Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Fluoresc ; 32(1): 397-404, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34977993

ABSTRACT

Reported here is a new [Cu4I4] cluster-based coordination polymer, namely [Cu4I4(bib)2]n·n(DMF) (1, bib = 1,4-bis(imidazolyl)butane, DMF = N,N'-dimethylformamide), which was synthesized by the self-assemble reaction of CuI, bib and KI under solvothermal conditions. Remarkably, compound 1 shows promising photocatalytic performance toward to the degradation of MB solution under visible light irradiation. For the COPD treatment, the ELISA detection kit was conducted to determine the content of INF-γ released by the respiratory tract mucosal epithelial cells. In addition to this, the activation levels of the NF-κB signaling pathway were still need to be assessed by the real time RT-PCR after the compound treatment.


Subject(s)
Copper/chemistry , Copper/pharmacology , Interferon-gamma/metabolism , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/metabolism , Animals , Catalysis , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Humans , Lethal Dose 50 , Mice , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Photochemical Processes , Polymers , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Respiratory Mucosa/cytology , Respiratory Mucosa/metabolism , Signal Transduction , X-Ray Diffraction
2.
Signal Transduct Target Ther ; 9(1): 215, 2024 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39134529

ABSTRACT

Dual inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathways offers the prospect of improving the effectiveness of EFGR-targeted therapy. In this phase 3 study (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04028778), 315 patients with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomized (1:1) to receive anlotinib or placebo plus gefitinib once daily on days 1-14 per a 3-week cycle. At the prespecified final analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), a significant improvement in PFS was observed for the anlotinib arm over the placebo arm (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.48-0.80, P = 0.003). Particularly, patients with brain metastasis and those harboring EGFR amplification or high tumor mutation load gained significant more benefits in PFS from gefitinib plus anlotinib. The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events was 49.7% of the patients receiving gefitinib plus anlotinib versus 31.0% of the patients receiving gefitinib plus placebo. Anlotinib plus gefitinib significantly improves PFS in patients with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , ErbB Receptors , Gefitinib , Indoles , Lung Neoplasms , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Quinolines , Humans , Gefitinib/administration & dosage , Gefitinib/adverse effects , Gefitinib/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Quinolines/administration & dosage , Quinolines/adverse effects , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Indoles/administration & dosage , Indoles/therapeutic use , Indoles/adverse effects , Male , Female , ErbB Receptors/genetics , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Middle Aged , Aged , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Adult , Aged, 80 and over
3.
Arch Oral Biol ; 147: 105630, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36709626

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to investigate possible connections between the oral microbiome and the onset and carcinogenesis of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). METHODS: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database, and SCOPUS by two authors independently, addressing the focused question- "Has oral microbiome dysbiosis been involved in the onset and carcinogenesis of oral epithelial dysplasia?" We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the quality of studies included in the review. RESULTS: Out of 580 references screened, ten studies were found eligible for inclusion. All studies were case-control studies, and only qualitative analysis was conducted due to heterogeneous characteristics. The overall risk of bias in the eligible studies was considered as high. Microbiome diversity indices showed inconsistent evidence among studies. A significant increase of phylum Bacteroidetes in OED patients was reported in five studies. Five studies reported an increase of genus Fusobacterium in both the OED and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients and six different studies respectively reported a reduction of genus Streptococcus in both the OED and OSCC groups when compared to normal controls. Other predominant bacteria that were specific to different patient groups varied in each study. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the included studies showed that the composition of the oral microbiome in patients with OED compared to healthy controls and OSCC patients was inconsistent. However, all ten studies showed non-negligible heterogeneity in the type and size of the sample, and the comparability between groups, which strongly limited the external validity of results. Further studies are strongly recommended.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Precancerous Conditions , Humans , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Precancerous Conditions/metabolism , Dysbiosis/complications , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Carcinogenesis
4.
Int J Endocrinol ; 2017: 1087017, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29109737

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To explore the differences in salivary BPI fold containing family A, member 1 (BPIFA1) concentration among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) subjects with various severities of chronic periodontitis and to determine whether BPIFA1 in saliva can be used as a potential biomarker of T2DM. METHODS: Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 44 subjects with T2DM and 44 without T2DM (NDM). Additionally, demographic data and general health parameters, including fasting blood glucose (FBG) and body mass index (BMI), were collected. We also detected full-mouth clinical periodontal parameters including probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding index (BI), and plaque index (PLI). Salivary BPIFA1, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations were also detected. RESULTS: BPIFA1 in saliva was detected at relatively high levels. T2DM subjects had decreased salivary BPIFA1 concentrations (P = 0.031). In T2DM subjects with nonperiodontitis or severe periodontitis, the level of BPIFA1 was significantly lower compared with that of NDM. Salivary TNF-α concentration displayed a similar trend to BPIFA1 in the NDM group. CONCLUSIONS: BPIFA1 protein is rich in saliva and might be used as a potential predictive biomarker of T2DM, especially in patients with severe periodontitis and nonperiodontitis. This trial is registered with ChiCTR-ROC-17010310.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL