Comprehensive needs, social support, and disease perception in lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the comprehensive needs of lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and to explore the relationships between comprehensive needs and social support and disease perception, moreover, to analyse associated factors of comprehensive needs. METHODS: The study was conducted in a teaching hospital in Jiaxing Province, China. A total of 141 patients with lung cancer completed a battery of self-report questionnaires, including the Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool in Cancer for Patients (CNAT), Social Supportive Rating Scale (SSRS), Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), and demographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire. RESULTS: The level of comprehensive needs was highest in the domain "medical demand" (42.17 ± 26.57), and the item with the highest level of comprehensive needs was "I need information about the financial support for my medical expenses" (2.00 ± 1.07). Statistically significant correlations were identified between the comprehensive needs score, social support, and disease perception. The multiple regression analysis showed that immunotherapy course, whether irAEs occur, social support, and disease perception were factors influencing patients' comprehensive needs. CONCLUSIONS: The most prevalent needs in lung cancer patients were found in the "medical needs" domain. Additionally, immunotherapy course, whether irAEs occur, disease perception, and social support were associated with comprehensive needs among lung cancer patients. It is essential to combine the associated factors to accurately evaluate patient needs. We should pay more attention to proposing the comprehensive measures for these patients and providing more individualized supportive care during the lengthy treatment period.

Factors associated with the comprehensive needs of caregivers of childhood cancer survivors in Korea.

PURPOSE: Caregivers of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) have diverse needs, which should be addressed to provide comprehensive cancer care. We aimed to evaluate the unmet needs of caregivers of CCS. METHODS: The subjects were 700 caregivers recruited at three major hospitals in South Korea. We collected study data using self-administered questionnaires and a thorough review of medical records. We assessed the unmet needs of caregivers using the comprehensive needs assessment tool for cancer caregivers and evaluated factors associated with the highest tertile range of unmet needs by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The greatest unmet needs of caregivers had to do with healthcare staff, followed by information. Compared with father-caregivers, mother-caregivers had greater unmet needs related to health and psychological problems, family/social support, and religious/spiritual support, with odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 3.79 (2.52-5.69), 3.17 (2.09-4.81), and 1.69 (1.14-2.50), respectively. Compared with caregivers of the youngest CCS (< 6 years), caregivers of CCS aged 12-18 years and caregivers of the oldest CCS (≥ 19 years) respectively showed 2.62 (1.24-5.52) and 3.18 (1.34-7.55) times greater unmet needs for information. Caregivers of CCS who received haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation had a 2.01-fold (1.14-3.57) greater need for practical support. CONCLUSION: Caregivers of CCS had substantial unmet needs required for comprehensive care for CCS. Several individual characteristics of caregivers and their children were significantly associated with greater unmet needs of the caregivers. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Personalized support based on the characteristics of both CCS and their caregivers is required to provide comprehensive care for CCS.

Classification of Support Needs for Elderly Outpatients with Diabetes Who Live Alone.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the support needs of elderly patients with diabetes and to classify elderly patients with diabetes living alone on the basis of support needs. METHODS: Support needs were derived from a literature review of relevant journals and interviews of outpatients as well as expert nurses in the field of diabetes to prepare a 45-item questionnaire. Each item was analyzed on a 4-point Likert scale. The study included 634 elderly patients with diabetes who were recruited from 3 hospitals in Japan. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to determine the underlying structure of support needs, followed by hierarchical cluster analysis to clarify the characteristics of patients living alone (n=104) who had common support needs. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis suggested a 5-factor solution with 23 items: (1) hope for class and gatherings, (2) hope for personal advice including emergency response, (3) supportlessness and hopelessness, (4) barriers to food preparation, (5) hope of safe medical therapy. The hierarchical cluster analysis of subjects yielded 7 clusters, including a no special-support needs group, a collective support group, a self-care support group, a personal-support focus group, a life-support group, a food-preparation support group and a healthcare-environment support group. CONCLUSIONS: The support needs of elderly patients with diabetes who live alone can be divided into 2 categories: life and self-care support. Implementation of these categories in outpatient-management programs in which contact time with patients is limited is important in the overall management of elderly patients with diabetes who are living alone.