ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Systems of care have been developed across the United States to standardize care processes and improve outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The effect of contemporary STEMI systems of care on racial and ethnic disparities in achievement of time-to-treatment goals and mortality in STEMI is uncertain. METHODS: We analyzed 178 062 patients with STEMI (52 293 women and 125 769 men) enrolled in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease registry between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Patients were stratified into and outcomes compared among 3 racial and ethnic groups: non-Hispanic White, Hispanic White, and Black. The primary outcomes were the proportions of patients achieving the following STEMI process metrics: prehospital ECG obtained by emergency medical services; hospital arrival to ECG obtained within 10 minutes for patients not transported by emergency medical services; arrival-to-percutaneous coronary intervention time within 90 minutes; and first medical contact-to-device time within 90 minutes. A secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Analyses were performed separately in women and men, and all outcomes were adjusted for age, comorbidities, acuity of presentation, insurance status, and socioeconomic status measured by social vulnerability index based on patients' county of residence. RESULTS: Compared with non-Hispanic White patients with STEMI, Hispanic White patients and Black patients had lower odds of receiving a prehospital ECG and achieving targets for door-to-ECG, door-to-device, and first medical contact-to-device times. These racial disparities in treatment goals were observed in both women and men, and persisted in most cases after multivariable adjustment. Compared with non-Hispanic White women, Hispanic White women had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.12-1.72]), whereas Black women did not (odds ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.74-1.03]). Compared with non-Hispanic White men, adjusted in-hospital mortality was similar in Hispanic White men (odds ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.82-1.18]) and Black men (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.85-1.09]). CONCLUSIONS: Race- or ethnicity-based disparities persist in STEMI process metrics in both women and men, and mortality differences are observed in Hispanic White compared with non-Hispanic White women. Further research is essential to evolve systems of care to mitigate racial differences in STEMI outcomes.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Male , Humans , Female , United States/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Coronary Artery Disease/etiology , American Heart Association , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Hospital Mortality , RegistriesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Emergency nurses must quickly identify patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. However, no recent nationwide research has explored nurses' knowledge of acute coronary syndrome symptoms. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses' recognition of acute coronary syndrome symptoms, including whether nurses attribute different symptoms to women and men. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional, descriptive design using an online survey. Emergency nurses from across the United States were recruited using postcards and a posting on the Emergency Nurses Association website. Demographic data and participants' recognition of acute coronary syndrome symptoms, using the Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptom Checklist, were collected. Descriptive statistics and ordinal regression were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The final sample included 448 emergency nurses with a median 7.0 years of emergency nursing experience. Participants were overwhelmingly able to recognize common acute coronary syndrome symptoms, although some symptoms were more often associated with women or with men. Most participants believed that women and men's symptoms were either "slightly different" (41.1%) or "fairly different" (42.6%). Nurses who completed training for the triage role were significantly less likely to believe that men and women have substantially different symptoms (odds ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.25-0.87). DISCUSSION: Emergency nurses were able to recognize common acute coronary syndrome symptoms, but some reported believing that the symptom experience of men and women is more divergent than what is reported in the literature.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Nurses , Humans , Male , Female , United States , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Sex Characteristics , Clinical Competence , Cross-Sectional Studies , PerceptionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: False ventricular tachycardia (VT) alarms are common during in-hospital electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Prior research shows that the majority of false VT can be attributed to algorithm deficiencies. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was: (1) to describe the creation of a VT database annotated by ECG experts and (2) to determine true vs. false VT using a new VT algorithm created by our group. METHODS: The VT algorithm was processed in 5320 consecutive ICU patients with 572,574 h of ECG and physiologic monitoring. A search algorithm identified potential VT, defined as: heart rate >100 beats/min, QRSs > 120 ms, and change in QRS morphology in >6 consecutive beats compared to the preceding native rhythm. Seven ECG channels, SpO2 , and arterial blood pressure waveforms were processed and loaded into a web-based annotation software program. Five PhD-prepared nurse scientists performed the annotations. RESULTS: Of the 5320 ICU patients, 858 (16.13%) had 22,325 VTs. After three levels of iterative annotations, a total of 11,970 (53.62%) were adjudicated as true, 6485 (29.05%) as false, and 3870 (17.33%) were unresolved. The unresolved VTs were concentrated in 17 patients (1.98%). Of the 3870 unresolved VTs, 85.7% (n = 3281) were confounded by ventricular paced rhythm, 10.8% (n = 414) by underlying BBB, and 3.5% (n = 133) had a combination of both. CONCLUSIONS: The database described here represents the single largest human-annotated database to date. The database includes consecutive ICU patients, with true, false, and challenging VTs (unresolved) and could serve as a gold standard database to develop and test new VT algorithms.
Subject(s)
Electrocardiography , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Humans , Tachycardia, Ventricular/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Heart Ventricles , AlgorithmsABSTRACT
The introduction of Mission: Lifeline significantly increased timely access to percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In the years since, morbidity and mortality rates have declined, and research has led to significant developments that have broadened our concept of the STEMI system of care. However, significant barriers and opportunities remain. From community education to 9-1-1 activation and emergency medical services triage and from emergency department and interfacility transfer protocols to postacute care, each critical juncture presents unique challenges for the optimal care of patients with STEMI. This policy statement sets forth recommendations for how the ideal STEMI system of care should be designed and implemented to ensure that patients with STEMI receive the best evidence-based care at each stage in their illness.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , American Heart Association , Clinical Decision-Making , Comprehensive Health Care , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Disease Management , Health Education , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Policy , Humans , Patient Transfer , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Secondary Care Centers , United StatesABSTRACT
Importance: Recognizing the association between timely treatment and less myocardial injury for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), US national guidelines recommend specific treatment-time goals. Objective: To describe these process measures and outcomes for a recent cohort of patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of a diagnosis-based registry between the second quarter of 2018 and the third quarter of 2021 for 114â¯871 patients with STEMI treated at 648 hospitals in the Get With The Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease registry. Exposures: STEMI or STEMI equivalent. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment times, in-hospital mortality, and adherence to system goals (75% treated ≤90 minutes of first medical contact if the first hospital is percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]-capable and ≤120 minutes if patients require transfer to a PCI-capable hospital). Results: In the study population, median age was 63 (IQR, 54-72) years, 71% were men, and 29% were women. Median time from symptom onset to PCI was 148 minutes (IQR, 111-226) for patients presenting to PCI-capable hospitals by emergency medical service, 195 minutes (IQR, 127-349) for patients walking in, and 240 minutes (IQR, 166-402) for patients transferred from another hospital. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was lower for those treated within target times vs beyond time goals for patients transported via emergency medical services (first medical contact to laboratory activation ≤20 minutes [in-hospital mortality, 3.6 vs 9.2] adjusted OR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.48-0.60], and first medical contact to device ≤90 minutes [in-hospital mortality, 3.3 vs 12.1] adjusted OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.36-0.44]), walk-in patients (hospital arrival to device ≤90 minutes [in-hospital mortality, 1.8 vs 4.7] adjusted OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.40-0.55]), and transferred patients (door-in to door-out time <30 minutes [in-hospital mortality, 2.9 vs 6.4] adjusted OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.78], and first hospital arrival to device ≤120 minutes [in-hospital mortality, 4.3 vs 14.2] adjusted OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.26-0.71]). Regardless of mode of presentation, system goals were not met in most quarters, with the most delayed system performance among patients requiring interhospital transfer (17% treated ≤120 minutes). Conclusions and Relevance: This study of patients with STEMI included in a US national registry provides information on changes in process and outcomes between 2018 and 2021.
Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Male , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Hospital Mortality , Time-to-Treatment , Cross-Sectional Studies , Patient Transfer , Time FactorsABSTRACT
AIMS: Test for an association between prehospital delay for symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), persistent symptoms, and healthcare utilization (HCU) 30-days and 6-months post hospital discharge. BACKGROUND: Delayed treatment for ACS increases patient morbidity and mortality. Prehospital delay is the largest factor in delayed treatment for ACS. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data collected from a multi-center prospective study. Included were 722 patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with symptoms that triggered a cardiac evaluation. Symptoms and HCU were measured using the 13-item ACS Symptom Checklist and the Froelicher's Health Services Utilization Questionnaire-Revised instrument. Logistic regression models were used to examine hypothesized associations. RESULTS: For patients with ACS (n = 325), longer prehospital delay was associated with fewer MD/NP visits (OR, 0.986) at 30 days. Longer prehospital delay was associated with higher odds of calling 911 for any reason (OR, 1.015), and calling 911 for chest related symptoms (OR, 1.016) 6 months following discharge. For non-ACS patients (n = 397), longer prehospital delay was associated with higher odds of experiencing chest pressure (OR, 1.009) and chest discomfort (OR, 1.008) at 30 days. At 6 months, longer prehospital delay was associated with higher odds of upper back pain (OR, 1.013), palpitations (OR 1.014), indigestion (OR, 1.010), and calls to the MD/NP for chest symptoms (OR, 1.014). CONCLUSIONS: There were few associations between prehospital delay and HCU for patients evaluated for ACS in the ED. Associations between prolonged delay and persistent symptoms may lead to increased HCU for those without ACS.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Aftercare , Chest Pain/complications , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Discharge , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prehospital electrocardiogram(s) (ECG) can improve early detection of acute coronary syndrome (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], non-STEMI, and unstable angina) and inform prehospital activation of cardiac catheterization lab; thus, reducing total ischemic time and improving patient outcomes. Less is known, however, about the association of prehospital ECG ischemic findings and long term adverse clinical events. With this in mind, this study was designed to examine the: 1) frequency of prehospital ECGs for acute myocardial ischemia (ST-elevation, ST-depression, and/or T-wave inversion); and, 2) whether any of these specific ECG features are associated with adverse clinical events within 30 day of initial presentation to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We included consecutive patients ≥ 21 years during a five-year period (2013-2017), who were transported by ambulance to the ED with non-traumatic chest pain and/or anginal equivalent(s) and had a prehospital 12lead ECG. Two cardiologists (LG, EC), blinded to clinical data, interpreted the 12lead ECGs applying current guideline based ischemia criteria. Adverse clinical events, return to ED, and rehospitalization evaluated at 30-days. RESULTS: We identified 3646 patients (mean age, 59.7 years ±15.7; 45% female) with ECGs, of which N = 3587 had data on the three ischemic markers of interest. Of these, 1762 (49.1%) had ECG evidence of ischemia. In adjusted logistic regression models, those with T-wave inversion had a higher odds (OR = 1.59) of new onset heart failure, while ST-elevation was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.69). Patients with ST-depression had higher odds of new onset heart failure and death within 30 days (OR = 1.29, 1.49 respectively), but this association attenuated after controlling for other ECG features. CONCLUSIONS: ST-depression and/or T-wave inversion are independent predictors of new onset heart failure, within 30 days of initial ED presentation. Our study in a large cohort of patients, suggests that using ECG ST-elevation alone may not capture patients with ischemia who may benefit from aggressive anti-ischemic therapies to reduce myocardial damage with resultant heart failure.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Emergency Medical Services , Heart Failure , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Ambulances , Depression , Electrocardiography , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Background: The American Heart Association recommends acquiring and interpreting prehospital electrocardiograms (ECG) for patients transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the emergency department with symptoms highly suspicious of acute coronary syndrome. If interpreted correctly, prehospital ECGs have the potential to improve early detection of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and inform prehospital activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory, thus reducing total ischemic time and improving patient outcomes. Standardized protocols for prehospital ECG interpretation methods are lacking due to variations in EMS system design, training, and procedures. Objectives: We aimed to describe approaches for prehospital ECG interpretation in EMS systems across North Carolina (NC), and examine potential differences among systems. Methods: A 35-item internet survey was sent to all NC EMS systems (n = 99). Questions pertaining to prehospital ECG interpretation methods included: paramedic, computerized algorithm (i.e., software interpretation), combined approaches, and/or transmission for physician interpretation, transmission capability, cardiac catheterization laboratory activation, and EMS system characteristics (e.g. rural versus urban). Data were summarized and compared. Results: A total of 96 EMS systems across NC responded to the survey (97% response rate); of these, 69% were rural. EMS medical directors (53%) or EMS administrative directors (42%) completed the majority of surveys. While 91% of EMS systems had a prehospital ECG interpretation protocol in place, only 61% had a written cardiac catheterization laboratory activation policy. More than half (55%) of systems reported paramedic interpretation of prehospital ECGs, followed by a combined paramedic and software interpretation approach (39%), physician interpretation (4%), or software interpretation only approach (2%). Nearly 80% of EMS systems transmitted prehospital ECGs to receiving hospitals (always or sometimes), regardless of interpretation method. All EMS systems had some paid versus non-paid EMS personnel and the majority (86%) had both basic and advanced life support capabilities. Conclusions: Most NC EMS systems had a paramedic only ECG interpretation or paramedic in combination with a computerized algorithm approach. Very few used a physician read approach following transmission, even in rural service areas.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Electrocardiography , Emergency Medical Services , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , North Carolina , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosisABSTRACT
Objective: Prehospital electrocardiography (ECG) is recommended for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), yet only 20-80% of chest pain patients receive a prehospital ECG. Less is known about prehospital ECG use in patients with less common complaints (e.g., fatigue) suspicious for ACS who are transported by emergency medical services (EMS). The aims of this study were to determine: (1) the proportion of patients with chest pain and less typical complaints, and (2) patient characteristics associated with prehospital ECG use in patients transported by EMS to emergency departments across North Carolina. Methods: A novel linked database was created between prehospital and emergency department (ED) patient care data from the North Carolina Prehospital Medical Information System and the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool. Institutional review board approval and a data use agreement were received prior to the start of the study. Patients ≥21 transported during 2010-14 by EMS with select variables were included. We examined patients' complaints (symptoms), characteristics (e.g., race, ethnicity, final hospital diagnosis), and prehospital ECG use (yes/no). Analysis included descriptive statistics and mixed logistic regression. Results: During 2010-14, there were 1,967,542 patients with linked EMS-ED data (mean age: 56.9 [SD: 22.2], 43.2% male, 63.7% White). Of these, 643,174 (32.6%) received a prehospital ECG. Patients with prehospital ECG presented with the following complaints: 20% chest pain; 10% shortness of breath; 6% abdominal pain/problems; 6% altered level of consciousness; 5% syncope/dizziness; 4% palpitations; 12% other complaints; and 37% missing. Patients' presenting complaints were the strongest predictor of prehospital ECG use, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, urbanicity, and date and time of EMS dispatch. Conclusions: Patients with chest pain were significantly more likely to receive a prehospital ECG compared to those with less typical but suspicious complaints for ACS. Patients with less common presentations remain disadvantaged for early triage, risk stratification, and intervention prior to the hospital.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Angina Pectoris/diagnosis , Electrocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital , Adult , Aged , Angina Pectoris/etiology , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , North Carolina , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , TriageABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: More than 5.5 million patients present to emergency departments in the United States annually for potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, diagnosing ACS remains a challenge in emergency departments. Our aim was to describe the quality of symptoms (chest discomfort/description of pain, location/radiation, and overall symptom distress) reported by women and men ruled-in and ruled-out for ACS in emergency departments. METHODS: The sample consisted of 1,064 patients presenting to emergency departments with symptoms that triggered cardiac workups. Trained research staff obtained data using the ACS Patient Information Questionnaire upon patient presentation to emergency departments. RESULTS: The sample (n = 1,064) included 474 (44.55%) patients ruled-in and 590 (55.45%) patients ruled-out for ACS. Symptom distress was significantly higher in patients ruled-in versus ruled-out for ACS (7.3 ± 2.6 vs. 6.8 ± 2.5; P = 0.002) and was a significant predictor for an ACS diagnosis in men (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.17; P = 0.003). Women also reported more chest pressure (51.75% vs. 44.65; P = 0.02) compared with men, and chest pressure was a significant predictor for a diagnosis of ACS (OR, 1.61; CI, 1.03-2.53; P = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Higher levels of symptom distress may help ED personnel in making a decision to evaluate a patient for ACS, and the presence of chest pressure may aid in making a differential diagnosis of ACS.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/physiopathology , Emergency Nursing/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Age Factors , Chest Pain/etiology , Chest Pain/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Despite evidence linking rapid defibrillation to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival, bystander use of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) remains low, due in part to AED placement and accessibility. AED-equipped drones may improve time-to-defibrillation, yet the benefits and costs are unknown.METHODS We designed drone deployment networks for the state of North Carolina using mathematical optimization models to select drone stations from existing infrastructure by specifying the number of stations and the targeted AED arrival time. Expected outcomes were evaluated over the drone's lifespan (4 years). We estimated the following parameters: proportion of OHCAs within a targeted AED delivery time, bystander utilization of AEDs, survival/neurological status, and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).RESULTS Statewide, 16,503 adults aged 18 or older were expected to experience OHCA with an attempted resuscitation over 4 years. Compared to no drone network, all proposed drone networks were expected to improve survival outcomes. For example, assuming 46% of OHCAs have bystanders willing to use an AED, a 500-drone network decreased the median time of defibrillator arrival from 7.7 to 2.7 minutes compared to no drone network. Expected survival rates doubled (24.5% versus 12.3%), resulting in an additional 30,267 QALYs ($858/incremental QALY). If just 4.5% of OHCAs had willing bystanders, 13.8% of victims would have survived. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that an AED drone network remained cost-effective over a wide range of assumptions.CONCLUSIONS With proper integration into existing systems, large-scale networks for drone AED delivery have the potential to substantially improve OHCA survival rates while remaining cost-effective. Public health researchers should consider advocating for feasibility studies and policy development surrounding drones.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergency Medical Services , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Adult , Aged , Child, Preschool , Defibrillators , Equipment Design , Humans , North CarolinaSubject(s)
Defibrillators , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Time-to-Treatment , Aircraft , Humans , Manikins , Patient SimulationABSTRACT
Early diagnosis is critical in the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), because effective therapies are time-dependent. Aims of this secondary analysis were to determine: (i) the prognostic value of symptoms for an ACS diagnosis in conjunction with electrocardiographic (ECG) and troponin results; and (ii) if any of 13 symptoms were associated with prehospital delay in those presenting to the emergency department (ED) with potential ACS. Patients receiving a cardiac evaluation in the ED were eligible for the study. Thirteen patient-reported symptoms were assessed in triage. Prehospital delay time was calculated as the time from symptom onset until registration in the ED. A total of 1,064 patients were enrolled in five EDs. The sample was 62% male, 70% white, and had a mean age of 60.2 years. Of 474 participants diagnosed with ACS, 118 (25%) had STEMI; 251 (53%) had non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI); and 105 (22%) had unstable angina. Sweating (OR = 1.42 CI [1.01, 2.00]) and shoulder pain (OR = 1.64 CI [1.13, 2.38]) added to the predictive value of an ACS diagnosis when combined with ECG and troponin results. Shortness of breath (OR = 0.71 CI [0.50, 1.00]) and unusual fatigue (OR = 0.60 CI [0.42, 0.84]) were predictive of a non-ACS diagnosis. Sweating predicted shorter prehospital delay (HR = 1.35, CI [1.10, 1.67]); shortness of breath (HR = 0.73 CI [0.60, 0.89]) and unusual fatigue (HR = 0.72, CI [0.57, 0.90]) were associated with longer prehospital delay. Patient-reported symptoms are significantly associated with ACS diagnoses and prehospital delay. Sweating and shoulder pain combined with ECG signs of ischemia may improve the timely detection of ACS in the ED.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital , Symptom Assessment/methods , Acute Coronary Syndrome/nursing , Adult , Aged , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Symptom Assessment/nursingABSTRACT
Only a small proportion of research-tested interventions translate into broad-scale implementation in real world practice, and when they do, it often takes many years. Partnering with national and regional organizations is one strategies that researchers may apply to speed the translation of interventions into real-world practice. Through these partnerships, researchers can promote and distribute interventions to the audiences they want their interventions to reach. In this paper, we describe five nurse scientists' programs of research and their partnerships with networks of national, regional, and local organizations, including their initial formative work, activities to engage multi-level network partners, and lessons learned about partnership approaches to speeding broad-scale implementation.
Subject(s)
Community-Institutional Relations , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Nursing Research , Program Development , Decision Making, Organizational , Diffusion of Innovation , Goals , Humans , Interpersonal RelationsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The American Heart Association recommends individuals with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) activate the Emergency Medical Services' (EMS) 911 system for ambulance transport to the emergency department (ED), which enables treatment to begin prior to hospital arrival. Despite this recommendation, the majority of patients with symptoms suspicious of ACS continue to self-transport to the ED. The IMMEDIATE AIM study was a prospective study that enrolled individuals who presented to the ED with ischemic symptoms. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine differences in patients presenting the ED for possible ACS who arrive by ambulance versus self-transport on: 1) time-to-initial hospital electrocardiogram (ECG), 2) presence of ischemic ECG changes, and 3) patient characteristics. METHODS: Initial 12-lead ECGs acquired upon patient arrival to the ED were evaluated for ST-elevation, ST-depression, and T-wave inversion. ECG signs of ischemia were analyzed both individually and collapsed into an independent dichotomous variable (ED ECG ischemia yes/no) for statistical analysis. Patient characteristics tested included: gender, age, race, ethnicity, English speaking, living alone, mode of transport, and presenting symptoms (chest pain, jaw pain, shortness of breath, nausea/vomiting, syncope, and clinical history). RESULTS: In 1299 patients (mean age 63.9, 46.7% male), 384 (29.6%) patients arrived by ambulance to the ED. The mean time-to-initial ECG was 47minutes for ambulance patients versus 53minutes for self-transport patients (p<0.001). Mode of transport was found to be an independent predictor for time-to-initial ECG controlling for age, gender, and race (p=0.004). There were significantly higher rates of ECG changes of ischemia for patients who arrived by ambulance versus self-transport (p=0.02), and patient characteristics differed by mode of transport to the ED. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate that less than 30% of individuals with symptoms of ACS activate the EMS '911' system for ambulance transport to the ED. Individuals more likely to activate 911 have timelier ECG but higher rates of ischemic changes, specifically ST-depression and T-wave inversion. Individuals least likely to activate 911 are women, younger individuals, Latino ethnicity, live with a significant other, and those experiencing chest or jaw pain.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , Electrocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Transportation of Patients/standards , Age Distribution , California/epidemiology , Electrocardiography/methods , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Distribution , Symptom Assessment/methods , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of three different computerized electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation algorithms in correctly identifying STEMI patients in the prehospital environment who require emergent cardiac intervention. METHODS: This retrospective study validated three diagnostic algorithms (AG) against the presence of a culprit coronary artery upon cardiac catheterization. Two patient groups were enrolled in this study: those with verified prehospital ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) activation (cases) and those with a prehospital impression of chest pain due to ACS (controls). RESULTS: There were 500 records analyzed resulting in a case group with 151 patients and a control group with 349 patients. Sensitivities differed between AGs (AG1=0.69 vs AG2=0.68 vs AG3=0.62), with statistical differences in sensitivity found when comparing AG1 to AG3 and AG1 to AG2. Specificities also differed between AGs (AG1=0.89 vs AG2=0.91 vs AG3=0.95), with AG1 and AG2 significantly less specific than AG3. CONCLUSIONS: STEMI diagnostic algorithms vary in regards to their validity in identifying patients with culprit artery lesions. This suggests that systems could apply more sensitive or specific algorithms depending on the needs in their community.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/methods , Electrocardiography/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Female , Humans , Machine Learning , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
AIMS/METHODS: We studied 735 patients who activated "911" for chest pain and/or anginal equivalent symptoms and received 12-lead ECG monitoring with specialized ischemia monitoring software in the ambulance. Prehospital electrocardiograms (PH ECG) were analyzed to determine the proportion of patients who present with completely normal PH ECG findings (absence of ischemia/infarction, arrhythmia, or any other abnormality) and to compare outcomes among patients with and without any PH ECG abnormality. RESULTS: Of 735 patients (mean age 70.5, 52.4% male), 68 (9.3%) patients had completely normal PH ECG findings. They experienced significantly less adverse hospital outcomes (12% vs 37%), length of stay (1.19 vs 3.86 days), and long-term mortality (9% vs 28%) than those with any PH ECG abnormality (p<.05). CONCLUSION: Normal PH ECG findings are associated with better short and long-term outcomes in ambulance patients with ischemic symptoms. These findings may enhance early triage and risk stratification in emergency cardiac care.