Impact of Early Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients Presenting with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review article we will discuss the acute hypertensive response in the context of acute ischemic stroke and present the latest evidence-based concepts of the significance and management of the hemodynamic response in acute ischemic stroke. RECENT FINDINGS: Acute hypertensive response is considered a common hemodynamic physiologic response in the early setting of an acute ischemic stroke. The significance of the acute hypertensive response is not entirely well understood. However, in certain types of acute ischemic strokes, the systemic elevation of the blood pressure helps to maintain the collateral blood flow in the penumbral ischemic tissue. The magnitude of the elevation of the systemic blood pressure that contributes to the maintenance of the collateral flow is not well established. The overcorrection of this physiologic hemodynamic response before an effective vessel recanalization takes place can carry a negative impact in the final clinical outcome. The significance of the persistence of the acute hypertensive response after an effective vessel recanalization is poorly understood, and it may negatively affect the final outcome due to reperfusion injury. Acute hypertensive response is considered a common hemodynamic reaction of the cardiovascular system in the context of an acute ischemic stroke. The reaction is particularly common in acute brain embolic occlusion of large intracranial vessels. Its early management before, during, and immediately after arterial reperfusion has a repercussion in the final fate of the ischemic tissue and the clinical outcome.

Transradial Access Results in Faster Skin Puncture to Reperfusion Time than Transfemoral Access in Posterior Circulation Mechanical Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Successful mechanical embolectomy for acute embolic arterial occlusion in the posterior cerebral circulation can potentially result in less neurologic disability and mortality. The transradial approach can potentially offer more direct navigation into the posterior circulation than the transfemoral approach and can result in faster recanalization time. OBJECTIVE: To compare procedural metrics and the technical and clinical outcomes of transradial versus transfemoral access for mechanical embolectomy in the posterior cerebral circulation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective review of a prospectively maintained neurointerventional database from a large volume neurointerventional service in a tertiary academic center. Patients presenting with acute disabling symptoms due to embolic occlusion of a large intracranial artery in the posterior that underwent to endovascular treatment in our institution from January 2017 to January 2019 were included in the present study. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and January 2019 a total of 10 subjects underwent a mechanical embolectomy for acute embolic occlusion on the posterior circulation via transradial access; and between January 2017 and January 2018 a total of 10 subjects underwent a mechanical embolectomy for acute embolic occlusion on the posterior circulation via transfemoral access. Subjects in the transradial access group had a shorter skin puncture to recanalization time compared to the transfemoral group (29.2 ± 17.6 in the transradial group vs. 63.9 ± 56.7 in the transfemoral group respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study comparing transradial versus transfemoral access for mechanical embolectomy in patients with acute embolic occlusion in the posterior cerebral circulation. Transradial access resulted in a safe, effective, and faster endovascular route for recanalization in the acute embolic occlusion of the posterior circulation.