ABSTRACT
The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of select 2023 dental literature to briefly touch on several topics of interest to modern restorative dentistry. Each committee member brings discipline-specific expertize in their subject areas that include (in order of appearance here): prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and oral radiology; and dental caries and cariology. The authors have focused their efforts on presenting information likely to influence the daily dental treatment decisions of the reader with an emphasis on current innovations, new materials and processes, emerging technology, and future trends in dentistry. With the overwhelming volume of literature published daily in dentistry and related disciplines, this review cannot be comprehensive. Instead, its purpose is to inform and update interested readers and provide valuable resource material for those willing to subsequently pursue greater detail on their own. Our intent remains to assist colleagues in navigating the tremendous volume of newly minted information produced annually. Finally, we hope readers find this work helpful in providing evidence-based care to patients seeking healthier and happier lives. (J Prosthet Dent 2024;132:â â â -â â â ).
ABSTRACT
The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of the 2022 dental literature to briefly touch on several topics of interest to modern restorative dentistry. Each committee member brings discipline-specific expertise in their subject areas that include (in order of the appearance in this report): prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and dental caries and cariology. The authors focused their efforts on reporting information likely to influence the daily dental treatment decisions of the reader with an emphasis on innovations, new materials and processes, and future trends in dentistry. With the tremendous volume of literature published daily in dentistry and related disciplines, this review cannot be comprehensive. Instead, its purpose is to update interested readers and provide valuable resource material for those willing to subsequently pursue greater detail on their own. Our intent remains to assist colleagues in navigating the tremendous volume of newly minted information produced annually. Finally, we hope that readers find this work helpful in managing patients.
ABSTRACT
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious concern for dentists as well as maxillofacial surgeons. Therefore, the safety of dental implant placement in patient receiving antiresorptive drugs (ARDs) has been the subject of controversial debate for several years and remains a source of uncertainty for surgeons and patients. This consecutive case series assessed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of dental implants placed in patients under antiresorptive therapy. Patients who received at least one dental implant at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany, between 2010 and 2019 with a history of current or past antiresorptive medication were included the study. The main outcomes were occurrence of MRONJ, implant success, and survival rate. A total of 16 patients were treated with 39 implants. No implant loss or MRONJ occurred in the respective patients. The reasons for antiresorptive intake were osteoporosis, malignancy, edema of bone marrow, or diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO). MRONJ occurred neither around implants nor in other locations. Cumulative implant success was 92.6% (25 of 27). No subjective complaints or postoperative complications were documented. Mean bone loss was 0.60 ± 0.98 mm. The prevalence of peri-implantitis was 30% on patient level and 29.6% on implant level. None of the patients had failed implants. No major complications after implant placement under antiresorptives could be detected. As long as implant surgery follows a specific protocol, implant placement in patients treated with antiresorptive therapy seems to be safe and predictable.
Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Peri-Implantitis/diagnostic imaging , Peri-Implantitis/drug therapyABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Antiresorptive drugs are widely used in osteology and oncology. An important adverse effect of these drugs is medication-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). There is scientific uncertainty about the underlying pathomechanism of MRONJ. A promising theory suspects infectious stimuli and local acidification with adverse effects on osteoclastic activity as crucial steps of MRONJ etiology. Clinical evidence showing a direct association between MRONJ and oral infections, such as periodontitis, without preceding surgical interventions is limited. Large animal models investigating the relationship between periodontitis and MRONJ have not been implemented. It is unclear whether the presence of infectious processes without surgical manipulation can trigger MRONJ. The following research question was formulated: is there a link between chronic oral infectious processes (periodontitis) and the occurrence of MRONJ in the absence of oral surgical procedures? Materials and Methods: A minipig large animal model for bisphosphonate-related ONJ (BRONJ) using 16 Göttingen minipigs divided into 2 groups (intervention/control) was designed and implemented. The intervention group included animals receiving i.v. bisphosphonates (zoledronate, n = 8, 0.05 mg/kg/week: ZOL group). The control group received no antiresorptive drug (n = 8: NON-ZOL group). Periodontitis lesions were induced by established procedures after 3 months of pretreatment (for the maxilla: the creation of an artificial gingival crevice and placement of a periodontal silk suture; for the mandible: the placement of a periodontal silk suture only). The outcomes were evaluated clinically and radiologically for 3 months postoperatively. After euthanasia a detailed histological evaluation was performed. Results: Periodontitis lesions could be induced successfully in all animals (both ZOL and NON-ZOL animals). MRONJ lesions of various stages developed around all periodontitis induction sites in the ZOL animals. The presence of MRONJ and periodontitis was proven clinically, radiologically and histologically. Conclusions: The results of this study provide further evidence that the infectious processes without prior dentoalveolar surgical interventions can trigger MRONJ. Therefore, iatrogenic disruption of the oral mucosa cannot be the decisive step in the pathogenesis of MRONJ.
Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Periodontitis , Animals , Swine , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/drug therapy , Swine, Miniature , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Zoledronic Acid/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Disease Models, Animal , Periodontitis/etiology , SilkABSTRACT
The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of the 2021 dental literature in restorative dentistry to inform busy dentists regarding noteworthy scientific and clinical progress over the past year. Each member of the committee brings discipline-specific expertise to coverage of this broad topical area. Specific subject areas addressed, in order of the appearance in this report, include COVID-19 and the dental profession (new); prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; implant dentistry; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and dental caries and cariology. The authors focused their efforts on reporting information likely to influence daily dental treatment decisions with an emphasis on future trends in dentistry. With the tremendous volume of dentistry and related literature being published daily, this review cannot possibly be comprehensive. Rather, its purpose is to update interested readers and provide important resource material for those interested in pursuing greater details on their own. It remains our intent to assist colleagues in negotiating the extensive volume of important information being published annually. It is our hope that readers find this work useful in successfully managing the patients and dental problems they encounter.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dental Caries , Dental Care , Dental Caries/therapy , Dental Materials , Humans , Prosthodontics , United StatesABSTRACT
The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of the 2020 professional literature in restorative dentistry to inform busy dentists regarding noteworthy scientific and clinical progress over the past year. Each member of the committee brings discipline-specific expertise to this work to cover this broad topic. Specific subject areas addressed include prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; implant dentistry; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs); sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and dental caries and cariology. The authors focused their efforts on reporting information likely to influence day-to-day dental treatment decisions with a keen eye on future trends in the profession. With the tremendous volume of dentistry and related literature being published today, this review cannot possibly be comprehensive. The purpose is to update interested readers and provide important resource material for those interested in pursuing greater detail. It remains our intent to assist colleagues in navigating the extensive volume of important information being published annually. It is our hope that readers find this work useful in successfully managing the dental patients they encounter.
Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Dental Care , Dental Materials , Humans , Periodontics , Prosthodontics , United StatesABSTRACT
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has become a well-known side effect of antiresorptive, and antiangiogenic drugs commonly used in cancer management. Despite a considerable amount of literature addressing MRONJ, it is still widely accepted that the underlying pathomechanism of MRONJ is unclear. However, several clinical and preclinical studies indicate that infection seems to have a major role in the pathogenesis of MRONJ. Although there is no conclusive evidence for the infection hypothesis yet, available data have shown a robust association between local infection and MRONJ development. This observation is very critical in order to implement policies to reduce the risk of MRONJ in patients under antiresorptive drugs. This critical review was conducted to collect the most reliable evidence regarding the link between local infection and MRONJ pathogenesis.
Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Neoplasms , Angiogenesis Inhibitors , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/drug therapy , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/epidemiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
This comprehensive review of the 2019 restorative dental literature is offered to inform busy dentists regarding remarkable publications and noteworthy progress made in the profession. Developed by the Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry, each author brings discipline-specific expertise to 1 of 8 sections of the report: (1) prosthodontics; (2) periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; (3) implant dentistry; (4) dental materials and therapeutics; (5) occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; (6) sleep-related breathing disorders; (7) oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and (8) dental caries and cariology. The report targets important information likely to influence day-to-day dental treatment decisions. Each review is not intended to stand alone but to update interested readers so that they may visit source material when greater detail is desired. As the profession moves toward evidence-based clinical decision-making, an incredible volume of potentially valuable dental literature continues to increase. It is the intention of this review and its authors to provide assistance in negotiating the extensive dental literature published in 2019. It is our hope that readers find this work useful in the clinical management of dental patients.
Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Dental Materials , Dental Occlusion , Humans , Periodontics , Prosthodontics , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The management of maxillary medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is challenging. Therefore, identifying the proper treatment is important. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical treatment of maxillary MRONJ using single-layer closure with mucoperiosteal flap and double-layer closure with buccal fat pad flap (BFPF) and mucoperiosteal flap and to find the outcomes after rehabilitation with obturators. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted and included all surgically treated and followed-up maxillary MRONJ cases in a single center. Demographics and clinical data, stage of MRONJ, surgical treatment, and treatment outcome were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-nine lesions were included. Removal of necrotic bone was followed by coverage with mucoperiosteal flap in 60 lesions and BFPF in 14 lesions. Seven lesions (five primarily and two following unsuccessful treatment with BFPF) underwent necrectomy and were reconstructed with obturators. Complete mucosal healing was achieved in 76.7% of the lesions covered with mucoperiosteal flap. BFPF led to complete mucosal healing in 85.7% of the lesions. No complications were observed in the defects rehabilitated with obturators. CONCLUSION: Removal of necrotic bone followed by closure with mucoperiosteal flap is reliable for MRONJ treatment. BFPF is effective for closure of MRONJ-related oroantral communications (OACs).
Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/surgery , Maxillary Diseases/surgery , Re-Epithelialization , Surgical Flaps , Adipose Tissue/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Mucosa/surgery , Periosteum/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
This comprehensive review of the 2018 dental literature is provided to inform busy dentists about progress in the profession. Developed by the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry, each author brings discipline-specific expertise to one of the 8 sections of the report including (1) prosthodontics; (2) periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; (3) implant dentistry; (4) dental materials and therapeutics; (5) occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; (6) sleep-related breathing disorders; (7) oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and (8) dental caries and cariology. The report targets important information that will likely influence day-to-day treatment decisions. Each review is not intended to stand alone but to update interested readers so that they may visit source materials if greater detail is desired. As the profession continues its march toward evidence-based clinical decision-making, an already voluminous library of potentially valuable dental literature continues to grow. It is the intention of this review and its authors to provide assistance in navigating the extensive dental literature published in 2018. It is our hope that readers find this work useful in the clinical management of patients moving forward.
Subject(s)
Dental Caries , Dental Materials , Dental Occlusion , Humans , Periodontics , Prosthodontics , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the role of imaging staging examinations (positron-emission tomographic computed tomography [PET/CT] and contrast-enhanced computed tomography [ceCT]) for the assessment of the comorbidity status of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A binary null hypothesis was drafted: 1) imaging staging examinations do not augment knowledge about the comorbidity status of patients with OSCC and 2) there is no difference between PET/CT and ceCT in this regard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was selected to address the research question. Patients with histologically confirmed OSCC who underwent whole-body staging by PET/CT or ceCT from 2012 through 2015 were considered for inclusion according to predefined criteria. Data collection was performed by the review of patient charts and histology, radiology, and nuclear medicine reports. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was chosen to quantify comorbidity and was calculated before and after staging and then compared. The type of imaging staging examination (PET/CT or ceCT) served as the predictor variable and the CCI was determined as the primary outcome variable. Descriptive and inferential statistics were computed for the variable scale. The significance level was set at a P value less than or equal to .05. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 178 patients (71 women, 107 men; average age, 64.2 yr) of whom 109 (61%) underwent PET/CT and 69 (39%) underwent ceCT staging. The pre- and post-staging CCI notably differed. Neither imaging technique showed superior results. CONCLUSION: Relevant and otherwise covert comorbidities can be found by the performance of imaging staging examinations. This enables clinicians to better assess the peri-therapeutic risk and prognosis of patients with OSCC. Therefore, a detailed evaluation of incidental findings on imaging studies is warranted and recommended.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnostic imaging , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Comorbidity , Contrast Media , Female , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Radiopharmaceuticals , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: A considerable proportion of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) recurrences involve the neck, which has a substantial impact on prognosis and is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to analyze clinical and pathologic characteristics of regional recurrence of OSCC and identify possible risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was designed to address the study purpose. All patients who were treated surgically for primary OSCC with or without adjuvant therapy between 2010 and 2015 were considered for inclusion with respect to predefined criteria, and demographic, clinical, and pathologic variables were collected. The lymph node status after primary OSCC treatment (pN) was defined as the predictor variable, and the occurrence of regional recurrence served as the primary outcome variable. Further variables of special interest were the histologic differentiation (G status) of the primary OSCC and the values of the lymph node ratio and log odds of positive lymph nodes. Descriptive, inferential, and appropriate time-dependent (Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression model) statistics were computed. The level of statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 171 patients (70 women and 101 men; average age, 62.4 years). Neck failure occurred in 18 patients (11%) either in combination with local recurrence (15 patients) or in isolation (3 patients). Poor histologic differentiation of the primary tumor was identified as an independent risk factor for regional recurrence. Most neck recurrences manifested in previously unaddressed levels (IV and V). CONCLUSIONS: Regional recurrence of OSCC might be associated with specific clinicopathologic parameters of the primary tumor. The importance of these parameters for OSCC prognosis assessment and recurrence prediction should be elucidated in further studies.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/secondary , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/secondary , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Lichen Planus, Oral , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Ad26COVS1 , COVID-19/prevention & controlABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To examine oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) specimens for programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and presence of programmed death-1 (PD-1)-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and to determine possible clinicopathologic implications. It was hypothesized that PD-L1 expression and PD-1-positive TIL presence in OSCC would have no clinical relevance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors implemented a retrospective cohort study design. The study cohort was chosen in compliance with predefined inclusion criteria. Demographic, clinical, and histopathologic data were gathered. Tissue microarrays were obtained from paraffin-embedded OSCC specimens and analyzed immunohistochemically for PD-L1 expression and PD-1-positive TIL infiltration. PD-L1 positivity of OSCC specimens served as the predictor variable and neck node metastasis served as the primary outcome variable. Descriptive and inferential statistics were computed and the significance level was set at a P value less than or equal to .05. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 88 patients (48 men, 40 women; mean age, 61.34 yr). Marked PD-L1 expression was detected in 29% of OSCC specimens (26 of 88) and 83% of specimens (73 of 88) exhibited a high rate of PD-1-positive TIL infiltration. PD-L1 positivity of OSCC samples was significantly associated with the anatomic origin of OSCC (P = .039), presence of cervical metastasis (P = .039), and high PD-L1-positive TIL infiltration (P = .033). CONCLUSION: A considerable proportion of OSCCs exhibited marked PD-L1 expression. This could be associated with clinical parameters. PD-L1 expression in OSCC might differ depending on its anatomic origin. PD-1-positive TILs could be detected in most OSCC specimens. These findings might indicate a potential role for the PD-1 and PD-L1 pathway in OSCC.
Subject(s)
B7-H1 Antigen/biosynthesis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Mouth Neoplasms/metabolism , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/biosynthesis , Aged , B7-H1 Antigen/analysis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/chemistry , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/chemistry , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/analysis , Retrospective Studies , Signal TransductionABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine the proportion of patients with cervical metastases caused by maxillary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and to identify any clinical or pathologic parameters that might be associated with the occurrence of metastatic neck disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all patients managed with primary surgical resection of maxillary OSCC at the authors' institution from 2006 through 2013 was performed. Cervical lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy were performed as warranted by preoperative staging examinations or histopathologic evaluation or as recommended after multidisciplinary consultation, and regular follow-up protocols were followed. In this analysis, each maxillary OSCC was assigned to an anterior or a posterior anatomic group based on the location of the primary lesion, with the anatomic tumor location serving as the predictor variable and the occurrence of cervical lymph node metastases as the outcome variable. Descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated with a significance level set at a P value less than .05 and post hoc power analyses were performed. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 92 patients (38 women, 54 men; average age, 60.9 yr). Overall, 27 patients developed cervical metastases (29.3%). Neck disease was present in 15 patients (16.3%) at initial presentation. Delayed cervical metastases were diagnosed in 12 patients (13%) and manifested after an average period of 11.17 months. The anatomic location of the OSCC within the maxillary structures (anterior vs posterior) and the histologic grade greatly influenced the occurrence of metastatic neck disease. No associations were found for the variables tumor size and resection status. CONCLUSION: In this series, cervical lymph node metastases were frequent and to some degree predictable based on anatomic location and tumor grade.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Maxillary Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/secondary , Cause of Death , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Forecasting , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neck/pathology , Neck Dissection/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Palatal Neoplasms/pathology , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Although the clinical importance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has been investigated, there are limited data about the overexpression of VEGF receptors (VEGF-Rs) and their clinical importance. VEGF-R isoforms have proven influence on proliferation rates, metastasis, and survival in different neoplasms. This study was conducted to investigate VEGF-R expression levels in OSCC samples and to identify any clinical relevance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design (n = 50) was used. Clinical data were gathered from patient charts. Validated immunohistochemical methods were applied to determine VEGF-R isoform expression by tumor cells. Descriptive and inferential statistics with respect to the variable scale were computed. The significance level was set at a P value less than or equal to .05. RESULTS: This study found overexpression of different VEGF-R isoforms in 88% of examined specimens. Statistically important associations were detected between overexpression of specific VEGF-Rs and tumor size, neck node metastasis, and tumor-associated death. Furthermore, a history of common OSCC risk factors (smoking and alcohol consumption) were found considerably more often in patients whose OSCC specimens displayed VEGF-R overexpression. CONCLUSION: These findings show that VEGF-R overexpression occurs frequently in OSCC and could have clinical implications.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Mouth Neoplasms/metabolism , Protein Isoforms/metabolism , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/metabolism , Aged , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Advanced maxillary medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw can cause extensive hard and soft tissue destruction that results in long-term oroantral fistulae. The surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw may relieve acute symptoms and eliminate the signs of inflammation, but the primary and sustained plastic closure of these defects can challenge both the clinician and the patients. Although the use of obturator prostheses for maxillary defects after ablative oncologic surgery is well documented, studies about this treatment for similar medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw-related defects are missing. This presentation of clinical situations describes the use of obturators as a conservative alternative to repetitive surgery for the rehabilitation of selected maxillary defects with oroantral communications.
Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Maxillary Diseases/therapy , Oroantral Fistula/therapy , Palatal Obturators , Adipose Tissue/transplantation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/surgery , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Debridement/methods , Denture Bases , Denture Design , Denture, Partial, Removable , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Male , Maxillary Diseases/surgery , Middle Aged , Oroantral Fistula/etiology , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/etiology , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/therapy , Zoledronic AcidABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The current recommendations for the treatment of bacterial salivary gland infections are mainly empirical. Therefore, an evidence-based literature review was conducted to identify antibiotics with favorable pharmacokinetics in saliva and to establish recommendations for the antibiotic treatment of sialadenitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review of the pertinent literature published from 1985 to 2013. If the predefined inclusion criteria were met, the articles were screened for various variables: antibiotic type, mode of administration, type of examined saliva, peak salivary antibiotic concentrations, biochemical methodology, and minimal inhibitory concentrations of bacteria implicated in sialadenitis (Staphylococcus aureus, Viridans streptococci, various gram-negative strains, and anaerobes). RESULTS: The review included 18 studies. The systematic analysis of the reported results concurred that intravenously administered cephalosporins achieve the highest concentrations in saliva, followed by orally administered cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. These concentrations exceed the minimal inhibitory concentrations of the bacteria of interest. Phenoxymethylpenicillin and tetracyclines are not secreted in the saliva at bactericidal levels. The antibiotic peak salivary levels depended on the type of saliva examined (parotid vs submandibular vs minor salivary gland) and the biochemical method of measurement (high-performance liquid chromatography vs bioassay). CONCLUSION: Cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones display superior pharmacokinetics in saliva and cover the spectrum of all bacteria implicated in sialadenitis. Within the limitations of this review, they can be recommended for the treatment of bacterial salivary gland infections.