Association between ACE1 and missed abortion: ACE1 promotes H2O2-induced trophoblast cell injury in vitro†.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 1 (ACE1) in H2O2-induced trophoblast cell injury and the potential molecular mechanisms. Oxidative stress was modeled by exposing HTR-8/SVneo cells to 200 µM H2O2. Western blot and real-time quantitative PCR methods were used to detect protein and mRNA expression level of ACE1 in chorionic villus tissue and trophoblast HTR-8/SVneo cell. Inhibition of ACE1 expression was achieved by transfection with small interfering RNA. Then flow cytometry, Cell Counting Kit-8, and Transwell assay was used to assess apoptosis, viability, and migration ability of the cells. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected by fluorescent probes, and malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and reduced glutathione (GSH) activities were determined by corresponding detection kits. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 1 expression was upregulated in chorionic villus tissue of patients with missed abortion (MA) compared with individuals with normal early pregnancy abortion. H2O2 induced elevated ACE1 expression in HTR-8/SVneo cells, promoted apoptosis, and inhibited cell viability and migration. Knockdown of ACE1 expression inhibited H2O2-induced effects to enhance cell viability and migration and suppress apoptosis. Additionally, H2O2 stimulation caused increased levels of ROS and MDA and decreased SOD and GSH activity in the cells, whereas knockdown of ACE1 expression led to opposite changes of these oxidative stress indicators. Moreover, knockdown of ACE1 attenuated the inhibitory effect of H2O2 on the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 1 was associated with MA, and it promoted H2O2-induced injury of trophoblast cells through inhibiting the Nrf2 pathway. Therefore, ACE1 may serve as a potential therapeutic target for MA.

A new simplified risk assessment model enhances postoperative prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in Chinese adult patients with inguinal hernia (CHAT-3): A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) significantly affects the prognosis of surgical patients with inguinal hernia. The complex Caprini score, commonly used for postoperative VTE risk assessment, poses practical challenges for surgeons in clinical settings. METHODS: The CHAT-3 trial, a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, compared a simple three-factor model to assess VTE risk against routine practices in post-inguinal hernia surgery (IHS) patients. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention or control arm. The intervention group used the three-factor model to identify patients at moderate or high risk of VTE for subsequent prophylaxis according to clinical guidelines. Both groups were followed for four weeks, with randomization implemented using computer-generated sequences. The primary outcome measured was the rate of VTE prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included time spent on VTE risk assessment (surgeon self-reported), postoperative D-dimer trends, perioperative VTE occurrence, bleeding events, and the net clinical benefit. RESULTS: Of the 1,109 participants, 508 in the experimental group and 601 in the control group completed follow-up. The three-factor model showed higher VTE prophylaxis rates in all patients (pharmacologic prophylaxis: 26.2% vs. 6.00%, P<0.001) and particularly in those at high risk (pharmacologic prophylaxis: 57.3% vs. 9.50%, P<0.001). The experimental group significantly reduced VTE risk assessment time compared to the Caprini score (1.39±0.55 min vs. 5.73±1.35 min, P<0.001). The experimental group had lower D-dimer levels (0.26±0.73 mg/L vs. 0.35±0.55 mg/L, P=0.028). In the experimental group, the patients did not experience an increased risk of VTE (0% vs. 1.66%, P=0.268) and bleeding (1.18% vs. 0.67%, P=0.558) compared to the controls. There was no significant difference in net clinical benefit, which combined VTE and bleeding events, between the experimental and control groups (1.18% vs. 0.83%, P=0.559). CONCLUSION: Applying the simple three-factor model in perioperative VTE management could quickly identify the patient with a high risk of VTE and improve the prophylaxis rate of perioperative VTE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: XXX. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000033769.

Enhancing thromboprophylaxis after colorectal cancer surgery in China: Bridging the gap between evidence and implementation through pathway optimization.

BACKGROUND: The CRC-VTE trial conducted in China revealed a significant occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, raising concerns about implementing thromboprophylaxis measures. The present study aimed to identify and analyze inappropriate aspects of current thromboprophylaxis practices. METHODS: This study performed an analysis of the CRC-VTE trial, a prospective multicenter study that enrolled 1836 patients who underwent CRC surgery. The primary objective was to identify independent risk factors for VTE after CRC surgery using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, among the cases in which VTE occurred, the appropriateness of thromboprophylaxis was assessed based on several factors, including pharmacologic prophylaxis, time to initiate prophylaxis, drug selection, drug dosage, and duration of pharmacologic prophylaxis. Based on the analysis of the current state of thromboprophylaxis and relevant clinical guidelines, a modified Delphi method was used to develop a clinical pathway for VTE prophylaxis after CRC surgery. RESULTS: In this analysis of 1836 patients, 205 (11.2%) were diagnosed with VTE during follow-up. The multifactorial analysis identified several independent risk factors for VTE, including age (≥70 years), female sex, varicose veins in the lower extremities, intraoperative blood transfusion, and the duration of immobilization exceeding 24 h. None of the patients diagnosed with VTE in the CRC trial received adequate thromboprophylaxis. The main reasons for this inappropriate practice were the omission of thromboprophylaxis, delayed initiation, and insufficient duration of thromboprophylaxis. We developed a specialized clinical pathway for thromboprophylaxis after CRC surgery to address these issues. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a comprehensive nationwide evaluation of existing thromboprophylaxis practices in patients after CRC surgery in China. A specialized clinical pathway was developed to address the identified gaps and improve the quality of care. This clinical pathway incorporates explicit, tailored, detailed recommendations for thromboprophylaxis after CRC surgery.