Added value of buccal cell FISH analysis in the diagnosis and management of Turner syndrome.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there an added diagnosis value of buccal cell FISH analysis compared with blood lymphocyte chromosomal investigations in patients with Turner syndrome (TS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Buccal cell FISH analysis, a non-invasive technique, modified the chromosomal results obtained with the blood karyotype in 17 patients (12%) of our cohort. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Few studies have evaluated buccal cell FISH analysis and compared them with blood karyotype in patients with TS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective, monocentric cohort study was conducted in a rare diseases centre (CMERC) between July 2017 and August 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In total, 142 adult patients with TS, and at least 5% 45,X cells in a previous blood karyotype, were recruited. All the patients' files were included in the CEMARA database. This national database has been declared to the French data protection agency (CNIL approval number 1187326). In compliance with French law, consent regarding non-opposition to collect and use the data was obtained from each patient. A FISH analysis on a buccal smear was performed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The percentage of 45,X cells was identical between the two tissues in only 32.4% of cases. The discrepancy was higher than 41% for 12% of the cohort. The percentage of 45,X cells was higher in blood in 53 (37.3%) patients, and higher in buccal cells in 43 (30.3%) of cases. In 17 (12%) cases, the blood karyotype had to be reconsidered in regard to the buccal cell analysis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: It would have been interesting to evaluate karyotypes in cells from other tissues such as cells from skin biopsy or from the urinary tract and even from blood vessels or gonads in case of surgery and to compare them with each patient's phenotype. However, most of the time, these tissues are not available. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Although blood lymphocyte karyotype remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of TS, buccal cell FISH analysis is an efficient tool to evaluate the global chromosomal constitution in these patients, thus allowing them to have better care and follow-up. For instance, identifying a Y chromosome can prevent the occurrence of a gonadoblastoma, as gonadectomy should be discussed. On the other hand, finding normal XX cells in a patient with a previous diagnosis of homogenous 45,X TS, may be psychologically helpful and relevant for gynaecological care. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was sought for the study. The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Tumor BRCA testing can reveal a high tumor mutational burden related to POLE pathogenic variants.

OBJECTIVE: Tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant, associated with high tumor mutational burden, are good candidates for immunotherapy. However, POLE pathogenic variants are not currently screened in routine clinical practice. Can these tumors be identified by means of an already available test? METHODS: We describe seven tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant, among eight patients with tumors harboring multiple BRCA1/2 variants (from 4 to 20). All patients were managed at Institut Curie, Paris. Five patients were selected because of unexpected tumor BRCA testing results with multiple variants and another three patients were selected because of a POLE pathogenic variant detected by large tumor testing. We looked for other tumor variants by Next-Generation Sequencing in tumors harboring multiple BRCA1/2 variants, and for multiple BRCA1/2 variants in tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant. RESULTS: Four of the five tumors selected because of multiple BRCA1/2 variants exhibited a POLE pathogenic variant, and all three tumors selected for POLE pathogenic variants exhibited multiple BRCA1/2 variants. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor BRCA testing could be a way to detect tumors harboring a highly mutagenic POLE pathogenic variant.