Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Nucl Med ; 47(10): 1612-21, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17015896

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: 3'-Deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine (FLT), a thymidine analog, is under investigation for monitoring cellular proliferation in gliomas, a potential measure of disease progression and response to therapy. Uptake may result from retention in the biosynthetic pathway or leakage via the disrupted blood-tumor barrier. Visual analysis or static measures of 18F-FLT uptake are problematic as transport and retention cannot be distinguished. METHODS: Twelve patients with primary brain tumors were imaged for 90 min of dynamic 18F-FLT PET with arterial blood sampling. Total blood activity was corrected for labeled metabolites to provide an FLT input function. A 2-tissue compartment, 4-rate-constant model was used to determine blood-to-tissue transport (K1) and metabolic flux (K(FLT)). Modeling results were compared with MR images of blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown revealed by gadolinium (Gd) contrast enhancement. Parametric image maps of K1 and K(FLT) were produced by a mixture analysis approach. RESULTS: Similar to prior work with 11C-thymidine, identifiability analysis showed that K1 (transport) and K(FLT) (flux) could be estimated independently for sufficiently high K1 values. However, estimation of K(FLT) was less robust at low K1 values, particularly those close to normal brain. K1 was higher for MRI contrast-enhancing (CE) tumors (0.053 +/- 0.029 mL/g/min) than noncontrast-enhancing (NCE) tumors (0.005 +/- 0.002 mL/g/min; P < 0.02), and K(FLT) was higher for high-grade tumors (0.018 +/- 0.008 mL/g/min, n = 9) than low-grade tumors (0.003 +/- 0.003 mL/g/min, n = 3; P < 0.01). The flux in NCE tumors was indistinguishable from contralateral normal brain (0.002 +/- 0.001 mL/g/min). For CE tumors, K1 was higher than K(FLT). Parametric images matched region-of-interest estimates of transport and flux. However, no patient has 18F-FLT uptake outside of the volume of increased permeability defined by MRI T1+Gd enhancement. CONCLUSION: Modeling analysis of 18F-FLT PET data yielded robust estimates of K1 and K(FLT) for enhancing tumors with sufficiently high K1 and provides a clearer understanding of the relationship between transport and retention of 18F-FLT in gliomas. In tumors that show breakdown of the BBB, transport dominates 18F-FLT uptake. Transport across the BBB and modest rates of 18F-FLT phosphorylation appear to limit the assessment of cellular proliferation using 18F-FLT to highly proliferative tumors with significant BBB breakdown.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Dideoxynucleosides/pharmacokinetics , Glioma/diagnostic imaging , Radiopharmaceuticals/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Aged , Blood-Brain Barrier/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Female , Gadolinium , Glioma/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Monte Carlo Method , Positron-Emission Tomography , Radioisotopes
2.
J Nucl Med ; 46(2): 371-80, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15695799

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: We present a method to measure the regional rate of cellular proliferation using a positron-emitting analog of thymidine (TdR) for human imaging studies. The method is based on the use of 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) to estimate the flux of TdR through the exogenous pathway. The model reflects the retention of FLT-monophosphate (FLTMP), which is generated by the phosphorylation of FLT by thymidine kinase 1 (TK1), the initial step in the exogenous pathway. METHODS: A model of FLT kinetics has been designed based on the assumptions of a steady-state synthesis and incorporation of nucleotides into DNA, an equilibration of the free nucleoside in tissue with the plasma level, and the relative rates of FLT and TdR phosphorylation from prior data using direct analysis with in vitro assays. A 2-compartment model with 4 rate constants adequately describes the kinetics of FLT uptake and retention over 120 min and leads to an estimation of the rate of cellular proliferation using the measured FLT blood clearance and the dynamic FLT uptake curve. RESULTS: Noise characteristics of kinetic parameter estimates for 3 tissues were assessed under a range of conditions representative of human cancer patient imaging. The FLT flux in these tissues can be measured with a SE of <5%, and FLT transport can be estimated with a SE of <15%. Abbreviating the data collection to 60 min or neglecting k(4), giving a 3-parameter model, results in an unsatisfactory loss of accuracy in the flux constant in tumor simulations. CONCLUSION: These analyses depict model behavior and provide expected values for the accuracy of parameter estimates from FLT imaging in human patients. Our companion paper describes the performance of the model for human data in patients with lung cancer. Further studies are necessary to determine the fidelity of K(FLT) (FLT flux) as a proxy for K(TDR) (thymidine flux), the gold standard for imaging cellular proliferation.


Subject(s)
Dideoxynucleosides/pharmacokinetics , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Models, Biological , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/metabolism , Radioisotope Dilution Technique , Algorithms , Cell Proliferation , Computer Simulation , Kinetics , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms/pathology , Radionuclide Imaging , Radiopharmaceuticals/pharmacokinetics , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tissue Distribution
3.
J Nucl Med ; 46(2): 274-82, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15695787

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Assessing cellular proliferation provides a direct method to measure the in vivo growth of cancer. We evaluated the application of a model of 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) kinetics described in a companion report to the analysis of FLT PET image data in lung cancer patients. Compartmental model analysis was performed to estimate the overall flux constants (K(FLT)) for FLT phosphorylation in tumor, bone marrow, and muscle. Estimates of flux were compared with an in vitro assay of proliferation (Ki-67) applied to tissue derived from surgical resection. Compartmental modeling results were compared with simple model-independent methods of estimating FLT uptake. METHODS: Seventeen patients with 18 tumor sites underwent up to 2 h of dynamic PET with blood sampling. Metabolite analysis of plasma samples corrected the total blood activity for labeled metabolites and provided the FLT model input function. A 2-compartment, 4-parameter model (4P) was tested and compared with a 2-compartment, 3-parameter (3P) model for estimating K(FLT). RESULTS: Bone marrow, a proliferative normal tissue, had the highest values of K(FLT), whereas muscle, a nonproliferating tissue, showed the lowest values. The K(FLT) for tumors estimated by compartmental analysis had a fair correlation with estimates by modified graphical analysis (r = 0.86) and a poorer correlation with the average standardized uptake value (r = 0.62) in tumor. Estimates of K(FLT) derived from 60 min of dynamic PET data using the 3P model underestimated K(FLT) compared with 90 or 120 min of dynamic data analyzed using the 4P model. Comparison of flux estimates with an independent measure of cellular proliferation showed that K(FLT) was highly correlated with Ki-67 (Spearman rho = 0.92, P < 0.001). Ignoring the metabolites of FLT in blood underestimated K(FLT) by as much as 47%. CONCLUSION: Compartmental analysis of FLT PET image data yielded robust estimates of K(FLT) that correlated with in vitro measures of tumor proliferation. This method can be applied generally to other imaging studies of different cancers after validation of parameter error. Tumor loss of phosphorylated FLT nucleotides (k(4)) is notable and leads to errors when FLT uptake is evaluated using model-independent approaches that ignore k(4), such as graphical analysis or the SUV.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Dideoxynucleosides/pharmacokinetics , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Computer Simulation , Humans , Kinetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Models, Biological , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Organ Specificity , Radioisotope Dilution Technique , Radionuclide Imaging , Radiopharmaceuticals/pharmacokinetics , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tissue Distribution
4.
Mol Imaging ; 1(3): 151-9, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12920853

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: 2-[11C]Thymidine (TdR), a PET tracer for cellular proliferation, may be advantageous for monitoring brain tumor progression and response to therapy. We previously described and validated a five-compartment model for thymidine incorporation into DNA in somatic tissues, but the effect of the blood-brain barrier on the transport of TdR and its metabolites necessitated further validation before it could be applied to brain tumors. METHODS: We investigated the behavior of the model under conditions experienced in the normal brain and brain tumors, performed sensitivity and identifiability analysis to determine the ability of the model to estirmine whether it can distinguish between thymidine transport and retention. RESULTS: Sensitivity and identifiability analysis suggested that the non-CO2 metabolite parameters could be fixed without significantly affecting thymidine parameter estimation. Simulations showed that K1t and KTdR could be estimated accurately (r = .97 and .98 for estimated vs. true parameters) with standard errors < 15%. The model was able to separate increased transport from increased retention associated with tumor proliferation. CONCLUSION: Our model adequately describes normal brain and brain tumor kinetics for thymidine and its metabolites, and it can provide an estimate of the rate of cellular proliferation in brain tumors.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Carbon Radioisotopes , Models, Neurological , Thymidine , Biological Transport, Active , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Division , DNA, Neoplasm/biosynthesis , Humans , Mathematics , Thymidine/metabolism , Tomography, Emission-Computed
5.
Mol Imaging ; 1(3): 145-50, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12920852

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: 2-[11C]Thymidine (TdR), a PET tracer for cellular proliferation, may be advantageous for monitoring brain tumor progression and response to therapy. Kinetic analysis of dynamic TdR images was performed to estimate the rate of thymidine transport (K1t) and thymidine flux (KTdR) into brain tumors and normal brain. These estimates were compared to MRI and pathologic results. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent sequential [11C]CO2 (major TdR metabolite) and TdR PET studies with arterial blood sampling and metabolite analysis. The data were fitted using the five-compartment model described in the companion article. RESULTS: Comparison of model estimates with clinical and pathologic data shows that K1t is higher for MRI contrast enhancing tumors (p < .001), and KTdR increases with tumor grade (p < .02). On average, TdR retention was lower after treatment in high-grade tumors. The model was able to distinguish between increased thymidine transport due to blood-brain barrier breakdown and increased tracer retention associated with tumor cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: Initial analysis of model estimates of thymidine retention and transport show good agreement with the clinical and pathological features of a wide range of brain tumors. Ongoing studies will evaluate its role in measuring response to treatment and predicting outcome.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Carbon Radioisotopes , Thymidine , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Carbon Dioxide/metabolism , Cell Division , DNA, Neoplasm/biosynthesis , Humans , Kinetics , Models, Neurological , Thymidine/metabolism , Tomography, Emission-Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL