Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: structures and function.

We have been attempting to elucidate the molecular mechanisms through which peroxisome proliferators exert their pleiotropic effects, with particular emphasis on understanding why humans appear unresponsive to these compounds. There is a wealth of data to implicate the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha) in mediating these effects in rodent species; PPAR alpha is expressed in tissues that show physiological changes in response to PPs, is transcriptionally activated in vitro by a variety of PPs, and it has been recently demonstrated that mice lacking this receptor are refractory to the effects of clofibrate and Wy-14,643, at least in the short term. It is conceivable that differences in PPAR alpha between responsive rodent and unresponsive human subjects may provide the key to understanding the basis of this species variation in response, and with this in mind we have been studying the biology of PPAR alpha in humans and looking at interindividual variation. There is already published evidence, albeit on only two sequences, for structural and functional polymorphism in human PPAR alphas. We have extended these findings, and shown that: There is considerable variation in hPPAR alpha cDNAs obtained from different individuals, both at the gross structural level (lack of a coding exon) and of a more subtle nature (single base changes leading to amino acid substitutions). One such cDNA, the sequence of which differs at only three amino acids from that published, encodes a receptor that is incapable of transcriptional activation by potent PPs. The degree to which hPPAR alpha transcripts are expressed in human livers can vary by up to an order of magnitude between individuals. The tissue-specific expression profile of PPAR alpha in humans is very different from that in rat and mouse. In particular, the human liver contains generally low levels of PPAR alpha in contrast to the responsive rodents, in which potent PPs cause liver tumors. Taken together, these data suggest first that human and rodent PPAR alphas differ according to a number of molecular and biochemical criteria, and secondly that there is a degree of interindividual variation in PPAR alpha structure and function. Studies are ongoing to clarify this further, but human polymorphism may go some way towards explaining the apparent paradox that active PPAR alpha receptors can be isolated from an "unresponsive" species.

Application of genomics to the definition of the molecular basis for toxicity.

Transcript profiling technology enables quantitative measurement of the transcriptional activity of potentially thousands of genes in biological samples. The application of such technology to toxicology, toxicogenomics, promises substantial dividends in mechanistic toxicity research and also, possibly, the ability to predict adverse toxicity for novel or untested compounds. Our laboratory has developed a custom approach to this technology, designing cDNA microarray platforms specifically for gene expression events of relevance to a large number of toxicological endpoints. Such arrays allow comprehensive coverage of genes associated with entire pathways (such as oxidative stress, signal transduction, stress response, epithelial biology) and enable simultaneous measurement of more than ten thousand gene expression events.

Species differences in sequence and activity of the peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) within the acyl CoA oxidase gene promoter.

In rats and mice, peroxisome proliferators (PP) cause liver enlargement, hepatocarcinogenesis and peroxisome proliferation associated with induction of enzymes such as acyl CoA oxidase (ACO). However, humans appear to be non-responsive to the adverse effects of PPs such as ACO induction. PPs activate the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) that binds to DNA at peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs) within the promoters of PP-responsive genes. When the human ACO promoter was cloned previously (Varanasi et al., 1996. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 271, 2147-2155), it was reported to contain a PPRE (5' AGGTCA C TGGTCA 3') that bound PPARalpha and could be activated in vitro by Wyeth-14,643 (at >1 mM) or DEHP (at > 1.5 mM). In contrast, when we cloned the ACO gene promoter from a human liver biopsy, it was non-responsive to PPs and differed at three positions (5' AGGTCA G CTGTCA 3') from that reported previously (Woodyatt et al., 1999. Carcinogenesis, 20, 369-375). Subsequent to this, Varanasi et al. re-sequenced their constructs and obtained the same sequence as we have described (Varanasi et al., 1998. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273, 30832). However, the observation that the errant sequence (5' AGGTCA C TGGTCA 3') was able to bind PPARalpha still remained since it appears that this sequence was used by Varanasi et al. (1996) to design oligonucleotides for their DNA binding analyses. Thus, if the 5' AGGTCA C TGGTCA 3' sequence did exist in some individuals, it could be active. To address this, we used site-directed mutagenesis to create a promoter fragment that contained the errant sequence. This reporter gene was transfected into NIH3T3 cells together with a plasmid expressing mPPARalpha, and assessed for its ability to drive PP-mediated gene transcription using a non-toxic concentration of Wyeth-14,643 (100 microM). This human ACO promoter was also inactive, unlike the equivalent rat ACO promoter fragment used as a positive control. Next, we used site directed mutagenesis to convert the PPRE found in the active rat ACO promoter (3' AGGACA A AGGTCA 5') to our inactive human sequence (AGGTCA G CTGTCA). This human PPRE was unable to drive PP-induced gene transcription even in the context of the rat ACO promoter suggesting that the activity of the rat promoter is conferred principally by the PPRE sequence, even though it may be enhanced by flanking sequences. These data confirm that neither the native nor the errant human ACO gene PPRE can respond to PPs. The absence of a responsive PPRE contributes to our understanding of the lack of response of humans to some of the adverse effects of the PP class of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens.

Apoptosis and proliferation in nongenotoxic carcinogenesis: species differences and role of PPARalpha.

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are nongenotoxic rodent hepatocarcinogens that cause liver enlargement and hepatocarcinogenesis associated with peroxisome proliferation, induction of hepatocyte DNA synthesis and suppression of apoptosis. Acyl CoA oxidase (ACO) is a key enzyme of peroxisomal beta-oxidation and its transcriptional activation by PPs is often used as marker for the rodent response. PPs activate the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha, PPARalpha. Recent data suggest a role for tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha). This cytokine appears to be permissive for a PPARalpha-dependent growth response to PPs. Humans and guinea pigs appear to be nonresponsive to the adverse effects of PPs noted in rodents. These species differences can be attributed to reduced quantity of full length functional PPARalpha in human liver and evidence supports the presence of a truncated form of PPARalpha, hPPARalpha8/14 in human liver. In addition, species differences could be attributed to qualitative differences in the PPARalpha-mediated response because the promoter for human ACO differs in sequence and activity from the rat equivalent. These data contribute to our understanding of how chemicals may cause tumours in rodents and how this response may differ in humans.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha-regulated growth responses and their importance to hepatocarcinogenesis.

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are a class of non-genotoxic rodent hepatocarcinogens that act by perturbing liver growth regulation. We have demonstrated previously that PPs suppress both spontaneous rat hepatocyte apoptosis and that induced by exogenous stimuli such as transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF beta1). More recently, we have demonstrated that PPs can suppress apoptosis induced by more diverse stimuli such as DNA damage or ligation of Fas, a receptor related to the tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) family of cell surface receptors. PPs transcriptionally activate the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha, PPAR alpha, a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. We investigated whether activation of PPAR alpha mediates the suppression of rat hepatocyte apoptosis induced by PPs. We isolated a naturally occurring variant form of PPAR alpha (hPPAR alpha-6/29) from human liver by PCR cloning. hPPAR alpha-6/29 shared the ability of mPPAR alpha to bind to DNA but, unlike mPPAR alpha, could not be activated by PPs. Furthermore, hPPAR alpha-6/29 could act as a dominant negative regulator of PPAR-mediated gene transcription. When introduced into primary rat liver cell cultures by transient transfection, hPPAR alpha-6/29 prevented the suppression of hepatocyte apoptosis by the PP nafenopin, but not that seen in response to phenobarbitone (PB), a non-genotoxic carcinogen whose action does not involve PPAR alpha. The suppression of hepatocyte apoptosis was abrogated completely even though only 30% of hepatocytes were transfected, suggesting the involvement of a soluble factor. Recent data have suggested that TNF alpha, perhaps released by liver Kupffer cells in response to PPs, may play a key role in mediating the effects of PPs on hepatocyte growth regulation.

Evidence for the suppression of apoptosis by the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha).

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are a class of nongenotoxic rodent hepatocarcinogens. We have demonstrated previously that PPs suppress both spontaneous rat hepatocyte apoptosis and that induced by exogenous stimuli such as transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGFbeta1). PPs transcriptionally activate the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha (PPAR alpha), a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. Here, we investigate whether activation of PPAR alpha mediates the suppression of rat hepatocyte apoptosis induced by PPs. We isolated a naturally occurring variant form of PPAR alpha (hPPAR alpha-6/29) from human liver by PCR cloning. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) demonstrated that hPPAR alpha-6/29 shared the ability of mPPAR alpha to heterodimerise with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) and bind to DNA. When hPPAR alpha-6/29 was transfected into Hepa1c1c7 cells together with a reporter plasmid containing a PPAR response element (PPRE), hPPAR alpha-6/29, unlike mPPAR alpha, could not be activated by PPs. Furthermore, hPPAR alpha-6/29 could act as a dominant negative regulator of PPAR-mediated gene transcription since increasing concentrations of hPPAR alpha-6/29 abrogated the activation of co-transfected mPPAR alpha. When introduced into primary rat liver cell cultures by transient transfection, hPPAR alpha-6/29 prevented the suppression of hepatocyte apoptosis by the PP nafenopin, but not that seen in response to phenobarbitone (PB), a nongenotoxic carcinogen whose action does not involve PPAR alpha. The suppression of hepatocyte apoptosis was abrogated completely even though only 30% of hepatocytes were transfected, suggesting the involvement of a soluble factor. These data indicate that activation of rat liver PPAR alpha provides a survival signal for hepatocytes, preventing their death in response to apoptotic stimuli.

The peroxisome proliferator (PP) response element upstream of the human acyl CoA oxidase gene is inactive among a sample human population: significance for species differences in response to PPs.

Peroxisome proliferators (PP) cause peroxisome proliferation, associated with rodent hepatocyte growth perturbation and hepatocarcinogenesis. However, in humans this class of non-genotoxic carcinogens does not appear to have the same adverse effects. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) mediates the effects of PPs in rodents via peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs) upstream of PP-responsive genes such as acyl coenzyme A oxidase (ACO). When the human ACO promoter was cloned previously, it was found to be active and to contain a consensus PPRE (-1918 AGGTCA C TGGTCA -1906). To confirm and extend those original findings, we isolated a 2 kb genomic fragment of the ACO gene promoter from a human liver biopsy and used it to create a beta-galactosidase reporter gene plasmid. The human ACO promoter reporter plasmid was added to both Hepalclc7 and NIH 3T3 cells together with a plasmid expressing mPPARa and assessed for its ability to drive PP-mediated gene transcription. The human ACO promoter fragment was inactive, unlike the equivalent rat ACO promoter fragment used as a positive control. The PPRE within our cloned fragment of the human ACO promoter differed at three positions (5'-AGGTCA G CTGTCA-3') from the previously published active human ACO promoter. Next, we studied the frequency of the inactive versus the active human PPRE within the human population. Using a PCR strategy, we isolated and analysed genomic DNA fragments from 22 unrelated human individuals and from the human hepatoma cell line HepG2. In each case, the PPRE contained the inactive sequence. These data show that the human ACO gene promoter found in a sample human population is inactive. This may explain at the genomic level the lack of response of humans to some of the adverse effects of the PP class of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens.