Seabed type and source parameters predictions using ship spectrograms in convolutional neural networks.

Broadband spectrograms from surface ships are employed in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to predict the seabed type, ship speed, and closest point of approach (CPA) range. Three CNN architectures of differing size and depth are trained on different representations of the spectrograms. Multitask learning is employed; the seabed type prediction comes from classification, and the ship speed and CPA range are estimated via regression. Due to the lack of labeled field data, the CNNs are trained on synthetic data generated using measured sound speed profiles, four seabed types, and a random distribution of source parameters. Additional synthetic datasets are used to evaluate the ability of the trained CNNs to interpolate and extrapolate source parameters. The trained models are then applied to a measured data sample from the 2017 Seabed Characterization Experiment (SBCEX 2017). While the largest network provides slightly more accurate predictions on tests with synthetic data, the smallest network generalized better to the measured data sample. With regard to the input data type, complex pressure spectral values gave the most accurate and consistent results for the ship speed and CPA predictions with the smallest network, whereas using absolute values of the pressure provided more accurate results compared to the expected seabed types.

Seabed classification from merchant ship-radiated noise using a physics-based ensemble of deep learning algorithms.

Merchant ship-radiated noise, recorded on a single receiver in the 360-1100 Hz frequency band over 20 min, is employed for seabed classification using an ensemble of deep learning (DL) algorithms. Five different convolutional neural network architectures and one residual neural network are trained on synthetic data generated using 34 seabed types, which span from soft-muddy to hard-sandy environments. The accuracy of all of the networks using fivefold cross-validation was above 97%. Furthermore, the impact of the sound speed and water depth mismatch on the predictions is evaluated using five simulated test cases, where the deeper and more complex architectures proved to be more robust against this variability. In addition, to assess the generalizability performance of the ensemble DL, the networks were tested on data measured on three vertical line arrays in the Seabed Characterization Experiment in 2017, where 94% of the predictions indicated that mud over sand environments inferred in previous geoacoustic inversions for the same area were the most likely sediments. This work presents evidence that the ensemble of DL algorithms has learned how the signature of the sediments is encoded in the ship-radiated noise, providing a unified classification result when tested on data collected at-sea.

Seabed and range estimation of impulsive time series using a convolutional neural network.

In ocean acoustics, many types of optimizations have been employed to locate acoustic sources and estimate the properties of the seabed. How these tasks can take advantage of recent advances in deep learning remains as open questions, especially due to the lack of labeled field data. In this work, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is used to find seabed type and source range simultaneously from 1 s pressure time series from impulsive sounds. Simulated data are used to train the CNN before application to signals from a single hydrophone signal during the 2017 Seabed Characterization Experiment. The training data includes four seabeds representing deep mud, mud over sand, sandy silt, and sand, and a wide range of source parameters. When applied to measured data, the trained CNN predicts expected seabed types and obtains ranges within 0.5 km when the source-receiver range is greater than 5 km, showing the potential for such algorithms to address these problems.

Characterizing distinct components of tactical aircraft noise sources.

Noise from a tactical aircraft can impact operations due to concerns regarding military personnel noise exposure and community annoyance and disturbance. The efficacy of mission planning can increase when the distinct, complex acoustic source mechanisms creating the noise are better understood. For each type of noise, equivalent acoustic source distributions are obtained from a tied-down F-35B operating at various engine conditions using the hybrid method for acoustic source imaging of Padois, Gauthier, and Berry [J. Sound Vib. 333, 6858-6868 (2014)]. The source distributions for the distinct noise types are obtained using different sections of a 71 element, ground-based linear array. Using a subarray close to the nozzle exit plane, source distributions are obtained for fine-scale turbulent mixing noise and broadband shock-associated noise, although grating lobes complicate interpretations at higher frequencies. Results for a subarray spanning the maximum sound region show that the multiple frequency peaks in tactical aircraft noise appear to originate from overlapping source regions. The observation of overlapping spatial extent of competing noise sources is supported by the coherence properties of the source distributions for the different subarrays.

Validating deep learning seabed classification via acoustic similarity.

While seabed characterization methods have often focused on estimating individual sediment parameters, deep learning suggests a class-based approach focusing on the overall acoustic effect. A deep learning classifier-trained on 1D synthetic waveforms from underwater explosive sources-can distinguish 13 seabed classes. These classes are distinct according to a proposed metric of acoustic similarity. When tested on seabeds not used in training, the classifier obtains 96% accuracy for matching such a seabed to one of the top-3 most acoustically similar classes from the 13 training seabeds. This approach quantifies the performance of a seabed classifier in the face of real seabed variability.