SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 variants lack higher infectivity but do have immune escape.

The 501Y.V2 variants of SARS-CoV-2 containing multiple mutations in spike are now dominant in South Africa and are rapidly spreading to other countries. Here, experiments with 18 pseudotyped viruses showed that the 501Y.V2 variants do not confer increased infectivity in multiple cell types except for murine ACE2-overexpressing cells, where a substantial increase in infectivity was observed. Notably, the susceptibility of the 501Y.V2 variants to 12 of 17 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies was substantially diminished, and the neutralization ability of the sera from convalescent patients and immunized mice was also reduced for these variants. The neutralization resistance was mainly caused by E484K and N501Y mutations in the receptor-binding domain of spike. The enhanced infectivity in murine ACE2-overexpressing cells suggests the possibility of spillover of the 501Y.V2 variants to mice. Moreover, the neutralization resistance we detected for the 501Y.V2 variants suggests the potential for compromised efficacy of monoclonal antibodies and vaccines.

Rapid development and mass production of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing chicken egg yolk antibodies with protective efficacy in hamsters.

Despite the record speed of developing vaccines and therapeutics against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, it is not a given that such success can be secured in future pandemics. In addition, COVID-19 vaccination and application of therapeutics remain low in developing countries. Rapid and low cost mass production of antiviral IgY antibodies could be an attractive alternative or complementary option for vaccine and therapeutic development. In this article, we rapidly produced SARS-CoV-2 antigens, immunized hens and purified IgY antibodies in 2 months after the SARS-CoV-2 gene sequence became public. We further demonstrated that the IgY antibodies competitively block RBD binding to ACE2, neutralize authentic SARS-CoV-2 virus and effectively protect hamsters from SARS-CoV-2 challenge by preventing weight loss and lung pathology, representing the first comprehensive study with IgY antibodies. The process of mass production can be easily implemented in most developing countries and hence could become a new vital option in our toolbox for combating viral pandemics. This study could stimulate further studies, optimization and potential applications of IgY antibodies as therapeutics and prophylactics for human and animals.

Novel hKDR mouse model depicts the antiangiogenesis and apoptosis-promoting effects of neutralizing antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)/KDR plays a critical role in tumor growth, diffusion, and invasion. The amino acid sequence homology of KDR between mouse and human in the VEGF ligand-binding domain was low, thus the WT mice could not be used to evaluate Abs against human KDR, and the lack of a suitable mouse model hindered both basic research and drug developments. Using the CRISPR/Cas9 technique, we successfully inserted different fragments of the human KDR coding sequence into the chromosomal mouse Kdr exon 4 locus to obtain an hKDR humanized mouse that can be used to evaluate the marketed Ab ramucirumab. In addition, the humanized mAb VEGFR-HK19 was developed, and a series of comparative assays with ramucirumab as the benchmark revealed that VEGFR-HK19 has higher affinity and superior antiproliferation activity. Moreover, VEGFR-HK19 selectively inhibited tumor growth in the hKDR mouse model but not in WT mice. The most important binding epitopes of VEGFR2-HK19 are D257, L313, and T315, located in the VEGF binding region. Therefore, the VEGFR2-HK19 Ab inhibits tumor growth by blocking VEGF-induced angiogenesis, inflammation, and promoting apoptosis. To our best knowledge, this novel humanized KDR mouse fills the gaps both in an animal model and the suitable in vivo evaluation method for developing antiangiogenesis therapies in the future, and the newly established humanized Ab is expected to be a drug candidate possibly benefitting tumor patients.

Antitumor activity of pegylated human interferon ß as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors via tumor growth inhibition and dendritic cell activation.

Type I interferons (IFN), especially human IFN alpha (IFNα), have been utilized for antitumor therapy for decades. Human interferon beta (IFNß) is rarely used for cancer treatment, despite advantages over IFNα in biological activities such as tumor growth inhibition and dendritic cell (DC) activation. The utilization of pegylated human IFNß (PEG-IFNß), as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was evaluated in this study through in vivo efficacy studies in syngeneic mouse melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) models resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In vitro comparative study of PEG-IFNß and pegylated IFNα-2b was performed in terms of tumor growth inhibition against human melanoma, NSCLC and COAD cell lines and activation of human monocyte-derived DCs (MoDCs). Our data demonstrate that the in vivo antitumor effects of PEG-IFNß are partially attributable to tumor growth-inhibitory effects and DC-activating activities, superior to pegylated IFNα-2b. Our findings suggest that utilizing PEG-IFNß as an antitumor therapy can enhance the therapeutic effect of ICIs in ICI-resistant tumors by directly inhibiting tumor growth and induction of DC maturation.

Validation of Luminex immunological and competitive Luminex immunological assays for clinical immunogenicity assessment of a 14-valent recombinant human papillomavirus vaccine.

A novel virus-like particle (VLP)-based multivalent recombinant human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was developed and evaluated in human, including 14 HPV-type specific VLP antigens (HPV6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59). The pseudovirus-based neutralizing assay (PBNA) method is widely used for immunogenicity assessment of HPV vaccine in clinical trials. However, as many as 14 antigen-specific antibody levels need be determined, PBNA is, for many reasons, challenging and time-consuming. In this study, we developed a Luminex immunological assay (LIA) and a competitive Luminex immunological assay (cLIA). These methods increase the throughput, reproducibility and precision, as well as reduce the complexity. All assay parameters showed good characteristics in the validation of both methods, benefiting from highly purified and structurally correct VLPs, high specific antibodies, standard VLP-microspheres and PE-mAbs conjugating process, adequate assay development and stable system. Validation data support the use of both methods for immunogenicity assessment in clinical trials. LIA showed higher sensitivity than cLIA, and due to limited epitopes of mAb, cLIA detected lower antibody responses, and therefore, fewer antibodies. This work not only supports clinical trials of 14-valent HPV vaccines more efficiently and reliably, but also provides a set of validation strategies and usable standards for general vaccine immunogenicity testing.

Rapid and Quantitative In Vitro Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies and Nanobodies.

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies and nanobodies have shown promising results as potential therapeutic agents for COVID-19. Identifying such antibodies and nanobodies requires evaluating the neutralization activity of a large number of lead molecules via biological assays, such as the virus neutralization test (VNT). These assays are typically time-consuming and demanding on-lab facilities. Here, we present a rapid and quantitative assay that evaluates the neutralizing efficacy of an antibody or nanobody within 1.5 h, does not require BSL-2 facilities, and consumes only 8 µL of a low concentration (ng/mL) sample for each assay run. We tested the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding inhibition efficacy of seven antibodies and eight nanobodies and verified that the IC50 values of our assay are comparable with those from SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization tests. We also found that our assay could evaluate the neutralizing efficacy against three widespread SARS-CoV-2 variants. We observed increased affinity of these variants for ACE2, including the ß and γ variants. Finally, we demonstrated that our assay enables the rapid identification of an immune-evasive mutation of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, utilizing a set of nanobodies with known binding epitopes.

Immunogenicity correlation in cynomolgus monkeys between Luminex-based total IgG immunoassay and pseudovirion-based neutralization assay for a 14-valent recombinant human papillomavirus vaccine.

A new virus-like particle based vaccine covering 14 types of high-risk and disease-inducing human papillomavirus (HPV) can offer better coverage against HPV-induced diseases, particularly cervical cancers. However, the assessment of immunogenicity of the vaccine is an important task, representing not only its significant clinical characteristics, but also a major challenge, in terms of both the suitability of methods and the clinical sample testing throughput supporting clinical development. This work covers the development and evaluation of a method based on Luminex technology (a coded-bead and flow-cytometric approach) to assess the HPV-type specific total immunoglobulin G (IgG). This method can evaluate the antibodies in sera post immunization against multiple types of HPV simultaneously (i.e., with multiplexing capability), save time and cost, and improve test throughput with higher sensitivity and precision than the classical, plate-based enzyme-linked immunoassay and competitive Luminex-based immunoassays. Using cynomolgus monkeys as model, we demonstrated the good correlation between the results from the pseudovirion-based neutralization assay (PBNA), and the Luminex-based total IgG assay, supporting that the latter method can be considered as a viable, dependable replacement method for the PBNA supporting immunogenicity evaluation of HPV vaccine in preclinical development and clinical investigation.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of SCT200, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody in patients with wild-type KRAS/NRAS/BRAF metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase I dose-escalation and dose-expansion study.

BACKGROUND: An over-expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been observed in colorectal cancer and is associated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis. SCT200 is a newly developed recombinant, fully humanized, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody. This study aimed to evaluate its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy in patients with wild-type KRAS/NRAS/BRAF metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).  METHODS: This phase I study comprising dose-escalation phase and dose-expansion phase. SCT200 was administrated intravenously to groups of three to six patients. An every 3-week dosing cycle (0.5-15.0 mg/kg) and multiple dosing schedule were evaluated. Blood samples were collected at preset intervals for PK assessment, radiological imaging was used for efficacy assessment, and continuous safety monitoring was performed in each group during the study.  RESULTS: From December 16, 2014 to December 31, 2018, fifty-six patients with wild-type KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mCRC receiving ≥ 1 dose of SCT200 were evaluated. Among them, 44.6% (25/56) of the patients failed at least two prior lines of chemotherapy. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred in any group. All of the patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). 96.4% (54/56) of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and 26.8% (15/56) of patients with Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. No serious TRAEs were observed. The most common TRAEs were dermotoxicity and hypomagnesemia. PK analysis showed non-linear PK in the range of 0.5 - 8.0 mg/kg of single dose SCT200, the clearance decreased, and the elimination half-life (T1/2) prolonged following dose increase. In the multiple-dose period, the clearance decreased, peak concentration increased, and T1/2 prolonged during prolonged drug administration, and a steady state was reached after five consecutive dose of 6.0 mg/kg quaque week (QW). The objective response rate (ORR) was 30.4% (17/56, 95% confidence interval [CI], 18.8%-44.1%). The ORR in the dose-expansion group (6.0 mg/kg QW) was 48.0% (12/25, 95% CI, 27.8%-68.7%), the median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95%CI, 3.6-5.5), and the median overall survival was 20.2 months (95%CI, 12.1-not reached). CONCLUSIONS: SCT200 showed favorable safety, PK profile, and preliminary efficacy for patients with wild-type KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mCRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02211443 ).

Comparison of efficacy and safety of ripertamab (SCT400) versus rituximab (Mabthera® ) in combination with CHOP in patients with previously untreated CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A randomized, single-blind, phase III clinical trial.

This study compared the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of ripertamab (SCT400) and rituximab (Mabthera® ) combined with CHOP as the first-line treatment for Chinese patients with CD20-positive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This is a randomized, patient-blind, multicenter, active-control, non-inferiority study with parallel design. Patients were randomly (2:1) to receive ripertamab combined with CHOP (S-CHOP) or rituximab (Mabthera® ) combined with CHOP (R-CHOP) for up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was the Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessed objective response rate (ORR) in full analysis set (FAS) and the per protocol set (PPS). A total of 364 patients (243 in the S-CHOP and 121 in the R-CHOP groups) were enrolled in this study. In FAS, IRC-assessed ORRs were 93.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90.0%, 96.5%) and 94.2% (95% CI: 88.4%, 97.6%) in the S-CHOP and R-CHOP groups (p = 0.9633), respectively. The ORR difference between the two groups -0.4% (95% CI: -5.5%, 4.8%) met the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -12%. There were no significant differences between the S-CHOP and R-CHOP groups in 1-year progression-free survival rates (81.1% vs. 83.2%, p = 0.8283), 1 year event-free survival rates (56.2% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.8005), and 3-year overall survival rates (81.0% vs. 82.8%, p = 0.7183). The results in PPS were consistent with those in FAS. The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and ≥ grade 3 TEAEs were 97.9% and 99.2%, 85.2% and 86.0% in the S-CHOP and R-CHOP groups, respectively in safety set. The percentage of anti-drug antibodies positive patients in the S-CHOP group was numerically lower than the R-CHOP group (10.9% vs. 16.0%). This study demonstrated that S-CHOP was not inferior to R-CHOP in the first-line treatment of Chinese patients with CD20-positive DLBCL in efficacy, safety and immunogenecity. S-CHOP could be an alternative first-line standard treatment regimen for this patient population.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of recombinant human coagulation factor VIII (omfiloctocog alfa) in previously treated Chinese children with severe hemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Omfiloctocog alfa, the first China-developed recombinant factor VIII (FVIII), demonstrated efficacy and safety of prophylaxis in previously treated patients (PTPs) aged ≥12 years with severe hemophilia A in China. AIMS: To investigate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of omfiloctocog alfa in pediatric PTPs with severe hemophilia A in China. METHODS: PTPs (>50 exposure days [ED] for Chinese patients aged <6 years; >150 EDs for patients aged 6-12 years) were treated with omfiloctocog alfa at 25-50 IU/kg every other day or three times per week for 24 weeks. PK was evaluated after single injection of 50 IU/kg. The primary efficacy endpoint was annualized bleeding rate (ABR). RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were enrolled (<6 years, n = 35; 6-12 years, n = 34) and mean exposure to omfiloctocog alfa was 78.9 days. Mean half-life was 6.7 and 10.2 h in children < 6 years and 6-12 years, respectively. Estimated mean ABRs of all patients were 4.05 for overall bleeding episodes and 1.38 for spontaneous bleeding episodes. Of 127 bleeding episodes, the success rate was 92.1%. 39.7% patients did not experience any bleeding episodes and the mean weekly dose of FVIII was 109.1 IU/kg for these patients. 83% bleeding episodes were controlled with ≤2 injections. Adverse reactions occurred in 2.9% of the patients. One 2-year-old patient developed inhibitors after 12 EDs and it resolved with omfiloctocog alfa immune tolerance induction. CONCLUSION: Omfiloctocog alfa was efficacious and well tolerated for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in Chinese pediatric PTPs with severe hemophilia A.

Feasibility Studies of Nebulized SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody in Mice and Cynomolgus Monkeys.

PURPOSE: Neutralizing antibodies, administrated through intravenous infusion, have shown to be highly efficacious in treating mild and moderate COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lung. However, antibodies do not transport across the plasma-lung barrier efficiently, and up to 100 mg/kg dose was used in human causing significant supply and cost burdens. This study was to explore the feasibility of nebulized antibodies inhalation delivery as an alternative route. METHODS: HB27, a potent RBD-specific humanized monoclonal antibody (Zhu et al. in National Sci Rev. 8:nwaa297, 2020), showed excellent protection against SARS-CoV-2 in animal model and good safety profile in clinical studies. The pharmacokinetics and preliminary safety of HB27 administrated through the respiratory tract were studied in mice and cynomolgus monkeys here. RESULTS: At a single 5 mg/kg dose, the peak HB27 concentration in mice pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) reached 857.8 µg/mL, 670-fold higher than the PRNT90 value of 1.28 µg/mL, and maintained above PRNT90 over 240 h. In contrast, when administrated by intravenous injection at a 5 mg/kg dose, the antibody concentrations in mice ELF were below PRNT90 value throughout, and were about 50-fold lower than that in the serum. In cynomolgus monkeys administrated with a single dose through inhalation, the antibody concentration in ELF remained high within 3 days. No drug-related safety concerns were observed in the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that nebulized neutralizing antibody delivery though inhalation could be a more efficient and efficacious alternative approach for treating COVID-19 and other respiratory infectious diseases, and warrants further evaluation in clinical studies.

A multi-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled phase II study comparing pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics and safety of ripertamab (SCT400) to rituximab (MabThera®) in patients with CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Objective: This multi-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled phase II study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety profile of ripertamab (SCT400), a recombinant anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, to rituximab (MabThera®) in patients with CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Patients with CD20-positive B-cell NHL who achieved complete remission or unconfirmed complete remission after standard treatment were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of ripertamab (375 mg/m2) or rituximab (MabThera®, 375 mg/m2). PK was evaluated using area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to d 85 (AUC0-85 d), AUC from time 0 to week 1 (AUC0-1 w), AUC from time 0 to week 2 (AUC0-2 w), AUC from time 0 to week 3 (AUC0-3 w), AUC from time 0 to week 8 (AUC0-8 w), maximum serum concentration (Cmax), terminal half-life (T1/2), time to maximum serum concentration (Tmax) and clearance (CL). Bioequivalence was confirmed if the 90% confidence interval (90% CI) of the geometric mean ratio of ripertamab/rituximab was within the pre-defined bioequivalence range of 80.0%-125.0%. PD, immunogenicity, and safety were also evaluated. Results: From December 30, 2014 to November 24, 2015, a total of 84 patients were randomized (ripertamab, n=42; rituximab, n=42) and the PK analysis was performed on 76 patients (ripertamab, n=38; rituximab, n=38). The geometric mean ratios of ripertamab/rituximab for AUC0-85 d, AUC0-inf, and Cmax were 96.1% (90% CI: 87.6%-105.5%), 95.9% (90% CI: 86.5%-106.4%) and 97.4% (90% CI: 91.6%-103.6%), respectively. All PK parameters met the pre-defined bioequivalence range of 80.0%-125.0%. For PD and safety evaluation, there was no statistical difference in peripheral CD19-positive B-cell counts and CD20-positive B-cell counts at each visit, and no difference in the incidence of anti-drug antibodies was observed between the two groups. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events and treatment-related adverse events were also comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: In this study, the PK, PD, immunogenicity, and safety profile of ripertamab (SCT400) were similar to rituximab (MabThera®) in Chinese patients with CD20-positive B-cell NHL.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of a Monoclonal Antibody (SCTA01) Targeting SARS-CoV-2 in Healthy Adults: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Study.

SCTA01 is a novel monoclonal antibody with promising prophylactic and therapeutic potential for COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity of SCTA01 in healthy adults. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation phase I clinical trial. Healthy adults were randomly assigned to cohort 1 (n = 5; 3:2), cohort 2 (n = 8; 6:2), cohort 3, or cohort 4 (both n = 10; 8:2) to receive SCTA01 (5, 15, 30, and 50 mg/kg, respectively) versus placebo. All participants were followed up for clinical, laboratory, PK, and immunogenicity assessments for 84 days. The primary outcomes were the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximal tolerable dose (MTD), and the secondary outcomes included PK parameters, immunogenicity, and adverse events (AE). Of the 33 participants, 18 experienced treatment-related AEs; the frequency was 52.0% (13/25) in participants receiving SCTA01 and 62.5% (5/8) in those receiving placebo. All AEs were mild. There was no serious AE or death. No DLT was reported, and the MTD of SCTA01 was not reached. SCTA01 with a dose range of 5 to 50 mg/kg had nearly linear dose-proportional increases in Cmax and AUC parameters. An antidrug antibody response was detected in four (16.0%) participants receiving SCTA01, with low titers, between the baseline and day 28, but all became negative later. In conclusion, SCTA01 up to 50 mg/kg was safe and well-tolerated in healthy participants. Its PK parameters were nearly linear dose-proportional. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT04483375.).

Pharmacokinetic, efficacy and safety evaluation of B-domain-deleted recombinant FVIII (SCT800) for prophylactic treatment in adolescent and adult patients with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: SCT800 is a recombinant human B-domain-deleted coagulation factor VIII (BDDrFVIII) developed in China. AIM: To evaluate the repeat pharmacokinetics (PKs), efficacy, and safety of SCT800 in previously treated Chinese adolescent and adult patients with severe haemophilia A. METHODS: A phase III, multicentre, prospective, open-label, single-arm trial was conducted at 12 medical centres. Subjects received treatment for 24 weeks. PKs were assessed at the initial and repeated dosing 24 weeks later. The primary endpoint was annualized bleeding rate (ABR). Breakthrough bleeding episodes and inhibitor development were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 71 of 73 patients completed the study, and 18 were enrolled for the repeat PK investigation. Total exposure was 5643 exposure days. Overall, SCT800 showed comparable repeat PK profiles. The total ABR was 2.82 (95% confidence interval 2.01-3.96). During prophylaxis, 43.8% of patients had no bleeding episodes. The majority (89.4%) of bleeding episodes were controlled with 1-2 injections of SCT800, the success rate (defined as 'excellent' or 'good' haemostatic response) for the treatment of bleeding episodes was 92.6%. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 53.4%. Drug-related AE incidence was 4.1%. The observed AEs were similar to those of other coagulation factor VIII, but lower in frequency. No subject developed an inhibitor, and no other safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: SCT800 has robust PK characteristics, and is safe and efficacious for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated adolescent and adult patients with severe haemophilia A.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SCT800, a new recombinant FVIII, in hemophilia A mice.

AIM: SCT800 is a new third-generation recombinant FVIII agent that is undergoing promising preclinical study. This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of SCT800 in hemophilia A mice. METHODS: After hemophilia A mice were intravenously injected with single dose of SCT800 (80, 180, and 280 IU/kg) or the commercially available product Xyntha (280 IU/kg), pharmacokinetics profiles were evaluated based on measuring plasma FVIII: C. For pharmacodynamics study, dose-response curves of SCT800 and Xyntha (1-200 IU/kg) were constructed using a tail bleeding model monitoring both bleeding time and blood loss. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics profile analysis showed a dose independency of SCT800 ranging from 80 to 280 IU/kg and comparable pharmacokinetic profiles between SCT800 and Xyntha at the doses tested. Pharmacodynamics study revealed comparable ED50 values of SCT800 and Xyntha in the tail bleeding model: 14.78 and 15.81 IU/kg for bleeding time, respectively; 13.50 and 13.58 IU/kg for blood loss, respectively. Moreover, at the doses tested, the accompanying dose-related safety evaluation in the tail bleeding model showed lower hypercoagulable tendency and wider dosage range potential for SCT800 than Xyntha. CONCLUSION: In hemophilia A mice, SCT800 shows comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to Xyntha at the doses tested, and possibly with better safety properties.

Identification of Epitopes for Neutralizing Antibodies Against H10N8 Avian Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin.

Objective To develop neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against H10N8 avian influenza virus hemagglutinin and to identify the binding sites. Methods MAbs against hemagglutinin of H10N8 avian influenza virus were developed by genetic engineering. Neutralizing MAbs were screened by microneutralization assay,and then tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot to identity the binding sites.The homology modeling process was performed using Discovery Studio 3.5 software,while the binding epitopes were analyzed by BioEdit software. Results One MAb that could neutralize the H10N8 pseudovirus was obtained and characterized. Analysis about epitopes suggested that the antibody could bind to the HA1 region of hemagglutinin,while the epitopes on antigen were conserved in H10 subtypes.Conclusions One neutralizing antibody was obtained by this research.The MAb may potentially be further developed as a pre-clinical candidate to treat avian influenza H10N8 virus infection.

Phase I study of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in Chinese patients with CD20-positive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics and biologic effects of a human-mouse chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (SCT400) in Chinese patients with CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (CD20(+) B-cell NHL). SCT400 has an identical amino acid sequence as rituximab, with the exception of one amino acid in the CH1 domain of the heavy chain, which is common in Asians. METHODS: Fifteen patients with CD20(+) B-cell NHL received dose-escalating SCT400 infusions (250 mg/m(2): n=3; 375 mg/m(2): n=9; 500 mg/m(2): n=3) once weekly for 4 consecutive weeks with a 24-week follow-up period. The data of all patients were collected for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics analyses. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Most drug-related adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Two patients had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Under premedication, the drug-related infusion reaction was mild. A rapid, profound and durable depletion of circulating B cells was observed in all dose groups without significant effects on T cell count, natural killer (NK) cell count or immunoglobulin levels. No patient developed anti-SCT400 antibodies during the course of the study. SCT400 serum half-life (T1/2), maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) generally increased between the first and fourth infusions (P<0.05). At the 375 mg/m(2) dose, the T1/2 was 122.5±46.7 h vs. 197.0±75.0 h, respectively, and the Cmax was 200.6±20.2 g/mL vs. 339.1±71.0 g/mL, respectively. From 250 mg/m(2) to 500 mg/m(2), the Cmax and AUC increased significantly in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.05). Patients with a high tumor burden had markedly lower serum SCT400 concentrations compared with those without or with a low tumor burden. Of the 9 assessable patients, 1 achieved complete response and 2 achieved partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: SCT400 is well-tolerated and has encouraging preliminary efficacy in Chinese patients with CD20(+) B-cell NHL.

A Review of Protein-Based COVID-19 Vaccines: From Monovalent to Multivalent Formulations.

The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), resulting in the COVID-19 pandemic, has profoundly impacted global healthcare systems and the trajectory of economic advancement. As nations grapple with the far-reaching consequences of this unprecedented health crisis, the administration of COVID-19 vaccines has proven to be a pivotal strategy in managing this crisis. Protein-based vaccines have garnered significant attention owing to their commendable safety profile and precise immune targeting advantages. Nonetheless, the unpredictable mutations and widespread transmission of SARS-CoV-2 have posed challenges for vaccine developers and governments worldwide. Monovalent and multivalent vaccines represent two strategies in COVID-19 vaccine development, with ongoing controversy surrounding their efficacy. This review concentrates on the development of protein-based COVID-19 vaccines, specifically addressing the transition from monovalent to multivalent formulations, and synthesizes data on vaccine manufacturers, antigen composition, pivotal clinical study findings, and other features that shape their distinct profiles and overall effectiveness. Our hypothesis is that multivalent vaccine strategies for COVID-19 could offer enhanced capability with broad-spectrum protection.

Current status and future directions for the development of human papillomavirus vaccines.

The development of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines has made substantive progress, as represented by the approval of five prophylactic vaccines since 2006. Generally, the deployment of prophylactic HPV vaccines is effective in preventing newly acquired infections and incidences of HPV-related malignancies. However, there is still a long way to go regarding the prevention of all HPV infections and the eradication of established HPV infections, as well as the subsequent progression to cancer. Optimizing prophylactic HPV vaccines by incorporating L1 proteins from more HPV subtypes, exploring adjuvants that reinforce cellular immune responses to eradicate HPV-infected cells, and developing therapeutic HPV vaccines used either alone or in combination with other cancer therapeutic modalities might bring about a new era getting closer to the vision to get rid of HPV infection and related diseases. Herein, we summarize strategies for the development of HPV vaccines, both prophylactic and therapeutic, with an emphasis on the selection of antigens and adjuvants, as well as implications for vaccine efficacy based on preclinical studies and clinical trials. Additionally, we outline current cutting-edge insights on formulation strategies, dosing schedules, and age expansion among HPV vaccine recipients, which might play important roles in addressing barriers to vaccine uptake, such as vaccine hesitancy and vaccine availability.

Immunogenicity of Tetravalent Protein Vaccine SCTV01E-2 against SARS-CoV-2 EG.5 Subvaraint: A Phase 2 Trial.

The Omicron EG.5 lineage of SARS-CoV-2 is currently on a trajectory to become the dominant strain. This phase 2 study aims to evaluate the immunogenicity of SCTV01E-2, a tetravalent protein vaccine, with a specific emphasis on its immunogenicity against Omicron EG.5, comparing it with its progenitor vaccine, SCTV01E (NCT05933512). As of 12 September 2023, 429 participants aged ≥18 years were randomized into the groups SCTV01E (N = 215) and SCTV01E-2 (N = 214). Both vaccines showed increases in neutralizing antibody (nAb) against Omicron EG.5, with a 5.7-fold increase and a 9.0-fold increase in the SCTV01E and SCTV01E-2 groups 14 days post-vaccination, respectively. The predetermined statistical endpoints were achieved, showing that the geometric mean titer (GMT) of nAb and the seroresponse rate (SRR) against Omicron EG.5 were significantly higher in the SCTV01E-2 group than in the SCTV01E group. Additionally, SCTV01E and SCTV01E-2 induced a 5.5-fold and a 5.9-fold increase in nAb against XBB.1, respectively. Reactogenicity was generally mild and transient. No vaccine-related serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs), or deaths were reported. In summary, SCTV01E-2 elicited robust neutralizing responses against Omicron EG.5 and XBB.1 without raising safety concerns, highlighting its potential as a versatile COVID-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variants.