Treatment of infected tibial non-unions using a BMAC and S53P4 BAG combination for reconstruction of segmental bone defects: A clinical case series.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of infected non-unions of the tibia is a challenging problem. The cornerstones of optimal infected non-union treatment consist of extensive debridement, fracture fixation, antimicrobial therapy and creation of an optimal local biological bone healing environment. The combination of S53P4 bioactive glass (BAG), as osteostimulative antibacterial bone graft substitute, and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) for the implantation of mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors might be a promising combination. In this paper, preliminary results of a new treatment algorithm for infected non-unions of the tibia is presented. METHODS: In this retrospective case series patients with infected non-unions of the tibia are treated according to a new treatment algorithm. Patients are treated with extensive debridement surgery, replacement of the osteosynthesis and implantation of S53P4 BAG and BMAC in a one-stage or two-stage procedure based on non-union severity. Subsequently patients are treated with culture based antibiotic therapy and followed until union and infection eradication. RESULTS: Five patients with an infected non-union were treated, mean age was 55, average NUSS-score was 44 and the average segmental bone defect was 4.6cm. One patient was treated in a one-stage procedure and four patients in a two-stage induced membrane-, or "Masquelet"-procedure. On average, 23 ml S53P4 BAG and 6.2 ml BMAC was implanted. The mean follow-up period was 13.6 months and at the end of follow-up all patients had clinical consolidation with an average RUST-score of 7.8 and complete eradication of infection. DISCUSSION: These early data on the combined implantation of S53P4 BAG and BMAC in treatment of infected non-unions shows promising results. These fracture healing results and eradication rates resulted in promising functional recovery of the patients. To substantiate these results, larger and higher quality studies should be performed.

Antibiotic-Loaded Collagen Sponges in Clinical Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic osteomyelitis is caused by bacterial infection of the bone and is a major problem in orthopaedic surgery. Treatment of chronic osteomyelitis requires surgical debridement accompanied by local and systemic administration of antibiotics. A widely established biodegradable local antibiotic carrier is antibiotic-loaded collagen sponges (fleeces). These sponges are commonly used in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis, but a systematic review of their clinical efficacy and assessment of the quality of evidence have not been conducted, to our knowledge. METHODS: This systematic review, performed according to the PRISMA statement, examined the clinical efficacy of and quality of evidence regarding different antibiotic-loaded collagen sponges in the clinical treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. Clinical efficacy was defined as eradication of infection with bone and wound-healing. In addition, the in vivo pharmacokinetics of the various collagen sponges were evaluated. Quality was based on the Level of Evidence, methodological quality, and risks of bias. RESULTS: A total of 813 articles were screened, and 10 were included. Gentamicin-sulfate sponges and gentamicin-sulfate/gentamicin-crobefate sponges were studied. A total of 413 patients were treated, with a success rate of 91%. Reported complications were fistulas, prolonged wound drainage, and wound-healing problems. In vivo pharmacokinetic profiles showed an average local antibiotic concentration that was above the minimum inhibitory concentration for only 5 days. The general quality of the included studies was low to moderate, and there was a moderate to high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence quality and Level of Evidence of the included studies were low, and the risk of bias in these studies was high. This makes the evidence regarding these sponges inconclusive, and no clinical decision-making can be based on these studies. Utilization of antibiotic-loaded collagen sponges in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis should only be carried out with caution; studies with high-level evidence are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical Application of Antimicrobial Bone Graft Substitute in Osteomyelitis Treatment: A Systematic Review of Different Bone Graft Substitutes Available in Clinical Treatment of Osteomyelitis.

Osteomyelitis is a common occurrence in orthopaedic surgery, which is caused by different bacteria. Treatment of osteomyelitis patients aims to eradicate infection by debridement surgery and local and systemic antibiotic therapy. Local treatment increases success rates and can be performed with different antimicrobial bone graft substitutes. This review is performed to assess the level of evidence of synthetic bone graft substitutes in osteomyelitis treatment. According to the PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews, different types of clinical studies concerning treatment of osteomyelitis with bone graft substitutes are included. These studies are assessed on their methodological quality as level of evidence and bias and their clinical outcomes as eradication of infection. In the fifteen included studies, the levels of evidence were weak and in ten out of the fifteen studies there was a moderate to high risk of bias. However, first results of the eradication of infection in these studies showed promising results with their relatively high success rates and low complication rates. Due to the low levels of evidence and high risks of bias of the included studies, these results are inconclusive and no conclusions regarding the performed clinical studies of osteomyelitis treatment with antimicrobial bone graft substitutes can be drawn.