ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine whether orthokeratology (OK) lenses with a smaller back optic zone diameter (BOZD) could exhibit stronger myopia control effects. METHOD: A meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023408184). A comprehensive systematic database search was conducted, encompassing PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid, CNKI and CBM, to identify relevant studies up to 25 March 2023. The primary inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis were studies that investigated the myopia control effect of OK lenses with a small optical treatment area (≤5 mm). To assess the quality of the retrieved articles, two researchers evaluated them using the Cochrane bias risk assessment criteria. The primary outcome measures were the changes in axial length (AL) and refractive error, using the weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess differences between small and traditional back optical treatment zone groups in terms of these outcomes. RESULTS: The analysis encompassed five eligible studies, with a 1 year duration. The average difference in AL between the groups was 0.12 mm (WMD = -0.12, 95% CI [-0.16, -0.09], p < 0.00001). Likewise, the average difference in refractive error between the two groups was 0.44 D (WMD = 0.44, 95% CI [0.30, 0.57], p < 0.00001). None of the studies reported severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that OK lenses with smaller back optical treatment zone are more effective in preventing myopia progression than traditional lenses. However, a longer-term evaluation is warranted.
Subject(s)
Axial Length, Eye , Myopia , Orthokeratologic Procedures , Refraction, Ocular , Humans , Orthokeratologic Procedures/methods , Myopia/therapy , Myopia/physiopathology , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Contact LensesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Myopia is controlled optically with peripheral defocus spectacles, multifocal contact lenses, or orthokeratology lenses. However, it is unknown which optical correction will improve visual performance. This scoping review aimed to identify and summarize studies on various visual functions using optical corrections for myopia control. METHODS: To develop the search strategy, population (Myopia), concept (visual performance), and context (unrestricted race/region) were used. PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched using the keywords myopia, contrast sensitivity, high and low contrast visual acuity, stereopsis, and optical correction of myopia control. This scoping review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework registry and followed the framework for scoping review outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: Eight studies (n = 8) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Four were conducted in Europe, two were conducted in China, and one was conducted in Japan and Singapore. Five studies were randomized controlled trials, out of which three used contact lenses and two studies used peripheral defocus spectacles lenses. Studies ranged from one day to 2 years. Three studies that used orthokeratology lenses were prospective study designs. Among the studies that used orthokeratology lenses and contact lenses, two studies measured the contrast sensitivity function with CSV1000 (Vector Vision) under mesopic and photopic conditions, with and without glare. Two studies measured the central and peripheral contrast sensitivity using psychophysics experiments. High and low contrast visual acuity was measured using the Freiburg Vision Test (n = 1) and ETDRS charts (n = 3), and stereopsis was assessed using a random dot stereogram (n = 1). The studies showed a reduction in central and peripheral contrast sensitivity function and low contrast acuity when treated with multifocal contact lenses, orthokeratology lenses, and peripheral defocus lenses compared with single-vision lenses. CONCLUSION: This scoping review found a reduction in central and peripheral contrast sensitivity function, as well as low contrast visual acuity when using various optical corrections for myopia control, while high-contrast visual acuity remained the same. The impact of visual functions may not influence the effectiveness of myopia control. Eye care practitioners should provide awareness to the parent and patient population about the potential visual impact of recent designs for optical corrections of myopia control.
Subject(s)
Contact Lenses , Eyeglasses , Myopia , Orthokeratologic Procedures , Visual Acuity , Humans , Myopia/physiopathology , Myopia/therapy , Visual Acuity/physiology , Orthokeratologic Procedures/methods , Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Refraction, Ocular/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Orthokeratology (OK) lens wear increases the risk of bacterial infection, but little is known about the microbiota of the conjunctival sac in myopic children wearing OK lenses. This study aimed to investigate the changes of conjunctival microbiota in children after treatment with OK lenses using 16 S rDNA sequencing. METHODS: Twenty-eight myopic children who had been continuously wearing OK lenses for 12 to 13 months were enrolled in this prospective study. Twenty-two gender- and age-matched myopic children who had not worn OK lenses or discontinued OK lens wear at least 1 year ago were recruited as controls. Conjunctival swabs from each participant were collected for exploration of the microbiota profiles, targeting the V3-V4 regions of the 16 S rRNA gene by MiSeq sequencing. The differences in the microbial community structure and diversity were also compared between groups. RESULTS: The bacterial alpha diversity indices in the OK lens group were not different from those in the non-wearer group (P > 0.05, Wilcoxon test), while beta diversity examined using principle coordinate analysis of unweighted UniFrac divided the two groups into different clusters. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes were the abundant phyla in the conjunctival sac microbiota in both groups (P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). Among children in the OK lens group, the Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size identified the compositional changes in OK lens-associated bacteria. Key functional genera such as Blautia, Parasutterella, and Muribaculum were enriched, whereas Brevundimonas, Acinetobacter, Proteus, and Agathobacter decreased significantly (P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). Phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states also showed altered bacterial metabolic pathways in OK lens-associated microbiota. Moreover, using receiver operating characteristic curves, Brevundimonas, Acinetobacter, Proteus, and Agathobacter alone (the area under the curve was all > 0.7500) or in combination (the area under the curve was 0.9058) were revealed to discriminate OK lens wearers from controls. CONCLUSIONS: The relative abundance of the microbial community in the conjunctival sac of myopic children can alter after OK lens wear. Brevundimonas, Acinetobacter, Proteus, and Agathobacter may be candidate biomarkers to distinguish between OK lens wearers and non-wearers.
Subject(s)
Contact Lenses , Microbiota , Myopia , Child , Humans , Prospective Studies , Phylogeny , Myopia/therapy , Bacteria/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Orthokeratology lenses, which are worn overnight, are recommended for reducing myopia progression. They lie on the cornea and can influence the ocular surface by temporarily reshaping the corneal surface through a reverse geometry design. This study investigated the effect of overnight orthokeratology lenses on tear film stability and meibomian gland status in children aged 8-15 years. METHODS: This prospective, self-controlled study included 33 children with monocular myopia who were prescribed orthokeratology lenses for at least one year. The experimental group (ortho-k group) comprised 33 myopic eyes. The control group comprised the emmetropic eyes of the same participants. Tear film stability and meibomian gland status were measured using a Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the data between the two groups. RESULTS: At the one-year visit, the non-invasive first tear film break-up time (NIBUTf) values were 6.15 ± 2.56 s and 6.18 ± 2.61 s in the experimental and control groups, respectively. The lower tear meniscus height was 18.74 ± 0.05 µm and 18.65 ± 0.04 µm in these groups, respectively. No significant difference was observed in loss of meibomian glands or non-invasive average tear film break-up time between the experimental and control groups using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. CONCLUSIONS: The stability of the tear film and meibomian gland status were not significantly affected by wearing orthokeratology lenses overnight, indicating that continuous use of orthokeratology lenses for 12 months has a minimal effect on the ocular surface. This finding can help guide the clinical management of tear film quality with respect to the use of orthokeratology contact lenses.
Subject(s)
Lacerations , Myopia , Humans , Child , Prospective Studies , Meibomian Glands , Myopia/therapy , Cornea , Corneal Topography , TearsABSTRACT
The growing incidence of myopia worldwide justifies the search for efficient methods of myopia prevention. Numerous pharmacological, optical, and lifestyle measures have already been utilized, but there remains a need to explore more practical and predictable methods for myopia control. This paper presents a review of the most recent studies on the prevention of myopia progression using defocus-incorporated multiple-segment spectacle lenses (DIMSsl), repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy, and a combination of low-dose atropine (0.01%) with orthokeratology lenses.
Subject(s)
Eyeglasses , Myopia , Humans , Child , Disease Progression , Myopia/prevention & control , Atropine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate changes in corneal biomechanical properties after long-term orthokeratology (OK) treatment and the factors affecting treatment outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-four myopic teenagers who wore OK lenses for more than 1 year were included. Twenty-three individuals of the same age and with the same spherical equivalent wearing single-vision spectacles (SVS) were enrolled as controls. After routine eye examinations, corneal biomechanical properties and axial length were measured. Parameters were compared between groups. RESULTS: Less axial elongation (AE) occurred in the OK group (P = 0.021). The OK group experienced a statistically significant decrease in the A1 deformation amplitude (P = 0.02), whole eye movement maximum (P = 0.026), and Ambrósio's relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh) (P < 0.001), and a statistically significant increase in the pachyslope (P < 0.001) and Corvis biomechanical index (P < 0.001). Smaller ARTh and a larger highest concavity deflection area resulted in a better refractive state. The inhibitory effect of AE was better for older patients with smaller ARTh. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term OK treatment slowed myopia progression by reshaping the cornea. Smaller ARTh after OK lens wear indicated a better refractive state and slower AE and could predict OK lens treatment outcomes.
Subject(s)
Contact Lenses , Myopia , Orthokeratologic Procedures , Adolescent , Axial Length, Eye , Cornea , Corneal Topography , Humans , Myopia/therapy , Orthokeratologic Procedures/methods , Refraction, Ocular , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate 3-year efficacy of orthokeratology lenses (OKL) in controlling axial length progression in myopic Scandinavian children. Through a cross-over design of the control group to compare the treatment efficacy in younger versus older children, with the latter having higher cycloplegic spherical refractive error (cSEQ) at treatment initiation. Further, the study aimed to evaluate the safety of the treatment. METHODS: This was a continuation of the randomized controlled study Clinical study Of Near-sightedness; TReatment with Orthokeratology Lenses (CONTROL study) in which the follow-up period of the original intervention group, that received OKL, was extended from 18 months to 36 months. Meanwhile, the original control group was crossed-over to OKL after the 18-month follow-up visit and treated for 18 months. Biometry was measured using Lenstar LS900, and contact lens complications were graded according to Efron Grading Scale for Contact Lens Complications (Efron score). Mixed models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Nineteen subjects in the OKL group and 28 in the control group completed the CONTROL study. Hereof, 17 and 24 subjects from the OKL group and control group, respectively, agreed to participate in the CONTROL2 study. In the OKL continue group, the treatment efficacy did not decline during the 3-year study period (p-values for follow-up visits were all ≥0.82). There was no statistically significant difference between treatment efficacy when OKL treatment was initiated in younger versus older children (p-value ≥0.14 for all follow-up visits). Low-grade corneal staining was seen in several subjects at some point during the study, but here were no treatment-requiring or sight-threatening adverse events during the study period. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of myopia control by OKL was stable during 3 years of treatment. Similar treatment efficacies were found regardless of the age at treatment initiation. No severe adverse events occurred during the study period.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To investigate the inhibition of myopia progression and axial elongation in children wearing orthokeratology (OK) lenses, as well as to evaluate the status of corneal reshaping, this study explores the relationship between changes in central corneal curvature (K-value) and e-value induced by OK lenses and axial elongation. Methods: In this study, it is planned to select children aged 8-15 who wear orthokeratology lenses at the Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Clinic of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University. All children will undergo slit lamp examination, visual acuity assessment, computerized refraction, intraocular pressure measurement, biometry, and corneal topography examination before lens wear and at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after lens wear in the pediatric ophthalmology clinic. Based on age (lower age group (8 < age ≤12 years); higher age group (12 < age ≤15 years)) and baseline equivalent spherical (SE) value (mild myopia group (-1.00 D < SE ≤ -3.25D); moderate myopia group (-3.25 D < SE ≤ -6.00 D)), four groups will be formed by pairing these factors. Suitable data will be selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and different groups will be included. Data will be organized, and statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software to obtain the results. The expected results will be discussed and analyzed. Results: After wearing OK lenses, all four groups achieved good visual acuity at follow-up. At 6 months, there were no significant differences in visual acuity among the four groups (P = 0.149, >0.05). There were no significant differences in refractive error among the four groups (P = 0.066, >0.05). Baseline axial length differed significantly among the four groups (P = 0.000, <0.001), with the LM group having longer axial length than the LL group (P < 0.001, paired samples t-test), and the HM group having longer axial length than the HL group (P < 0.001, paired samples t-test). However, there were no significant differences in axial length change compared to baseline among the groups at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months (P 1 = 0.053; P 3 = 0.557; P 6 = 0.329, >0.05). Significant differences were observed in corneal flat K-value change compared to baseline among the four groups at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months (P 1 = 0.001, P 3 = 0.001, P 6 = 0.004, <0.05). There were no significant differences in e-value change among the groups at 1 and 3 months (P 1 = 0.205, P 3 = 0.252, >0.05), but significant differences were found in e-value change compared to baseline at 6 months (P 6 = 0.010, <0.05). Multiple regression analysis with changes in central corneal flat K-value and e-value as independent variables and axial elongation as the dependent variable showed a correlation between e-value change at 6 months and axial elongation (P = 0.004, <0.05), indicating a negative correlation. Conclusion: Orthokeratology (OK) lenses effectively improve myopic children's vision by reshaping the cornea, leading to reduced central corneal curvature and flattening of its anterior surface. The effectiveness of OK lenses is not significantly affected by age or initial myopia severity. Children of varying ages and myopia levels experience similar levels of axial length control with OK lens wear. Changes in corneal shape due to OK lenses affect axial elongation, with greater changes in corneal morphology associated with smaller increases in axial length.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of orthokeratology (ortho-k) and 0.01% atropine for retardation of myopia progression in myopic children. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 282 patients, aged 8-17 years, were enrolled, including 100 children treated with ortho-k, 84 with 0.01% atropine, and 98 with single-vision spectacles. During the follow-up of 1 year, ortho-k wearers were examined at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months after treatment, and thereafter every 3 months, while the others were examined every 3 months by measurements of uncorrected vision, intraocular pressure, refractive power, slit-lamp microscopy, corneal topography, and the lens fitting when necessary. The axial length was measured every 6 months. RESULTS: Patients with ortho-k had stable uncorrected vision after 1 month of lens wear, all reaching 0 logMAR. The annual axial elongation was 0.23 ± 0.19 mm, 0.22 ± 0.20 mm, and 0.39 ± 0.27 mm in the ortho-k, atropine, and spectacle groups, respectively, with significant difference (F = 23.251, P = 0.000). The axial length was delayed to increase by 41.03% and 43.59% within a year in patients with ortho-k and atropine, respectively, as compared to patients with spectacles (F = 0.006, P = 0.936). The elongation was ≤ 0.3 mm in 69.0% and 66.7% of patients in the two groups, respectively, versus 38.8% in the spectacle group (χ2 = 17.251, P = 0.000). During the follow-up, the rate of corneal staining was 11.0% and 2.0% in the ortho-k and spectacle groups, respectively (χ2 = 8.076, P = 0.003). The use of atropine did not increase corneal staining, but the incidence of related photophobia was 4.8%. No other serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Ortho-k lenses and 0.01% atropine can achieve similar efficacy of myopia retardation, which was significantly better than that obtained with single-vision spectacles, in myopic children. The risk of corneal staining after ortho-k wear may be slightly higher than that with spectacles, but could be well controlled.
Subject(s)
Myopia , Orthokeratologic Procedures , Child , Humans , Atropine/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Myopia/diagnosis , Myopia/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Corneal Topography , Refraction, Ocular , Axial Length, EyeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To translate and cross-culturally adapt PREP2 into Danish and to investigate the face validity and reliability of Danish PREP2 through cognitive interviewing, Rasch and reliability analyses. METHODS: The Danish PREP2 was translated using a standardized procedure and then pretested following the Three-Steps-Interviews (TSTI) process. A total of 15 myopic children aged 7-14 wearing either orthokeratology lenses (ortho-k) or single-vision spectacles (SVS) were included in pretesting comprising cognitive interviews and Rasch analysis. Data from cognitive interviewing was analysed thematically according to Collins. Rasch analysis was used to pretest the psychometric properties in terms of person- and item-fit statistics. Reliability was assessed via test-retest using Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) in the CONTROL study population, which consisted of 60 Danish children aged 7-14 years wearing either ortho-k or SVS. RESULTS: Fifteen children participated in pilot studies comprising of cognitive interviewing and Rasch analysis and 44 out of 60 CONTROL children participated in test-retest reliability analysis. The translation process resulted in a Danish version of PREP2 corroborating the original. Pretesting highlighted issues in the contextualization of items and in marking responses. Thus, we introduced a digital format with help texts. Cognitive interviewing identified issues in the following Collins' themes: comprehension (understanding of concepts), judgement (ambiguity of items) and response (selecting answers). Rasch analysis indicated that help texts were useful for clarifying context. The ICC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The cross-cultural adaptation of PREP2 was satisfactory and issues were identified and corrected through pretesting. The test-retest reliability showed substantial consistency. The instrument could be validated in a more generalizable setting in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03246464 (CONTROL study).
Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Humans , Child , Male , Female , Denmark , Reproducibility of Results , Adolescent , Psychometrics/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Eyeglasses , Refractive Errors/physiopathology , Refractive Errors/therapy , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Visual Acuity/physiology , Pilot Projects , Myopia/therapy , Myopia/physiopathology , Myopia/psychology , TranslationsABSTRACT
Purpose: To assess changes in optical quality and visual function in children after 3 months of wearing orthokeratology (OK) lenses. Methods: A total of 25 myopic children aged 8-12 years were recruited and completed the follow-up study. Optical quality, visual function and corneal morphology were assessed at baseline and at follow-ups 1 and 3 months after wearing OK lenses. Optical quality parameters mainly included the modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff, objective scattering index (OSI), Strehl ratio (SR) and the predicted visual acuities (PVAs). Visual function was assessed by visual acuity, monocular contrast sensitivity function (CSF) across five spatial frequencies and the area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) that was also computed as an index for overall CSF. Results: The MTF cutoff and SR values both increased after 1 month of wearing the OK lenses (baseline vs. 1 month: P MTF = 0.008 and P SR = 0.049); this improvement plateaued after 3 months of lens wear (1 month vs. 3 months: P MTF = 0.626, P SR = 0.428). The corneal morphology also showed the similar change trend. The OSI showed the opposite change trend (baseline vs. 1 month: P OSI < 0.001; 1 month vs. 3 months: P OSI = 0.720). The mean CSF at 1.5 cpd decreased significantly after 1 month of wearing the lenses (baseline vs. 1 month: p = 0.001) and recovered after 3 months of lens wear (baseline vs. 3 months: p = 0.076). CSF at spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12 and 18 cpd as well as the AULCSF did not significantly differ between any two timepoints (all Ps > 0.05). Conclusion: After 3 months of wearing OK lenses, the subjects exhibited a decrease in optical quality, similar to corneal morphology, whereas their visual function remained largely unchanged. Thus, the optical quality was more susceptible to OK lenses than visual function in children. The initial month of OK treatment of children is a key period to be paid close attention to deterioration of optical quality and visual function.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of myopia control defined by axial elongation and safety of orthokeratology lenses (OKL) in a Scandinavian (Danish) population. METHODS: Sixty Danish children aged 6-12 years with myopia ranging from 0.5 to 4.75 dioptres (D) spherical component and refractive astigmatism ≤2.5 D in both eyes were randomly assigned to either OKL or single-vision spectacles (SVS). Study duration was 18 months. Outcome measures were axial length (AL) measured with Lenstar LS900 (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland) and adverse events graded with Efron Grading Scale for Contact Lens Complications. RESULTS: Nineteen participants completed the 18-month follow-up in the OKL group and 28 in the SVS group. The average AL elongation in the OKL group was 0.24 mm smaller as compared to the SVS group (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.36, mixed model adjusted for baseline sex, age and AL). There were no fast progressors (>0.75 D/year) in the OKL group during the follow-up period in contrast to 22% in the SVS group. No treatment-requiring or vision-threatening adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Orthokeratology lenses reduced AL elongation in myopic Scandinavian children by 59%, with no treatment-requiring or vision-threatening adverse events. The results align with outcomes of previous clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Myopia/therapy , Orthokeratologic Procedures/methods , Child , Contact Lenses/classification , Denmark , Female , Humans , Male , Visual Acuity/physiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To estimate repeatability and inter-observer variation of choroidal thickness measurements in myopic Danish children aged 7-14 years using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS: Thirty-nine children were enrolled. Optical correction was single-vision spectacles (SVS) or orthokeratology lenses (OKL). Three repeated 7 × 7 mm 3-dimensional SS-OCT macula scans and three repeated 9 mm SS-OCT line scans were collected for each child using a DRI OCT Triton. Choroidal thickness was measured using three different methods: line scan method 1 (LM1), line scan method 2 (LM2) and 3D macula scan method (3DM). Segmentation was adjusted if needed. Coefficients of repeatability (CR) and limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. RESULTS: The CRs ranged from 13.4 to 23.9 µm, 14.5 to 26.2 µm and 5.2 to 10.7 µm for LM1, LM2 and 3DM, respectively. The LoA ranged from -22.9 to +31.5 µm, -23.3 to +32.2 µm and -10.2 to +12.4 µm for LM1, LM2 and 3DM, respectively. Segmentation was adjusted in most scans (63%-92%). Mean choroidal thickness ranged from 142.2 ± 47.2 to 253.8 ± 60.9 µm and 190.1 ± 64.0 to 299.0 ± 55.8 µm for the SVS and OKL groups, respectively, measured by 3DM. CONCLUSION: The 3DM was the most repeatable method in this paediatric population. It yielded a CR of 10.7 µm, confidence interval 2.4 µm, which makes the minimal detectable difference between two measurements 13.1 µm. Most inter-observer variation could be explained by the intramethod variation. Segmentation adjustment on 3D macula scans did not increase CR on a group level.
Subject(s)
Choroid/diagnostic imaging , Myopia/diagnosis , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Visual Acuity , Adolescent , Child , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Myopia/epidemiology , Myopia/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Time FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine methods tried in clinical trials to reduce the progression of myopia in children, and spectacle prescribing patterns of hospital ophthalmologists. METHODS: A multi-sectioned survey composed of Likert items relating to the methods of reducing myopia progression (orthokeratology lenses [O-K lenses], undercorrected glasses, and topical atropine) and the patterns of prescribing spectacles for children (including two cases involving a 5-year-old girl and an 8-year-old boy) were distributed to members of the Korean Ophthalmological Society, and the collected data was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 78 out of 130 ophthalmologists returned the survey. On a scale of 1 to 5, the mean rates of whether the ophthalmologists think O-K lenses arrest myopia progression, and whether they recommend their patients to wear O-K lenses if indicative, were 3.06 and 2.75, respectively. Moreover, the mean rates of whether they consider that wearing glasses which are undercorrected would slow down the progression of the myopia, or if they think topical atropine helps in arresting myopia progression in children, were 2.34 and 1.27, respectively. In response to the case studies, the majority of practitioners preferred to prescribe the full amount found in cycloplegic refraction to pediatric patients with myopia. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmologists in clinical practice encouraged children to wear O-K lenses more than undercorrected glasses as a way to retard myopia progression. However, the application of atropine is rarely tried in clinical trials. In managing pediatric patients with myopia (case specific), the majority of the practitioners chose to prescribe glasses with full cycloplegic correction.