Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on DXA waiting lists and osteoporosis prescription trends in England 2019-2023.

This study uses NHS waiting times and osteoporosis medication community prescription datasets to assess the impact of COVID-19 on DXA waits and osteoporosis medication patterns in England. Results show significant increases in DXA waiting list times and variation in prescription rates. Investment is needed to improve waiting list times. PURPOSE: This study investigates the impact of COVID-19 on DXA scan waiting lists, service recovery and osteoporosis medication prescriptions in the NHS following the March 2020 national lockdowns and staff redeployment. METHODS: Data from March 2019 to June 2023, including NHS digital diagnostics waiting times (DM01) and osteoporosis medication prescriptions from the English Prescribing Dataset (EPD), were analysed. This encompassed total waiting list data across England's seven regions and prescribing patterns for various osteoporosis medications. Analyses included total activity figures and regression analysis to estimate expected activity without COVID-19, using R for all data analysis. RESULTS: In England, DXA waiting lists have grown significantly, with the yearly mean waiting list length increasing from 31,851 in 2019 to 65,757 in 2023. The percentage of patients waiting over 6 weeks for DXA scans rose from 0.9% in 2019 to 40% in 2020, and those waiting over 13 weeks increased from 0.1% in 2019 to 16.7% in 2020. Prescription trends varied, with increases in denosumab, ibandronic acid and risedronate sodium and decreases in alendronic acid, raloxifene hydrochloride and teriparatide. A notable overall prescription decrease occurred in the second quarter of 2020. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 has significantly increased DXA scan waiting lists with ongoing recovery challenges. There is a noticeable disparity in DXA service access across England. Osteoporosis care, indicated by medication prescriptions, also declined during the pandemic. Addressing these issues requires focused investment and effort to improve DXA scan waiting times and overall access to osteoporosis care in England.

Pre-operative bone quality deficits and risk of complications following spine fusion surgery among postmenopausal women.

Poor bone quality is a risk factor for complications after spinal fusion surgery. This study investigated pre-operative bone quality in postmenopausal women undergoing spine fusion and found that those with small bones, thinner cortices and surgeries involving more vertebral levels were at highest risk for complications. PURPOSE: Spinal fusion is one of the most common surgeries performed worldwide. While skeletal complications are common, underlying skeletal deficits are often missed by pre-operative DXA due to artifact from spinal pathology. This prospective cohort study investigated pre-operative bone quality using high resolution peripheral CT (HRpQCT) and its relation to post-operative outcomes in postmenopausal women, a population that may be at particular risk for skeletal complications. We hypothesized that women with low volumetric BMD (vBMD) and abnormal microarchitecture would have higher rates of post-operative complications. METHODS: Pre-operative imaging included areal BMD (aBMD) by DXA, cortical and trabecular vBMD and microarchitecture of the radius and tibia by high resolution peripheral CT. Intra-operative bone quality was subjectively graded based on resistance to pedicle screw insertion. Post-operative complications were assessed by radiographs and CTs. RESULTS: Among 50 women enrolled (age 65 years), mean spine aBMD was normal and 35% had osteoporosis by DXA at any site. Low aBMD and vBMD were associated with "poor" subjective intra-operative quality. Skeletal complications occurred in 46% over a median follow-up of 15 months. In Cox proportional models, complications were associated with greater number of surgical levels (HR 1.19 95% CI 1.06-1.34), smaller tibia total area (HR 1.67 95% CI1.16-2.44) and lower tibial cortical thickness (HR 1.35 95% CI 1.05-1.75; model p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Women with smaller bones, thinner cortices and procedures involving a greater number of vertebrae were at highest risk for post-operative complications, providing insights into surgical and skeletal risk factors for complications in this population.

Intraoperative physician assessment during total hip arthroplasty correlates with DXA parameters.

PURPOSE: Orthopedic surgeons can assess bone status intraoperatively and recommend skeletal health evaluation for patients with poor bone quality. Intraoperative physician assessment (IPA) at the time of total knee arthroplasty correlates with preoperative DXA-measured bone mineral density (BMD). This study evaluated IPA during total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a quantitative measure of bone status based on tactile assessment. METHODS: This retrospective analysis identified 60 patients (64 hips) undergoing primary THA who had IPA recorded in the operative report and a DXA within 2 years before surgery. Intraoperatively, two surgeons assessed bone quality on a 5-point scale (1 = excellent; 5 = poor). IPA score was compared to DXA BMD and T-score, 3D Shaper measurements, WHO classification, FRAX scores, radiographic Dorr classification, and cortical index. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the IPA score and lowest T-score, WHO classification, and FRAX major and hip fracture scores (r = ± 0.485-0.622, all p < 0.001). There was a moderate correlation between IPA score and total hip BMD and 3D Shaper measurements, including trabecular volumetric BMD, cortical surface BMD, and cortical thickness (r = ± 0.326-0.386, all p < 0.01). All patients with below-average IPA scores had osteopenia or osteoporosis by DXA. CONCLUSION: IPA during THA is a simple, valuable tool for quantifying bone status based on tactile feedback. This information can be used to identify patients with poor bone quality that may benefit from skeletal status evaluation and treatment and provide intraoperative guidance for implant selection. Orthopedic surgeons can assess bone health at the time of surgery. Intraoperative physician assessment (IPA) is a bone quality score based on surgeons' tactile assessment that correlates strongly with the lowest T-score, WHO classification, and FRAX fracture risk. IPA can guide surgical decision-making and future bone health treatment.

Utility of MRI-based vertebral bone quality scores and CT-based Hounsfield unit values in vertebral bone mineral density assessment for patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis.

This study investigated bone mineral density assessment for patients with DISH. DXA-based T-scores overestimated bone quality, while MRI-based VBQ scores and CT-based HU values provided accurate assessments, particularly for advanced degenerative cases. This enhances accurate evaluation of BMD, crucial for clinical decision-making. PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic effectiveness of DXA, MRI, and CT in assessing bone mineral density (BMD) for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 105 DISH patients and 116 age-matched controls with lumbar spinal stenosis was conducted. BMD was evaluated using DXA-based T-scores, MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores, and CT-based Hounsfield unit (HU) values. Patients were categorized into three BMD subgroups. Lumbar osteophyte categories were determined by Mata score. Demographics, clinical data, T-scores, VBQ scores, and HU values were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified VBQ and HU thresholds for diagnosing normal BMD using DXA in controls. Correlations between VBQ, HU, and lumbar T-score were analyzed. RESULTS: Age, gender, and BMI showed no significant differences between DISH and control groups. DISH patients had higher T-score (L1-4), the lowest T-score, and Mata scores. VBQ and HU did not significantly differ between groups. In controls, VBQ and HU effectively diagnosed normal BMD (AUC = 0.857 and 0.910, respectively) with cutoffs of 3.0 for VBQ and 104.3 for HU. DISH had higher normal BMD prevalence using T-scores (69.5% vs. 58.6%, P < 0.05), but no significant differences using VBQ (57.1% vs. 56.2%, P > 0.05) and HU (58.1% vs. 57.8%, P > 0.05). Correlations revealed moderate correlations between HU and T-scores (L1-4) in DISH (r = 0.642, P < 0.001) and strong in controls (r = 0.846, P < 0.001). Moderate negative correlations were observed between VBQ and T-scores (L1-4) in DISH (r = - 0.450, P < 0.001) and strong in controls (r = - 0.813, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DXA-based T-scores may overestimate BMD in DISH. VBQ scores and HU values could effectively complement BMD assessment, particularly in DISH patients or those with advanced lumbar degeneration.

Updated practice guideline for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

The introduction of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technology in the 1980s revolutionized the diagnosis, management and monitoring of osteoporosis, providing a clinical tool which is now available worldwide. However, DXA measurements are influenced by many technical factors, including the quality control procedures for the instrument, positioning of the patient, and approach to analysis. Reporting of DXA results may be confounded by factors such as selection of reference ranges for T-scores and Z-scores, as well as inadequate knowledge of current standards for interpretation. These points are addressed at length in many international guidelines but are not always easily assimilated by practising clinicians and technicians. Our aim in this report is to identify key elements pertaining to the use of DXA in clinical practice, considering both technical and clinical aspects. Here, we discuss technical aspects of DXA procedures, approaches to interpretation and integration into clinical practice, and the use of non-bone mineral density measurements, such as a vertebral fracture assessment, in clinical risk assessment.

Sex-Specific Association of Clinical Parameters and Components of Femoral Bone Quality in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Poor bone quality is a critical factor associated with an increased risk of complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no consistent recommendations have yet been established for assessing indicators of bone quality preoperatively. Thus, it remains unclear which preoperatively available and readily accessible parameters are most closely associated with femoral bone quality. Here, we obtained femoral neck specimens from 50 patients undergoing THA. Preoperative Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, pelvic radiographs, and laboratory parameters were analyzed. In the obtained specimens, bone microstructure was assessed using micro-CT and histomorphometry. Additionally, matrix mineralization and osteocyte lacunar morphology were evaluated using quantitative backscattered electron imaging. Our analysis revealed that DXA-derived T-scores correlated with trabecular microstructure. Furthermore, radiographic indices and body mass index correlated differentially with aspects of bone quality in women and men. Contrary to previous observations, no correlation was found between serum vitamin D levels and osteoid indices, nor between clinical parameters and matrix mineralization. Age was strongly associated with the number of mineralized osteocyte lacunae, a factor that appeared to be independent of sex. Taken together, our study demonstrates that no single preoperatively available parameter exhibits a strong and consistent association with femoral bone quality. However, DXA remains a reliable preoperative measure for determining the trabecular microstructure of the femoral neck. In clinical practice, surgeons should adopt an individualized approach to preoperative assessments by considering age, sex, BMI, and radiographic indices to enhance their insight into femoral bone quality, particularly when DXA is unavailable.

Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Diabetic Osteopathy: Another Positive Effect of Incretines? A 12 Months Longitudinal Study.

Diabetic osteopathy is a frequent complication in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The association between T2DM and increased fracture risk has led to study the impact of new antidiabetic drugs on bone metabolism. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are incretin mimetic drugs which have many pleiotropic properties. The relationship between GLP-1RAs and bone is very complex: while in vitro and animal studies have demonstrated a protective effect on bone, human studies are scarce. We led a 12 months longitudinal study evaluating bone changes in 65 patients withT2DM for whom a therapy with GLP-1RAs had been planned. Fifty-four T2DM patients completed the 12-month study period; of them, 30 had been treated with weekly dulaglutide and 24 with weekly semaglutide. One-year therapy with GLP-1RAs resulted in a significant reduction in weight and BMI. Bone mineral density (BMD), bone metabolism, trabecular bone score (TBS), adiponectin, and myostatin were evaluated before and after 12 months of GLP-1RAs therapy. After 12 months of therapy bone turnover markers and adiponectin showed a significant increase, while myostatin values showed a modest but significant reduction. BMD-LS by DXA presented a significant reduction while the reduction in BMD-LS by REMS was not significant and TBS values showed a marginal increase. Both DXA and REMS techniques showed a modest but significant reduction in femoral BMD. In conclusion, the use of GLP-1RAs for 12 months preserves bone quality and reactivates bone turnover. Further studies are needed to confirm whether GLP-1RAs could represent a useful therapeutic option for patients with T2DM and osteoporosis.

Opportunistic screening for osteopathy with routine abdominal computed tomography scan in chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lumbar vertebral bone attenuation, measured in Hounsfield units (HU) can indirectly indicate the bone mineral density (BMD). The aim of this study is to determine the optimal HU threshold on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans to detect osteopathy in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients with CP who underwent CT scans to measure HU at L1 to L4 vertebrae. The mean lumbar vertebral attenuation of female renal transplant donors, aged 20-30 years was utilized to calculate the T-scoreHU of all patients at each vertebral level. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to determine the HU and T-scoreHU for diagnosis of osteopathy in patients with CP. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry value was used to categorize osteopenia and osteoporosis. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients (mean age, 34.5 ± 10.9 years; 72 % males) and 33 female renal transplant donors (mean age, 28 ± 2.4 years) were included. A threshold HU value 212 or T scoreHU of -1.80 at L1 vertebra was found to have a 78 % sensitivity and 70 % specificity for differentiating between osteoporosis and non-osteoporosis (osteopenia and normal BMD). Similarly, a threshold HU value of 254 or a T-scoreHU of -0.46 at L1 vertebra had 78 % sensitivity and 71 % specificity for distinguishing between normal and low BMD (osteoporosis and osteopenia). CONCLUSION: Abdominal CT images, which are routinely performed in chronic pancreatitis, can be used for opportunistic screening of osteoporosis and osteopenia without additional cost or radiation exposure.

Cross-sectional study of patients with VCP multisystem proteinopathy 1 using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: VCP multisystem proteinopathy 1 (MSP1), encompassing inclusion body myopathy (IBM), Paget's disease of bone (PDB) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) (IBMPFD), features progressive muscle weakness, fatty infiltration, and disorganized bone structure in Pagetic bones. The aim of this study is to utilize dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) parameters to examine it as a biomarker of muscle and bone disease in MSP1. METHODS: DXA scans were obtained in 28 patients to assess body composition parameters (bone mineral density [BMD], T-score, total fat, and lean mass) across different groups: total VCP disease (n = 19), including myopathy without Paget's ("myopathy"; n = 12) and myopathy with Paget's ("Paget"; n = 7), and unaffected first-degree relatives serving as controls (n = 6). RESULTS: In the VCP disease group, significant declines in left hip BMD and Z-scores were noted versus the control group (p ≤ .03). The VCP disease group showed decreased whole body lean mass % (p = .04), and increased total body fat % (p = .04) compared to controls. Subgroup comparisons indicated osteopenia in 33.3% and osteoporosis in 8.3% of the myopathy group, with 14.3% exhibiting osteopenia in the Paget group. Moreover, the Paget group displayed higher lumbar L1-L4 T-score values than the myopathy group. DISCUSSION: In MSP1, DXA revealed reduced bone and lean mass, and increased fat mass. These DXA insights could aid in monitoring disease progression of muscle loss and secondary osteopenia/osteoporosis in MSP1, providing value both clinically and in clinical research.

Bone mineral density and body mass composition measurements in premenopausal anorexic patients: the impact of lean body mass.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluating bone density and body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and analyzing their relationships among young anorexic women in comparison with normal-lean matched controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 98 normal-underweight young females were enrolled (aged more than 16 and less than 24 years). The study group included 68 anorexic patients and 30 healthy age-matched controls. The patients underwent a DXA examination to evaluate bone mineral density and body composition. Several indexes of body composition were used: the FMI (Fat Mass Index), the TLMI (Total Lean Mass Index) and the SMI (Skeletal Muscle mass Index) the last one as a marker of sarcopenia. RESULTS: According to the ISCD (International Society for Clinical Densitometry) criteria, a significantly higher percentage of anorexic patients were found to be below the expected range for age as compared to controls (P < 0.01). According to WHO criteria, 20% of the anorexic patients presented an osteoporotic T-score index at the lumbar level and 18% presented an osteoporotic T-score at the femoral level. As regards the lean body characteristics, the SMI and TLMI were significantly lower in the anorexic population (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively) and 24% of the anorexic patients presented SMI values that are indicative of pre-sarcopenia. In addition, only the SMI significantly correlated with both the lumbar and the femoral BMD values. CONCLUSION: Anorexic patients have a very high risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Bone density is influenced by fat body mass and also significantly by lean body mass. Special consideration should be given to the sarcopenic condition since it is a worsening factor of bone health.

TBS correlates with bone density and microstructure at trabecular and cortical bone evaluated by HR-pQCT.

INTRODUCTION: Trabecular bone score (TBS) estimates bone microstructure, which is directly measured by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT). We evaluated the correlation between these methods and TBS influence on fracture risk assessed by FRAX. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 129 individuals (82 women, 43 postmenopausal) 20 to 82.3 years without prevalent clinical or non-clinical morphometric vertebral fractures, using DXA (spine and hip), HR-pQCT at distal radius (R) and tibia (T) and TBS which classifies bone microarchitecture as normal (TBS ≥ 1.350), partially degraded (1.200 < TBS < 1.350), or degraded (TBS ≤ 1.200). RESULTS: Spine and hip BMD and HR-pQCT parameters at cortical bone: area (T), density (R,T) thickness (T) and trabecular bone: density (R,T), number (T) and thickness (R) were significantly better in the 78 individuals with normal TBS (group 1) versus the 51 classified as partially degraded (n = 42) or degraded microarchitecture (n = 9) altogether (group 2). TBS values correlated with age (r = - 0.55), positively with spine and hip BMD and all cortical and trabecular bone density and microstructure parameters evaluated, p < 0.05 all tests. Binary logistic regression defined age (p = 0.008) and cortical thickness (p = 0.018) as main influences on TBS, while ANCOVA demonstrated that HR-pQCT data corrected for age were not different between TBS groups 1 and 2. TBS adjustment increased FRAX risk for major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures. CONCLUSION: We describe significant association between TBS and both trabecular and cortical bone parameters measured by HR-pQCT, consistent with TBS influence on fracture risk estimation by FRAX, including hip fractures, where cortical bone predominates.

The effect of forearm rotation on the bone mineral density measurements of the distal radius.

INTRODUCTION: Forearm dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is often performed in clinics where central DXA is unavailable. Accurate bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is crucial for clinical assessment. Forearm rotation can affect BMD measurements, but this effect remains uncertain. Thus, we aimed to conduct a simulation study using CT images to clarify the effect of forearm rotation on BMD measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forearm CT images of 60 women were analyzed. BMD was measured at the total, ultra-distal (UD), mid-distal (MD), and distal 33% radius regions with the radius located at the neutral position using digitally reconstructed radiographs generated from CT images. Then, the rotation was altered from - 30° to 30° (supination set as positive) with a one-degree increment, and the percent BMD changes from the neutral position were quantified for all regions at each angle for each patient. RESULTS: The maximum mean BMD changes were 5.8%, 7.0%, 6.2%, and 7.2% for the total, UD, MD, and distal 33% radius regions, respectively. The analysis of the absolute values of the percent BMD changes from the neutral position showed that BMD changes of all patients remained within 2% when the rotation was between - 5° and 7° for the total region, between - 3° and 2° for the UD region, between - 4° and 3° for the MD region, and between - 3° and 1° for the distal 33% radius region. CONCLUSION: Subtle rotational changes affected the BMD measurement of each region. The results showed the importance of forearm positioning when measuring the distal radius BMD.

Clinical utility of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in biopsy-confirmed coeliac disease.

BACKGROUND: People with coeliac disease (CD) are at increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Currently, baseline dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is recommended for all patients with newly diagnosed CD. We aimed to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis and the clinical utility of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) in predicting major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) in patients with biopsy-proven CD. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data for consecutive adult patients with biopsy-proven CD between 2001 and 2015 who underwent DXA scanning within 1 year of diagnosis and were followed up for a minimum of 7 years. Fracture risk was assessed using FRAX scores, and the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures during the follow-up period was analysed. RESULTS: A total of 593 patients (median age 45.0 years, 68.5% female) were included. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis were 32.3% and 14.5%, respectively. Increasing age (OR 1.06, p < .0001), decreasing BMI (OR 0.90, p = .003), and higher baseline immunoglobulin A-tissue tissue transglutaminase titre (OR 1.04, p = .03) were significantly associated with increased risk of osteoporosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the FRAX tool to predict MOF were 21.2%, 91.3%, 16.3%, 93.5%, respectively. A higher risk of fractures was associated with ongoing gluten exposure (OR 1.86, p = .02), previous fractures (OR 2.69, p = .005), and older age (OR 1.03, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is a common finding in patients with CD. The FRAX tool showed high specificity in predicting osteoporotic fractures and could be used to aid with patient selection for DXA scanning in some cases.

Bone health screening practices with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and prediction of abnormal results in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of suboptimal peak bone mass attainment. This study aimed to understand rates of bone health screening adherence, describe factors associated with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) acquisition, and identify factors associated with abnormal DXA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of pediatric IBD patients over a 10-year time frame. We included IBD patients (2-20 years of age) enrolled in ImproveCareNow and excluded patients with primary metabolic bone disease. Time-to-event methods and multivariable logistic regression were employed to identify factors associated with DXA acquisition and abnormal DXA. RESULTS: In 676 patients, 464 (68.63%) pediatric patients with IBD had a risk factor for low bone mineral density (BMD); 137 (29.53%) underwent an initial DXA scan. Quiescent disease was significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of DXA (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.97), while weight z-score <-2 was significantly associated with DXA performance (HR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.08-3.98). Abnormal DXA results (BMD z-score ≤-1) occurred in 59 (35.54%) individuals. After adjusting for visit diagnosis, delayed puberty, severe disease course, 6 months or greater of steroid exposure, and history of fracture, BMI z-score <-1 (odds ratio: 5.45; 95% CI: 2.41-12.33) was associated with abnormal DXA. CONCLUSIONS: DXA screening occurred in less than one-third of eligible pediatric IBD patients. Compliance was more common in patients with a weight z-score <-2 and less common in those with quiescent disease. BMI strongly predicted abnormal DXA results when adjusting for risk factors for abnormal BMD.

Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Assessment of the Effects of Parathyroidectomy Using Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry, Trabecular Bone Score, and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry-Based Three-Dimensional Modeling.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the bone microstructure to determine whether curative surgery of primary hyperparathyroidism produces changes in bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), and three-dimensional (3D) dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) parameters and whether these changes are comparable. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 85 patients (60 women and 25 men, 60.4 ± 12.5 years) diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism and undergoing parathyroidectomy. Mean percent changes in BMD (lumbar spine [LS], femoral neck [FN], total hip [TH], and 1/3 radius), TBS and 3D-DXA parameters (trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD), cortical vBMD, integral vBMD, cortical surface density (sBMD), and cortical thickness at TH) after surgery (12, 24, and/or 36 months) were calculated and compared, and we sought the determinants of these changes. RESULTS: After parathyroidectomy, BMD presented statistically significant mean increases in LS, FN, and TH during the first 3 years after surgery (P < .001), accompanied by an improvement in all 3D-DXA parameters, but there were no significant changes in 1/3 radius BMD or TBS. Cortical sBMD, trabecular vBMD, and integral vBMD reached mean increases of similar magnitude to those of FN and TH BMD. Age and preoperative serum levels of parathyroid hormone and carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen were significantly associated with percent changes after surgery. CONCLUSION: We found a benefit of parathyroidectomy for bone, with significant percent increases in LS, FN, and TH BMD up to the third year after surgery, and a qualitative benefit for the hip in both its trabecular and cortical compartments and bone strength.

Bone fragility and osteoporosis in children and young adults.

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disorder which increases fragility fracture risk. Elderly individuals, especially postmenopausal women, are particularly susceptible to osteoporosis. Although rare, osteoporosis in children and young adults is becoming increasingly evident, highlighting the need for timely diagnosis, management and follow-up. Early-onset osteoporosis is defined as the presence of a low BMD (Z-score of ≤ -2.0 in individuals aged < 20 years; T-score of ≤ -2.5 in those aged between 20 to 50 years) accompanied by a clinically significant fracture history, or the presence of low-energy vertebral compression fractures even in the absence of osteoporosis. Affected children and young adults should undergo a thorough diagnostic workup, including collection of clinical history, radiography, biochemical investigation and possibly bone biopsy. Once secondary factors and comorbidities are excluded, genetic testing should be considered to determine the possibility of an underlying monogenic cause. Defects in genes related to type I collagen biosynthesis are the commonest contributors of primary osteoporosis, followed by loss-of-function variants in genes encoding key regulatory proteins of canonical WNT signalling (specifically LRP5 and WNT1), the actin-binding plastin-3 protein (encoded by PLS3) resulting in X-linked osteoporosis, and the more recent sphingomyelin synthase 2 (encoded by SGMS2) which is critical for signal transduction affecting sphingomyelin metabolism. Despite these discoveries, genetic causes and underlying mechanisms in early-onset osteoporosis remain largely unknown, and if no causal gene is identified, early-onset osteoporosis is deemed idiopathic. This calls for further research to unravel the molecular mechanisms driving early-onset osteoporosis that consequently will aid in patient management and individualised targeted therapy.

Diagnosing (severe) osteoporosis by Hologic vs. Lunar measurements: A single-center retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Although different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners provide different bone mineral density (BMD) values, there is not a gold standard DXA scanner. T-score is used to facilitate the interpretation of BMD, and osteoporosis (OP) is diagnosed based on T-scores. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the BMD and T-score differences between Lunar Prodigy and Hologic Horizon DXA scanners. METHODOLOGY: Data were collected for patients with previous BMD measurement on Lunar Prodigy and Hologic Horizon DXA scanners within one year in the same medical center. RESULTS: In a total of 55 patients, BMD values of femoral neck/total, and lumbar vertebrae were all lower at Hologic than Lunar (all p < 0.01). The mean T-score difference at the lumbar spine was 0.74 ±â€¯0.42 (p < 0.001). Of the 49 patients diagnosed as OP (T-score ≤-2.5) with the Hologic, the diagnoses were changed for 25 individuals (51.0 %) with Lunar (p < 0.001). Herewith, although the diagnoses of OP did not change by the repeat technique in other 24 patients (49 %), 13 of them (26.5 %) were categorized as having "high fracture risk" instead of "very high fracture risk" group (i.e., T-score <-3.0). We observed moderate-to-good reliabilities (with an intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] of 0.633-0.878 and 0.733-0.842 for BMD and T-scores, respectively) between measurements with the Lunar and Hologic scanners. Except for one measurement in L3, L4, L1-4 vertebrae, the Bland-Altman plot did not reveal any consistent bias between the measurements of the Lunar and Hologic scanners. CONCLUSIONS: The consistency between different DXA scanners (especially for Hologic vs. Lunar) is important for proper management, especially in patients with low T-scores and OP.

DXA Reporting Updates: 2023 Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

INTRODUCTION: Professional guidance and standards assist radiologic interpreters in generating high quality reports. Initially DXA reporting Official Positions were provided by the ISCD in 2003; however, as the field has progressed, some of the current recommendations require revision and updating. This manuscript details the research approach and provides updated DXA reporting guidance. METHODS: Key Questions were proposed by ISCD established protocols and approved by the Position Development Conference Steering Committee. Literature related to each question was accumulated by searching PubMed, and existing guidelines from other organizations were extracted from websites. Modifications and additions to the ISCD Official Positions were determined by an expert panel after reviewing the Task Force proposals and position papers. RESULTS: Since most DXA is now performed in radiology departments, an approach was endorsed that better aligns with standard radiologic reports. To achieve this, reporting elements were divided into required minimum or optional. Collectively, required components comprise a standard diagnostic report and are considered the minimum necessary to generate an acceptable report. Additional elements were retained and categorized as optional. These optional components were considered relevant but tailored to a consultative, clinically oriented report. Although this information is beneficial, not all interpreters have access to sufficient clinical information, or may not have the clinical expertise to expand beyond a diagnostic report. Consequently, these are not required for an acceptable report. CONCLUSION: These updated ISCD positions conform with the DXA field's evolution over the past 20 years. Specifically, a basic diagnostic report better aligns with radiology standards, and additional elements (which are valued by treating clinicians) remain acceptable but are optional and not required. Additionally, reporting guidance for newer elements such as fracture risk assessment are incorporated. It is our expectation that these updated Official Positions will improve compliance with required standards and generate high quality DXA reports that are valuable to the recipient clinician and contribute to best patient care.

3D-DXA Based Finite Element Modelling for Femur Strength Prediction: Evaluation Against QCT.

Osteoporosis is characterised by the loss of bone density resulting in an increased risk of fragility fractures. The clinical gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis is based on the areal bone mineral density (aBMD) used as a surrogate for bone strength, in combination with clinical risk factors. Finite element (FE) analyses based on quantitative computed tomography (QCT) have been shown to estimate bone strength better than aBMD. However, their application in the osteoporosis clinics is limited due to exposure of patients to increased X-rays radiation dose. Statistical modelling methods (3D-DXA) enabling the estimation of 3D femur shape and volumetric bone density from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan have been shown to improve osteoporosis management. The current study used 3D-DXA based FE analyses to estimate femur strength from the routine clinical DXA scans and compared its results against 151 QCT based FE analyses, in a clinical cohort of 157 subjects. The linear regression between the femur strength predicted by QCT-FE and 3D-DXA-FE models correlated highly (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.86) with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 397 N. In conclusion, the current study presented a 3D-DXA-FE modelling tool providing accurate femur strength estimates noninvasively, compared to QCT-FE models.

National Survey of the Bone Densitometry Evaluation Process Within an Integrated Healthcare System.

BACKGROUND: To assess the current state of bone mineral density evaluation services via dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provided to Veterans with fracture risk through the development and administration of a nationwide survey of facilities in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODOLOGY: The Bone Densitometry Survey was developed by convening a Work Group of individuals with expertise in bone densitometry and engaging the Work Group in an iterative drafting and revision process. Once completed, the survey was beta tested, administered through REDCap, and sent via e-mail to points of contact at 178 VHA facilities. RESULTS: Facility response rate was 31 % (56/178). Most DXA centers reported positively to markers of readiness for their bone densitometers: less than 10 years old (n=35; 63 %); in "excellent" or "good" condition (n=44; 78 %, 32 % and 46 %, respectively); and perform phantom calibration (n=43; 77 %). Forty-one DXA centers (73 %) use intake processes that have been shown to reduce errors. Thirty-seven DXA centers (66 %) reported their technologists receive specialized training in DXA, while 14 (25 %) indicated they receive accredited training. Seventeen DXA centers (30 %) reported performing routine precision assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Many DXA centers reported using practices that meet minimal standards for DXA reporting and preparation; however, the lack of standardization, even within an integrated healthcare system, indicates an opportunity for quality improvement to ensure consistent high quality bone mineral density evaluation of Veterans.