ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia (NC-CAP) often result in hospitalization with considerable risks of mortality, ICU treatment, and long-term morbidity. A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in COVID-19 CAP (C-CAP) and NC-CAP may improve clinical management. METHODS: Using prospectively collected CAPNETZ study data (January 2017 to June 2021, 35 study centers), we conducted a comprehensive analysis of clinical outcomes including in-hospital death, ICU treatment, length of hospital stay (LOHS), 180-day survival, and post-discharge re-hospitalization rate. Logistic regression models were used to examine group differences between C-CAP and NC-CAP patients and associations with patient demography, recruitment period, comorbidity, and treatment. RESULTS: Among 1368 patients (C-CAP: n = 344; NC-CAP: n = 1024), C-CAP showed elevated adjusted probabilities for in-hospital death (aOR 4.48 [95% CI 2.38-8.53]) and ICU treatment (aOR 8.08 [95% CI 5.31-12.52]) compared to NC-CAP. C-CAP patients were at increased risk of LOHS over seven days (aOR 1.88 [95% CI 1.47-2.42]). Although ICU patients had similar in-hospital mortality risk, C-CAP was associated with length of ICU stay over seven days (aOR 3.59 [95% CI 1.65-8.38]). Recruitment period influenced outcomes in C-CAP but not in NC-CAP. During follow-up, C-CAP was linked to a reduced risk of re-hospitalization and mortality post-discharge (aOR 0.43 [95% CI 0.27-0.70]). CONCLUSION: Distinct clinical trajectories of C-CAP and NC-CAP underscore the need for adapted management to avoid acute and long-term morbidity and mortality amid the evolving landscape of CAP pathogens.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The value of therapeutic drug monitoring during azathioprine (AZA) therapy with respect to clinical outcomes has been convincingly demonstrated in recent meta-analyses. However, the association between AZA metabolites and the mucosal state in inflammatory bowel disease is largely unclear. AIMS: We investigated the association between AZA's active metabolite 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and fecal calprotectin (FC) as a well-validated surrogate marker of mucosal inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) on AZA monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 443 6-TGN measurements, 140 values from 88 patients with CD on AZA monotherapy visiting the inflammatory bowel disease outpatient clinic between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. In a subcohort with serial 6-TGN measurements, longitudinal FC measurements in patients with versus without intervention (dose increase, allopurinol, and education) were assessed. RESULTS: In patients with 6-TGN concentrations within a predefined range (250-450 pmol/8×10 red blood cells), FC was significantly lower (median: 119.5 vs. 327.2 mg/kg, P=0.003), and hemoglobin as well as serum protein concentrations were significantly higher than in patients with 6-TGN outside of this range. C-reactive protein and transferrin saturation were not different. In the longitudinal cohort, 6-TGN increased in the intervention group, but only a minority reached the defined range; no significant change in FC was observed. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to show that in patients with CD receiving AZA monotherapy, 6-TGN concentrations within a defined range (250-450 pmol/8×10 red blood cells) are associated with significantly lower FC. A treat-to-target concept directed by 6-TGN to reach mucosal healing may thus be a promising approach (DRKS00013246).