is not an accurate representation of the scale of patients with adverse effects. Conclusion: Rampant administration of vaccines along with widespread advertisement of vaccine-induced side effects via social media has created apprehension in the general population. This warrants studies improving awareness about the most vital preventive measure available to halt and eventually end the COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a common, T-cell-mediated disease, affecting 0.44-2.8% of the general population in India. It is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease possibly due to chronic inflammation. Those patients with severe psoriasis are at a higher risk of death due to cardiovascular disease. The use of scoring tools may help the care providers to assess cardiovascular risks in these patients. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the cardiovascular risks in patients with severe psoriasis using the commonly used risk-assessment tools (Framingham risk score [FRS] and Pooled cohort equations [PCE]) and to understand the utility of these tools in practice. METHODS: It is a case-control study performed in the dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care center during the study period from January to December 2020. Consenting adults with chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) more than 10 were included in the study. The FRS and PCE risk scores were calculated for the patients and age- and sex-matched healthy controls. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were assessed and 30 patients were excluded. Of the 183 patients, 152 patients were assessed using FRS and 135 patients using PCE. Equal number of age- and sex-matched healthy controls were also assessed. The mean age of the patients assessed using the FRS and PCE was 47 ± 10.9 and 52.84 ± 8.9 years, respectively. The mean age of the controls was 45.52 ± 8.7 and 51.76 ± 8.1 years in the FRS and PCE groups, respectively. The male to female ratio was 1.92:1 and 2:1 in the FRS and PCE risk-score groups, respectively. The mean PASI score was 16.45 ± 7.88 and 15.6 ± 7.6 in the two groups, respectively. The 10-year risk estimate using FRS in the patients ranged from 0 to 26.9%. The mean and median estimates were 4.95 ± 5.7 and 2.8%, respectively, while 2.65 ± 4.7 and 0.8% in the controls (P = 0.001). The 10-year risk estimate in the patients using the PCE risk score ranged from 0.3 to 39.6%. The mean and median estimate in the patients was 8.17 ± 9.9 and 5.2%, respectively while they were 5.68 ± 7.5% and 2.6% in the controls (P = 0.024). The agreement between the FRS and PCE was found to be poor (Ï, 0.049). There was no statistically significant correlation of PASI to either the PCE risk score (P = 0.498) or FRS (P = 0.630). LIMITATIONS: A small sample size, and study in a tertiary care center may have resulted in sampling bias. CONCLUSION: Psoriasis is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. These tools may help a dermatologist in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. It can also help in the awareness of the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients.