Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: A Subgroup Analysis of the CHANCE-2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: The atherosclerotic sources of embolism are a significant contributor to embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). However, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of intensive dual antiplatelet therapy for ESUS. We conducted an investigation to determine whether gene-directed dual antiplatelet therapy could reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with ESUS. METHODS: CHANCE-2 (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that objectively compared ticagrelor plus aspirin and clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles in China. All study participants were classified into ESUS and non-ESUS groups for the prespecified exploratory analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the interaction of the state of ESUS with the effects of dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: The subgroup analysis comprised 5796 participants (90.4% of the total 6412 participants) in the CHANCE-2 trial, with a median age of 64.9 years (range, 57.0-71.4 years), of whom 1964 (33.9%) were female. These participants underwent diffusion-weighted imaging as part of the study protocol. After systematic evaluation, 15.2% of patients (881/5796) were deemed to have ESUS. The incidence of stroke recurrence in patients with ESUS was found to be 5.6% in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 9.2% in the clopidogrel-aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.99]; P=0.04). In patients without ESUS, the respective incidence rates were 5.6% and 7.5% (hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.58-0.90]; P<0.01). The P value was 0.56 for the treatment × ESUS status interaction effect. CONCLUSIONS: In this prespecified exploratory analysis, ticagrelor with aspirin was superior to clopidogrel with aspirin for preventing stroke at 90 days in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles and were classified as ESUS. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04078737.

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Carriers with Stroke or TIA.

BACKGROUND: Comparisons between ticagrelor and clopidogrel for the secondary prevention of stroke in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers have not been extensively performed. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 202 centers in China involving patients with a minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles. Patients were assigned within 24 hours after symptom onset, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive ticagrelor (180 mg on day 1 followed by 90 mg twice daily on days 2 through 90) and placebo clopidogrel or to receive clopidogrel (300 mg on day 1 followed by 75 mg once daily on days 2 through 90) and placebo ticagrelor; both groups received aspirin for 21 days. The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke, and the primary safety outcome was severe or moderate bleeding, both within 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 11,255 patients were screened and 6412 patients were enrolled, with 3205 assigned to the ticagrelor group and 3207 to the clopidogrel group. The median age of the patients was 64.8 years, and 33.8% were women; 98.0% belonged to the Han Chinese ethnic group. Stroke occurred within 90 days in 191 patients (6.0%) in the ticagrelor group and 243 patients (7.6%) in the clopidogrel group (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.94; P = 0.008). Secondary outcomes were generally in the same direction as the primary outcome. Severe or moderate bleeding occurred in 9 patients (0.3%) in the ticagrelor group and in 11 patients (0.3%) in the clopidogrel group; any bleeding occurred in 170 patients (5.3%) and 80 patients (2.5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among Chinese patients with minor ischemic stroke or TIA who were carriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, the risk of stroke at 90 days was modestly lower with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel. The risk of severe or moderate bleeding did not differ between the two treatment groups, but ticagrelor was associated with more total bleeding events than clopidogrel. (Funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China and others; CHANCE-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04078737.).

Genotype-Guided Dual Antiplatelet Use for Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke by Imaging Status: Subgroup Analysis of the CHANCE-2 Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to investigate whether ticagrelor/aspirin versus clopidogrel/aspirin can further reduce the residual risk of stroke recurrence in patients with positive diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events II (CHANCE-2) trial. METHODS: Patients with DWI data in the CHANCE-2 trial were included and divided into those with and without acute infarction according to their DWI findings. The primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome were stroke recurrence and moderate to severe bleeding within 3 months of follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 6,412 patients enrolled in the CHANCE-2 trial, 5,796 (90.4%) patients with DWI data were included in the subgroup analysis. A total of 4,369 patients (75.4%) had an acute infarction on DWI. Patients with positive DWI had higher risk of recurrent stroke (8.1%) than those without infarction (2.2%) within 3-month follow-up. Compared with clopidogrel/aspirin, ticagrelor/aspirin was associated with lower risk of stroke in patients with positive DWI (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.80, p < 0.001) than in those negative DWI (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.55-2.72, p = 0.63), with a significant interaction association (p for interaction = 0.049). The risk of moderate to severe bleeding was similar between ticagrelor/aspirin and clopidogrel/aspirin treatment in the different groups. INTERPRETATION: Our study demonstrates that imaging evaluation should be emphasized before targeting the best candidates for genotype-guided dual antiplatelet therapy in future clinical research and practice. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:783-792.

Differential effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel by homocysteine levels on risk of recurrent stroke: a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Elevated homocysteine levels are associated with increased blood coagulation and platelet activity and may modulate the response to antiplatelet therapies. We aimed to investigate the effects of homocysteine levels on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) versus clopidogrel-ASA among patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 (The Clopidogrel in High-risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II) trial. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with ticagrelor-ASA or clopidogrel-ASA. We categorized participants into groups with elevated and non-elevated homocysteine levels, based on the median level. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent stroke within 90-day follow-up. The primary safety outcome was severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 2740 participants were randomly assigned to receive ticagrelor-ASA and 2700 to receive clopidogrel-ASA. Use of ticagrelor-ASA was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke among participants with elevated homocysteine levels (74 [5.3%] v. 119 [8.5%]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.81), but not among those with non-elevated levels (86 [6.4%] v. 87 [6.7%]; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.71-1.32; p = 0.04 for interaction). When analyzed as a continuous variable, the benefits of ticagrelor-ASA with regard to recurrent stroke increased as homocysteine levels increased (p = 0.04 for interaction). No significant interaction between homocysteine levels and treatment with regard to severe or moderate bleeding was observed (p = 0.7 for interaction). We found a significant interaction between homocysteine levels and therapy with regard to recurrent stroke in females (p = 0.04 for interaction) but not males. INTERPRETATION: In comparison with clopidogrel-ASA, ticagrelor-ASA conferred more benefit to patients with elevated homocysteine levels, particularly to female patients, in this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial involving patients with minor ischemic stroke or TIA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT04078737.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapies and Causes in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Prespecified Analysis in the CHANCE-2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether patients with different stroke/transient ischemic attack etiologies benefit differently from gene-directed dual antiplatelet therapy. This study explored the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin in transient ischemic attack or minor stroke with different causes in the CHANCE-2 trial (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II). METHODS: This was a prespecified analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial, which enrolled 6412 patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles. Patients with centralized evaluation of TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) classification of large-artery atherosclerosis, small-vessel occlusion, and stroke of undetermined cause were included. The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke, and the primary safety outcome was severe or moderate bleeding, both within 90 days. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the interaction of TOAST classification with the effects of dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin. RESULTS: A total of 6336 patients were included in this study. In patients administered ticagrelor-aspirin and clopidogrel-aspirin, respectively, stroke recurred in 85 (9.8%) and 88 (10.7%) patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.63-1.18]; P=0.34); 32 (3.6%) and 61 (7.0%) patients with small-vessel occlusion (hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33-0.79]; P=0.002); and 68 (4.8%) and 87 (5.9%) patients with stroke of undetermined cause (hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.58-1.10]; P=0.17), with P=0.08 for the treatment×cause subtype interaction effect. There were no significant differences in severe or moderate bleeding events in patients with different cause and different treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this prespecified analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial, the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin in preventing new stroke were consistent in patients with different causes. The influence of stroke cause on benefit of gene-guided antiplatelet therapy should be explored by further trials. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04078737.

Bleeding Risk of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to identify the risk of bleeding events and potential risk factors within 90 days in patients who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles and received dual antiplatelet therapy after minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. METHODS: A total of 6,412 patients were enrolled from the CHANCE-2 (Clopidogrel with Aspirin in High-Risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events II) trial. The main outcome was any bleeding within 90 days defined by the criteria from GUSTO (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries). RESULTS: A total of 250 (3.9%) bleeding events were reported, which occurred mainly within the 21 days of dual antiplatelet therapy (200 cases, 3.1%). Minor bleeding of the skin bruises, epistaxis, and gum bleeding were most frequent. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with ticagrelor-aspirin compared with clopidogrel-aspirin was associated with increased bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.68-2.89, p < 0.001). Current smoking was associated with a lower risk of bleeding (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52-0.95, p = 0.02). Additionally, ticagrelor-aspirin compared with clopidogrel-aspirin was associated with higher risk of bleeding in patients aged <65 years (HR = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.95-4.22) and those without diabetes mellitus (HR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.88-3.73; p for interaction = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). INTERPRETATION: Bleeding events mostly occurred within the 21-day dual antiplatelet therapy stage and were generally mild. The risk of bleeding was greater in nonsmoking patients, and was associated with treatment with ticagrelor-aspirin compared with clopidogrel-aspirin, particularly in patients aged <65 years and nondiabetic patients. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:380-388.

Impact of body mass index on efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack.

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) may affect the response to platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. We aimed to explore whether BMI influenced the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel for secondary prevention of minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) among patients enrolled in the CHANCE-2 (Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel with Aspirin in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events II) trial. METHODS: In a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted in China, we randomized patients with minor stroke or TIA who carried the CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele to receive either ticagrelor-acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or clopidogrel-ASA. We classified patients into obese (BMI ≥ 28) or nonobese (BMI < 28) groups. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke within 90 days, and the primary safety outcome was severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days. RESULTS: Among 6412 patients, 876 were classified as obese and 5536 were classified as nonobese. Compared with clopidogrel-ASA, ticagrelor-ASA was associated with a significantly lower rate of stroke within 90 days among patients with obesity (25 [5.4%] v. 47 [11.3%]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.87), but not among those in the nonobese group (166 [6.0%] v. 196 [7.0%]; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69-1.04) The interaction of treatment and BMI group was significant (p for interaction = 0.04). We did not observe any difference by BMI group in rates of severe or moderate bleeding (9 [0.3%] v. 10 [0.4%] in the nonobese group; 0 [0.0%] v. 1 [0.2%] in the obese group; p for interaction = 0.99). INTERPRETATION: In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial involving patients with minor ischemic stroke or TIA, compared with clopidogrel-ASA, patients with obesity received more clinical benefit from ticagrelor-ASA therapy than those without obesity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT04078737.

Ticagrelor-Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel-Aspirin Among CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Carriers With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack in Relation to Renal Function: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CHANCE-2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the risk-benefit ratio of dual antiplatelet therapies among patients with stroke and impaired renal function is limited and inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of renal function on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin treatment. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04078737). SETTING: 202 centers in China. PATIENTS: CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele carriers with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. INTERVENTION: Ticagrelor-aspirin and clopidogrel-aspirin. MEASUREMENTS: Renal function was evaluated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent stroke and severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days, respectively. RESULTS: Among 6378 patients, 4050 (63.5%) had normal (eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2), 2010 (31.5%) had mildly decreased (eGFR 60 to 89 mL/min/1.73 m2), and 318 (5.0%) had moderately to severely decreased (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) renal function. The corresponding differences in recurrent stroke between ticagrelor-aspirin and clopidogrel-aspirin for normal, mildly decreased, and moderately to severely decreased renal function was -2.8 percentage points (95% CI, -4.4 to -1.3 percentage points) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [CI, 0.49 to 0.81]), -0.2 percentage point (CI, -2.4 to 2.0 percentage points) (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.69 to 1.39]), and 3.7 percentage points (CI, -2.3 to 10.1 percentage points) (HR, 1.31 [CI, 0.48 to 3.55]), respectively. Rates of severe or moderate bleeding did not substantially differ by treatment assignments across eGFR categories. LIMITATION: Renal function was only evaluated by using eGFR, and the proportion of patients with severely decreased renal function was low. CONCLUSION: Patients with normal, rather than impaired, renal function received greater benefit from ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China.

Effect of Hypertension on Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor-Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel-Aspirin in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a risk factor of poor stroke outcomes and associated with antiplatelet resistance. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin in patients with different hypertension status, using randomized trial data from the CHANCE-2 trial (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II). METHODS: A total of 6412 patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles were enrolled and randomized to either ticagrelor-aspirin or clopidogrel-aspirin group. Hypertension status were classified into no, newly diagnosed, and previously diagnosed hypertension according to medical history, blood pressure, and antihypertensive medications during hospitalization. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke recurrence and moderate to severe bleeding risk within 90-day follow-up. RESULTS: Ticagrelor-aspirin was associated with reduced risk of new stroke in patients without hypertension (32 [4.8%] versus 60 [7.2%]; hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.86]), but not in those with a newly diagnosed hypertension (20 [5.3%] versus 36 [9.1%]; hazard ratio 0.59 [95% CI, 0.33-1.07]), or those with a previously diagnosed hypertension (139 [7.0%] versus 147 [7.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.74-1.18]) compared with clopidogrel-aspirin (P=0.04 for interaction). The risk of bleeding for ticagrelor-aspirin was not associated with hypertension status (0.1% versus 0.4%; 0.3% versus 0.5%, 0.4% versus 0.3%, P=0.50 for interaction). All the efficacy and safety outcomes between treatments did not differ by blood pressure levels on admission. CONCLUSIONS: In the CHANCE-2 trial, patients without hypertension received a significantly greater benefit from ticagrelor- aspirin than those with previous hypertension after minor stroke or transient ischemic attack, and a similar benefit trend was observed in those with newly diagnosed hypertension. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04078737.

Association of acute kidney disease with the prognosis of ischemic stroke in the Third China National Stroke Registry.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney disease (AKD) evolves a spectrum of acute and subacute kidney disease requiring a global strategy to address. The present study aimed to explore the impact of AKD on the prognosis of ischemic stroke. METHODS: The Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III) was a nationwide registry of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack between August 2015 and March 2018. As a subgroup of CNSR-III, the patients who had serum creatinine (sCr) and serum cystatin C (sCysC) centrally tested on admission and at 3-month, and with 1-year follow-up data were enrolled. Modified AKD criteria were applied to identify patients with AKD during the first 3 months post stroke according to the guidelines developed by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes in 2012. The primary clinical outcome was 1-year all-cause death, and secondary outcomes were stroke recurrence and post stroke disability. RESULTS: Five thousand sixty-five patients were recruited in the study. AKD was identified in 3.9%, 6.7%, 9.9% and 6.2% of the patients by using sCr, sCr-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRsCr), sCysC-based eGFR (eGFRsCysC), and combined sCr and sCysC-based eGFR (eGFRsCr+sCysC) criteria, respectively. AKD defined as sCr or eGFRsCr criteria significantly increased the risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 2.67, 95% CI: 1.27-5.61; adjusted HR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.17-4.10) and post stroke disability (adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.04-2.44; adjusted OR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.08-2.11). AKD diagnosed by eGFRsCysC or eGFRsCr+sCysC criteria had no significant impact on the risk of all-cause death and post stroke disability. AKD, defined by whichever criteria, was not associated with the risk of stroke recurrence in the adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS: AKD, diagnosed by sCr or eGFRsCr criteria, were independently associated with 1-year all-cause death and post stroke disability in Chinese ischemic stroke patients.

Prognostic Metrics Associated with Inflammation and Atherosclerosis Signaling Evaluate the Burden of Adverse Clinical Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients.

BACKGROUND: Conventional prognostic risk factors can only partly explain the adverse clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke. We aimed to establish a set of prognostic metrics and evaluate its public health significance on the burden of adverse clinical outcomes of ischemic stroke. METHODS: All patients were from the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS). We established prognostic metrics of ischemic stroke from 20 potential biomarkers in a propensity-score-matched extreme case sample (n = 146). Pathway analysis was conducted using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. In the whole CATIS population (n = 3575), we evaluated effectiveness of these prognostic metrics and estimated their population-attributable fractions (PAFs) related to the risk of clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of death or major disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≥3) at 3 months after stroke. RESULTS: Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), S100A8/A9, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) were selected as prognostic metrics for ischemic stroke. Pathway analysis showed significant enrichment in inflammation and atherosclerosis signaling. All 4 prognostic metrics were independently associated with poor prognosis of ischemic stroke. Compared with patients having 1 or 0 high-level prognostic metrics, those with 4 had higher risk of primary outcome (OR: 3.84, 95%CI: 2.67-5.51; PAF: 37.4%, 95%CI: 19.5%-52.9%). CONCLUSION: The set of prognostic metrics, enriching in inflammation and atherosclerosis signaling, could effectively predict the prognosis at 3 months after ischemic stroke and would provide additional information for the burden of adverse clinical outcomes among patients with ischemic stroke.

Plasma S100A8/A9 Concentrations and Clinical Outcomes of Ischemic Stroke in 2 Independent Multicenter Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: S100A8/A9 is implicated in inflammation mechanisms related to atherosclerosis and plaque vulnerability, but it remains unclear whether S100A8/A9 is associated with the prognosis of ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate these associations in 2 independent multicenter cohorts. METHODS: Plasma S100A8/A9 concentrations at baseline were measured among 4785 patients with ischemic stroke from 2 independent cohorts: Infectious Factors, Inflammatory Markers, and Prognosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke (IIPAIS) and China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS). The primary outcome was a composite outcome of death or major disability at 3 months after ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes were major disability, death, and a composite outcome of death or vascular events. RESULTS: Among the combined participants of IIPAIS and CATIS, the adjusted odds ratios associated with the highest quartile of plasma S100A8/A9 were 2.11 (95% CI, 1.66-2.68) for the primary outcome and 1.62 (95% CI, 1.27-2.07) for the secondary outcome of major disability; adjusted hazard ratios were 4.14 (95% CI, 2.10-8.15) for the secondary outcome of death and 2.08 (95% CI, 1.38-3.13) for the composite outcome of death or vascular events. Each SD increase of log-transformed S100A8/A9 was associated with 28% (95% CI, 18%-39%; P < 0.001) increased risk of the primary outcome. Multivariable-adjusted spline regression analyses showed a linear association between plasma S100A8/A9 concentrations and primary outcome (P < 0.001 for linearity). Subgroup analyses further confirmed these associations. CONCLUSIONS: High plasma S100A8/A9 concentrations at baseline were independently associated with increased risks of adverse clinical outcomes at 3 months after ischemic stroke, suggesting that S100A8/A9 might have a role as a prognostic marker of ischemic stroke.

Serum Dkk-1 (Dickkopf-1) Is a Potential Biomarker in the Prediction of Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Objective- Serum Dkk-1 (dickkopf-1) level has been shown to be elevated in patients with ischemic stroke, but its impact on clinical outcomes of ischemic stroke remains unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between serum Dkk-1 and prognosis of ischemic stroke. Approach and Results- We measured serum Dkk-1 levels in 3178 patients with ischemic stroke from CATIS (China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke). The primary outcome was a combination of all-cause mortality and major disability (modified Rankin scale score, ≥3) at 1 year after stroke. Secondary outcomes were stroke recurrence and vascular events. After multivariate adjustment, elevated Dkk-1 levels were associated with an increased risk of primary outcome (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.89; Ptrend=0.015) when 2 extreme quartiles were compared. Each SD increase of log-transformed Dkk-1 was associated with 12% (95% CI, 1%-24%) increased risk of primary outcome. Multiple-adjusted spline regression model showed a linear association between serum Dkk-1 and risk of primary outcome ( P for linearity, 0.039). Subgroup analyses further confirmed these associations. The addition of serum Dkk-1 to conventional risk factors improved the predictive power for primary outcome (net reclassification improvement: 10.11%, P=0.029; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.21%, P=0.028). Conclusions- High serum Dkk-1 levels at baseline were associated with poor prognosis at 1 year after ischemic stroke, suggesting that serum Dkk-1 may be a potential prognostic biomarker for ischemic stroke. Further studies from other samples of patients with ischemic stroke are needed to replicate our findings and to clarify the potential mechanisms.

A Comparison of Mortality Prognostic Scores in Ischemic Stroke Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to compare the predictive accuracy of 4 recently established stroke mortality scores in the Chinese population, including the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke risk score, the iScore prediction rule for 30-day mortality, the iScore prediction rule for 1-year mortality, and the PLAN score. METHODS: We analyzed data from 9698 hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke in the China National Stroke Registry (September 2007-August 2008). Outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. To evaluate the performance of each model, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared using the z-test. RESULTS: Among 9698 patients, the mean age was 65.5 years and 38.6% were female. Overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality were 3.0%, 5.9%, and 14.6%, respectively. The AUC values of 4 scores for each outcome were all more than .75. The z-test did not show significant difference among the AUC values of these 4 scores. For patients who received thrombolysis therapy, these 4 scores had apparent reductions in the AUC values. CONCLUSIONS: We could confirm the predictive value of all these 4 scores for short-term and long-term mortalities in Chinese IS patients. However, these 4 scores need to be interpreted with caution in the patients who received thrombolysis therapy.

[Management of bilateral benign paroxysmal positional vertigo with Dix-Hallpike test].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnosis and treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) with bilateral positive Dix-Hallpike test. METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on the clinical data of BPPV patients diagnosed in the Dizziness Clinic of Changzheng Hospital from January 2012 to December 2012. Totally 490 patients with vertigo and nystagmus provoked by Dix-Hallpike maneuver were included in the present analysis. RESULTS: Among all the patients, 55 (11.2%) of them presented with bilateral nystagmus by the provocative test. According to the type of nystagmus provoked by Dix-Hallpike maneuver, the 55 patients can be divided into the following four categories. (1) Bilateral geotropic (n = 16) and apogeotropic nystagmus (n = 5): all these patients were diagnosed with horizontal canal BPPV and free of vertigo after head side-shaking exercise in supine position and Barbecue maneuver. (2) Bilateral predominant down-beating nystagmus (n = 2): patients in this group were diagnosed with anterior canal BPPV, and got recovered after Kim maneuver. (3) Bilateral torsional up-beating geotropic nystagmus (n = 20): after a lying-down test, 6 of the patients manifested as vertical up-beating nystagmus and 14 patients remained torsional up-beating nystagmus. The former were diagnosed with bilateral posterior canal BPPV, and were cured after bilateral PRM therapy, and the latter were diagnosed with horizontal canal BPPV, who were cured after Barbecue maneuver. (4) Torsional up-beating geotropic nystagmus on one side and down-beating nystagmus on the other side (n = 12). The down-beating nystagmus on the other side disappeared when the patients was firstly seated up with head down in 30 degrees for half an hour before second Dix-Hallpike maneuver. These patients were diagnosed with unilateral posterior canal BPPV and cured by PRM therapy. CONCLUSIONS: It is common for vertigo patients with bilateral nystagmus induced by Dix-Hallpike test. The diagnoses should be made by the types of nystagmus provoked step by step before maneuver therapy.

Effects of remnant cholesterol on the efficacy of genotype-guided dual antiplatelet in CYP2C19 loss-of -function carriers with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a post-hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial.

Background: The atherogenicity of remnant cholesterol (RC), a contributor to residual risk of cardiovascular events, has been underlined by recent guidelines. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between RC levels and the efficacy and safety of genotype-guided dual antiplatelet therapy in the CHANCE-2 trial. Methods: This post-hoc study used data from the CHANCE-2 trial, which was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6412 patients (aged >40 years) enrolled from 202 hospitals in China, between Sept 23, 2019, and March 22, 2021, who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles and had either an acute minor stroke or high-risk transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and could start treatment within 24 h of symptom onset. Participants received either (1:1) ticagrelor plus aspirin (control) or clopidogrel plus aspirin (intervention) and the effect of reducing the 3-month risk of any new stroke was assessed (ischemic or haemorrhagic, primary outcome). From the CHANCE-2 study population, we enrolled 5890 patients with complete data on RC. The cutoff point of RC for distinguishing patients with greater benefit from ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin was determined with subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot. The primary efficacy and safety outcome was recurrent stroke and severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days, respectively. CHANCE-2 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04078737. Findings: The cutoff to define elevated RC was 0.91 mmol/L. Ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke in patients with non-elevated RC levels (122 [5.3%] versus 179 [7.8%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.85), but this benefit was absent in those with elevated RC levels (58 [8.4%] versus 48 [7.3%]; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.73-1.65; P-interaction = 0.03). When analyzed as a continuous variable, the benefit of ticagrelor-aspirin on recurrent stroke decreased as RC levels increased. The rates of severe or moderate bleeding between treatment groups were similar across RC categories (0.3% versus 0.3%, P-interaction = 0.95). Interpretation: Our post-hoc findings suggest that RC could be a potential biomarker to discriminate patients who received more benefits from ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin therapy in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers with minor stroke or TIA. These findings need to be validated in an independent study. Funding: The National Key Research and Development Program of China, Beijing Natural Science Foundation Haidian original innovation joint fund, Fund for Young Talents of Beijing Medical Management Center, the high-level public health talents, Training Fund for Open Projects at Clinical Institutes and Departments of Capital Medical University; and Salubris.

The Influence of Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol on the Efficacy of Genotype-Guided Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Preventing Stroke Recurrence.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), which represents the total cholesterol content of all pro-atherogenic lipoproteins, has recently been included as a new target for lipid-lowering therapy in high-risk atherosclerotic patients in multiple guidelines. Herein, we aimed to explore the relationship between non-HDL-C level and the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin in preventing stroke recurrence. METHODS: This study comprised a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 (Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events II) trial, from which 5,901 patients with complete data on non-HDL-C were included and categorized by median non-HDL-C levels, using a cutoff of 3.5 mmol/L. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent stroke and severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days. RESULTS: Ticagrelor-aspirin significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with low non-HDL-C (71 [4.8%] vs. 119 [7.7%]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.74), but not in those with high non-HDL-C (107 [7.3%] vs. 108 [7.6%]; adjusted HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.67-1.16), compared with clopidogrel-aspirin (P for interaction=0.010). When analyzed as a continuous variable, the benefit of ticagrelor-aspirin for recurrent stroke decreased as non-HDL-C levels increased. No significant differences in the treatment assignments across the non-HDL-C groups were observed in terms of the rate of severe or moderate bleeding (5 [0.3%] vs. 8 [0.5%] in the low non-HDL-C group; 4 [0.3%] vs. 2 [0.1%] in the high non-HDL-C group; P for interaction=0.425). CONCLUSION: CHANCE-2 participants with low non-HDL-C levels received more clinical benefit from ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin compared to those with high non-HDL-C, following minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

One-Year Outcomes of Early Therapy With Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Carriers With Stroke or TIA Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel with Aspirin in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events II (CHANCE-2) trial showed that among Chinese patients with minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) who were carriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, dual-antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor-aspirin reduced the 90-day risk of stroke without increased severe or moderate bleeding compared with clopidogrel-aspirin. However, whether dual-antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel beyond the 90 days of follow-up remained unclear. In this study, we reported 1-year follow-up outcomes of the CHANCE-2 trial. METHODS: The CHANCE-2 trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 202 centers in China. Patients with a minor stroke or TIA who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles were randomized within 24 hours after symptom onset, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive ticagrelor and placebo clopidogrel or to receive clopidogrel and placebo ticagrelor for 90 days; both groups received aspirin for the first 21 days. After day 90, treatment was as per the choice of the clinician and the patient. RESULTS: Among 6,412 patients, the proportion of patients on ticagrelor plus aspirin, clopidogrel plus aspirin, ticagrelor alone, clopidogrel alone, aspirin alone, other antiplatelet, and no antiplatelet beyond month 3 to 1 year was 0.09%, 1.56%, 0.13%, 2.66%, 73.65%, 0.78%, and 21.13% in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 0.03%, 1.63%, 0.19%, 2.60%, 72.83%, 0.66%, and 22.06% in the clopidogrel-aspirin group, respectively. The primary outcome of new stroke occurred in 252 patients (7.91%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 310 patients (9.73%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group by 1 year of follow-up (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% CI 0.68-0.95; p = 0.007); new stroke beyond 3 months to 1 year occurred in 61 patients (2.07%) and 67 patients (2.32%) (p = 0.48), respectively. Primary safety outcome of severe or moderate bleeding occurred in 17 patients (0.53%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 20 patients (0.63%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group (p = 0.61). DISCUSSION: For CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele carriers, early dual-antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel at 1 year in reducing recurrent stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: URL: clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04078737. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with minor stroke or TIA with TIACYP2C19 loss-of-function, ticagrelor plus aspirin for 21 days is superior to clopidogrel plus aspirin in reducing the 1-year risk of recurrent stroke.

Efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in the elderly for stroke prevention: a subgroup analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence of the optimal antiplatelet therapy for elderly patients who had a stroke is limited, especially those elder than 80 years. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in old-old patients compared with younger patients in the ticagrelor or Clopidogrel with aspirin in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events-II (CHANCE-2) trial. METHODS: CHANCE-2 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in China involving patients with high-risk transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke with CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles. In our substudy, all enrolled patients were stratified by age: old-old (≥80 years), young-old (65-80 years) and younger (<65 years). The primary outcomes were stroke recurrence and moderate to severe bleeding within 90 days, respectively. RESULTS: Of all the 6412 patients, 406 (6.3%) were old-old, 2755 (43.0%) were young-old and 3251 (50.7%) were younger. Old-old patients were associated with higher composite vascular events (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.98, p=0.048), disabling stroke (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.88, p=0.0002), severe or moderate bleeding (HR 8.40, 95% CI 1.95 to 36.21, p=0.004) and mortality (HR 7.56, 95% CI 2.23 to 25.70, p=0.001) within 90 days. Ticagrelor-aspirin group was associated with lower risks of stroke recurrence within 90 days in younger patients (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.91, p=0.008), which was no differences in old-old patients. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients aged over 80 in CHANCE-2 trial had higher risks of composite vascular events, disabling stroke, severe or moderate bleeding and mortality within 90 days. Genotype-guided DAPT might not be as effective in old-old patients as in younger ones. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04078737.

Colchicine in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (CHANCE-3): multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of colchicine versus placebo on reducing the risk of subsequent stroke after high risk non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack within the first three months of symptom onset (CHANCE-3). DESIGN: Multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial. SETTING: 244 hospitals in China between 11 August 2022 and 13 April 2023. PARTICIPANTS: 8343 patients aged 40 years of age or older with a minor-to-moderate ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and a high sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥2 mg/L were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 within 24 h of symptom onset to receive colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily on days 1-3, followed by 0.5 mg daily thereafter) or placebo for 90 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome was any new stroke within 90 days after randomisation. The primary safety outcome was any serious adverse event during the treatment period. All efficacy and safety analyses were by intention to treat. RESULTS: 4176 patients were assigned to the colchicine group and 4167 were assigned to the placebo group. Stroke occurred within 90 days in 264 patients (6.3%) in the colchicine group and 270 patients (6.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.16); P=0.79). Any serious adverse event was observed in 91 (2.2%) patients in the colchicine group and 88 (2.1%) in the placebo group (P=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The study did not provide evidence that low-dose colchicine could reduce the risk of subsequent stroke within 90 days as compared with placebo among patients with acute non-cardioembolic minor-to-moderate ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and a high sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥2 mg/L. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05439356.