Implementation of a patient dose monitoring system in conventional digital X-ray imaging: initial experiences.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to report on the initial experience after implementation of a patient dose-monitoring system in conventional X-ray imaging. METHODS: A dose-monitoring system collected dose data relating to different radiographs (one projection) and studies (two or more projections). Images were acquired on digital X-ray systems equipped with flat-panel detectors. During period 1, examinations were performed in a routine fashion in 12,614 patients. After period 1, technical modifications were performed and radiographers underwent training in radiation protection. During period 2, examinations were performed in 14,514 patients, and the radiographers were advised to read dose data after each radiograph/study. Dose data were compared by means of kerma area product (KAP, gray × centimetre squared) and entrance surface air kerma (ESAK, milligray). RESULTS: During period 1, 13,955 radiographs and 8,466 studies were performed, and in period 2 16,090 radiographs and 10,389 studies. In period 2, KAP values for radiographs were an average of 25 % lower and for studies 7 % lower, and ESAK values for radiographs were 24 % lower and for studies 5 % lower. The reduction in KAP was significant in 8/13 radiographs and in 6/14 studies, and the reduction in ESAK was significant in 6/13 radiographs and 5/14 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a patient dose-monitoring system in conventional X-ray imaging allows easy data collection, supports dose reduction efforts, and may increase radiographers' dose awareness. KEY POINTS: • A dose-monitoring system enables easy dose data collection in X-ray imaging. • The system facilitates dose reduction efforts and may increase radiographers' radiation awareness. • Mean kerma-area-product significantly declined in period 2 in 8/13 radiographs and 6/14 studies. • In ESAK a significant decline was evident in 6/13 radiographs and 5/14 studies.

Establishing Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in IR Procedures with Dose Management Software.

PURPOSE: To obtain local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in diagnostic and therapeutic IR procedures with dose management software to improve radiation protection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dose data of various vascular and nonvascular IR procedures performed within 18 months were collected and analyzed with dose management software. To account for different levels of complexity, procedures were subdivided into simple, standard, and difficult procedures as graded by interventional radiologists. Based on these analyses, local DRLs (given as kerma-area product [KAP]) were proposed. Comparison with dose data of others was conducted, and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate relationships between dose metrics. RESULTS: Analysis included 1,403 IR procedures (simple/standard/difficult, n = 346/702/355). Within the same procedure, KAP tended to increase with level of complexity. Overall, very strong correlation between KAP (Gy ∙ cm2) and cumulative air kerma (KA,R; Gy) was observed, and moderate to strong correlation between KAP and time and KA,R and time was observed. For simple procedures, strong correlation was seen between KAP and time and KA,R and time; for standard and difficult procedures, only moderate correlation was seen. Correlation between KAP and time and KA,R and time was strong in nonvascular procedures but only moderate in vascular procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Dose management software can be used to derive local DRLs for various IR procedures, taking into consideration different levels of complexity. Proposed local DRLs can contribute to obtaining detailed national DRLs as part of efforts to improve patients' radiation protection further.

Combined Use of a Patient Dose Monitoring System and a Real-Time Occupational Dose Monitoring System for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventions.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect on patient radiation exposure of the combined use of a patient dose monitoring system and real-time occupational dose monitoring during fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient radiation exposure, in terms of the kerma area product (KAP; Gy ∙ cm(2)), was measured in period 1 with a patient dose monitoring system, and a real-time occupational dose monitoring system was additionally applied in period 2. Mean/median KAP in 19 different types of FGIs was analyzed in both periods for two experienced interventional radiologists combined as well as individually. Patient dose and occupational dose were correlated, applying Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Although FGIs were similar in numbers and types over both periods, a substantial decrease was found for period 2 in total mean ± SD/median KAP for both operators together (period 1, 47 Gy ∙ cm(2) ± 67/41 Gy ∙ cm(2); period 2, 37 Gy ∙ cm(2) ± 69/34 Gy ∙ cm(2)) as well as for each individual operator (for all, P < .05). Overall, KAP declined considerably in 15 of 19 types of FGIs in period 2. Mean accumulated dose per intervention was 4.6 µSv, and mean dose rate was 0.24 mSv/h. There was a strong positive correlation between patient and occupational dose (r = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of a patient dose monitoring system and a real-time occupational dose monitoring system in FGIs significantly lessens patient and operator doses.

Does Real-Time Monitoring of Patient Dose With Dose Management Software Increase CT Technologists' Radiation Awareness?

OBJECTIVE: Dose management software can be used to increase patient safety. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether real-time monitoring of patient dose in CT examinations increases CT technologists' dose awareness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dose data of two scanners (clinical routine CT scanner, mainly outpatients; emergency CT scanner, predominantly emergency department and ICU patients) were analyzed before (period 1) and after (period 2) dose management software was implemented in clinical routine and technologists were advised to check for dose notifications (dose values above reference levels) after each examination (i.e., real-time monitoring). To assess statistically significant differences between both the scanners and the study periods, we used chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 6413 examinations were performed (period 1 = 3214 examinations, period 2 = 3199 examinations). Dose notifications were mainly because of patient miscentering (period 1 = 45% of examinations, period 2 = 23%), overweight patients (period 1 = 35%, period 2 = 49%), and scanning repetition (period 1 = 10%, period 2 = 15%). Overall, the number of dose notifications significantly declined in period 2 (period 1, n = 210; period 2, n = 120; p < 0.001). Miscentering was more often seen on the clinical routine CT examinations (period 1 = 46%, period 2 = 23%) than on the emergency CT examinations (period 1 = 44%, period 2 = 22%) and occurred significantly less frequently on both scanners in period 2 (period 1: n = 94; period 2: n = 27; p < 0.001). The relative values of dose notifications due to overweight patients or scanning repetition were higher in period 2, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Real-time monitoring of patient dose with dose management software increases CT technologists' dose awareness and leads to a reduced number of dose notifications due to human error.