ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pruritus may seriously impair quality of life in patients with cholestatic diseases such as primary or secondary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC, SSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Pharmacologic strategies show limited efficacy and can provoke serious side effects. We hypothesized that bezafibrate, a broad peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist, relieves cholestasis-associated itch by alleviating hepatobiliary injury. The aim of this investigator-initiated FITCH trial (Fibrates for cholestatic ITCH) was to assess effects of bezafibrate on pruritus in patients with PSC, PBC, and SSC. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe pruritus (≥5 of 10 on visual analog scale [VAS]) due to PSC, PBC, or SSC were recruited for this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial between 2016 and 2019. Patients received once-daily bezafibrate (400 mg) or placebo for 21 days. The primary end point was ≥50% reduction of pruritus (VAS; intention-to-treat). RESULTS: Of 74 randomized patients, 70 completed the trial (95%; 44 PSC, 24 PBC, 2 SSC). For the primary end point, bezafibrate led in 45% (41% PSC, 55% PBC) and placebo in 11% to ≥50% reduction of severe or moderate pruritus (P = .003). For secondary end points, bezafibrate reduced morning (P = .01 vs placebo) and evening (P = .007) intensity of pruritus (VAS) and improved the validated 5D-Itch questionnaire (P = .002 vs placebo). Bezafibrate also reduced serum alkaline phosphatase (-35%, P = .03 vs placebo) correlating with improved pruritus (VAS, P = .01) suggesting reduced biliary damage. Serum bile acids and autotaxin activity remained unchanged. Serum creatinine levels tended to mildly increase (3% bezafibrate, 5% placebo, P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: Bezafibrate is superior to placebo in improving moderate to severe pruritus in patients with PSC and PBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, ID: NTR5436 (August 3, 2015), ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02701166 (March 2, 2016).
Subject(s)
Bezafibrate/administration & dosage , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/complications , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/complications , Pruritus/drug therapy , Adult , Bezafibrate/adverse effects , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos/administration & dosage , Placebos/adverse effects , Pruritus/diagnosis , Pruritus/etiology , Pruritus/psychology , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Visual Analog ScaleABSTRACT
Overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) negatively impacts the prognosis of liver transplant candidates. However, it is not taken into account in most prioritizing organ allocation systems. We aimed to assess the impact of OHE on waitlist mortality in 3 cohorts of cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation, with differences in the composition of patient population, transplantation policy, and transplantation rates. These cohorts were derived from two centers in the Netherlands (reference and validation cohort, n = 246 and n = 205, respectively) and one in Spain (validation cohort, n = 253). Competing-risk regression analysis was applied to assess the association of OHE with 1-year waitlist mortality. OHE was found to be associated with mortality, independently of MELD score, other cirrhosis-related complications and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; sHR = 4.19, 95% CI = 1.9-9.5, P = 0.001). The addition of extra MELD points for OHE counteracted its negative impact on survival. These findings were confirmed in the Dutch validation cohort, whereas in the Spanish cohort, containing a significantly greater proportion of HCC and with higher transplantation rates, OHE was not associated with mortality. In conclusion, OHE is an independent risk factor for 1-year waitlist mortality and might be a prioritization rule for organ allocation. However, its impact seems to be attenuated in settings with significantly higher transplantation rates.