Prospective Multicenter Study of the Primary Obesity Surgery Endoluminal (POSE 2.0) Procedure for Treatment of Obesity.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Primary Obesity Surgery Endoluminal (POSE) 2.0 procedure involves a novel pattern of full-thickness gastric body plications to shorten and narrow the stomach using durable suture anchor pairs. Our prospective, multicenter trial examined the safety, efficacy, durability, and physiologic effects of POSE 2.0 in adults with obesity. METHODS: Adults with obesity underwent POSE 2.0 at 3 centers. Primary outcomes were percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) and proportion of patients achieving >5% TBWL at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included change in obesity comorbidities, satiety, quality of life at 6 months, and durability of plications at 12 and 24 months. Subjects were followed for adverse events throughout the study duration. RESULTS: 44 patients (61% female; mean age, 45 ± 9.7 years; mean body mass index, 37 ± 2.1 kg/m2) were enrolled. This procedure used an average of 19 suture anchor pairs, with a mean duration of 37 ± 11 minutes, and was technically successful in all subjects. Mean %TBWL at 12 months was 15.7% ± 6.8%. At 12 months, %TBWL >5%, >10%, and >15% was achieved in 98%, 86%, and 58% of patients, respectively. Improvements in lipid profile, liver biochemistries, and hepatic steatosis were seen at 6 months. Improvements in hepatic steatosis persisted for 24 months in a subgroup of patients (P < .01). POSE 2.0 reduced maximum tolerated meal volume (P = .03) and was associated with increased fullness (P < .01) and improved eating behavior (P < .01) at 6 months. Impact of weight on quality-of-life questionnaire improved at 6 months (2.23 vs 1.23; P < .01). Repeat assessment at 24 months (n = 26) showed fully intact plications. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: POSE 2.0 is an effective and durable endoscopic bariatric therapy which may influence physiologic pathways impacting satiety. Larger comparative studies are needed to further elucidate these initial findings. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03721731.

A Comprehensive Review on Bariatric Endoscopy: Where We Are Now and Where We Are Going.

Background: Obesity is a chronic disease that impairs quality of life and leads to several comorbidities. When conservative therapies fail, bariatric surgical options such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the most effective therapies to induce persistent weight loss. Over the last two decades, bariatric endoscopy has become a valid alternative to surgery in specific settings. Primary bariatric endoscopic therapies: Restrictive gastric procedures, such as intragastric balloons (IGBs) and endoscopic gastroplasty, have been shown to be effective in inducing weight loss compared to diet modifications alone. Endoscopic gastroplasty is usually superior to IGBs in maintaining weight loss in the long-term period, whereas IGBs have an established role as a bridge-to-surgery approach in severely obese patients. IGBs in a minority of patients could be poorly tolerated and require early removal. More recently, novel endoscopic systems have been developed with the combined purpose of inducing weight loss and improving metabolic conditions. Duodenal mucosal resurfacing demonstrated efficacy in this field in its early trials: significant reduction from baseline of HbA1c values and a modest reduction of body weight were observed. Other endoscopic malabsorptive have been developed but need more evidence. For example, a pivotal trial on duodenojejunal bypasses was stopped due to the high rate of severe adverse events (hepatic abscesses). Optimization of these more recent malabsorptive endoscopic procedures could expand the plethora of bariatric patients that could be treated with the intention of improving their metabolic conditions. Revisional bariatric therapies: Weight regain may occur in up to one third of patients after bariatric surgery. Different endoscopic procedures are currently performed after both RYGB and SG in order to modulate post-surgical anatomy. The application of argon plasma coagulation associated with endoscopic full-thickness suturing systems (APC-TORe) and Re-EndoSleeve have shown to be the most effective endoscopic treatments after RYGB and SG, respectively. Both procedures are usually well tolerated and have a very low risk of stricture. However, APC-TORe may sometimes require more than one session to obtain adequate final results. The aim of this review is to explore all the currently available primary and revisional endoscopic bariatric therapies focusing on their efficacy and safety and their potential application in clinical practice.

Fluid-filled intragastric balloons are an effective and safe weight loss option across BMI and age ranges.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is an expanding public health problem, resulting in more than half a billion adults worldwide. Intragastric balloon (IGB) placement is a weight loss alternative for obese patients with an inadequate weight loss response to diet and exercise. The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy and safety of the single-chamber fluid-filled IGB for weight loss and compare its results across different age groups. METHODS: We performed a database review of 239 consecutive patients from two outpatient GI clinics who underwent placement of an IGB. Our final analysis composed of 239 IGB placements in 232 patients (mean age, 44.5 ± 10.3 years; 67% female; baseline BMI 42.0 ± 9.0). Efficacy outcomes included the percentage of the total (%TWL) and excess weight loss (%EWL). Safety outcomes were measured as the number of patients who required early IGB removal (before 6 months). RESULTS: %TWL at 3 months was 10.1% and 14.4% at 6 months. Overall, 92%, 74%, and 47% of patients lost 5%, 10%, and 15% of total weight at 6 months, respectively. %EWL was 22.1% and 30.7% at 3 and 6 months post-IGB placement, respectively. The balloon was safely removed at six months after placement in most patients, whereas in 13.0% of cases early removal was performed at an average of 12.0 weeks after placement (range, 2 days-23 weeks). CONCLUSION: The use of a single-chamber fluid-filled IGB is successful in inducing a significant amount of weight loss in almost three-fourths of patients six months after its placement. This beneficial effect is seen across different BMI ranges and age groups at a similar level. IGBs should be considered an effective and safe alternative for obese patients who fail lifestyle interventions and conservative measures, fulfilling the unmet needs of many who are unwilling or unable to undergo bariatric surgery.

Primary obesity surgery endoluminal (POSE) for the treatment of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Primary obesity surgery endoluminal (POSE) utilizes an incision-less operating platform system to create full-thickness plications in the gastric fundus and body (original POSE). Many studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of original POSE for the treatment of obesity. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature in an attempt to evaluate the outcomes of original POSE per the ASGE task force thresholds. METHODS: Bibliographic databases were systematically searched for studies assessing the outcomes of POSE for the treatment of obesity. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that assessed outcomes of POSE were included. Studies were included if they reported percent total weight loss (%TWL) or percent excess weight loss (%EWL) and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAE). RESULTS: A total of seven studies with 613 patients were included. Two included studies were RCTs, while the remaining were observational studies. Pooled mean %EWL at 3-6 months and 12-15 months were 42.62 (95% CI 37.56-47.68) and 48.86 (95% CI 42.31-55.41), respectively. Pooled mean %TWL at 3-6 months and 12-15 months was 13.45 (95% CI 8.93-17.97) and 12.68 (95% CI 8.13-17.23), respectively. Subgroup analysis of two RCTs showed that weight loss at 1 year was significantly higher in POSE patients (%EWL difference in means 19.45 (95% CI 4.65-34.24, p value = 0.01). The overall incidence of serious adverse events was only 2.84% and included GI bleeding, extra-gastric bleeding, hepatic abscess, severe pain, severe nausea, and severe vomiting. The mean number of total anchors placed in the fundus and body was 13.18 (95% CI 11.77-14.58), and the mean procedure time was 44.55 min (95% CI 36.44-52.65). CONCLUSION: POSE, a minimally invasive endoscopic bariatric therapy, is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of obesity. The outcomes of POSE meet and surpass the ASGE joint task force thresholds. Future studies should evaluate newer versions of this procedure that emphasize gastric body plication sparing the fundus.

A Mediterranean-Style Diet Plan Is Associated with Greater Effectiveness and Sustainability in Weight Loss in Patients with Obesity after Endoscopic Bariatric Therapy.

This study aimed to investigate the impact of a Mediterranean-style diet on weight loss effectiveness and sustainability in patients with obesity who underwent endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBT), relative to a protein diet plan. Thus, 132 patients with obesity (BMI 30-40 kg/m2) who underwent EBT, were asked to follow a Mediterranean-style diet plan (n = 52) or a protein diet plan (n = 26) for six months. General linear models were used to compare outcome variables between dietary intervention groups. Results showed that participants who followed a Mediterranean-style diet plan lost 14.2% more weight (95% CI: 3.0; 25.3), compared with those who followed a protein diet plan. Additionally, following a Mediterranean-style diet plan was associated with the sustainability of weight loss. Note that three months after the end of the dietary intervention, the patients who followed a Mediterranean-style diet plan were still losing weight (-1.2 ± 3.0 kg), while those with a protein diet plan gained, on average, 2.4 ± 3.3 kg (p < 0.001). Therefore, we conclude that combining EBT with a Mediterranean-style diet plan could represent an effective dietary intervention to improve the effectiveness and sustainability of weight loss after an EBT.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for obesity patients: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a minimally invasive, effective, and safe technique for weight loss intervention. Since a relatively small number of cases were present in previous studies, this study aimed to elucidate the efficacy and safety of ESG. METHODS: Relevant publications were identified through searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science before March 1, 2019. The percentage of total body weight loss (%TBWL), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and the adverse event rate in each follow-up session were extracted, pooled, and analyzed. Forest plots were graphed based on random effects models. RESULTS: A total of 1542 patients from nine studies were eligible for analysis. The pooled results of %TBWL at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 8.78% (p = 0.000), 11.85% (p = 0.000), 14.47% (p = 0.024), and 16.09% (p = 0.063), respectively. The pooled results of %EWL at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 31.16% (p = 0.000), 43.61% (p = 0.000), 53.14% (p = 0.000), and 59.08% (p = 0.015), respectively. Finally, the pooled rate of mild adverse events was 72% (p < 0.01), and the pooled estimate of severe adverse events was only 1% (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Although the conventional surgical sleeve gastrectomy is the gold standard for bariatric surgery, ESG could be a promising minimally invasive alternative for treating obesity with satisfactory efficacy and low risk.

Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies: New and Emerging Technologies.

Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMT) are a new addition to the treatment arsenal for obesity. These include devices that are placed or removed via flexible endoscopy, and procedures that utilize instruments that require flexible endoscopy for the indications of weight loss or treatment of glucose intolerance (from pre-diabetes to diabetes). The EBMTs are generally divided into gastric and small bowel categories, and although individual EBMTs may have unique mechanisms of action, similar themes in proposed mechanism of action are seen in the gastric and small bowel EBMTs, respectively. In this review we will describe the therapies approved for use in the United States or currently in the process of obtaining approval for use in the United States. We will discuss potential mechanisms of action and examine safety and efficacy data.

Aspiration therapy leads to weight loss in obese subjects: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Obese patients rarely achieve long-term weight loss with only lifestyle interventions. We evaluated the use of endoscopic aspiration therapy for obesity. Aspiration therapy involves endoscopic placement of a gastrostomy tube (A-Tube) and the AspireAssist siphon assembly (Aspire Bariatrics, King of Prussia, PA) to aspirate gastric contents 20 minutes after meal consumption. METHODS: We performed a pilot study of 18 obese subjects who were randomly assigned (2:1) to groups that underwent aspiration therapy for 1 year plus lifestyle therapy (n = 11; mean body mass index, 42.6 ± 1.4 kg/m(2)) or lifestyle therapy only (n = 7; mean body mass index, 43.4 ± 2.0 kg/m(2)). Lifestyle intervention comprised a 15-session diet and behavioral education program. RESULTS: Ten of the 11 subjects who underwent aspiration therapy and 4 of the 7 subjects who underwent lifestyle therapy completed the first year of the study. After 1 year, subjects in the aspiration therapy group lost 18.6% ± 2.3% of their body weight (49.0% ± 7.7% of excess weight loss [EWL]) and those in the lifestyle therapy group lost 5.9% ± 5.0% (14.9% ± 12.2% of EWL) (P < .04). Seven of the 10 subjects in the aspiration therapy group completed an additional year of therapy and maintained a 20.1% ± 3.5% body weight loss (54.6% ± 12.0% of EWL). There were no adverse effects of aspiration therapy on eating behavior and no evidence of compensation for aspirated calories with increased food intake. No episodes of binge eating in the aspiration therapy group or serious adverse were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In a pilot study, aspiration therapy appears to be a safe and effective long-term weight loss therapy for obesity.

Efficacy and safety of duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for obesity and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted up to September 15, 2022. Thirty studies involving 1751 patients were included. At 12 months post-implantation, the reduction in body mass index (BMI) was 4.8 kg/m2 (95% CI 4.1, 5.5), with an excess weight loss of 41.3% (95% CI 33.4%,49.2%) and a total weight loss of 13.1% (95% CI 10.1%, 16.0%). Significant decrease was observed in HbA1c and fasting glucose, with a standardized mean difference of - 0.72 (95% CI - 0.95, - 0.48) and - 0.62 (95% CI - 0.82, - 0.42), respectively. However, these improvements in weight loss and glycemic control were only partially sustained after explantation. In situ, DJBL significantly improves blood pressure and lipid levels. The pooled early removal rate was 19%, and the incidence of severe adverse events was 17%, including device migration (6%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (4%), device obstruction (4%), and hepatic abscess (2%). DJBL offers significant improvement in weight loss and glycemic control, as well as cardiovascular parameters while in situ. Further studies are warranted to better understand the long-term efficacy and safety of DJBL. The benefits of DJBL need to be carefully weighed against the risks in clinical decision-making.

Outcomes and Trends of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies (EBT) Among Minority Populations.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBT) have emerged as effective options for weight loss. While the benefits of EBT have been documented, data regarding such therapies among minority populations remains scant. We aim to investigate EBT trends and outcomes in minority populations. METHODS: Data were extracted from the 2015 to 2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) databases. Intragastric balloon (IGB) and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) cases were identified, and procedure volume assessed by year and race/ethnicity. Measures of interest included year-to-year mortality, surgical complications, and 30-day adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Of 966,646 cases in the MBSAQIP databases, 5209 (0.54%) IGB and ESG cases were included. 10.7% were black, and 81.6% were female patients. Compared to white patients, black and Hispanic patients were younger (p < 0.01) with a higher body mass index (p < 0.001). Mortality (0.03% vs. 0% vs. 0%, p = 0.99), reoperation (1.1% vs. 0.8% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.30), and reintervention (3.9% vs. 3.2% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.09) rates were similar between racial/ethnic cohorts. All complications were similar between racial/ethnic cohorts, except a higher rate of venous thromboembolism, in Hispanic (1.04%, p < 0.01) compared to black (0.18%) and white (0.21%) patients. IGB and ESG were predominantly performed in white and Hispanic patients, respectively. ESG was associated with a higher leak (0.6% vs. 0.02%, p < 0.01) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) (1.0% vs. 0.12%, p < 0.01) rate. CONCLUSION: While EBTs have increased annually, they are performed less in black patients. Future studies are needed to identify access barriers for black patients. They are safely performed with similar outcomes in racial/ethnic cohorts, except for a higher VTE rate in Hispanic patients.

Demographic Disparities in Recruitment for Clinical Trials Focused on Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Studies have shown that there are multiple disparities in the recruitment for clinical trials across medical specialties, which makes it challenging to translate research findings to the real world. We performed a systematic review of RCTs focused on EBTs and examined the sex, racial, and ethnic background and age of participants. METHODS: A systematic search of trials pertaining to EBTs was performed. Demographic details from all trials were abstracted and recorded and compared to real-world demographics of obesity in the United States, as reported in the NHANES 2017-March 2020. RESULTS: A total of 11 trials were included. Mean age of all patients was 43.50 ± 9.25, which differs from the age distribution of obesity in the population (35% between 40 and 59 years). Mean female representation was 89%, which is higher than real-world estimates (50%). A mean of 74% of participants were white, with underrepresentation of African American (21%) and Hispanic (10%) participants as compared to real-world estimates. CONCLUSION: Populations affected by obesity are not equitably reflected in clinical trials focused on endoscopic bariatric therapies.

The Efficacy Comparison of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies: 6-Month Versus 12-Month Intragastric Balloon Versus Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Intragastric balloon (IGB) insertion and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) are known to be effective and safe in achieving weight loss. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a 6-month IGB therapy, a 12-month IGB therapy, and ESG. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the weight loss at IGB (Orbera) removal after 6 months (124 patients), at IGB (Orbera365) removal after 12 months (61 patients) and at 6 and 12 months after ESG (42 and 34 patients, respectively). Postprocedural care, including medication and diet, was the same for all procedures. RESULTS: Mean TBWL in patients undergoing IGB placement for 6 and 12 months and ESG after 6 and 12 months were 15.2, 15.8, 26.5, and 28.7 kg, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean %TBWL in patients undergoing IGB placement for 6 or for 12 months (15.3% vs. 14.7%, P = 0.7). ESG patients showed a significantly higher mean %TBWL than IGB patients after 6 months (15.3 vs. 19.8, P = 0.005) and 12 months (14.7 vs. 22.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: All three studied methods were effective for achieving weight loss. However, there was no significant difference between 6-month and 12-month IGB therapies outcomes. ESG appeared to be a more effective obesity treatment modality than IGB.

Current treatment landscape for obesity in Singapore.

The rising prevalence of obesity in Singapore is a harbinger for a corresponding increase in obesity-related complications such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary heart disease. Obesity is a complex disease driven by multiple factors, and hence, treatment cannot follow a 'one-size-fits-all' approach. Lifestyle modifications involving dietary interventions, physical activity and behavioural changes remain the cornerstone of obesity management. However, similar to other chronic diseases such as T2DM and hypertension, lifestyle modifications are often insufficient on their own, hence the importance of other treatment modalities including pharmacotherapy, endoscopic bariatric therapy and metabolic-bariatric surgery. Weight loss medications currently approved in Singapore include phentermine, orlistat, liraglutide and naltrexone-bupropion. In recent years, endoscopic bariatric therapies have evolved as an effective, minimally invasive and durable therapeutic option for obesity. Metabolic-bariatric surgery remains the most effective and durable treatment for patients with severe obesity, with an average weight loss of 25%-30% after one year.

Weight Loss Effect of GLP-1 RAs With Endoscopic Bariatric Therapy and Bariatric Surgeries.

Background: Different treatment modalities are available for obesity management, including lifestyle changes, pharmacotherapy, endoscopic interventions, and surgeries. Limited evidence is available on the weight loss effect of combining glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) with endoscopic bariatric therapy (EBT) and bariatric surgeries (BS). Objectives: In this systematic review, we compared the weight loss effect and metabolic changes of combining GLP-1 RAs with EBT and BS. Methods: Literature searches were performed in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar, and PRISMA databases. Only randomized control trials and retrospective studies were included. Results: A total of 11 studies was included. Nine studies compared BS with and without liraglutide and 2 compared EBT with and without liraglutide. Adding liraglutide to EBT or BS provided significant weight loss when compared with EBT or BS alone. When changes in weight were compared across the studies, EBT with liraglutide showed a weight loss effect comparable to the net weight loss (ie, nadir weight loss after BS-regained weight) achieved following BS alone. Conclusion: This review showcases a promising approach for managing obesity that combines GLP-1 RAs with EBT. This approach is expected to achieve shorter hospital stays, fewer side effects, and longer term weight loss benefits than BS alone. However, additional prospective studies with higher quality, more consistent outcome measures for weight loss and metabolic changes are needed to further evaluate the approach.

Adherence to Healthy Lifestyle Habits Is a Determinant of the Effectiveness of Weight Loss among Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies.

Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) are promising strategies for the treatment of obesity. However, there is still great variability in its effectiveness in weight loss. Thus, we investigated whether adherence to healthy lifestyle habits is a significant determinant of weight loss effectiveness among patients undergoing EBTs. Additionally, the role of eating behaviors and psychological traits in the effectiveness of weight loss was studied. A cohort of 361 participants (81.4% women; age 41.8 ± 9.5 years; BMI 37.8 ± 4.3 kg/m2) was followed for 1 year after EBT. Anthropometric parameters, adherence to healthy lifestyle habits, emotional eating, and psychological traits (anxiety and depression) were evaluated. General linear models were used to compare outcome variables according to weight loss effectiveness groups (poor vs. good weight-loss-responders). Additionally, a hierarchical linear regression model was used to determine whether adherence to healthy lifestyle habits, emotional eating, or psychological traits were significant predictors of excess weight loss (%EWL). One year after EBT, weight loss differed significantly between good and poor weight-loss-responders (67.5% EWL [95% CI: 64.2, 70.8] vs. 28.2% EWL [95% CI: 25.5, 30.9], p < 0.001). Participants who adhered to good lifestyle habits had 4.37 more odds [95% CI: 2.19, 8.88] of being good weight-loss-responders. We also observed that eating four to five meals/day and practicing muscle-strengthening activities >2 times/week were the two lifestyle habits that most significantly determined weight loss response. Furthermore, our results revealed that while adherence to healthy lifestyle habits was a significant determinant of %EWL 3, 6, and 12 months after EBT (p < 0.001), emotional eating was a significant determinant of %EWL only 3 and 6 months after the intervention (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Regarding psychological traits, we observed that neither anxiety nor depression were significant determinants of %EWL. Our results revealed that adherence to healthy lifestyle habits is a significant determinant for weight loss effectiveness among patients with obesity undergoing EBT. These findings highlight the importance of implementing an adequate nutritional intervention program, especially since patients who adhere to good lifestyle habits are able to achieve a weight loss that would be comparable with bariatric surgery.

Endobariatric procedures for obesity: clinical indications and available options.

Obesity remains a growing public health epidemic that has increased healthcare costs and related comorbidities. Current treatment guidelines encourage a multidisciplinary approach starting from patient selection, interventions, and long-term follow-up to maintain weight loss. However, these conservative interventions are largely ineffective at reducing body weight due to low adherence to the treatment regimen. Recently, endoscopic bariatric therapies have become an attractive alternative to traditional invasive bariatric surgeries due to their improved efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Endoscopic bariatric therapies include intragastric balloon placement, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, gastric bypass revision, and aspiration therapy. These procedures fall into two separate categories depending on the primary mechanism involved: restrictive or malabsorptive. Restrictive methods, such as the Orbera® and ReShape™ intragastric balloons, increase satiation and delay gastric emptying while decreasing the amount of food that can be ingested. In contrast, malabsorptive devices, such as the EndoBarrier®, interfere with the small intestine's ability to absorb food while restoring normal gastrointestinal hormone levels regulating satiation. Together, these techniques provide useful alternatives for patients in whom pharmacological or lifestyle modifications have proven ineffective. Despite these advantages, the long-term effects of these procedures on metabolic changes remain to be studied. Furthermore, the management of complications from these procedures continues to evolve. In this review, we aim to elaborate on the clinical indications and efficacy of the endobariatric procedures, together with various types of available endoscopic bariatric therapy procedures.

Gray matter volume increases induced by intragastric balloon treatment and their associations with neuroinflammation: A magnetic resonance study.

OBJECTIVE: We simultaneously performed structural MRI, 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and whole-body hydration status assessment to evaluate brain changes in patients with morbid obesity treated with intra-gastric balloon (IGB) for six months. We asked, if changes in myo-inositol ratios (marker of neuroinflammation) are related to brain volume increases accompanying IGB-induced weight loss. METHODS: Twenty five patients with morbid obesity (OB, 43.9 ± 11.8 years, BMI = 49.1 ± 7.2, 12 females, 9 without co-morbid conditions) were treated with IGB for six months. They underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 3T one month before IGB insertion, three months after insertion (N = 19), and one month after IGB removal (N = 14). RESULTS: Insertion of IGB lead to 8.9% and 12.3% weight reduction over the first three months and over the entire treatment, respectively. Over the entire treatment, total gray matter volume increased by 2.0% (p = 0.009). These changes were mostly pronounced in the left precuneus and in the right frontal pole (>1.9%, p < 0.009). The increases in cortical volume in the right hemisphere and the left posterior cingulate cortical thickness over the entire treatment were significantly related to decreases in myo-inositol ratios measured over the first three months of the treatment (r < -0.740, p < 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: IGB treatment lead to brain structural improvements consistent with earlier studies of bariatric patients without co-morbid conditions. Our results also pointed to improvements in brain regions, where atrophy in other studies was related to type 2 diabetes and hypertension. The correlations point to neuroinflammation as one of the potential processes behind brain volume reductions in patients with morbid obesity.

Successful Use of Intragastric Balloon Therapy as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation.

Obesity is an important limiting factor for heart transplantation (HT) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Achieving substantial weight loss is challenging in this population due to activity limitations and fluid retention. Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) including intragastric balloons (IGB) are effective primary weight loss therapies. IGBs have also been successfully utilized as a bridge therapy prior to liver transplantation and, in one case report, prior to HT. Potential advantages of IGBs in this population include low bleeding risk and less invasiveness as compared to other EBTs and surgery. We report the successful use of IGB as a bridge therapy in two patients with class II obesity and end-stage CHF requiring left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), anticoagulation, antiplatelet, and inotrope therapy.

The Effects of Bariatric Surgery and Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies on GERD: An Update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bariatric surgery and endoluminal bariatric therapies (EBTs) form an increasingly utilized therapeutic approach to treat obese patients but may worsen gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In this updated article, we review the evidence on the effects of bariatric procedures on GERD. FINDINGS: Recent evidence implicates sleeve gastrectomy with the highest rates of de novo GERD and Barrett's esophagus (BE), whereas malabsorptive-restrictive procedures such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) were shown to have significantly lower reported rates. The intragastric balloon (IGB) has been associated with increased likelihood of GERD, whereas insufficient evidence exists linking endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) to GERD. SUMMARY: Gastroesophageal reflux disease may be treated with some bariatric procedures but is often developed de novo as a result of the change in anatomy. Patients set to undergo bariatric surgery may benefit from pre-procedural endoscopy to choose the more suitable therapy. Further studies with objective measurements of GERD post procedure may provide more insight into the effects of bariatric therapies on reflux, especially more novel ones such as ESG.

Aspiration Therapy.

Aspiration therapy is a novel, endoscopic bariatric therapy that allows patients to remove a portion of an ingested meal through a modified percutaneous gastrostomy tube, called an A-Tube. Weight loss results from both fewer calories consumed, and from modifications in lifestyle and mealtime behaviors that patients make as a result of having the device installed. The first commercially available device for aspiration therapy, the AspireAssist (Aspire Bariatrics, King of Prussia, PA), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2016 for weight loss for greater than 6 months duration in patients with a body mass index of 35-55. Multiple studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of aspiration therapy, with low rates of adverse events related to the procedure, including no reported deaths, as well as no evidence of eating disorders developed during therapy. This chapter will describe our experience with aspiration therapy. We will describe how we select appropriate candidates for aspiration therapy, how we perform the procedure including a summary of the equipment used, and how we mitigate and manage complications of the procedure. This article will highlight the effectiveness of aspiration therapy as a novel and safe approach for weight loss in patients in obesity.