mTOR inhibitors a potential predisposing factor for chronic hepatitis E: Results from the prospective collaborative CHES study (Chronic Hepatitis EScreening in patients with immune impairment and increased transaminases levels).

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis E virus (HEV) in persons with immune impairment has a progressive course leading to a rapid progression to liver cirrhosis. However, prospective data on chronic HEV is scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for chronic HEV infection in subjects with immune dysfunction and elevated liver enzymes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CHES is a multicenter prospective study that included adults with elevated transaminases values for at least 6 months and any of these conditions: transplant recipients, HIV infection, haemodialysis, liver cirrhosis, and immunosuppressant therapy. Anti-HEV IgG/IgM (Wantai ELISA) and HEV-RNA by an automated highly sensitive assay (Roche diagnostics) were performed in all subjects. In addition, all participants answered an epidemiological survey. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-one patients were included: 131 transplant recipients, 115 cirrhosis, 51 HIV-infected subjects, 87 on immunosuppressants, 4 hemodialysis. Overall, 210 subjects were on immunosuppressants. Anti-HEV IgG was found in 94 (25.6%) subjects with similar rates regardless of the cause for immune impairment. HEV-RNA was positive in 6 (1.6%), all of them transplant recipients, yielding a rate of chronic HEV of 5.8% among solid-organ recipients. In the transplant population, only therapy with mTOR inhibitors was independently associated with risk of chronic HEV, whereas also ALT values impacted in the general model. CONCLUSIONS: Despite previous abnormal transaminases values, chronic HEV was only observed among solid-organ recipients. In this population, the rate of chronic HEV was 5.8% and only therapy with mTOR inhibitors was independently associated with chronic hepatitis E.

Autoantibodies to cytoplasmic rods and rings in patients with hepatitis C virus infection treated with direct-acting antivirals: The role of prior treatment with interferon plus ribavirin.

INTRODUCTION: The cytoplasmic rods-rings (RR) pattern is found in hepatitis C (HCV) patients treated with interferon-ribavirin when studied with ANA-IIF. Ribavirin aggregates/induces antigenic changes in IMPDH-2, an enzyme necessary for ribavirin action. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective search for anti-RR autoantibodies (HEp-2, INOVA) in patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) from October 2015 to June 2017. HCV-negative patients from up to June 2016 acted as controls. Anti-RR was analyzed at baseline and, mainly, during treatment and follow-up. The Chi-square test, Student's t-test and a logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and June 2016, 1258 men and 2389 women who were HCV-negative and 137 men and 112 women who were HCV-positive patients were studied. Approximately 22.9% of HCV-negative and 13.2% of HCV-positive were ANA-IIF-positive (p<0.05). Three HCV-negative (0.08%) and 23 (9.2%) HCV-positive patients had anti-RR (p<0.001). A total of 122 patients received DAAs; 30 received DAA+RBV; 46 pre-treated with IFN-RBV received DAA; 31 pre-treated with IFN-RBV received DAA+RBV; 16 received IFNpeg-RBV; and 24 received IFN-RBV-DAA. None of the 122 DAA-treated patients showed anti-RR; anti-RR were identified in 14.8% of those treated with DAA-RBV; in 25.9% of those pre-treated with IFN-RBV receiving DAA; in 22.2% of IFN-RBV-pre-treated patients who received DAA+RBV; in 7.4% of those treated with IFNpeg-RBV and in 29.6% of those treated with IFNpeg-RBV-DAA. The multivariate analysis showed significant associations between anti-RR and "Exposure to IFN" and "Time of exposure to RBV". CONCLUSIONS: Anti-RR autoantibodies were detected only in patients with current or past treatments with RBV, even in cases in which only DAAs were later administered.

Factors influencing hepatitis C cure in the era of direct-acting antivirals. / Factores que influyen en la curación de la hepatitis C en la era de los antivirales de acción directa.

Direct-acting antiviral agents are highly potent drugs with a strong genetic barrier. Consequently, the factors influencing hepatitis C cure have been reduced and have progressively lost importance. Host factors, such as the presence of cirrhosis, race, and treatment adherence, influence sustained viral response. Adherence, together with treatment errors and drug interactions, are also important, especially in older patients. Viral factors, such as viral load, genotype, and the presence of baseline resistances affect the response rate but their influence can be minimised by using pan-genotypic regimens. Treatment simplification and the high efficacy of new antiviral treatments will allow treatment universalisation and will hopefully enable elimination of the infection in the next few decades. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled "The value of simplicity in hepatitis C treatment", which is sponsored by Gilead. © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Prevalence of the potential drug-drug interactions between pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals and the concomitant medications associated with patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection in Spain. / Prevalencia de las potenciales interacciones medicamentosas entre los antivirales de acción directa pangenotípicos y la medicación concomitante asociada a los pacientes con infección del virus de la hepatitis C crónica en España.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the comorbidity and potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) among pangenotypic direct-acting-antivirals (pDAAs) and the concomitant medications associated with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients in routine clinical practice in Spain. METHODS: Retrospective observational study. Included patients were ≥18 years, diagnosed with CHC, on antiviral treatment and required medical attention during 2017. Two groups were differentiated according to age ranges (<50 and ≥50 years). The variables collected were: age, gender, general/specific comorbidity, concomitant medication and potential DDIs (www.hep-druginteractions.org). The pDAAs analysed were: a) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), b) Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and c) Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Bivariate statistical analysis, P<.05. RESULTS: 3,430 patients with a mean age of 56.9 years and 60.3% males were enrolled. The average Charlson index was 0.8. Age range distribution: 18-49 years (28.9%) and ≥50 years (71.1%). The average number of medications per patient/year was 3.1 (SD 2.6). The total percentage of potential DDIs was: 8.6% minor DDIs, 40.5% clinically significant DDIs and 10.0% contraindicated medication. These DDIs were greater in patients ≥50 years (8.6%, 43.8% and 12.4%, respectively, P<.001). For all ages, SOF/VEL showed a lower percentage of: minor interactions (1.3% vs. 6.6% and 5.9%, P<.001); clinically significant interactions (53.4%, vs. 77.4% and 66.3%, P<.001) and contraindicated medication (1.7% vs. 8.3% and 10.7%, P<.001) compared to GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL/VOX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CHC present high comorbidity and concomitant medication use, particularly elderly patients, thus implying a greater exposure to potential DDIs. Although the DDI rate was considerable with the three combinations analysed, SOF/VEL showed a lower number of clinically significant interactions.

Role of ribavirin in interferon-free therapy for the treatment of hepatitisC virus. / Papel de la ribavirina en la terapia libre de interferón frente al virus de la hepatitisC.

Interferon-free regimens achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of over 90%, have generally well-tolerated adverse effects and involve 12-week treatment durations for most patients with chronic hepatitis C, including naive or previously treated patients and patients with or without cirrhosis. However, some of the treatment options recommended by the guidelines require the addition of ribavirin (RBV) or extend the duration of treatment to increase efficacy. The use of RBV is a useful tool in those difficult-to-cure patients such as patients with decompensated or genotype-3-infected cirrhosis and those who have not achieved SVR after treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAA). Overall, adding RBV to the different combinations causes adverse effects related to a decrease in haemoglobin and involves inconveniences such as its dosage, which requires patients to take several tablets twice daily. However, severe anaemia is rare and easily manageable with a dose reduction. In addition, RBV is teratogenic. In practice, because RBV is inexpensive and well tolerated when combined with an interferon-free regimen, it continues to be a useful tool to optimise the results of some HCV treatment regimens. RBV-free regimens eliminate RBV-related adverse effects related, resulting in better tolerability, improving patient adherence and quality of life and reducing the cost of treatment.

Characteristics and course of chronic hepatitis B e antigen-negative infection. / Características y evolución de la infección crónica por virus de la hepatitis B antígeno e negativo.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiological, analytical and histological characteristics and clinical course of hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers with negative HBe antigen. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective cohort study of HBV carriers with negative HBe antigen (2005-2012), with no other causes of liver disease. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients were included, with mean age 40.5±12.2 years; 54% were women, and 38% were of foreign origin; the number of foreign patients significantly increased (P<.001) over the years. Transaminases were normal in nearly 75% and HBV-DNA was <2,000IU/ml in 56% of patients at diagnosis. There was a gradual decrease in HBV-DNA levels in inactive carriers over the study period. Fibrosis study was performed in 47% of patients by Fibroscan® or liver biopsy: 55.4% normal histology and 6.1% cirrhosis. Just over three quarters of patients (77.77%) were inactive carriers. Treatment was required in 15.5% of patients (20% because of cirrhosis and 80% HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B). Five patients cleared HBsAg (annual rate .94%), all of whom presented HBV-DNA <2,000IU/ml at diagnosis. Five patients developed complications (3.6%), 4 of them hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), of which only 2 had cirrhosis. There was 1 HBV-related death (.72%). CONCLUSION: Among HBV carriers with negative HBe antigen, inactive HBs-Ag carriers are predominant. HBV-DNA gradually decreases in the first few years after diagnosis. Morbidity and mortality are low, especially if glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) is normal and HBV-DNA levels are low at diagnosis. Treatment is needed in a considerable number of patients. HCC is the most frequent complication, even in the absence of cirrhosis.

Predictive variables of sustained virological response after early discontinuation of triple therapy with telaprevir for genotype-1 HCV infection.

BACKGROUND: Pivotal phase studies of telaprevir (TLV) and boceprevir (BOV) showed 10-56% rates of early treatment interruption. However, there have been no reports on the sustained virological response (SVR) rates of these patients. AIM: To assess the SVR rate in a large cohort of patients who discontinued triple therapy with TLV or BOV for reasons other than stopping rules and to identify variables predicting SVR. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A survey was sent to 15 hospitals in Catalonia asking them to report all TLV/BOV treatments finished by 31 May 2014. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, liver fibrosis and therapeutic data were recorded for treatments with early discontinuation. Logistic regression analysis, ROC curves and prognostic assessment of the variables identified were calculated. RESULTS: Twelve hospitals responded to the survey, representing 467 treatments and 121 (21.2%) early discontinuations, 76 (62.8%) due to stopping rules and 45 (37.2%) for other reasons. Early discontinuation was more frequent with BOV [38.2% (50/131) versus 21.1% (71/336) p<0.005], mainly due to stopping rules [78% (39/50) versus 52.1% (37/71); p=0.004]. SVR was achieved in 21/121 patients (17.4%), 19/71 (26.8%) treated with TLV and 2/50 (4.0%) treated with BOV. In patients discontinuing treatment for reasons other than stopping rules, SVR was achieved in 19/37 (55.9%) treated with TLV and in 2/11 (18.2%) treated with BOV. The SVR rate in patients treated with TLV who discontinued due to a severe adverse event was 61.5% (16/26). A logistic regression analysis was performed only with triple therapy with TLV and early discontinuation. The predictive variables of SVR were undetectable HCV-RNA at treatment week 4 and treatment length longer than 11 weeks. Treatment duration longer than 11 weeks showed the best accuracy (0.794), with a positive predictive value of 0.928. CONCLUSIONS: Early discontinuation of TLV-based triple therapy due to reasons other than stopping rules still have a significant SVR rate (55.9%). Undetectable HVC-RNA at week 4 of treatment and treatment duration longer than 11 weeks are predictive of SVR in this subset of patients.

[Infectious diseases in the adult population admitted to a general hospital]. / Enfermedades infecciosas en población adulta extranjera ingresada en un hospital general.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the infectious diseases (ID) that led to hospital admission of the foreign population>14 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of foreign patients admitted to hospital (2000-2012). RESULTS: A total of 3,087 foreigners were admitted with infectious diseases. Of these, 73.6% were from low income countries, and 26.4% from high income countries. Most of them (86.9%) were admitted with common ID, 11.8% with transmissible ID, and 1.6% with tropical ID. Tropical ID and transmissible ID were higher in patients from low income countries (14.7%) than from high income countries (9.7%, p<0.001). The main tropical ID was malaria (74%). The main transmissible ID were tuberculosis (40.3%), hepatitis (27.8%), and HIV/AIDS (27.5%). CONCLUSION: Common ID were the main reason for admission in foreign population.

[Is it possible to stop treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs in patients with e-antigen negative chronic hepatitis B? Experience and new expectations]. / ¿Es posible suspender el tratamiento con antivirales orales en los pacientes con hepatitis crónica B antígeno e negativa? Experiencia y nuevas expectativas.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) is usually indefinite, since the loss of HBsAg, as a criterion for its discontinuation, is a rare event. Recent evidence suggests that discontinuing NA therapy may be feasible in selected patients. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the rate of virological relapse in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB who discontinued treatment with NAs. METHODS: We performed a single-center observational study that included 140 patients with HBsAg-negative CHB. Twenty-two patients, who received only NAs, discontinued treatment for different reasons and were subsequently monitored. All had normal ALT and AST, undetectable DNA and absence of cirrhosis or significant comorbidities before stopping treatment. RESULTS: Twelve patients showed virologic relapse (54.54%). The mean interval between discontinuation and relapse was 6.38 months (± 1.9) (75% relapsed during the first 12 months after discontinuation). Five received adefovir, 1 lamivudine and adefovir, 1 tenofovir and 5 lamivudine alone. The mean treatment duration in this group was 38.5 months (± 4.5). The sustained response group had a higher mean age and longer treatment duration than patients with virologic relapse but these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that NA treatment can be stopped in selected patients with CHB as long as they are not cirrhotic, have completed a minimum period of treatment, have normal ALT and sustained undetectable DNA. These patients should be closely monitored during the first year and then indefinitely.

[HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B treatment with oral antiviral agents: experience and results in clinical practice]. / Tratamiento de la hepatitis crónica B antígeno e positiva con antivirales orales: experiencia y resultados en la práctica clínica.

INTRODUCTION: Due to globalization and migratory movements, HBeAg+ chronic hepatitis B is becoming increasingly important in Spain. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the epidemiological features, progression, and treatment response to oral antiviral agents (OA) in HBeAg+ chronic hepatitis B patients in our area. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 436 patients with chronic hepatitis B infection followed up at the Ramón y Cajal Hospital from 1990 to June 2012. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (14.9%) had HBeAg+ chronic hepatitis B. Seven patients in the immunotolerant phase were not treated, while the remaining 58 received treatment. Four patients were excluded: two due to severe acute hepatitis, one due to hepatitis C virus coinfection and another because of a Delta virus coinfection. Of the remaining 54 patients, 19 received interferon with or without OA, and 35 received only OA. Two patients treated for less than 1 month were not included in the analysis. The analysis was finally performed in 33 patients. The mean duration of treatment was 46.81 months (6-138). Lamivudine was the most frequently prescribed drug (39.39%) followed by tenofovir (24.24%) and entecavir (21.21%). The mean age was 42.08±14 years and 75.75% (25/33) of the patients were male. Nineteen of 33 patients (57.57%) achieved seroconversion to anti-HBe, and 27.27% (9/33) showed clearance of HBsAg. There was no evidence of HBsAg reversion after a mean follow-up of 35.6 months. There were 8 cases of resistance in 7 patients: 7 to lamivudine and 1 to adefovir. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 15% of chronic hepatitis B patients in our area are HBeAg+. Treatment with OA achieves a high seroconversion rate (57.57%) and a considerable percentage of HBsAg clearance (27.27%).

[Characterization of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection without indication for treatment]. / Caracterización de los pacientes con infección crónica por virus de la hepatitis B sin indicación de tratamiento.

Chronic infection by the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a dynamic process that results from the interaction between HBV replication and the host's immune response. In accordance with the consensus document of the European Association for the Study of the Liver, treatment is not indicated for the immune tolerant and inactive carrier phases. However, there are situations in the 2 phases (which we could call gray areas of chronic HBV infection) in which the correct categorization of patients is not easy and in which the start of treatment can be proposed. In the immune tolerant phase, treatment could be indicated for health professionals whose responsibilities require their participation in invasive procedures. Treatment could also be indicated for pregnant women who are HBeAg-positive, ALT normal and have high HBV DNA values and for whom oral antiviral treatment is indicated during the last trimester of pregnancy to reduce the risk of vertical HBV transmission from mother to child. For patients in the inactive carrier phase who are HBeAg-negative with persistent normal ALT levels and HBV DNA ≥ 2000 IU/mL, the intensity of the hepatic lesion will determine the indication for treatment. If these patients already have established cirrhosis then treatment is indicated if the HBV DNA is detectable, regardless of the ALT level.

[Chronic hepatitis C: patients with mild disease]. / Hepatitis crónica por virus C: pacientes con enfermedad leve.

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is usually asymptomatic. The severity of the hepatic lesion in these patients at diagnosis varies and, from the histopathologic point of view, most have mild disease. A series of factors have been described that correlate with the progression of fibrosis in patients with mild fibrosis: age at diagnosis, the duration of the infection, male sex, HIV coinfection, transaminase levels during follow-up, alcohol consumption, metabolic factors such as diabetes and overweight, necroinflammatory activity in the initial biopsy, and the degree of steatosis. In patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C infection, the standard treatment has been pegylated interferon and ribavirin. However, response rates are markedly increased by concomitant use of first-generation protease inhibitors, boceprevir or telaprevir. In patients with moderate fibrosis, these drugs are well tolerated, in addition to being effective. Currently, dual therapy should be reserved for patients with good baseline predictive factors of response and/or contraindications for treatment with telaprevir or boceprevir. In patients with genotypes other than genotype 1, the standard treatment continues to be the combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin, although the development of new direct-acting antiviral agents such as sofosbuvir and simeprevir will change the strategies used in these patients. The decision to wait for the new treatments is complex because their release date is unknown; likewise, their high cost will limit the possibilities for their use.

Randomized clinical trial comparing high versus standard dose of ribavirin plus peginterferon alfa-2a in hepatitis C genotype 3 and high viral load. Dargen-3 study.

INTRODUCTION: Less than half of patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 (G3) and high viral load (HVL) without a rapid virological response (RVR) achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) when treated with peginterferon plus ribavirin (RBV). OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of high doses of RBV on SVR in patients with G3 and HVL. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients were randomized to receive peginterferon α-2a+RBV 800 mg/day (A; n=42) or peginterferon α-2a+RBV 1600 mg/day+epoetin ß 400 IU/kg/week SC (B; n=55). Patients allocated to group B who achieved RVR continued on RBV (800mg/day) for a further 20 weeks (B1; n=42) while non-RVR patients received a higher dose of RBV (1600 mg/day)+epoetin ß (B2; n=13). RESULTS: RVR was observed in 64.3% of patients in A and in 76.4% in B (p=0.259). Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed SVR rates of 64.3% (A) and 61.8% (B), with a reduction of -2.5% (-21.8% to 16.9%) (p=0.835). The SVR rate was 61.9% in arm B1 and 61.5% in arm B2. No serious adverse events were reported, and the rate of moderate adverse events was < 5%. CONCLUSIONS: G3 patients with high viral load without RVR did not obtain a benefit from a higher dose of RBV. Higher doses of RBV plus epoetin ß were safe and well tolerated (Clin Trials Gov NCT00830609).

[The value of genetics in the era of hepatitis C triple therapy]. / Valor de la genética en la era de la terapia triple frente al virus de la hepatitis C.

Despite the introduction of protease inhibitors (PI) in the treatment of hepatitis C, the sensitivity of interferon continues to be essential to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) and to eradicate the viral infection. Currently, pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) are required to avoid selection of PI-resistance mutations. The likelihood of obtaining an SVR with dual therapy in treatment-naïve patients with genotype 1 infection varies from 40% to 50%. That is, almost half of these patients would not require a PI, thus avoiding their adverse effects and considerably reducing the cost of the treatment. Identifying which patients could potentially respond to dual therapy is one of the main challenges in clinical practice. The genetic variability of the host is one of the main factors affecting the sensitivity of PEG-IFN and therefore in the response to current treatment. Other baseline factors related to the host, the virus and, especially, to intratreatment factors such as rapid virological response (RVR) are strongly associated with the probability of achieving an SVR. The evidence on the decision to prescribe dual or triple therapy according to the factors predictive of response is based on retrospective studies or post-hoc analyses of pivotal studies on PI. Study of the polymorphisms of the IFNL3 gene (IL28B), ITPA, IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), TT/ΔG (ss469415590; IFNL4)) and RBV transporters could help in the decision to prescribe dual or triple therapy in treatment naïve patients.

[Hepatitis C treatment in special patient groups]. / Tratamiento de la hepatitis C en grupos de pacientes especiales.

The treatment plan for chronic hepatitis C in special populations varies according to comorbidity and the current evidence on treatment. In patients with hepatitis C virus and HIV coinfection, the results of dual therapy (pegylated interferon plus ribavirin) are poor. In patients with genotype 1 infection, triple therapy (dual therapy plus boceprevir or telaprevir) has doubled the response rate, but protease inhibitors can interact with some antiretroviral drugs and provoke more adverse effects. These disadvantages are avoided by the new, second-generation, direct-acting antiviral agents. In patients who are candidates for liver transplantation or are already liver transplant recipients, the optimal therapeutic option at present is to combine the new antiviral agents, with or without ribavirin and without interferon. The treatment of patients under hemodialysis due to chronic renal disease continues to be dual therapy (often with reduced doses of pegylated interferon and ribavirin), since there is still insufficient information on triple therapy and the new antiviral agents. In mixed cryoglobulinemia, despite the scarcity of experience, triple therapy seems to be superior to dual therapy and may be used as rescue therapy in non-responders to dual therapy. However, a decision must always be made on whether antiviral treatment should be used concomitantly or after immunosuppressive therapy.

Prevalence and clinical-epidemiological characteristics of chronic hepatitis due to hepatitis delta virus on Gran Canaria Island.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to know the prevalence and clinical-epidemiological characteristics of patients with chronic infection due to hepatitis D virus (HDV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was carried out on patients with HDV infection under follow-up in a hospital in 2023. All patients carrying HBsAg were tested for antibodies against HDV. HDV RNA detection was performed in all antibody-positive samples. The medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 340 patients carrying HBsAg, 24 (7.1%) had anti-HDV antibodies, and 6 (25%) had detectable HDV RNA (chronic infection). The prevalence of chronic hepatitis in HBsAg carriers was 1.8%. All patients had a genotype 1 infection. Half of the patients were of African origin and 29.2% were Spanish. Of the 6 patients with chronic infection, 5 (83.3%) had cirrhosis and 2 (33.3%) had hepatocellular carcinoma. Half of the patients had some exacerbation of the disease during follow-up. Of the 18 patients without viremia, 2 (11.1%) presented cirrhosis (one recently diagnosed). The mean follow-up time of patients without viremia was 13.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of chronic HDV hepatitis in our area is low and in all cases it presents as an advanced disease, with exacerbations during follow-up. Patients without viremia have probably resolved the infection, as viremia was not detected in any moment.

Epidemiological characteristic and prognosis changes in chronic hepatitis B in people living with HIV.

INTRODUCTION: Due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment and vaccination during the last decades in Spain, epidemiological and prognosis of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may have changed. METHODS: Retrospective review of CHB-HIV coinfected patients in a single reference center in Madrid until year 2019. We compared incidence, epidemiological and clinical characteristics according diagnosis period (before 2000, 2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, 2015-2019). A retrospective longitudinal study was done to assess mortality, related risk factors and hepatic decompensation. RESULTS: Out of 5452 PLHIV, 160 had CHB (prevalence 2.92%; 95%CI 2.5-3.4), 85.6% were men, median age 32.1 (27-37.2). Incidence rate did not change over the years (2.4/100 patients-year). PLHIV with CHB diagnosed before year 2000 (n = 87) compared with those diagnosed between 2015 and 2019 (n = 11) were more often native-Spanish (90.8% vs. 18.2%), had infected using intravenous drugs (55.2% vs. 0), were coinfected with hepatitis C (40% vs. 9.1%) or hepatitis delta virus (30.4% vs. 0) and had more severe liver disease (cirrhosis 24.1% vs. 0). After a median follow-up of 20.4 years, 23 patients died (7.1/1000 patients-year) and 19 had liver decompensation (4.9/1000 patients-year). All deaths and liver decompensation occurred in patients diagnosed before year 2010. Mortality was associated with higher liver fibrosis in Fibroscan® (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09). CONCLUSION: The epidemiology of CHB in PLHIV in our cohort is changing with less native Spanish, more sexually transmitted cases and less coinfection with other hepatotropic virus. Patients diagnosed before 2010 have worst prognosis related to higher grades of liver fibrosis.

[Meeting Report: 20 years after the First International Symposium on hepatitis C virus and related viruses]. / Resumen de congreso: 20 años después del primer Simposium Internacional sobre el virus de la hepatitis C y otros virus relacionados.

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) was discovered by the team of Michael Houghton at Chiron Corporation in 1989 and the first symposium on HCV and related viruses was held in Venice, Italy, shortly after, in 1992. This conference was organized to advance knowledge on what then was a mysterious virus responsible for most cases of «non-A, non-B¼ hepatitis. During the 20 years since the first conference, the scientific quality of presentations has steadily increased, together with the tremendous advances in basic and clinical research and epidemiology. What started as a small conference on a new virus, about which there were very few data, has today become a first-in-class congress: a meeting place for basic researchers, clinicians, epidemiologists, public health experts, and industry members to present the most important advances and their application to HCV treatment and control. The nineteenth HCV symposium was held in September 2012, once again in Venice.

[To consider negative viral loads below the limit of quantification can lead to errors in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis C virus infection]. / Considerar negativa una carga viral expresada como menor del límite inferior de cuantificación puede inducir a error en el diagnóstico y manejo terapéutico de la hepatitis C.

INTRODUCTION: For years many clinical laboratories have routinely classified undetectable and unquantifiable levels of hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) determined by RT-PCR as below limit of quantification (BLOQ). This practice might result in erroneous clinical decisions. AIM: To assess the frequency and clinical relevance of assuming that samples that are BLOQ are negative. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We performed a retrospective analysis of RNA determinations performed between 2009 and 2011 (Cobas/Taqman, lower LOQ: 15 IU/ml). We distinguished between samples classified as «undetectable¼ and those classified as «<1.50E+01IU/mL¼ (BLOQ). RESULTS: We analyzed 2.432 HCV-RNA measurements in 1.371 patients. RNA was BLOQ in 26 samples (1.07%) from 23 patients (1.68%). BLOQ results were highly prevalent among patients receiving Peg-Riba: 23 of 216 samples (10.6%) from 20 of 88 patients receiving treatment (22.7%). The clinical impact of BLOQ RNA samples was as follows: a) 2 patients initially considered to have negative results subsequently showed quantifiable RNA; b) 8 of 9 patients (88.9%) with BLOQ RNA at week 4 of treatment later showed sustained viral response; c) 3 patients with BLOQ RNA at weeks 12 and 48 of treatment relapsed; d) 4 patients with BLOQ RNA at week 24 and/or later had partial or breakthrough treatment responses, and e) in 5 patients the impact were null or could not be ascertained. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that BLOQ HCV-RNA indicates viremia and that equating a BLOQ result with a negative result can lead to treatment errors. BLOQ results are highly prevalent in on-treatment patients. The results of HCV-RNA quantification should be classified clearly, distinguishing between undetectable levels and levels that are BLOQ.

Asociación Mexicana de Hepatología A.C. Clinical guideline on hepatitis B.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continues to be a worldwide public health problem. In Mexico, at least three million adults are estimated to have acquired hepatitis B (total hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc]-positive), and of those, 300,000 active carriers (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-positive) could require treatment. Because HBV is preventable through vaccination, its universal application should be emphasized. HBV infection is a major risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Semi-annual liver ultrasound and serum alpha-fetoprotein testing favor early detection of that cancer and should be carried out in all patients with chronic HBV infection, regardless of the presence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Currently, nucleoside/nucleotide analogues that have a high barrier to resistance are the first-line therapies.