Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 36(5): 286-91, 1998 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9629994

ABSTRACT

The effects of mizolatine, a new H1 receptor antagonist, on safety and pharmacokinetics of digoxin were studied in a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study. After administration of digoxine alone (0.25 mg o.d. for 7 days), 12 healthy young male volunteers (23+/-2 years) received either placebo and digoxin (0.25 mg o.d.) or mizolastine (10 mg o.d.) and digoxin (0.25 mg o.d.) during 7 days. The assessment criteria consisted in hemodynamic and ECG parameters recordings and the pharmacokinetics of digoxin during the last day of coadministration (day 14). No difference between the 2 treatment groups was evidenced on ECG, hemodynamic, and clinical and laboratory safety parameters. No change in AUC and tmax was recorded. No clinically relevant effect of mizolastine on the digoxin pharmacokinetics was found. However, a statistically significant increase in digoxin Cmax (3.03+/-0.18 nmolxl(-1) vs 2.52+/-0.19 nmolxl(-1), p < 0.05) and Cmin (0.99+/-0.08 nmolxl(-1) vs 0.87+/-0.07 nmolxl(-1), p=0.05) occurred after the coadministration vs digoxin alone. It can be concluded that mizolastine and digoxin at therapeutic dosages can be safely coadministered.


Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/pharmacokinetics , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Digoxin/pharmacokinetics , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Adult , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/administration & dosage , Area Under Curve , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Digoxin/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Drug Interactions , Electrocardiography/drug effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Humans , Male
2.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 39(1): 31-8, 1995 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7756096

ABSTRACT

1. The possible interaction between a new H1 antihistamine, mizolastine, and lorazepam was assessed in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study involving 16 healthy young male volunteers who received mizolastine 10 mg or placebo once daily for 8 days with a 1 week wash-out interval. The interaction of mizolastine, at steady-state, with a single oral dose of lorazepam or placebo was assessed on days 6 or 8 of each treatment period. 2. Psychomotor performance and cognitive function were evaluated using objective tests (critical flicker fusion threshold, choice reaction time, tapping, arithmetic calculation, body sway) and self-ratings (visual analogue scale, ARCI) before and at 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after dosing. Short-term memory (Sternberg memory scanning immediate free recall of a word list) and long-term memory (delayed free recall and recognition of words and pictures) were assessed before and at 3 h after dosing. Pharmacodynamic interactions were evaluated by repeated measures ANOVA in a 2 x 2 factorial interaction model. 3. Mizolastine, 10 mg once daily, at steady-state, was devoid of sedation and detrimental effect on skilled performance and memory. 4. In contrast, a single 2 mg dose of lorazepam produced marked impairment of psychomotor performance, cognitive functions (significant reduction in flicker fusion threshold, tapping and arithmetic calculation and increase in reaction times and body sway) and subjective sedation from 2 to 8 h after dosing. In addition, lorazepam induced an anterograde amnesia, characterised by a decrease in delayed free recall and recognition, and a deficit in short term memory.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Lorazepam/pharmacology , Memory/drug effects , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Cognition/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Drug Interactions , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Lorazepam/administration & dosage , Lorazepam/pharmacokinetics , Male
3.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 40(5): 459-65, 1995 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8703650

ABSTRACT

1. Mizolastine, a new benzimidazole derivative with potent selective, non-sedative H1-histamine antagonist activity was compared with terfenadine, cetirizine and loratadine using the histamine-induced wheal and flare model in healthy volunteers. 2. Study design was a five way double-blind crossover design using a single dose of mizolastine 10 mg, terfenadine 120 mg, cetirizine 10 mg, loratadine 10 mg and placebo. 3. Histamine tests were performed on 10 occasions up to +24 h after dosing using an intradermal injection of histamine 2 micrograms with concommittant contralateral injection of a saline control. 4. Mizolastine, terfenadine, cetirizine and loratadine significantly (P < 0.001 vs placebo) inhibited the wheal and flare formation starting 1 to 2 h after dosing up to 24 h after dosing. 5. Mizolastine was significantly more active than loratadine on the wheal (P < 0.01) and flare (P < 0.05) inhibition from 3 up to 6 and 8 h respectively, as active as terfenadine on both parameters and as active as cetirizine on wheal inhibition while less active (P < 0.01) than cetirizine on flare inhibition at 2 and 12 h post-dosing.


Subject(s)
Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/drug therapy , Adult , Cetirizine/pharmacology , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Loratadine/pharmacology , Male , Terfenadine/pharmacology
4.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 48(2): 143-50, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7589029

ABSTRACT

The pharmacodynamic interaction between mizolastine, a new H1 antihistamine, and ethanol was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover, placebo-controlled study. Eighteen healthy young male volunteers received mizolastine 10 mg, or cetirizine 10 mg or placebo once daily for 7 days with a 1-week wash-out interval. An oral dose of ethanol or ethanol placebo, given 2 h after dosing on days 5 or 7 of each treatment period, was administered to achieve a peak blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.7 g/l then maintained for 1 h by two further doses of ethanol. Driving ability and psychomotor performance were evaluated using actual and simulated driving tests, critical flicker fusion threshold (CFF), adaptive tracking and divided attention (DAT) tasks. Ethanol produced a significant decrement in all tasks up to 5.5 h after administration: an increase in steering movements of 4.6, in lateral deviation of 0.45 m, in braking reaction time of 80 ms, in driving test and DAT performance of + 3.2; and a decrease in CFF and in tracking speed of 2.6 m.s-1. Neither mizolastine nor cetirizine significantly impaired driving ability or arousal (CFF) compared with the placebo. However, both drugs significantly impaired DAT performance 6:00 h post-dose (increase of + 2.1 for mizolastine and + 2.4 for cetirizine). The tracking speed was significantly decreased 7:50 h after mizolastine administration (-1.3 m.s-1) and more consistently from 1:30 to 7:50 h after cetirizine administration (-1.4 m.s-1). No significant adverse interaction, i.e. potentiation, occurred between ethanol and either antihistamine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Cetirizine/pharmacology , Ethanol/pharmacology , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Interactions , Humans , Male , Psychomotor Performance , Task Performance and Analysis , Volunteers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL