A comprehensive overview of diffuse correlation spectroscopy: theoretical framework, recent advances in hardware, analysis, and applications.

Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is a powerful tool for assessing microvascular hemodynamic in deep tissues. Recent advances in sensors, lasers, and deep learning have further boosted the development of new DCS methods. However, newcomers might feel overwhelmed, not only by the already-complex DCS theoretical framework but also by the broad range of component options and system architectures. To facilitate new entry to this exciting field, we present a comprehensive review of DCS hardware architectures (continuous-wave, frequency-domain, and time-domain) and summarize corresponding theoretical models. Further, we discuss new applications of highly integrated silicon single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) sensors in DCS, compare SPADs with existing sensors, and review other components (lasers, sensors, and correlators), as well as data analysis tools, including deep learning. Potential applications in medical diagnosis are discussed and an outlook for the future directions is provided, to offer effective guidance to embark on DCS research.

Comparing the performance potential of speckle contrast optical spectroscopy and diffuse correlation spectroscopy for cerebral blood flow monitoring using Monte Carlo simulations in realistic head geometries.

Significance: The non-invasive measurement of cerebral blood flow based on diffuse optical techniques has seen increased interest as a research tool for cerebral perfusion monitoring in critical care and functional brain imaging. Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) and speckle contrast optical spectroscopy (SCOS) are two such techniques that measure complementary aspects of the fluctuating intensity signal, with DCS quantifying the temporal fluctuations of the signal and SCOS quantifying the spatial blurring of a speckle pattern. With the increasing interest in the use of these techniques, a thorough comparison would inform new adopters of the benefits of each technique. Aim: We systematically evaluate the performance of DCS and SCOS for the measurement of cerebral blood flow. Approach: Monte Carlo simulations of dynamic light scattering in an MRI-derived head model were performed. For both DCS and SCOS, estimates of sensitivity to cerebral blood flow changes, coefficient of variation of the measured blood flow, and the contrast-to-noise ratio of the measurement to the cerebral perfusion signal were calculated. By varying complementary aspects of data collection between the two methods, we investigated the performance benefits of different measurement strategies, including altering the number of modes per optical detector, the integration time/fitting time of the speckle measurement, and the laser source delivery strategy. Results: Through comparison across these metrics with simulated detectors having realistic noise properties, we determine several guiding principles for the optimization of these techniques and report the performance comparison between the two over a range of measurement properties and tissue geometries. We find that SCOS outperforms DCS in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio for the cerebral blood flow signal in the ideal case simulated here but note that SCOS requires careful experimental calibrations to ensure accurate measurements of cerebral blood flow. Conclusion: We provide design principles by which to evaluate the development of DCS and SCOS systems for their use in the measurement of cerebral blood flow.