Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 276(4): 1175-1182, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30689037

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is most often assessed in cancer patients on abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). Abdominal CT imaging is not routinely performed in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Recently, a novel method to assess SMM on a single transversal CT slice at the level of the third cervical vertebra (C3) was published. The objective of this study was to assess the robustness of this novel C3 measurement method in terms of interobserver agreement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) at our center between 2007 and 2011 were evaluated. Fifty-four patients with were randomly selected for analysis. Six observers independently measured the cross-sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the level of C3 using a predefined, written protocol as instruction. Interobserver agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), a Bland-Altman plot and Fleiss' kappa (κ). RESULTS: The agreement in vertebra selection between all observers was excellent (Fleiss' κ: 0.96). There was a substantial agreement between all observers in single slice selection (Fleiss' κ: 0.61). For all CSMA measurements, ICCs were excellent (0.763-0.969; all p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between measurements, with narrow limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement for SMM measurement at the level of C3 was excellent. Assessment of SMM at the level of C3 is easy and robust and can performed on routinely available imaging in HNC patients.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Muscle, Skeletal , Sarcopenia/diagnostic imaging , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/diagnostic imaging , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
2.
Oral Oncol ; 123: 105617, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34749251

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is associated with adverse outcomes. SMM is often assessed at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) on abdominal imaging. Abdominal imaging is not routinely performed in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). We aim to validate SMM measurement at the level of the third cervical vertebra (C3) on head and neck imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with pre-treatment whole-body computed tomography (CT) between 2010 and 2018 were included. Cross-sectional muscle area (CSMA) was manually delineated at the level of C3 and L3. Correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. Cohen's kappa was used to assess the reliability of identifying a patient with low SMM. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included. Correlation between CSMA at the level of C3 and L3 was good (r = 0.75, p < 0.01). Using a multivariate formula to estimate CSMA at L3, including gender, age, and weight, correlation improved (r = 0.82, p < 0.01). The agreement between estimated and actual CSMA at L3 was good (ICC 0.78, p < 0.01). There was moderate agreement in the identification of patients with low SMM based on the estimated lumbar skeletal muscle mass index (LSMI) and actual LSMI (Cohen's κ: 0.57, 95%CI 0.45-0.69). CONCLUSIONS: CSMA at C3 correlates well with CSMA at L3. There is moderate agreement in the identification of patients with low SMM based on the estimated lumbar SMI (based on measurement at C3) and actual LSMI.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Sarcopenia , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cross-Sectional Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sarcopenia/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL