ABSTRACT
In recent years, knowing the risks of stochastic effects of radiation, patient dose in diagnostic radiology is taken in to consideration extensively. Many countries and international organization, including International Commission on Radiological Protection, use quantities such as dose area product, entrance surface dose, etc. in radiological investigations, which serve as a guide for patient dose reduction. The concept of diagnostic reference level (DRL) is used to optimizing the dose of patients undergoing diagnostic radiology examinations. The present study aimed to review the studies on the DRLs in Iran. This study was conducted to review the status of patient dose in diagnostic radiology in Iran. A comprehensive literature search was performed without time constraints in the popular databases such as Google Scholar, Medline, Embase, PubMed, Irandoc, Iran Medex, Magiran and Scientific Information Database under the key words 'Entrance Surface Dose', 'dose area product, 'diagnostic reference level' and 'DRL' in Iran. Data on the radiation dose to patients has demonstrated further reductions in patient doses in the Iran. Considering advanced techniques and dose reduction methodologies complicates comparability between studies. Joint efforts of experts in the field of radiological protection and medical imaging and training program are necessary for achieving an acceptable condition.
Subject(s)
Radiation Protection , Radiology , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Iran , Reference ValuesABSTRACT
Background: The X-ray is a critical diagnostic and therapeutic tool with harmful effects. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has some recommendations regarding applying radiation protection principles. Objective: This study aimed to determine the standards of the typical radiation protection in radiographic departments of hospitals in Iran. Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, the usual radiation protection standards in places, such as the physical environment of the control and waiting rooms, radiographic devices, the physical space of the darkroom, and shielding facilities, were investigated using a checklist in Iran. A total of 84 hospitals in 51 cities throughout Iran were randomly selected, and the checklists were distributed to the radiation protection officers. In hospitals with multiple radiography rooms, the radiation protection officers were asked to complete the checklist about the room with the highest workload as a baseline to evaluate their facilities. Finally, the authors reviewed all checklists. Results: In radiology departments in control and waiting rooms, the mean of radiation protection was 71.9%. Pregnancy and radiation warning signs and labels were present in 96.1% of the parameters, while gonad shielding protocols were not presented. Conclusion: The principles of observed radiation protection were unsatisfactory, and it is recommended that surveillance be conducted at frequent intervals.