Fear-avoidant beliefs and behaviours after upper limb fracture in older people: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to understand older people's perspectives of associated fear-avoidant beliefs following upper limb fracture. METHODS: Published and unpublished literature databases were systematically searched from inception to 1st April 2023. Qualitative studies reporting the perspectives of fear-avoidant beliefs or behaviours in people who had sustained an upper limb fracture were eligible. Data extracted included characteristics of people interviewed, experiences and perceptions of fear, fear of falling, and fear-avoidant beliefs and behaviours. Data were synthesised using a meta-ethnography approach and the GRADE-CERQUAL tool. RESULTS: Eight studies were eligible (n = 150 participants; 109 distal radial/41 humeral fracture). Three overarching themes were identified: (1) type of fear-avoidant experiences, (2) drivers of fear-avoidant beliefs and behaviours, and (3) consequences of fear-avoidant beliefs and behaviours. The themes generated were based on moderate confidence evidence. In summary, whilst some patients initially consider upper limb fractures to be relatively minor injuries, over time, the realisation occurs that they have wide-ranging consequences with longer-term perspectives on recovery. This often occurs following an initial period of reduced fear. Providing education and support immediately post-fracture to prevent or challenge initial health beliefs around fear of falls and fear of movement is imperative to recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Fear-avoidant beliefs can impact heavily on certain older people's recovery, as well as their longer-term health and wellbeing. Consideration of fear avoidance and taking steps to mitigate against this in the acute upper limb trauma setting will better serve these patients in their ongoing recovery from injury.

Current alternatives to traditional radial approach for coronary interventions: A randomized prospective study of the ulnar and distal radial approaches.

BACKGROUND: The radial artery is the standard access for coronary intervention; however, it is essential to have alternative accesses as it may be used as a conduit during coronary artery bypass grafting or for dialysis fistula. Ulnar and distal radial artery accesses have emerged as alternative accesses for traditional radial artery. AIM: To compare distal radial artery access and ulnar artery access as alternatives to traditional radial artery access regarding safety, efficacy, and success rate. METHODS: Two-hundred patients were included (100 traditional radial [TRA], 50 distal radial [DRA] and 50 ulnar). Access artery follow up ultrasound was performed up to 28 days. RESULTS: Procedural success rate was 97%, 74%, and 92% in the TRA, DRA and ulnar groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Crossover occurred in 3 patients (3%) in TRA, 13 patients (26%) in DRA and 4 cases (8%) in ulnar group (p < 0.001). The most common cause of crossover was failure of artery cannulation. Regarding cannulation time, the mean access time in seconds was 80.19 ± 25.98, 148.4 ± 29.60, 90.5 ± 21.84 in TRA, DRA and ulnar groups, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study concluded that these new approaches proved to be potential alternatives to traditional radial approach; however, ulnar artery access proved to be superior to distal radial artery access as regards success rate and cannulation time.

Stent graft implantation from distal radial access-A novel way to treat femoral access site complication during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A case report.

In this paper, a case of an 82-year-old man who was admitted to our department with sever symptomatic degenerative aortic valve stenosis is presented and discussed. After all screening procedures, a successful transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement was performed, but the closure of the femoral access was unsuccessful due to suture-based device failure. We decided to perform a prolonged balloon dilatation and external compression at the bleeding site, but the bleeding did not stop; therefore, an iCover stent graft was implanted from distal radial artery access using slender technique. Following that, the bleeding was stopped, and the patient had an uneventful outcome.

How to Omit the Potential Pitfalls in Distal Radial Access: Lessons From Cadaveric and CTA Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To verify the anatomical basis, ideal puncture sites, and potential pitfalls of the distal radial artery (dRA) in the anatomical snuffbox region for distal radial access (dTRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 26 formalin-fixed upper limbs and computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the upper limbs of 168 consecutive patients were studied. Cadaveric dissection and dRA 3D reconstruction were used to evaluate the dRA route for dTRA. The puncture sites, dRA diameter, and angle of the dRA and tendons of the extensor pollicis brevis were also measured in the patients and cadavers. RESULTS: The cadaver dissection provided more insights than did the dRA 3D reconstruction. However, preoperative evaluation had better diagnostic accuracy (p=0.024). Puncture sites 1 and 3 had a high success rate (63.2% possible success rate, 191/302). The DISFAVOR theory was put forward, in which 8 types of potential pitfalls that may interrupt puncture procedure or lead to a surgical failure were observed, including occlusion, stenosis, tortuosity, arteriovenous fistula, angioma, different radial artery (RA) ramifications, radial veins, and cephalic veins. The mean diameter of dRA based on cadaver dissection and CTA was 2.53 (SD=0.73) and 2.63 (SD=0.69) mm, respectively. Furthermore, the minimum distance from the outer layer of dRA to the skin was 5.71 (SD=2.0) mm based on CTA. The angle between the dRA and tendons of extensor pollicis brevis (TEPB) based on cadaver dissection and CTA was 58.0° (SD=21.5°) and 51.8° (SD=16.6°), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Puncture sites 1 and 3 were more suitable for the dTRA, and we put forward the DISFAVOR theory to summarize the 8 types of potential pitfalls during the use of dTRA.

Effect of the Sauvé-Kapandji method on the wrist contact surface for distal radial ulnar joint disorders.

BACKGROUND: The Sauvé-Kapandji (S-K) method is a surgical procedure performed for chronic deformities of the distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ). Changes to the joint contact surface from pre- to postoperatively under physiological in vivo conditions have not yet been determined for this useful treatment. The aim of the present study was therefore to compare the articular contact area of the wrist joint between before and after the S-K method for DRUJ disorders. METHODS: The SK method was performed for 15 patients with DRUJ osteoarthritis and ulnar impaction syndrome. We calculated the Mayo Wrist Score as the patient's clinical findings and created 3-dimensional bone models of cases in which the S-K method was performed and calculated the contact area and shift in the center of the contact area using customized software. RESULTS: The Mean modified Mayo Wrist Score improved significantly from 60.3 preoperatively to 80.3 postoperatively (P < 0.01). Scaphoid contact area to the radius increased significantly from 112.6 ± 37.0 mm2 preoperatively to 127.5 ± 27.8 mm2 postoperatively (P = 0.03). Lunate contact area to radius-ulna was 121.3 ± 43.3 mm2 preoperatively and 112.5 ± 37.6 mm2 postoperatively, but this decrease was not significant (P = 0.38). Contact area ratio of scaphoid to lunate increased significantly from 1.01 ± 0.4 preoperatively to 1.20 ± 0.3 postoperatively (P = 0.02). Postoperative translations of the center of the scaphoid and lunate contact areas were decomposed into ulnar and proximal directions. Ulnar and proximal translation distances of the scaphoid contact area were 0.8 ± 1.7 mm and 0.4 ± 0.6 mm, respectively, and those of the lunate contact area were 1.1 ± 1.7 mm and 0.4 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. This study revealed changes in wrist contact area and center of the contact area before and after the S-K method. CONCLUSION: These results may accurately indicate changes in wrist joint contact area from pre- to postoperatively using the S-K method for patients with DRUJ disorder. Evaluation of changes in contact area due to bone surface modeling of the wrist joint using 3DCT images may be useful in considering surgical methods.

Biomechanical Analysis of Transosseous Repair Versus Combined Transosseous With Capsular Repair for Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears With Instability.

PURPOSE: This study compared the biomechanical stability of transosseous repair and transosseous combined with capsular repair techniques to reattach the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) for distal radioulnar joint instability. METHODS: Eight adult cadaveric upper-extremity specimens were studied. Each underwent peripheral ulnar-sided detachment of the deep and superficial TFCC fibers and repair. Four groups were prepared sequentially: intact TFCC, disrupted TFCC, transosseous repair, and combined transosseous with capsular repair. Forearm rotational torque was measured in three wrist positions: 60° flexion, neutral position, and 60° extension. Maximum dorsal and palmar ulnar translations in response to a 20-N traction load were measured at nine wrist positions after stabilizing the humerus and radius. Measurements were taken before and after TFCC disruption and following repair. RESULTS: Clear instability of the radius relative to the ulna was observed after sectioning the deep and superficial fibers of the TFCC, and stability was markedly improved after reconstruction in all positions. Compared with the normal group, rotational torque was similar between the two repair methods. In the pronation palmar flexion and supination dorsal extension positions, dorsal-palmar translation was smaller in the combined transosseous with capsular repair group than in the transosseous repair-alone group. CONCLUSIONS: Triangular fibrocartilage complex deep fibers are the primary stabilizing structure of the distal radioulnar joint. In this cadaveric study, the combined transosseous with capsular repair technique demonstrated less dorsal-palmar translation compared with the transosseous-alone repair technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Combined transosseous with capsular repair is expected to provide improved postoperative stability for patients with peripheral TFCC tears and distal radioulnar joint instability.

Percutaneous treatment of type C distal radius fractures using dual-external fixator.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to introduce a potential alternative percutaneous treatment for AO types C1, C2, and C3 distal radius fractures using dual-external fixator (a no-bridging cemented-pin frame and a conventional wrist-bridging external fixator). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2018 to January 2021, 52 patients (52 distal radius fractures) were treated with dual-external fixator. For comparison, 61 patients (61 distal radius fractures) were treated with a plate and screw system. Wrist function was assessed using the Mayo Wrist Score. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Fracture healing was achieved in all patients. At the final follow-up of 29 months (range, 24-34 months) vs 36 months (range, 26-39 months) (P > 0.05), the patients treated with dual-external fixator and a plate and screw system achieved mean ulnar deviations of 31° vs 29° (P < 0.05), mean Mayo Wrist Scores of 91.12 ± 5.98 vs 88.12 ± 7.54 (P < 0.05), and mean patient satisfaction scores of 23.42 ± 2.47 vs 23.04 ± 2.32 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AO types C1, C2, and C3 distal radius fractures can be treated successfully using dual-external fixator. The technique is a potential alternative in addition to the conventional treatments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IIa.

Effect of proximal artery restriction on flow reduction and cardiac function in hemodialysis patients with high-flow arteriovenous fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: Arteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis patients. High-flow arteriovenous fistula may cause high-output heart failure. Various procedures are used to reduce high-flow arteriovenous fistula. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of proximal artery restriction combined with distal artery ligation on flow reduction for high-flow arteriovenous fistula and on cardiac function and echocardiographic changes in patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected from the medical records of patients undergoing hemodialysis with heart failure and high-flow arteriovenous fistula between May 2018 and May 2021. Thirty-one patients were treated with proximal artery restriction (banding juxta-anastomosis of the proximal artery) combined with distal artery ligation (anastomosis distal artery ligation). Changes in the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Workgroup cardiac function class, blood pressure, and echocardiography before and 6 months after flow restriction were compared, and post-intervention primary patency was followed-up. RESULTS: The technical success rate of the surgery was 100%, and no surgery-related adverse events occurred. Blood flow and blood flow/cardiac output decreased significantly after flow restriction. Blood flow decreased from 2047.21 ± 398.08 mL/min to 1001.36 ± 240.42 mL/min, and blood flow/cardiac output decreased from 40.18% ± 6.76% to 22.34% ± 7.21% (P < .001). Post-intervention primary patency of arteriovenous fistula at 6, 12, and 24 months was 96.8%, 93.5%, and 75.2%, respectively. The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Workgroup cardiac function class improved significantly after 6 months of flow restriction (P < .001). The systolic and diastolic left heart function improved, as evidenced by a significant decrease in left atrial volume index, left ventricular end-diastolic/end-systolic diameters, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular mass index, cardiac output, and cardiac index and an increase in lateral peak velocity of longitudinal contraction, average septal-lateral s', and lateral early diastolic peak velocity after flow restriction (P < .05). Systolic pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 32.36 ± 8.56 mmHg to 27.57 ± 8.98 mmHg (P < .05), indicating an improvement in right heart function. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal artery restriction combined with distal artery ligation effectively reduced the blood flow of high-flow arteriovenous fistula and improved cardiac function.

Ultrasound-guided distal transradial access for cardiac catheterization: Technical notes for the interventionalist.

Over the latest years, the use of distal radial access (dTRA), also called "snuffbox," has become more and more popular for cardiac catheterization. Indeed, dTRA has several advantages compared to the traditional proximal radial approach, such as a lower risk of hand ischemia, radial artery occlusion (RAO) and faster post-procedural hemostasis. However, due to the presence of different muscular-skeletal structures, as well as to the small diameter of the distal radial artery (dRA), an ultrasound-guided cannulation would be preferred since a blind puncture increases the risk of tendon damage and/or the irritation of the underlying periosteum. The present article is aimed to provide the key tips for performing US-guided access using the dRA in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac procedures.

Incidence of Distal Radial Artery Occlusion and its Influencing Factors After Cardiovascular Intervention Via the Distal Transradial Access.

INTRODUCTION: One of the important advantages of the distal transradial access (dTRA) is the significant reduction in the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO). There are few reports on the influencing factors for distal radial artery occlusion (dRAO) after cardiovascular interventions via the dTRA. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included the clinical data of patients who underwent a cardiovascular intervention via the dTRA. The dRAO was evaluated by ultrasound within 24 hours after the procedure. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to explore the influencing factors for dRAO. RESULTS: The incidence of dRAO was 3.5% (28/805) at 24 hours follow-up after the procedure. In the comparison between the 2 groups, the preoperative distal radial artery (DRA) internal diameter in the dRAO group was significantly smaller than that in the non-dRAO group (p=0.001). The prevalence of DRA inner diameter/sheath outer diameter <1 was significantly higher in the dRAO group than in the non-dRAO group (p=0.013). The number of puncture attempts was significantly greater in the dRAO group than in the non-dRAO group (p=0.007). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that DRA inner diameter/sheath outer diameter <1 was an independent risk factor for dRAO (OR=4.827, 95% CI=1.087-21.441, p=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of dRAO 24 hours after cardiovascular intervention via the dTRA was 3.5%, and a DRA inner diameter/sheath outer diameter <1 was an independent risk factor for dRAO. Preoperative ultrasound assessment of vessel inner diameter and selection of a sheath with a smaller outer diameter may reduce the risk of dRAO. CLINICAL IMPACT: The incidence of distal radial artery occlusion after cardiovascular intervention was 3.5%. The distal radial artery inner diameter/sheath outer diameter <1 was an independent risk factor for distal radial artery occlusion. Preoperative ultrasound assessment of vessel inner diameter and selection of a sheath with a smaller outer diameter may reduce the risk of distal radial artery occlusion. The number of puncture attempts and compression time were not related to distal radial artery occlusion.

Percutaneous Superficial Temporal Artery Access Facilitating Carotid Artery Stenting Performed From Distal Radial Artery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to describe carotid artery stenting (CAS) via distal transradial access (dTRA) facilitated by additional superficial temporal artery (STA) access, in a patient with complex aortic arch vessel anatomy. TECHNIQUE: A 72-year-old woman with a prior history of complex cervical surgery and radiotherapy due to laryngeal malignancy, presented with a symptomatic 90% stenosis of the left internal carotid artery (ICA). Due to high cervical lesion, the patient was rejected from carotid endarterectomy. Angiography demonstrated 90% stenosis of the left ICA and a type III aortic arch. After failure of left common carotid artery (CCA) cannulation with appropriate catheter support via dTRA and transfemoral approaches, CAS was attempted a second time. After percutaneous ultrasound guided access to right dTRA and left STA, a 0.035 inch guidewire introduced to the left CCA from the contralateral dTRA was snared and externalized via left STA to improve wire support for guiding advancement. Thereafter, the left ICA lesion was successfully stented with a 7×30 mm self-expanding stent via right dTRA. All vessels involved were patent at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The STA may be a promising adjunctive access site to increase transradial catheter support for CAS or neurointerventional procedures in the anterior circulation. CLINICAL IMPACT: Transradial cerebrovascular interventions have been gaining popularity, however, unstable catheter access to distal cerebrovascular structures limits its widespread use. Guidewire externalization technique via additional STA access may improve transradial catheter stabilty and increase procedural success with possibly low access stie complication rate.

Distal radial access for neuroangiography and neurointerventions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown that coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via distal radial access (DRA) are safe and effective. Safety and efficacy of neuroangiography and neurointerventions via DRA are unknown. PURPOSE: Search the literatures on neuroangiography and neurointerventions via DRA and conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched from inception to November 10, 2022. After literature screening, data extraction and assessment of literature quality, random effects model was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 236 literatures were retrieved, and 17 literatures including 1163 patients were finally included for meta-analysis.The pooled access success rate was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.98), and the heterogeneity was obvious (I2 = 55.5%). The pooled access-related complications incidence rate was 0.03 (95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.05), and the heterogeneity was not obvious (I2 = 15.8%). CONCLUSION: Neuroangiography and neurointerventions via DRA may be safe and effective. DRA is an alternative access for neuroangiography and neurointerventions.

Predictors of success and puncture site complications in the distal radial approach.

The distal radial approach (DRA) has been proposed as an alternative approach for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, the predictors of DRA failure and puncture site complications are unclear. Among 7153 consecutive patients undergoing CAG or PCI between November 2018 and January 2021, 3610 patients undergoing CAG or PCI with DRA were analyzed. The primary endpoint of this study was the procedural success, and the secondary endpoint of this study was puncture site complications during procedure. Puncture site complications during procedure were defined as a composite of major bleeding, minor bleeding, arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and neuropathy. The DRA success rate and the puncture site complication rate were 90.4% and 7.7%, respectively. The predictors of DRA failure were low body weight and dual antiplatelet therapy; those of DRA success were PCI and ultrasonography-guided DRA; those of puncture site complications during procedure were low body weight, peripheral arterial disease, dual antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, and PCI; and that of no puncture site complications were previous PCI and ultrasonography-guided DRA. The negative predictors of DRA success with no puncture site complication during procedure were low body weight and dual antiplatelet therapy. The positive predictor of DRA success with no puncture site complication during procedure was ultrasonography-guided DRA. We identified the predictors of DRA failure and puncture site complications during procedure in patients undergoing CAG and PCI with DRA. Ultrasonography-guided DRA was associated with a high DRA success rate and a low puncture site complication rate in patients undergoing CAG or PCI with DRA.

Evaluation of a new insertion site for arterial pressure line in intensive care unit management: a prospective study.

The arterial pressure line (A-line) is primarily inserted through the radial artery. However, accidental removal due to joint movement can be problematic in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of A-line insertion in the ICU through the distal radial approach (DRA), which is used in cardiac catheterization. This single-center, prospective, comparative study included 200 patients (≥ 20 years) who were brought to our hospital for emergency care and required A-line insertion. Patients were quasi-randomized to the traditional radial approach (TRA) or DRA. Data were recorded at the time of A-line insertion, administration, and removal. We evaluated the vessel diameter, number of punctures, success of the procedure, presence of complications, such as infection during management, and time taken for hemostasis after catheter removal. The primary endpoint was the accidental removal rate. Due to incomplete information, data were collected for 193 patients (96 TRA and 97 DRA). Successful procedures were observed in 95 of the 96 patients with TRA and 94 of the 97 patients with DRA. Guidewire use during insertion was significantly more common in the DRA group (P < 0.01) and post-puncture splint fixation was significantly more common in the TRA group (P < 0.01). Accidental removal, the primary endpoint, was observed in 10 patients with TRAs and 11 patients with DRAs, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.99). DRA is as safe and effective as the TRA, suggesting that it is useful as a new A-line insertion site.

Distal versus conventional radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: Design and rationale of DISCO RADIAL study.

BACKGROUND: Transradial access (TRA) has become the default access method for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures. As compared to transfemoral access, TRA has been shown to be safer, cost-effective and more patient-friendly. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) represents the most frequent complication of TRA, and precludes future coronary procedures through the radial artery, the use of the radial artery as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting or as arteriovenous fistula for patients on hemodialysis. Recently, distal radial access (DRA) has emerged as a promising alternative to TRA, yielding potential for minimizing the risk of RAO. However, an international multicenter randomized comparison between DRA, and conventional TRA with respect to the rate of RAO is still lacking. TRIAL DESIGN: DISCO RADIAL is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, superiority trial. A total of 1300 eligible patients will be randomly allocated to undergo coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through DRA or TRA using the 6 Fr Glidesheath Slender sheath introducer. Extended experience with both TRA and DRA is required for operators' eligibility and optimal evidence-based best practice to reduce RAO systematically implemented by protocol. The primary endpoint is the incidence of forearm RAO assessed by vascular ultrasound at discharge. Several important secondary endpoints will also be assessed, including access-site cross-over, hemostasis time, and access-site related complications. SUMMARY: The DISCO RADIAL trial will provide the first large-scale multicenter randomized evidence comparing DRA to TRA in patients scheduled for coronary angiography or PCI with respect to the incidence of RAO at discharge.

Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The novel distal radial artery (dRA) approach is a popular arterial access route for interventional cardiology and neurointerventions. We explored the dRA as an alternative site to the classic forearm radial artery (RA) for perioperative blood pressure monitoring. We hypothesized that dRA catheterization is noninferior to RA for the first attempt success rate. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled, noninferiority study. Adult patients who underwent elective surgery at the Jinling Hospital from May 2021 to August 2021 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was to test the noninferiority of the first attempt success rate between the groups. Secondary endpoints included anatomical characteristics, catheterization time, arterial posterior wall puncture rate, postoperative compression time, dampened arterial pressure waveforms, and complications. RESULTS: Totally, 161 patients who received either dRA (n = 81) or RA (n = 80) catheterization were analyzed. The first attempt success rates were 87.7 and 91.3% in the dRA and RA groups, respectively, with a mean difference of - 3.6% (95% CI, - 13.1 to 5.9%). The dRA diameter and cross-sectional area were significantly smaller than those of the RA (P < 0.001). The subcutaneous depth of dRA was significantly greater than that of the RA (P < 0.001). The dRA had a longer catheterization time (P = 0.008) but a shorter postoperative compression time (P < 0.001). The arterial posterior wall puncture rate of dRA was significantly higher than that of the RA (P = 0.006). The dRA had fewer dampened arterial waveforms than RA (P = 0.030) perioperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The dRA is a rational alternative approach to RA for perioperative arterial pressure monitoring and provides a noninferior first attempt success rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2100043714 , registration date: 27/02/2021).

Treatment of distal radius fractures using a cemented K-wire frame.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study included an alternative treatment for types A2, A3, and B1 distal radius fractures using percutaneous fixation with a cemented K-wire frame. METHODS: From January 2017 to January 2020, 78 patients with distal radius fractures were treated with percutaneous internal fixation using a cemented K-wire frame. There were 47 male patients and 31 female patients. The fractures were classified into types A2 (n = 10), A3 (n = 46), and B1 (n = 22). X-rays were taken immediately after surgery and after the bone had healed. Wrist function was assessed using the Mayo Wrist Score (90-100, excellent; 80-90, good; 60-80, satisfactory; < 60, poor). Patient satisfaction was assessed using the 10-cm visual analog scale. RESULTS: Neither fixation failure nor K-wire migration was found (P > 0.05). Osteomyelitis was not observed in this series. All patients achieved bone healing after a mean of 4.5 weeks (range, 4 to 8 weeks). Follow-up lasted a mean of 27 months (range, 24 to 33 months). The mean score of wrist function was 97 (range, 91 to 100). Among them, 66 results were excellent and 12 results were good. The mean patient satisfaction was 10 cm (range, 8 to 10 cm). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous fixation with cemented K-wire frame is a safe and preferred choice for the treatment of types A2, A3, and B1 distal radius fractures. The frame provides support to prevent wire migration. The fixation technique is a minimally invasive procedure that is easy to perform. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IVa.

Intra-articular fibromembranous septum after intra-articular distal radial fracture: Arthroscopic excision and factors associated with formation of the septum.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular fibromembranous septum in the radiocarpal joint can cause wrist contracture after distal radial fracture, but the mechanism underlying the formation of the septum is unknown. This study examined the clinical outcomes in patients treated with arthroscopic excision of the septum and the factors associated with formation of the septum in patients with and without a septum. METHODS: Fifty-three patients (22 with septum and 31 without septum) treated for intra-articular distal radial fracture with arthroscopy using a volar locking plate and secondary removal of the plate were included. Clinical outcomes and radiological assessments were analyzed. RESULTS: In patients with a septum, the range of wrist flexion and total wrist arc before the second operation were significantly more limited than in those without a septum (p < 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). The improvement rate (improvement in wrist arc divided by the wrist arc of the healthy side) after arthroscopic excision of the septum and plate removal was greater in patients with a septum than in those without a septum (6.1% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.08). The significant factors affecting formation of the septum were the residual articular gap and the height of the midradial ridge on computed tomography images. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular fibromembranous septum after surgically treated intra-articular distal radial fracture affects limited range of motion and secondary arthroscopic excision of the septum improves the wrist range of motion. Anatomical reduction and maintenance of the articular fragment, as well as anatomical characteristics might be causes of septum formation.

Detecting Distal Radial Fractures from Wrist Radiographs Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network with an Accuracy Comparable to Hand Orthopedic Surgeons.

In recent years, fracture image diagnosis using a convolutional neural network (CNN) has been reported. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the ability of CNN to diagnose distal radius fractures (DRFs) using frontal and lateral wrist radiographs. We included 503 cases of DRF diagnosed by plain radiographs and 289 cases without fracture. We implemented the CNN model using Keras and Tensorflow. Frontal and lateral views of wrist radiographs were manually cropped and trained separately. Fine-tuning was performed using EfficientNets. The diagnostic ability of CNN was evaluated using 150 images with and without fractures from anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. The CNN model diagnosed DRF based on three views: frontal view, lateral view, and both frontal and lateral view. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CNN model, plotted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and calculated the area under the ROC curve (AUC). We further compared performances between the CNN and three hand orthopedic surgeons. EfficientNet-B2 in the frontal view and EfficientNet-B4 in the lateral view showed highest accuracy on the validation dataset, and these models were used for combined views. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the CNN based on both anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were 99.3, 98.7, and 100, respectively. The accuracy of the CNN was equal to or better than that of three orthopedic surgeons. The AUC of the CNN on the combined views was 0.993. The CNN model exhibited high accuracy in the diagnosis of distal radius fracture with a plain radiograph.

Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm.

Distal transradial access (dTRA) is a novel alternative to conventional radial artery access for coronary catheterization. However, the feasibility and safety of repeated use of dTRA have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the repeated use of dTRA for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm. A total of 1717 patients underwent angiography or angioplasty via dTRA. We retrospectively analyzed the catheterization records of patients who underwent repeated puncture of the distal radial artery in the same arm. The incidence of successive applications of dTRA and the reasons for dropout were retrospectively investigated. A total of 416 patients, including three who underwent coronary catheterization with the bilateral dTRA in the initial attempt were analyzed. A 3-, 4-, 5-, or 6-French sheath or sheathless guide catheter was used in the initial procedure. A maximum of four successive coronary catheterization procedures were performed. The second procedure with dTRA on the same arm was successfully performed in 395 cases (94.3%), with a successive rate of 89.6% for both the third and fourth dTRA procedures. Conversion to another approach site (n = 30) was attributed to radial artery occlusion (n = 9), narrowing of the distal radial artery (n = 19), and puncture failure (n = 2). The current data indicate that the repeated use of dTRA is safe and feasible, and this approach may become a standard approach site in the future.