Clinical practice guidelines for telesurgery 2022 : Committee for the promotion of remote surgery implementation, Japan Surgical Society.

Telesurgery is expected to improve medical access in areas with limited resources, facilitate the rapid dissemination of new surgical procedures, and advance surgical education. While previously hindered by communication delays and costs, recent advancements in information technology and the emergence of new surgical robots have created an environment conducive to societal implementation. In Japan, the legal framework established in 2019 allows for remote surgical support under the supervision of an actual surgeon. The Japan Surgical Society led a collaborative effort, involving various stakeholders, to conduct social verification experiments using telesurgery, resulting in the development of a Japanese version of the "Telesurgery Guidelines" in June 2022. These guidelines outline requirements for medical teams, communication environments, robotic systems, and security measures for communication lines, as well as responsibility allocation, cost burden, and the handling of adverse events during telesurgery. In addition, they address telementoring and full telesurgery. The guidelines are expected to be revised as needed, based on the utilization of telesurgery, advancements in surgical robots, and improvements in information technology.

Tele-assessment of bandwidth limitation for remote robotics surgery.

PURPOSE: We investigated the communication bandwidth (CB) limitation for remote robotics surgery (RRS) using hinotori™ (Medicaroid, Kobe, Japan). METHODS: The operating rooms of the Hokkaido University Hospital and Kyushu University Hospital were connected using the Science Information NETwork (SINET). The minimum required CB for the RRS was verified by decreasing the CB from 500 to 100 Mbps. Ten surgeons were tested on a task (intracorporeal suturing) at different levels of video compression (VC) (VC1: 120 Mbps, VC2: 40 Mbps, VC3: 20 Mbps) with the minimum required CB, and assessed based on the task completion time, Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS), and System and Piper Fatigue Scale-12 (PFS-12). RESULTS: Packet loss was observed at 3-7% and image degradation was observed at 145 Mbps CB. The task performance with VC1 was significantly worse than that with VC2 and VC3 according to the task completion time (VC1 vs VC2, P = 0.032; VC1 vs. VC3, P = 0.032), GEARS (VC1 vs VC2; P = 0.029, VC1 vs VC3; P = 0.031), and PFS-12 (VC1 vs. VC2; P = 0.032, VC1 vs. VC3; P = 0.032) with 145 Mbps. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide evidence that RRS using hinotori™ requires a CB ≥ 150 Mbps. We also found that when there is insufficient CB, RRS can be continued by compressing the image.

Technical evaluation of robotic tele-cholecystectomy: a randomized single-blind controlled pilot study.

Although robotic telesurgery is growing in popularity, the benefits of telesurgery compared to local surgery are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of robotic tele-cholecystectomy with a commercial line using the Saroa™ (Riverfield, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) system. The operation rooms of the Hokkaido University Hospital and Kushiro City General Hospital were connected using a best effort-type line (1 Gbps), with a distance of 250 km between the two hospitals. In this experimental single-blind randomized crossover trial, eight expert robotic surgeons performed robotic cholecystectomy in an artificial organ model using the Saroa™ system and were randomized to begin with either local surgery or telesurgery. All surgeons were assessed on task completion time, total path length of the right- and left- hand forceps and camera, Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS), Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS), and System and Piper Fatigue Scale-12 (PFS-12). In all experiments, the communication environment was stable and the mean communication delay was 8 ms (3-31 ms). All tele-cholecystectomies were performed safely. There was no significant difference in completion time (P = 0.495), score of GEARS (P = 0.258), GOALS (P = 0.180), or PFS-12 (P = 0.528) between local surgery and telesurgery. The total path of the forceps tended to be longer in tele-cholecystectomy, particularly with significantly longer left-hand forceps total path length (P = 0.041). Robotic tele-cholecystectomy using a commercial line can be performed safely as same as local robotic surgery, but the total path of the left-hand forceps was prolonged in robotic tele-cholecystectomy due to overshoot. Therefore, a solution for overshooting will be required in the future.