Development of a clinical decision tool to reduce diagnostic testing for primary aldosteronism in patients with difficult-to-control hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Satisfactory tools to preclude low-risk patients from intensive diagnostic testing for primary aldosteronism (PA) are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to develop a decision tool to determine which patients with difficult-to-control hypertension have a low probability of PA, thereby limiting the exposure to invasive testing while at the same time increasing the efficiency of testing in the remaining patients. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients with difficult-to-control hypertension, analysed through a standardized diagnostic protocol between January 2010 and October 2017 (n = 824), were included in this cross-sectional study. PA was diagnosed by a combined approach: 1) elevated aldosterone-to-renin ratio (> 5.0 pmol/fmol/s), confirmed with 2) non-suppressible aldosterone after standardized saline infusion (≥280 pmol/L). Multivariable logistic regression analyses including seven pre-specified clinical variables (age, systolic blood pressure, serum potassium, potassium supplementation, serum sodium, eGFR and HbA1c) was performed. After correction for optimism, test reliability, discriminative performance and test characteristics were determined. RESULTS: PA was diagnosed in 40 (4.9%) of 824 patients. Predicted probabilities of PA agreed well with observed frequencies and the c-statistic was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.70-0.83). Predicted probability cut-off values of 1.0-2.5% prevented unnecessary testing in 8-32% of the patients with difficult-to-control hypertension, carrying sensitivities of 0.98 (95%CI 0.96-0.99) and 0.92 (0.83-0.97), and negative predictive values of 0.99 (0.98-1.00) and 0.99 (0.97-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: With a decision tool, based on seven easy-to-measure clinical variables, patients with a low probability of PA can be reliably selected and a considerable proportion of patients with difficult-to-control hypertension can be spared intensive diagnostic testing.

Endovascular baroreflex amplification for resistant hypertension: a safety and proof-of-principle clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Carotid baroreflex activation lowers blood pressure and might have potential application for the treatment of resistant hypertension. We did a proof-of-principle trial with a novel endovascular baroreceptor amplification device, MobiusHD (Vascular Dynamics, Mountain View, CA, USA), in patients with resistant hypertension. METHODS: CALM-FIM_EUR was a prospective, first-in-human, open-label study done at six European centres. Eligible patients were adults with resistant hypertension (office systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg despite taking at least three antihypertensive agents, including a diuretic). MobiusHD devices were implanted unilaterally in the internal carotid artery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of serious adverse events at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included changes in office and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01911897. FINDINGS: Between December, 2013, and February, 2016, 30 patients were enrolled and underwent successful implantation. Mean age was 52 years (SD 12), 15 patients (50%) were men, and mean antihypertensive use was 4·4 drugs (1·4). Mean office blood pressure was 184/109 mm Hg (18/14) at baseline and was reduced by 24/12 mm Hg (13-34/6-18) at 6 months (p=0·0003 for systolic and p=0·0001 diastolic blood pressure). Mean baseline 24 h ambulatory blood pressure was 166/100 mm Hg (17/14) at baseline and was reduced by 21/12 mm Hg (14-29/7-16) at 6 months (p<0·0001 for systolic and diastolic blood pressure). Five serious adverse events had occurred in four patients (13%) at 6 months: hypotension (n=2), worsening hypertension (n=1), intermittent claudication (n=1) and wound infection (n=1). INTERPRETATION: In patients with resistant hypertension, endovascular baroreceptor amplification with the MobiusHD device substantially lowered blood pressure with an acceptable safety profile. Randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trials are warranted to investigate the use of this treatment further. FUNDING: Vascular Dynamics.

Endovascular Baroreflex Amplification for Resistant Hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Most hypertension devices have been designed to interrupt or modify the sympathetic nervous system, which seems to be unbalanced in hypertension. Carotid baroreceptors play a pivotal role in maintaining adrenergic balance via a direct feedback interface and would be an exceptional target for intervention. The purpose of this review is to define the role of the baroreceptor in hypertension, to examine device-based therapies targeting the baroreflex and to explore future promises of endovascular baroreflex amplification (EBA). RECENT FINDINGS: In the last two decades, two therapeutic strategies targeting the carotid baroreceptor have evolved: baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) and EBA. Both therapies enhance baroreceptor activity, either directly by electrical stimulation or indirectly by changing the geometric shape of the carotid sinus and increasing pulsatile wall strain. By showing a significant, sympathetic inhibition-mediated effect on blood pressure, BAT has laid the foundation for baroreflex-targeting therapies for resistant hypertension. EBA is a less invasive therapy with promising first-in-man study results. Ongoing randomized sham-controlled trials are needed to better understand efficacy, durability, and long-term safety and define phenotypes that may most benefit from this treatment.

The effect of endovascular baroreflex amplification on central sympathetic nerve circuits and cerebral blood flow in patients with resistant hypertension: A functional MRI study.

Background: Endovascular baroreflex amplification (EVBA) by implantation of the MobiusHD is hypothesized to lower blood pressure by decreasing sympathetic activity through the mechanism of the baroreflex. In the present exploratory study we investigated the impact of MobiusHD implantation on central sympathetic nerve circuits and cerebral blood flow (CBF) in patients with resistant hypertension. Materials and methods: In thirteen patients, we performed blood oxygenation level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD fMRI) at rest and during Valsalva maneuvers, before and 3 months after EVBA. Data were analyzed using a whole-brain approach and a brainstem-specific analysis. CBF was assessed using arterial spin labeling MRI. Results: Resting-state fMRI analysis did not reveal significant differences in functional connectivity at 3 months after EVBA. For the Valsalva maneuver data, the whole-brain fMRI analysis revealed significantly increased activation in the posterior and anterior cingulate, the insular cortex, the precuneus, the left thalamus and the anterior cerebellum. The brainstem-specific fMRI analysis showed a significant increase in BOLD activity in the right midbrain 3 months after EVBA. Mean gray matter CBF (partial volume corrected) decreased significantly from 48.9 (9.9) ml/100 gr/min at baseline to 43.4 (13.0) ml/100 gr/min (p = 0.02) at 3 months. Conclusions: This first fMRI pilot study in patients with resistant hypertension treated with EVBA showed a significant increase in BOLD activity during the Valsalva maneuver in brain regions related to sympathetic activity. No notable signal intensity changes were observed in brain areas involved in the baroreflex circuit. Future randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate whether the observed changes are directly caused by EVBA. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02827032.

Treatment of Resistant Hypertension With Endovascular Baroreflex Amplification: 3-Year Results From the CALM-FIM Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term (3-year) safety and effectiveness of endovascular baroreflex amplification (EVBA) from both the European and American CALM-FIM cohorts. BACKGROUND: The CALM-FIM study demonstrated that EVBA in patients with resistant hypertension significantly lowered blood pressure (BP) with an acceptable safety profile during 6-month follow-up. METHODS: The CALM-FIM studies were prospective, nonrandomized, first-in-human studies that enrolled patients with resistant hypertension (office systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg and mean 24-hour ambulatory BP ≥130/80 mm Hg despite a stable regimen of ≥3 antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic agent). The incidence of (serious) adverse events and changes in BP, heart rate, and prescribed antihypertensive medication up to 3 years after implantation were determined. RESULTS: The Mobius device was implanted in 47 patients (30 in Europe, 17 in the United States; mean age 54 years, 23 women). Five serious adverse events (hypotension, n = 2; hypertension, n = 1; vascular access complications, n = 2) and 2 transient ischemic attacks occurred within 30 days postprocedure. Two strokes and 1 transient ischemic attack occurred more than 2 years postimplantation. Mean office BP at baseline was 181 ± 17/107 ± 16 mm Hg and decreased by 25/12 mm Hg (95% CI: 17-33/8-17 mm Hg) at 6 months and 30/12 mm Hg (95% CI: 21-38/8-17 mm Hg) at 3 years. Mean 24-hour ambulatory BP at baseline was 166 ± 16/98 ± 15 mm Hg and decreased by 20/11 mm Hg (95% CI: 14-25/8-15 mm Hg) at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: EVBA with the MobiusHD was effective in reducing BP at 3-year follow-up and appears to have an acceptable safety profile in patients with uncomplicated implantation, although data from randomized sham-controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risk-benefit profile. (Controlling and Lowering Blood Pressure With the MobiusHD™ [CALM-FIM_EUR], NCT01911897; Controlling and Lowering Blood Pressure With the MobiusHD™ [CALM-FIM_US], NCT01831895).

Endovascular baroreflex amplification and the effect on sympathetic nerve activity in patients with resistant hypertension: A proof-of-principle study.

BACKGROUND: First in human studies suggest that endovascular baroreflex amplification (EVBA) lowers blood pressure (BP). To explore potential mechanisms for BP reduction, this study examines the effects of EVBA on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS). METHODS: In a single-center sub-study of the CALM-DIEM study (Controlling And Lowering blood pressure with the MobiusHD-Defining Efficacy Markers), 14 patients with resistant hypertension were treated with EVBA. Microneurography and non-invasive continuous BP measurements were performed at baseline and three months after MobiusHD implantation. The primary outcome was change in MSNA. Secondary outcomes were change in baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), cardiovascular responses to a sympathetic stimulus, BP, heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV). RESULTS: The primary endpoint was obtained in 10 of 14 patients enrolled in the sub-study. MSNA burst frequency and burst incidence decreased in 6 of 10 patients: mean change -4.1 bursts/min (95% confidence interval -12.2 to 4.0) and -3.8 bursts/100 heartbeats (-15.2 to 7.7). MSNA spike frequency and spike count decreased in 8 of 10 patients: mean change -2.8 spikes/sec (-7.3 to 1.8) and -3.0 spikes/heartbeat (-6.1 to 0.1). Change in MSNA and BP were not correlated. Office BP decreased by -14/-6 mmHg (-27 to -2/-15 to 3). We observed a trend towards decreased HR (-5 bpm, -10 to 1) and increased total power HRV (623 msec2, 78 to 1168). In contrast, BRS and cardiovascular responses remained unchanged after EVBA. CONCLUSIONS: In this proof-of-principle study, EVBA did not significantly decrease MSNA in patients with resistant hypertension. EVBA did not impair baroreflex function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration at NCT02827032.

Plasma Trough Concentrations of Antihypertensive Drugs for the Assessment of Treatment Adherence: A Meta-Analysis.

Biochemical drug screening by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in plasma is an accurate method for the quantification of plasma concentrations of antihypertensive medications in patients with hypertension. Trough concentrations could possibly be used as drug-specific cutoff values in the biochemical assessment of (non-)adherence. We performed a literature review and meta-analysis of pharmacokinetic studies to determine plasma trough concentrations of amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and valsartan. PubMed was searched for pharmacokinetic studies up to September 2020. Eligible studies reported steady-state mean trough concentration and their variance. Pooled trough concentrations were estimated using a three-level random effects meta-analytic model. Moderator analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. One thousand three hundred eighteen potentially relevant articles were identified of which 45 were eligible for inclusion. The pooled mean trough concentration was 9.2 ng/mL (95% CI, 7.5-10.8) for amlodipine, 41.0 ng/mL (95% CI, 17.4-64.7) for hydrochlorothiazide, and 352.9 ng/mL (95% CI, 243.5-462.3) for valsartan. Substantial heterogeneity was present for all 3 pooled estimates. Moderator analyses identified dosage as a significant moderator for the pooled trough concentration of amlodipine (ß1=0.9; P<0.05), mean age, and mean body weight for the mean trough concentration of hydrochlorothiazide (ß1=2.2, P<0.05, respectively, ß1=-4.0, P<0.05) and no significant moderators for valsartan. Plasma trough concentrations of amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, and valsartan, measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, are highly heterogeneous over the different studies. Use of the pooled trough concentration as a cutoff in the biochemical assessment of adherence can result in inaccurate diagnosis of (non-)adherence, which may seriously harm the patient-physician relationship, and is therefore not recommended.

Four ECG left ventricular hypertrophy criteria and the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with vascular disease.

OBJECTIVE: The relation between different electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH) criteria and cardiovascular risk in patients with clinical manifest arterial disease is unclear. Therefore, we determined the association between four ECG-LVH criteria: Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell product, Cornell/strain index and Framingham criterion; and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in this population. METHODS: Risk of cardiovascular events was estimated in 6913 adult patients with clinical manifest arterial disease originating from the Secondary Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) cohort. Cox proportional regression analysis was used to estimate the risk of the four ECG-LVH criteria and the primary composite outcome: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or cardiovascular death; and secondary outcomes: MI, stroke and all-cause mortality; adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: The highest prevalence of ECG-LVH was observed for Cornell product (10%) and Cornell/strain index (9%). All four ECG-LVH criteria were associated with an increased risk of the primary composite endpoint: Sokolow-Lyon (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.66), Cornell product (hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.30-1.82), Cornell/strain index (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.44-2.00) and Framingham criterion (hazard ratio 1.78, 95% CI 1.21-2.62). Cornell product, Cornell/strain index and Framingham criterion ECG-LVH were additionally associated with an elevated risk of secondary outcomes. Cardiovascular risk increased whenever two, or three or more ECG-LVH criteria were present concurrently. CONCLUSION: All four ECG-LVH criteria are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. As Cornell/strain index is both highly prevalent and carries a high cardiovascular risk, this is likely the most relevant ECG-LVH criterion for clinical practice.

Hypertension: Overly important but under-controlled.

Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease and death. Despite increased knowledge of its importance in cardiovascular disease, the worldwide prevalence is still increasing and there is considerable scope for improvement of awareness, treatment and control. In this review, five major issues in hypertension management in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease will be outlined. The first two issues will address hypertension diagnosis: out-of-office blood pressure measurements and the detection of secondary hypertension. The last three issues will address hypertension treatment: lifestyle modification, medication adherence and blood pressure targets. For each of the five issues, we will outline existing knowledge, gaps in existing knowledge, barriers preventing full implementation of guideline recommendations, and possible solutions to improve management of the current disquieting situation.