ABSTRACT
Candidemia is the main invasive fungal disease among hospitalized patients. Several breakthrough candidemia (BrC) cases have been reported, but few studies evaluate the epidemiology, risk factors, molecular characterization, antifungal susceptibility profile and outcome of those patients, especially in developing countries and including patients using broad spectrum antifungals. We conducted a retrospective study from 2011 to 2016, including patients aged 12 years or older with candidemia. Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors for candidemia were evaluated and compared with patients with BrC using univariate and multivariate analysis. Sequential Candida isolates from BrC were identified by internal transcribed spacer sequencing, genotyped with amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting (AFLP), and tested for antifungal susceptibility. From 148 candidemia episodes, 27 breakthrough episodes (18%) were identified, with neutropenia and mucositis being independent risk factors for BrC. Candida non-albicans was more frequent in the BrC group (P < .001). AFLP showed high correlation with conventional methods of identification among breakthrough isolates and a high genetic similarity among isolates from the same patient was observed. C. albicans was the most susceptible species with low MIC values for all antifungal agents tested. In contrast, we found isolates of C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis resistant to triazoles and echinocandins. In conclusion, BrC occurred mainly in severely immunosuppressed patients, with neutropenia and mucositis. Mortality did not differ between the groups. Candida non-albicans species were more recovered from BrC, with C. albicans being the most susceptible to antifungals.
Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida/drug effects , Candidemia/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis , Brazil , Candida/classification , Candida/isolation & purification , Candidemia/diagnosis , Candidemia/epidemiology , Candidemia/microbiology , Child , Drug Resistance, Fungal/drug effects , Female , Humans , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Invasive Fungal Infections/prevention & control , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
A panel of national experts was convened by the Brazilian Infectious Diseases Society in order to organize the national recommendations for the management of zika virus infection. The focus of this document is the diagnosis, both clinical and laboratorial, and appropriate treatment of the diverse manifestations of this infection, ranging from acute mild disease to Guillain-Barré syndrome and also microcephaly and congenital malformations.
ABSTRACT
Candida glabrata is an infrequent cause of candidemia in Brazilian public hospitals. We investigated putative differences in the epidemiology of candidemia in institutions with different sources of funding. Prospective laboratory-based surveillance of candidemia was conducted in seven private and two public Brazilian tertiary care hospitals. Among 4,363 episodes of bloodstream infection, 300 were caused by Candida spp. (6.9%). Incidence rates were significantly higher in public hospitals, i.e., 2.42 vs. 0.91 episodes per 1,000 admissions (P< 0.01). Patients in private hospitals were older, more likely to be in an intensive care unit and to have been exposed to fluconazole before candidemia. Candida parapsilosis was more frequently recovered as the etiologic agent in public (33% vs. 16%, P< 0.001) hospitals, whereas C. glabrata was more frequently isolated in private hospitals (13% vs. 3%, P < 0.001). Fluconazole resistance among C. glabrata isolates was more frequent in private hospitals (76.5% vs. 20%, P = 0.02). The 30-day mortality was slightly higher among patients in public hospitals (53% vs. 43%, P = 0.10). Candida glabrata is an emerging pathogen in private institutions and in this setting, fluconazole should not be considered as a safe option for primary therapy of candidemia.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida glabrata/isolation & purification , Candidemia/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil/epidemiology , Candida glabrata/drug effects , Candidemia/drug therapy , Candidemia/epidemiology , Candidemia/mortality , Child , Child, Preschool , Demography , Drug Resistance, Fungal , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Fluconazole/pharmacology , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Hospitals , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Laboratories, Hospital , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tertiary Healthcare , Young AdultABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Reduction mammaplasty is one of the most common surgeries performed by plastic surgeons. It relieves back and neck pain and improves the aesthetic contour of the ptotic breast. Postsurgical pyoderma gangrenosum (PSPG) is an unusual inflammatory disorder leading to rapidly progressive skin necrosis that can occur after any surgical procedure. The skin lesions have the characteristic appearance of ulcers with a purple-colored border and erythematous halo. Clinically, the patient has a low fever and severe local pain. In the majority of cases this disease is misdiagnosed as severe infection leading to improper debridement, exacerbating the problem. The mainstay of therapy for PSPG is still nonoperative and focuses on immunosuppressive medications and local wound care, which allows healing in the majority of the cases. It is important for plastic surgeons and infectologists to be cognizant of this entity, as a delay in diagnosis and management can be life-threatening and lead to considerable tissue loss and disfigurement of the breast. The authors report a case of reduction mammaplasty complicated with PSPG and its treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Subject(s)
Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Pyoderma Gangrenosum/etiology , Female , Humans , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen that causes a range of serious infections that are often challenging to treat, as this pathogen can express multiple resistance mechanisms, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a combination antimicrobial agent comprising ceftazidime, a third-generation semisynthetic cephalosporin, and avibactam, a novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor. This review explores the potential role of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. Ceftazidime-avibactam has good in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa relative to comparator ß-lactam agents and fluoroquinolones, comparable to amikacin and ceftolozane-tazobactam. In Phase 3 clinical trials, ceftazidime-avibactam has generally demonstrated similar clinical and microbiological outcomes to comparators in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections or hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa. Although real-world data are limited, favourable outcomes with ceftazidime-avibactam treatment have been reported in some patients with MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa infections. Thus, ceftazidime-avibactam may have a potentially important role in the management of serious and complicated P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by MDR and XDR strains.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Invasive candidosis is increasingly prevalent in seriously ill patients. Our aim was to compare micafungin with liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of adult patients with candidaemia or invasive candidosis. METHODS: We did a double-blind, randomised, multinational non-inferiority study to compare micafungin (100 mg/day) with liposomal amphotericin B (3 mg/kg per day) as first-line treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidosis. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as both a clinical and a mycological response at the end of treatment. Primary analyses were done on a per-protocol basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00106288. FINDINGS: 264 individuals were randomly assigned to treatment with micafungin; 267 were randomly assigned to receive liposomal amphotericin B. 202 individuals in the micafungin group and 190 in the liposomal amphotericin B group were included in the per-protocol analyses. Treatment success was observed for 181 (89.6%) patients treated with micafungin and 170 (89.5%) patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B. The difference in proportions, after stratification by neutropenic status at baseline, was 0.7% (95% CI -5.3 to 6.7). Efficacy was independent of the Candida spp and primary site of infection, as well as neutropenic status, APACHE II score, and whether a catheter was removed or replaced during the study. There were fewer treatment-related adverse events--including those that were serious or led to treatment discontinuation--with micafungin than there were with liposomal amphotericin B. INTERPRETATION: Micafungin was as effective as--and caused fewer adverse events than--liposomal amphotericin B as first-line treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidosis.
Subject(s)
Amphotericin B/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Lipoproteins/therapeutic use , Peptides, Cyclic/therapeutic use , APACHE , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Candidiasis/complications , Candidiasis/microbiology , Double-Blind Method , Echinocandins , Female , Humans , Lipopeptides , Male , Micafungin , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is used for the prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease (IFD). Previous studies have shown it to be cost-effective compared to fluconazole/itraconazole. However, posaconazole has never been economically evaluated in developing countries. AIMS: The aim of the present study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of posaconazole compared to fluconazole in public (SUS) and private hospitals (PHS) in Brazil. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness simulation was conducted on the basis of a pivotal study on the use of posaconazole in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, adjusting the costs to Brazilian data. RESULTS: A pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed on a hypothetical sample of 100 patients in each drug group. The total cost of posaconazole use alone was USD$ 220,656.31, whereas that for fluconazole was USD$ 83,875.00. Our results showed that patients with IFD remain hospitalized for an additional 12 days, at an average cost of USD$ 850.85 per patient per day. The total money spent by PHS for 100 patients for 100 days was USD$ 342,318.00 for the posaconazole group and USD$ 302,039.00 for the fluconazole group. An analysis of sensitivity (10%) revealed no intergroup difference. CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil posaconazole is cost-effective, and should be considered for the prophylaxis of patients with AMD/myelodysplasia (AML/MDS) undergoing chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/economics , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Private/economics , Hospitals, Public/economics , Mycoses/prevention & control , Triazoles/economics , Brazil , Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia/complications , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Developing Countries/economics , Fluconazole/economics , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Itraconazole/economics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Mycoses/economics , Mycoses/etiologyABSTRACT
This is part of the series of practice guidelines commissioned by the Brazilian Society for Infectious Diseases through its Practice Guidelines Committee. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide assistance to clinicians in the antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in immunocompetent adults. Panel members and consultants are experts in adult infectious diseases. The guidelines are evidence based where possible. The recommendations included in this document were elaborated based on the most frequently isolated pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibilities. The etiology was based mainly on international studies, since there are very few regional data. On the other hand, the antimicrobial susceptibilities of main bacterial causes of CAP were based on the results of several antimicrobial resistance surveillance studies recently performed in Brazil. Other reference guidelines for the treatment of CAP, such as those elaborated by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and by the Canadian Infectious Diseases Society, were also discussed by the group during the elaboration of this document.
Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Community-Acquired Infections/classification , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Pneumonia/classification , Pneumonia/microbiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Vancomycin has been used with increased frequency during the past 15 years and the most common toxicity with this drug is the red man syndrome . Other adverse effects include neutropenia, fever, phlebitis, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, thrombocytopenia, interstitial nephritis, lacrimation, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, necrotizing cutaneous vasculitis and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Only two cases of vancomycin-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and one case of pancytopenia have been reported in the medical literature. The treatment for both situations is based on cessation of the vancomycin therapy; in cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome, antihistamine and/or steroid agents can be used. This article reports a case of pancytopenia and a case of erythema major associated with neutropenia.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Erythema/chemically induced , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Vancomycin/adverse effects , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Female , Fever/chemically induced , Hip Prosthesis , Humans , Methicillin Resistance , Middle Aged , Ofloxacin/therapeutic use , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Pruritus/chemically induced , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Syndrome , Vancomycin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Long-term potent activity of antiretrovirals is essential for HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced patients. TITAN (TMC114/r In Treatment-experienced pAtients Naive to lopinavir) compared Week-96 efficacy and safety of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) versus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r). Treatment-experienced, LPV-naive, HIV-1-infected patients were randomised to DRV/r 600/100 mg bid or LPV/r 400/100 mg bid plus optimised background regimen (≥ 2 NRTIs/NNRTIs). 595 patients were enrolled (mean baseline HIV-1 RNA: 4.30 log10 copies/mL; median CD4 count: 232 cells/mm3). At Week 96, more DRV/r than LPV/r patients achieved HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (66.8% versus 58.9% [intent-to-treat (ITT)/time-to-loss of virological response (TLOVR)], estimated difference 8.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-16.7), demonstrating the primary endpoint of non-inferiority of DRV/r (p < 0.001); the difference in response was statistically significant (p = 0.034). For the secondary efficacy parameter (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) at Week 96, response to DRV/r was 60.4% versus 55.2% for LPV/r (ITT-TLOVR), estimated difference 5.8%, 95% CI: -2.3-13.9. Virological failure (VF; HIV-1 RNA > 400 copies/mL) with DRV/r (13.8%) was nearly half that with LPV/r (25.6%). Discontinuations due to adverse events were 8.1% for both DRV/r and LPV/r. Treatment-related grade 2-4 diarrhoea was 8.1% (DRV/r) versus 15.2% (LPV/r). Increases in triglycerides and total cholesterol were less pronounced with DRV/r. At 96 weeks, noninferiority (HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL) of DRV/r over LPV/r was maintained; the difference in response was statistically significant. VF rate and treatment-related grade 2-4 diarrhoea were lower with DRV/r versus LPV/r.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , HIV-1 , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Adult , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Darunavir , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , HIV Protease Inhibitors/adverse effects , HIV-1/isolation & purification , Humans , Logistic Models , Lopinavir/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral/analysis , Ritonavir/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Viral LoadABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The inclusion of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) into national immunization programs in many countries has significantly decreased the incidence of disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, a substantial portion of disease remained and, in some areas, there has been an increase in disease produced by serotypes not included in PCV7. A 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was studied in healthy Brazilian infants in a phase 3, double-blind, randomized study. METHODS: Infants were randomized to receive either PCV7 or PCV13 at 2, 4, 6, (doses 1-3), and 12 (toddler dose) months of age, along with routine pediatric vaccinations (diphtheria, tetanus, whole-cell pertussis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine). Pneumococcal anticapsular polysaccharide-binding immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses and antibody responses to pertussis antigens were measured 1 month after both dose 3 of the infant series and the toddler dose. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: The proportion of subjects achieving a serotype-specific IgG concentration ≥0.35µg/mL measured 1 month after the infant series was comparable in the PCV13 (≥94.2%) and PCV7 (≥93.0%) groups for the 7 serotypes common to both vaccines. The percentage of responders for the 6 additional serotypes ranged from 87.1 to 100% for PCV13. The percentage of responders varied across the pertussis antigens studied, but was not different in PCV13 and PCV7 recipients. Overall, the safety profile of PCV13 was comparable with that of PCV7. CONCLUSIONS: PCV13 was comparable to PCV7 in safety and tolerability, elicited comparable immune responses to the common serotypes, and did not interfere with immune responses to concomitantly administered whole-cell pertussis vaccine. The robust immunogenicity exhibited by PCV13 for the additional serotypes suggests that it could provide significant protection against these serotypes.
Subject(s)
Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Brazil , Double-Blind Method , Female , Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine , Humans , Immunization Programs , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Infant , Male , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosageABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Analyze patients with HIV infection from Curitiba, Paraná, their epidemiological characteristics and HIV RAM. METHODS: Patients regularly followed in an ID Clinic had their medical data evaluated and cases of virological failure were analyzed with genotypic report. RESULTS: Patients with complete medical charts were selected (n = 191). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. One hundred thirty two patients presented with subtype B infection (69.1%), 41 subtype C (21.5%), 10 subtype F (5.2%), 7 BF (3.7%) and 1 CF (0.5%). Patients with subtype B infection had been diagnosed earlier than patients with subtype non-B. Also, subtype B infection was more frequent in men who have sex with men, while non-B subtypes occurred more frequently in heterosexuals and women. Patients with previous history of three classes of ARVs (n = 161) intake were selected to evaluate resistance. For RT inhibitors, 41L and 210W were more frequently observed in subtype B than in non-B strains. No differences between subtypes and mutations were observed to NNTRIs. Mutations at 10, 32 and 63 position of protease were more observed in subtype B viruses than non-B, while positions 20 and 36 of showed more amino acid substitutions in subtype non-B viruses. Patients with history of NFV intake were evaluated to resistance pathway. The 90M pathway was more frequent in subtypes B and non-B. Mutations previously reported as common in non-B viruses, such as 65R and 106M, were uncommon in our study. Mutations 63P and 36I, previously reported as common in HIV-1 subtypes B and C from Brazil, respectively, were common. CONCLUSION: There is a significant frequency of HIV-1 non-B infections in Paraná state, with isolates classified as subtypes C, F, BF and BC. Patients with subtype C infection were more frequently female, heterosexual and had a longer average time of HIV diagnosis.