Multiple Strategies Reveal a Bidentate Interaction between the Nipah Virus Attachment and Fusion Glycoproteins.

The paramyxoviral family contains many medically important viruses, including measles virus, mumps virus, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, and the deadly zoonotic henipaviruses Hendra and Nipah virus (NiV). To both enter host cells and spread from cell to cell within infected hosts, the vast majority of paramyxoviruses utilize two viral envelope glycoproteins: the attachment glycoprotein (G, H, or hemagglutinin-neuraminidase [HN]) and the fusion glycoprotein (F). Binding of G/H/HN to a host cell receptor triggers structural changes in G/H/HN that in turn trigger F to undergo a series of conformational changes that result in virus-cell (viral entry) or cell-cell (syncytium formation) membrane fusion. The actual regions of G/H/HN and F that interact during the membrane fusion process remain relatively unknown though it is generally thought that the paramyxoviral G/H/HN stalk region interacts with the F head region. Studies to determine such interactive regions have relied heavily on coimmunoprecipitation approaches, whose limitations include the use of detergents and the micelle-mediated association of proteins. Here, we developed a flow-cytometric strategy capable of detecting membrane protein-protein interactions by interchangeably using the full-length form of G and a soluble form of F, or vice versa. Using both coimmunoprecipitation and flow-cytometric strategies, we found a bidentate interaction between NiV G and F, where both the stalk and head regions of NiV G interact with F. This is a new structural-biological finding for the paramyxoviruses. Additionally, our studies disclosed regions of the NiV G and F glycoproteins dispensable for the G and F interactions. IMPORTANCE: Nipah virus (NiV) is a zoonotic paramyxovirus that causes high mortality rates in humans, with no approved treatment or vaccine available for human use. Viral entry into host cells relies on two viral envelope glycoproteins: the attachment (G) and fusion (F) glycoproteins. Binding of G to the ephrinB2 or ephrinB3 cell receptors triggers conformational changes in G that in turn cause F to undergo conformational changes that result in virus-host cell membrane fusion and viral entry. It is currently unknown, however, which specific regions of G and F interact during membrane fusion. Past efforts to determine the interacting regions have relied mainly on coimmunoprecipitation, a technique with some pitfalls. We developed a flow-cytometric assay to study membrane protein-protein interactions, and using this assay we report a bidentate interaction whereby both the head and stalk regions of NiV G interact with NiV F, a new finding for the paramyxovirus family.

Improving grapevine virus diagnostics: Comparative analysis of three dsRNA enrichment methods for high-throughput sequencing.

The extraction of double stranded (ds) RNA is a common enrichment method for the study, characterization, and detection of RNA viruses. In addition to RNA viruses, viroids, and some DNA viruses, can also be detected from dsRNA enriched extracts which makes it an attractive method for detecting a wide range of viruses when coupled with HTS. Several dsRNA enrichment strategies have been developed. The oldest utilizes the selective binding properties of dsRNA to cellulose. More recent methods are based on the application of anti-dsRNA antibodies and viral proteins with a specific affinity for dsRNA. All three methods have been used together with HTS for plant virus detection and study. To our knowledge, this is the first comparative study of three alternative dsRNA enrichment methods for virus and viroid detection through HTS using virus-infected, and healthy grapevine test plants. Extracts were performed in triplicate using methods based on, the anti-dsRNA antibody mAb rJ2 (Millipore Sigma Canada Ltd, Oakville, ON, Canada), the B2 dsRNA binding protein, and ReliaPrep™ Resin (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). The results show that the workflows for all three methods are effectively comparable, apart from purification steps related to antibody and binding protein construct. Both the cellulose resin and dsRNA binding protein construct methods provide highly enriched dsRNA extracts suitable for HTS with the B2 method providing a 36× and the ReliaPrep™ Resin a 163× increase in dsRNA enrichment compared to the mAb rJ2 antibody. The overall consistency and cost effectiveness of the ReliaPrep™ cellulose resin-based method and the potentially simpler adaptation to robotics made it the method of choice for future transfer to a semi-automated workflow.