Risk factors and prevalence of ramp lesions in ACL ruptures: An analysis from the registry of the Francophone Arthroscopic Society.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of ramp lesions among patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and identify risk factors associated with these lesions. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted using data from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society's registry, including 5359 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) from June 2020 to June 2023. Potential risk factors for ramp lesion such as patient demographics, revision surgery, pivot shift, side-to-side anteroposterior laxity, medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury, lateral meniscal tear and the volume of ligament remnant were evaluated using multivariate regression analyses. BMI and delay to surgery were also assessed. RESULTS: Ramp lesions were identified in 822 patients (15.3%). Univariate analysis identified male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury, percentage of ACL remnant (all p < 0.0001) and pivot shift (p = 0.0103) as significant risk factors. MCL injury was associated with a lower risk (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury and percentage of ACL remnants remained significant risk factors, while MCL injury remained a protective factor. The anteroposterior laxity wasn't a significant predictor in either analysis. In subgroup analysis, there were no differences concerning body mass index (n.s) and the delay to surgery (n.s). CONCLUSION: The study identified male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury and pourcentage of ACL remnant as significant risk factors for ramp lesions, with MCL injury acting as a protective factor. This will help regarding the suspicion and identification of ramp lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Increased anterior tibial subluxation and differences between anterior tibial subluxation in the lateral and medial compartments are associated with failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether increased anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) and differences between ATS in the lateral and medial compartments (ATSL-M) are associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) failure. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched from their inception through 21 November 2023. The focus was on comparative studies reporting ATS in patients who experienced primary ACLR failure, in contrast to patients after primary ACLR with no evidence of graft failure. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the overall standardized mean difference between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of eight studies involving 963 patients were included in the final review. Three studies (64 cases and 171 controls) measured ATS on radiographs. The failed ACLR group exhibited a significantly increased ATS on radiographs compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Six studies (324 cases and 488 controls) measured lateral ATS on magnetic resonance imaging and five of them (285 cases and 374 controls) also measured medial ATS. The average values of lateral and medial ATS, as well as ATSL-M, were calculated and compared between the two groups. The failed ACLR group demonstrated significantly increased lateral (p < 0.001) and medial ATS (p < 0.001), the average value of lateral and medial ATS (p < 0.001) and ATSL-M (p = 0.039) compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Increased ATS and ATSL-M are associated with primary ACLR failure. The measurement of tibiofemoral position shows promise for its application in preoperative planning and postoperative management of ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The 45° and 60° of sagittal femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provide similar knee stability.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare 45° and 60° of sagittal femoral tunnel angles in terms of anterior tibial translation (ATT), valgus angle and graft in situ force following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: Ten porcine knees were subjected to the following loading conditions: (1) 89 N anterior tibial load at 35° (full extension), 60° and 90° of knee flexion and (2) 5 N m valgus tibial moment at 35° and 45° of knee flexion. ATT and graft in situ force of the intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and ACLR were collected using a robotic universal force/moment sensor (UFS) testing system for (1) ACL intact, (2) ACL-deficient (ACLD) and (3) two different ACLR using different sagittal femoral tunnel angles (coronal 45°/sagittal 45° and coronal 45°/sagittal 60°). RESULTS: During the anterior tibial load, the femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 45° and 60° had significantly higher ATT than that of the ACL-intact knees at 60° of knee flexion (p < 0.05). The femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 60° had significantly lower graft in situ force than that of the ACL-intact knees at 60° and 90° of knee flexion (p < 0.05). During the valgus tibial moment, the femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 45° and 60° had significantly lower graft in situ force than that of the ACL-intact knees at all knee flexions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 45° provided similar ATT, valgus angle and graft in situ force to that of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 60°. Therefore, both femoral tunnel angles could be used in ACLR, as the sagittal femoral tunnel angle does not appear to be relevant in post-operative knee stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

The effectiveness of quadrupled semitendinosus graft technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A network meta-analysis assessing various graft preparation techniques.

PURPOSE: This study aims to perform a network meta-analysis of hamstring graft preparation techniques to enhance anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction guidelines and inform clinical decision-making in patients with primary ACL rupture. METHODS: A review of the literature, from 1 January 1990, to 31 August 2023, was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, focusing on the clinical outcomes of various hamstring graft preparation techniques. Forty-six studies (over 4800 knees) were analysed. Eight graft compositions: doubled hamstring (ST/G)-1978 grafts, doubled hamstring with augmentation (ST/G+A)-586 grafts, tripled semitendinosus (3ST)-124 grafts, quadrupled semitendinosus (4ST)-1273 grafts, five-strand tripled semitendinosus + doubled gracilis (3ST/2GR-839 grafts, six-strand tripled semitendinosus + tripled gracilis (3ST/3GR)-335 grafts, seven-strand quadrupled semitendinosus + tripled gracilis (4ST/3GR)-11 grafts and ≥eight strands-24 grafts were compared, considering graft sizes, laxity, muscle strength, range-of-motion, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sport (RTS) and adverse events. RESULTS: The 4ST grafts fared better than the ST/G grafts in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sport, KOOS Q and RTS (mean difference [MD], -1.69; p = 0.0159; MD, -1.55; p = 0.0325; MD, -1.93; p = 0.001; odds ratio: 3.13; p < 0.0001). The IKDC differed significantly between the 4ST and ST/G+A groups (MD, 1.88; p = 0.046). The ST/G+A resulted in the lowest knee laxity, surpassing the ST/G, 3ST and 4ST. The ST/G had the smallest diameter (ST/G vs. ST/G+A: MD, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-1.86, p < 0.0001). Reduced failure rates were noted with the 3ST/2GR (3ST/2GR vs. ST/G: MD, 6.93; p = 0.009) and 3ST/3GR (3ST/3GR vs. ST/G: MD, 53.64; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The ideal hamstring graft for ACLR should be individualized. A 4ST graft is likely to yield good PROMs. For high stability and rapid RTS, adding augmentation to the graft is advisable. The ST/G is the thinnest graft possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Network meta-analysis of level I-III studies.

Hop distance to body height ratio outperforms limb symmetry index in predicting second anterior cruciate ligament injury.

PURPOSE: The ability of current return-to-sport (RTS) tests to predict second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (ACLI) in athletes with a history of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is unclear. This study aimed to prospectively assess the risk of a second ACLI by identifying the most significant deviation in hop test results in professional athletes after ACLR compared to healthy peers. METHODS: A total of 30 professional athletes with a history of ACLR and 30 healthy professional athletes participated in this study. Participants performed 10 functional hop tests, and the subsequent limb symmetry index (LSI) was compared between the groups. After a 3-year follow-up, the re-injury rate was assessed among the ACLR group. Fourteen ACLR athletes who sustained a second ACLI were included and matched with 14 controls from the healthy group. The LSI and the hop distance to body height percentage (D/H) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Statistical analyses confirmed a significant decrease in LSI in the ACLR group compared to the healthy group in the triple hop for distance (p = .023). In re-injured ACLR athletes, seven different hop tests showed a significant decrease in the D/H index compared to the healthy controls. Meanwhile, for LSI, only the triple cross-over hop for distance (p = .045) showed a significant increase in the healthy group. CONCLUSION: Before clearing athletes for RTS, assessing functional hop test results using the hop distance to body height ratio, aligned with normative data from healthy controls, could further enhance the prediction of reduced graft rupture risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Perioperative outcomes in isolated versus multiligamentous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort analysis.

PURPOSE: The outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the setting of multiligamentous knee injury (M-ACLR) have not been well characterized compared to isolated ACLR (I-ACLR). This study aims to characterize and compare short-term outcomes between I-ACLR and M-ACLR. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2017. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify and compare elective I- and M-ACLR patients, excluding patients undergoing concomitant meniscal or chondral procedures. Patient demographics and outcomes after I- and M-ACLR were compared using bivariate analysis. Multiple logistic regression analyzed if multiligamentous ACLR was an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. RESULTS: There was a total of 13,131 ACLR cases, of which 341 were multiligamentous cases. The modified fragility index-5 was higher in multiligamentous ACLR (p < 0.001). Multiligamentous ACLR had worse perioperative outcomes, with higher rate of all complications (3.8%, p = 0.013), operative time > 1.5 h (p < 0.001), length of stay (LOS) ≥ 1 day (p < 0.001), wound complication (2.1%, p = 0.001), and intra- or post-op transfusions (p < 0.001). In multiple logistic regression, multiligamentous ACLR was an independent risk factor for LOS ≥ 1 (odds ratio [OR] 5.8), and intra-/post-op transfusion (OR 215.1) and wound complications (OR 2.4). M-ACLR was not an independent risk factor for any complication, reoperation at 30 days, readmission, urinary tract infection (UTI), or venous thromboembolism (VTE). CONCLUSION: M-ACLR generally had worse outcomes than I-ACLR, including longer LOS, need for perioperative transfusions, and wound complications.

Characteristics of early complications in isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

PURPOSE: The early complications of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery (ACLR) have not been well characterized using large databases. This study aims to characterize incidence, impact, and risk factors for short-term operative complications following elective, isolated ACLR surgery. We hypothesize that demographic and perioperative factors may predict 30-day complications after isolated ACLR. METHODS: This case-control analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (2005-2017) used Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify elective, isolated ACLR patients. Patients undergoing concomitant procedures were excluded. Complications were analyzed using bivariate analysis against demographic variables. Multiple stepwise logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for morbidity after ACLR. RESULTS: A total 12,790 patients (37.0% female, p = 0.674) were included with a mean age of 32.2 years old (SD 10.7 years, p < 0.001). Mean BMI was 27.8 kg/m2 (6.5) where 28.9% of patients had a BMI > 30 (p = 0.064). The most common complications were wound-related (0.57%). In cases with complications, there were higher rates of (1.3% vs 0.8%, p = 0.004) prolonged operation (> 1.5 h), higher rate (2.9% vs 1.8%, p = 0.004) of extended length of stay (≥ 1 day), unplanned reoperation (15.8% vs 0.3%, p < 0.001), and unplanned readmission (17.5% vs 0.3%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed prolonged operative time (p = 0.001), dyspnea (p = 0.008), and non-ambulatory surgery (p = 0.034) to be predictive of any complication. Dependent functional status (p = 0.091), mFI-5 > 0.2 (= 0.173), female sex (p = 0.191), obesity (p = 0.101), and smoking (p = 0.113) were not risk factors for complications. CONCLUSION: ACLR is associated with low rates of morbidity and readmissions. The most common comorbidities, complications, and predictors of morbidities were identified to aid surgeons in further reducing adverse outcomes of ACLR. Operative time > 1.5 h, dyspnea, and non-ambulatory surgery are predictive of complications.

High prevalence of increased posterior tibial slope in ACL revision surgery demands a patient-specific approach.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of an "increased posterior tibial slope (PTS)" (PTS ≥ 12°) in a population with one, two or ≥ three anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft insufficiencies. Furthermore, to investigate whether the prevalence of an increased PTS and the absolute PTS increases with an increasing number of ACL graft insufficiencies, as well as to determine the survival time of the first ACL graft. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with an ACL graft insufficiency between January 2021 and March 2022 were included. The PTS was measured using the proximal anatomical tibial axis on long lateral knee radiographs. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the number of ACL graft insufficiencies: group A (1 graft insufficiency), group B (2 graft insufficiencies) and group C (≥ 3 graft insufficiencies). The prevalence of increased PTS and absolute PTS between groups was compared alongside the survival of the first ACL graft between patients with or without increased PTS. RESULTS: Two-hundred and six patients (147 males/59 females) met the inclusion criteria. 73 patients showed an increased PTS [prevalence 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) (29%; 42%)]. 155 patients were found in category A, 42 patients in B and 9 patients in C. The prevalence of increased PTS for group A, B and C was, 32% [95% CI (25%; 40%)], 38% [95% CI (23%; 53%)] and 78% [95% CI (51%; 100%)], respectively. The prevalence of increased PTS and mean PTS did not increase significantly between group A and B. However, both parameters increased significantly between group A and C, and group B and C (p < 0.05). The survival time of the first ACL graft in patients with or without an increased PTS was 3 (interquartile range (IQR) 5) and 6 years (IQR 9), respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There is a 35% prevalence of increased PTS in the studied ACL graft insufficient patient cohort. The survival of the first ACL graft is shorter in patients with an increased PTS. Surgeons should be aware of the high prevalence of increased PTS when consulting patients for revision ACL reconstruction as it is an important risk factor for recurrent instability.

First revision ACL reconstruction combined with tibial deflexion osteotomy improves clinical scores at 2 to 7 years follow-up.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes of first revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with tibial deflexion osteotomy (TDO) in patients with posterior tibial slope (PTS) >10° at >2 years. METHODS: The authors studied outcomes of a consecutive series of 16 patients that underwent first revision ACLR with TDO, including Lysholm score, IKDC subjective and objective scores, Lachman test, PTS, and signs of osteoarthritis. One woman was excluded because of early signs of knee arthritis, as the first revision ACLR took place 27 years following the primary ACLR. This left a final cohort of 15 patients assessed at minimum follow-up of 2 years. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 14 men and 1 woman aged 25.3 ± 6.6 years (range 16-39) at first revision ACLR. At final follow-up of 4.4 ± 1.5 years (range, 2-7), PTS was corrected from 12.5 ± 1.8° (range 8-15°) to 1.9 ± 3.6° (range - 4 to 8°), and none of the knees had radiographic signs of osteoarthritis. Lysholm score was 83.8±12.5, IKDC subjective score was 80.3±16.2, and IKDC objective score was A in 5 (33%), and B in 10 (67%). The net improvement exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in 93% of patients for the IKDC subjective score and in 80% of patients for the Lysholm score. None of the knees had any retears, and only one required a reoperation to re-suture a medial meniscal tear due to trauma. CONCLUSION: At 2-7 years following revision ACLR combined with TDO, net improvement exceeded the MCID in 93% of patients for IKDC subjective score and in 80% of patients for Lysholm score, with no retears or major complications. These results suggest that TDO is a safe technique to protect the ACL graft and might be considered as of first revision ACLR to correct excessive PTS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Persistent knee extension deficits are common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Knee extension deficits complicate recovery from ACL injury and reconstruction; however, the incidence of knee extension loss is not well defined. The aim of this review was to identify the incidence of loss of extension (LOE) following ACL rupture and reconstruction, explore the definitions of knee extension deficits reported and identify prognostic factors affecting LOE incidence. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Library and PEDro for studies in publication up to November 2021, with no restrictions on publication year. References were screened and assessed for inclusion using predetermined eligibility criteria. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that quantified knee angle, loss of extension or incidence of extension deficit were included for quality assessment and data extraction. Statistical summaries were generated and meta-analyses performed in two parts to examine: (i) the probability of a datapoint being zero incidence compared to a nonzero incidence and (ii) the relationship between the predictors and nonzero LOE incidence. RESULTS: A sample of 15,494 studies were retrieved using the search criteria, with 53 studies meeting eligibility criteria. The pooled results from 4991 participants were included for analysis, with 4891 participants who had undergone ACLR. The proportion of included studies judged at an overall low risk of bias was small (7.8%). The observed group and study were the most important predictors for whether a datapoint reported an incidence of extension deficit. Time to follow-up (P < 0.001) and graft type (P = 0.02) were found to have a significant influence on nonzero LOE incidence (%). Covariate adjusted estimates of average LOE indicated 1 in 3 patients presenting with LOE at 12 month follow-up, reducing to 1 in 4 at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: This review examined the definitions for the measurement and interpretation of postoperative knee extension and established the trajectory of knee extension deficit after ACL injury and reconstruction. While factors associated with loss of extension were identified, the exact trajectory of knee extension deficits was difficult to infer due to discrepancies in measurement techniques and patient variation. On average, 1 in 3 patients may present with loss of extension of at least 3 degrees at 12-month follow-up, decreasing to 1 in 4 at 2 years. These results may be used by clinicians as an upper threshold for acceptable complication rates following ACLR. Future work should focus on LOE as a clinically relevant complication of ACL injury and treatment with appropriate attention to standardisation of definitions, measurements and better understanding of natural history. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018092295. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Though five-strand hamstring autografts demonstrate greater graft diameter, postoperative outcomes are equivocal to four-strand hamstring autograft preparations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I and II studies.

PURPOSE: To compare graft dimensions, functional outcomes, and failure rates following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with either five-strand or four-strand hamstring autograft options. METHODS: Three databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE) were searched from inception to 22 April 2023 for level I and II studies comparing five- and four-strand hamstring autografts in ACLR. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on demographics, surgical details and rehabilitation, graft diameter, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and rates of positive Lachman test, positive pivot shift test, and graft rupture were extracted. PROMs included Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC). RESULTS: One randomized controlled trial (RCT) and four prospective cohort studies with 572 patients were included. Graft diameters were larger in the five-strand group with a mean difference of 0.93 mm (95% CI 0.61 to 1.25, p < 0.001, I2 = 66%). The five-strand group reported statistically higher KOOS ADL subscale and Lysholm scores with a mean difference of 4.85 (95% CI 0.14 to 9.56, p = 0.04, I2 = 19%) and 3.01 (95% CI 0.48 to 5.53, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%), respectively. There were no differences in KOOS symptoms, pain, quality of life, or sports subscales, or IKDC scores. There were no differences in rates of positive Lachman test, positive pivot shift test, or graft rupture with pooled odds ratios of 0.62 (95% CI 0.13 to 2.91, n.s., I2 = 80%), 0.94 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.75, n.s., I2 = 31%), and 2.13 (95% CI 0.38 to 12.06, n.s., I2 = 0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although five-stranded hamstring autografts had significantly larger graft diameters compared to four-stranded grafts with a mean difference of 0.93 mm, similar graft rupture rates and clinical laxity assessments were identified following ACLR. While some PROMs were statistically superior in the five-stranded hamstring groups, the threshold for the minimal clinical important difference was not reached indicating similar clinical outcomes overall. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

No difference in revision risk between autologous hamstring graft less than 8 mm versus hybrid graft 8 mm or larger in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Hamstring autograft (HA) is commonly used for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, if the harvested HA is inadequate in diameter, it is often augmented with an allograft tendon, forming a hybrid graft (HY). This study sought to evaluate aseptic revision risk following HA versus HY ACLR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data obtained from our healthcare system's ACLR registry. Patients ≤ 25 years of age who underwent primary isolated ACLR were identified (2005-2020). Graft type and diameter size was the primary exposure of interest: < 8 mm HA and ≥ 8 mm HY. A secondary analysis was performed to examine 7 mm HA and 7.5 mm HA vs ≥ 8 mm HY. Propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the risk of aseptic revision. RESULTS: The study sample included 1,945 ACLR: 548 ≥ 8 mm HY, 651 7 mm HA, and 672 7.5 mm HA. The crude cumulative aseptic revision probability at 8-years for ≥ 8 mm HY was 9.1%, 11.1% for 7 mm HA, and 11.2% for 7.5 mm HA. In adjusted analysis, no difference in revision risk was observed for < 8 mm HA (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.82), 7 mm HA (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.71-2.11), or 7.5 mm HA (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.74-1.82) compared to ≥ 8 mm HY. CONCLUSION: In a US-based cohort of ACLR patients aged ≤ 25 years, we failed to observe any differences in aseptic revision risk for HA < 8 mm compared to HY ≥ 8 mm. Augmentation of a HA as small as 7 mm is not necessary to prevent a revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction moderately improved tegner scores over the long-term: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of anatomical double-bundle (DB) versus single-bundle (SB) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in skeletally mature patients with ACL injuries. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to February 7, 2022 were screened for randomized controlled trials. The Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Checklist was used to categorize studies as anatomic. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, with pooled results being summarized using mean difference (MD). Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool. Certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE. RESULTS: A search of 1371 unique articles yielded eight eligible trials, representing 735 patients (360 DB, 375 SB) with mean (SD) age of 28.5 (2.86) years and follow-up of 52.1 (36.2) months. Most trials had moderate to low RoB. Overall, DB was not significantly better than SB on Lysholm scores (MD = 0.52, 95% CI, - 1.80-2.85, p = 0.66; moderate certainty) or subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (MD = - 0.40, 95% CI, - 4.35-3.55, p = 0.84; moderate certainty). Tegner scores were significantly higher in SB than DB in the intermediate term (MD = - 0.72, 95% CI, - 1.10 to - 0.34, p = 0.0002; high certainty), while significantly higher in DB relative to SB in the long-term (MD = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.02-1.03, p = 0.04; high certainty). CONCLUSION: DB ACL reconstruction significantly improves Tegner scores relative to SB ACL reconstruction over the long-term (t ≥ 5 years). Intermediate term Tegner scores favour SB reconstruction. In both durations, there was no clinically significant difference based on the pre-specified minimal clinically important difference of 1.0 point. There were also no significant differences in IKDC or Lysholm scores. Surgeons should consider anatomical DB ACL reconstruction as a result of long-term improvement in patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Comparison of post-operative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between patients with vs. without elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance.

PURPOSE: It is unclear if an elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a risk factor for poor outcomes following ACLR. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with an elevated TT-TG have an increased risk of retear following primary ACLR compared to controls with a normal TT-TG. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary ACLR between July 2018 and June 2019 with an available preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were eligible for inclusion. TT-TG distance was measured on preoperative MRI scans by two independent investigators. Clinical outcomes, return-to-sport rates, and Lysholm scores were compared between patients with a TT-TG < 12.5 mm (normal) and those with a TT-TG ≥ 12.5 mm (elevated). RESULTS: Overall, 159 patients were included, 98 with normal TT-TG distance and 61 with elevated TT-TG distance. Patients with an elevated TT-TG distance had worse post-operative Lysholm scores than patients with a normal TT-TG distance (83.0 vs. 95.0, p = 0.010). In patients who received a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft, an elevated TT-TG distance was associated with higher rates of subjective instability (13.0% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.041), reoperation (13.0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.012), and post-operative complications (25.0% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.026), as well as lower ACL psychological readiness scores (324.1 vs. 446.7, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Patients with an elevated pre-operative TT-TG distance have worse Lysholm scores than patients with normal TT-TG distance. Patients with an elevated pre-operative TT-TG distance who underwent ACLR with BTB grafts had significantly higher rates of subjective instability, reoperation, and post-operative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between isolated ACL reconstruction and combined ACL with anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcomes between isolated cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and combined ACL with anterolateral ligament reconstruction in chronic ACL injury especially with rotary instability problem. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted of literature published up to July 2021 on PubMed, Google Search, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing isolated ACLR and ACL with anterolateral reconstruction. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted outcome data, and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies. Pooled clinical outcomes used random effects with mean differences and risk ratio for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. RESULTS: After excluding 49 articles based on full-text screening, six studies were identified which met the inclusion criteria in the meta-analysis. Clinical outcomes such as residual laxity, rotatory instability, and graft failure were compared between isolated ACLR and combined ACL and anterolateral stability reconstruction. Overall, both clinical outcomes of isolated ACL and combined ACL with anterolateral reconstruction show improvement results in pivot shift test, the absence of residual laxity and incidence of graft failure. Compared to isolated ACLR, the prominent postoperative result was by combined ACL with anterolateral reconstruction which had significant differences in laxity outcome based on (I2 = 89%, p < 0.00001) and (MD = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.33-1.08, p = 0.00002). CONCLUSIONS: The combined ACL with anterolateral reconstruction tended to have superior clinical outcomes, especially in the absence of residual laxity, compared to the isolated ACLR, but the other results were not significantly different statistically. Combined ACL and anterolateral reconstruction were not performed routinely for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, but more suitable for chronic rotatory instability problem.

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction versus anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a comparative study of clinical outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies showed increasing evidences of anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction that proves to be more superior to the previous double-bundle (DB) ACLR technique especially in improving knee stability in biomechanic studies. However to date, there have been no studies evaluating the functional outcome of DB-ACLR vs single-bundle (SB) with ALL in ACLR. METHODS: A total of 138 patients with ACL deficient knee were enrolled to the study. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction (DB-ACLR) was performed in 75 patients and single-bundle ACL reconstruction with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (SB + ALL) ACLR was performed in 63 patients. Surgical outcomes were compared with The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) and the Kujala score at the 3rd, 6th and 9th month post-operative. RESULTS: The IKDC score in the 3rd and 6th month was superior in the SB + ALL group compared to the DB group. However, this difference was not statistically significant. In the meantime, there were no statistically significant difference between the Kujala Score at the 3rd, 6th, and 9th months consecutively. There were no statistically significant differences in the functional outcomes of DB-ACLR and SB + ALL groups at the 3rd, 6th, and 9th months post-operative period. CONCLUSION: The functional outcome comparison showed non-superiority of SB + ALL group compared to the DB-ACLR group. The patellar pain was less found in DB-ACLR group at 6- and 9-months post-operative period.

The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and RAMP lesion repair on psychological status.

BACKGROUND: There are few studies examining anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and RAMP lesion repair. However, no studies have investigated the level of functional performance and psychological state after ACLR and all-inside RAMP lesion repair. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of ACLR and RAMP lesion repair on psychological status. ACLR and meniscal RAMP lesion repair were hypothesized to be associated with better psychological outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cohort study. METHODS: Patients who underwent ACLR with semitendinosus and gracilis autografts by a single surgeon were determined retrospectively. Fifteen patients who underwent ACLR and all-inside meniscus RAMP lesion repair (ACLR-RR) and 15 patients who underwent isolated ACLR were compared. Patients were evaluated by a physiotherapist at least 9 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was anterior cruciate ligament-return to sports after injury (ACL-RSI), and the psychological status of the patients was examined. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS), Tegner activity score, Lysholm knee score, single hop tests, and limb symmetry index (LSI). While pain intensity at rest and during movement was evaluated with VAS, functional performance level was evaluated with the Tegner activity score, the Lysholm knee score, single hop tests, and limb symmetry index (LSI). RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the ACL-RSI values in the ACLR-RR group compared to the isolated ACLR group (p = 0.02). The results of the groups in VAS scores at rest and during movement, Tegner activity levels, and Lysholm knee scores, in the intact and operated leg single hop tests (single leg hop, cross hop, triple hop, and six-meter hop test), and the LSI values in the single leg hop tests showed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed different psychological outcomes and similar functional levels for ACLR and all-inside meniscus RAMP repair compared with isolated ACLR. It was observed that the psychological status of patients with RAMP lesions should also be evaluated.

Clinical outcomes and return to sport after single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by bone-patellar tendon autograft combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis.

PURPOSE: The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure rate continues to increase. Involvement of a young population with a desire to return to sport, explains the increased need for ACLR (revACLR) revision. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome, complications, failure rate and return to sport of a single-stage revACLR using bone patellar tendon-bone (BTBT) combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 36 patients who underwent revACLR. Knee stability was assessed by Lachman and Pivot shift test. Objective anterior laxity was determined by KT-2000 arthrometer. The IKDC subjective, Lysholm, ACL-RSI Scores, level of sport activity and Forgotten Joint Score-12 were recorded. RESULTS: Of 36 patients, we collected data from 17 who underwent single-stage revACLR with autologous BTBT combined with LET, performed using an extra-articular MacIntosh procedure as modified by Arnold-Coker. The side-to-side difference in Lachman test and Pivot shift test significantly improved postoperatively. The subjective IKDC, Lysholm and ACL-RSI significantly improved from 71.4 ± 9.03 to 92 ± 6.9, from 58.3 ± 19.3 to 66.8 ± 27.7 and from 50.4 ± 12.2 to 68.6 ± 24.5, respectively during the post-operative follow-up. Ten patients (58.8%) returned to their desired level of sport. One patient was considered a failure because of the postoperative laxity. CONCLUSION: Single-stage revACLR with BPTB combined with LET is a safe procedure that shows good objective and subjective outcomes, and a high rate of return to the same level of sport. Reducing rotational instability and strain on intra-articular reconstructed structures results in a low rate of complications and failure.

Could anterior closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy be a viable option in patients with high posterior tibial slope who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aims to examine the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) combined with anterior closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (ACW-HTO) for posterior tibial slope (PTS) reduction to investigate the efficacy of this procedure in improving anterior knee stability and preventing graft failure in primary and revision ACLR. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in six databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus). The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The initial screening identified 1246 studies. Each eligible clinical article was screened according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 levels of evidence (LoE), excluding clinical studies of LoE V. Quality assessment of the articles was performed using the ROBINS-I methodological evaluation. This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). For the outcomes that were possible to perform a meta-analysis, a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Five clinical studies were included in the final analysis. A total of 110 patients were examined. Pre- and post-operative clinical and objective tests that assess anteroposterior knee stability, PTS, clinical scores, and data on surgical characteristics, complications, return to sports activity, and graft failure after ACLR were investigated. A meta-analysis was conducted using R software, version 4.1.3 (2022, R Core Team), for Lysholm score and PTS outcomes. A statistically significant improvement for both these clinical and radiological outcomes (p < 0.05) after the ACW-HTO surgical procedure was found. CONCLUSION: ACLR combined with ACW-HTO restores knee stability and function with satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury associated with a high PTS and seems to have a protective effect from further ruptures on the reconstructed ACL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Tibial slope correction combined with second revision ACLR grants good clinical outcomes and prevents graft rupture at 7-15-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: To update previously published outcomes (at 2-8 years) of second revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) combined with tibial deflexion osteotomy (TDO), after an interval of 5 more years (at 7-15 years), and monitor evolution of clinical scores and progression of osteoarthritis. METHODS: The initial retrospective consecutive series included nine patients that underwent one-stage second revision ACLR with TDO, all of whom were contacted for second follow-up at minimum 7 years. An independent observer collected IKDC-SKF, the Lysholm score, and assessed radiographs for signs of osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Of the nine original patients, seven were assessed at the clinic, one could only be assessed by telephone, and one was lost to follow-up. At final follow-up of 9.9 ± 3.0 years, the eight patients assessed maintained or improved clinical scores, compared to the previous follow-up at 4.0 ± 2.9 years. The mean Lysholm score improved from 73.8 ± 5.8 (65-82) to 84.5 ± 11.9 (59-95), and IKDC improved from 71.6 ± 6.2 (62-79) to 82.9 ± 12.1 (61-98). Of the three patients that had signs of arthritis at the previous follow-up, the stage of osteoarthritis increased in one (from grade 2 to grade 3), remained unchanged in one, and could not be assessed in one. CONCLUSION: At 7-15 years following second revision ACLR with TDO, patients maintained or improved clinical scores compared to the previous follow-up at 2-8 years, without retears or reoperations. Although eight of the nine knees had meniscectomies or meniscal sutures, osteoarthritis progressed in only one of the six knees that had signs of arthritis at the previous follow-up. These results confirm that TDO can protect the ACL graft from retear, with minimal progression of osteoarthritis and/or risks of meniscal tears, suggesting that correction of excessive tibial slope should be considered when performing ACLR, whether a revision or primary procedure.