Changes in Stress Urinary Incontinence Symptoms after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: a Nationwide Cohort Study (FINPOP).

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Various strategies are employed to manage stress urinary incontinence (SUI) during pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. This study was aimed at facilitating shared decision-making by evaluating SUI symptom changes, staged SUI procedures, and their prognostic factors following POP surgery without concomitant SUI intervention. METHODS: We analyzed 2,677 POP surgeries from a population-based observational cohort, excluding patients with prior SUI surgery. The outcome measures were subjective SUI utilizing the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 questionnaire and number of subsequent SUI procedures. Multivariable linear models were applied to identify predictors of persistent SUI, procedures for persistent SUI, and de novo SUI. The primary assessment occurred at the 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 50% (1,329 out of 2,677) experienced SUI; 35% (354 out of 1,005) resolved, an additional 14% (140 out 1,005) improved, and 5.1% (67 out of 1,308) underwent a procedure for persistent SUI. De novo SUI symptoms developed in 20% (218 out of 1,087), with 3.2% (35 out of 1,087) reporting bothersome symptoms; 0.8% (11 out of 1,347) underwent a procedure for de novo SUI. High baseline symptom severity increased the risk of persistent SUI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-2.53), whereas advanced preoperative apical prolapse decreased the risk (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.93). De novo SUI was more common with advancing age (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05), baseline urgency urinary incontinence (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.38), and after transvaginal mesh surgery (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24-3.00). It was not dependent on the compartment or preoperative degree of prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: In a pragmatic setting, POP surgery results in a low rate of subsequent SUI procedures.

Predictors of persistent overactive bladder following surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Reliable risk factors for persistent urgency following pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery are still unclear. We aimed to identify preoperative parameters related to persistent postoperative urgency in a cohort of women following surgery for POP stage 3-4 with concomitant overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, women with POP stage 3-4 and OAB who underwent POP repair during November 2012-December 2020 were included. Preoperative evaluation included history, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q), multi-channel urodynamic studies and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Surgical procedures included: anterior and posterior colporrhaphy, sacrospinous ligament suspension, anterior vaginal wall mesh repair and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. At the 12-month follow-up, urogynecological history, POP-Q evaluation, cough stress test and the PFDI-20 questionnaire were repeated. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three patients were included in the analysis. Resolution of urgency was observed in 56% of women. Variables associated with persistent postoperative urgency included body mass index (BMI) (27 kg/m2 vs 25.7 kg/m2, p = 0.04), preoperative increased daytime frequency (46.39% vs 61.84%, p = 0.05), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (51.46% vs 80.26%, p = 0.0001), detrusor overactivity (DO) (40.2% vs 61.84%, p = 0.009) and lower maximum flow rate on UDS (13.9 ml/s vs 15 ml/s, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis confirmed preoperative DO (OR: 12.2 [95% CI: 1.4-16.6]; p = 0.01), preoperative UUI (OR 3.8 [95% CI: 1.3-11.0]; p = 0.008) and BMI > 25 kg/m2 (OR 1.8 [95% CI: 1.1-7.2]; p = 0.04) as predictive factor for persistent urgency. CONCLUSIONS: In women with advanced POP and OAB, being overweight, preoperative UUI and DO are related to persistent postoperative urgency. These findings will guide our future preoperative counseling and reinforce the role of UDS in POP management.

How does office assessment of prolapse compare to what is seen in the operating room?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: It is not known whether the measurements of pelvic organ assessment under anesthesia accurately estimate prolapse severity. We compared Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) measurements in the office to exams under anesthesia. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing prolapse surgery between February 2020 and July 2020. POP-Qs at rest and with Valsalva were performed at pre- and postoperative visits. POP-Q under anesthesia was performed, without traction, at the start of case (pre-surgical), following apical suspension, and at the end of case (post-surgical). Primary outcome was change in POP-Q between the office and operating room. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, additional patients were recruited to maintain the follow-up time frame. RESULTS: Out of 66 patients, 63 underwent surgery and 33 had postoperative exams within 6 weeks. Mean age was 61.3 ± 11.9 years, and mean BMI was 28.4 ± 6.5 kg/m2. Preoperative Aa, Ba, C, Ap, Bp, and D with Valsalva had greater descent than pre-surgical measurements. However, preoperative Gh with Valsalva (4.1 ± 1.3 cm) was not different from pre-surgical Gh (4.0 ± 1.0 cm) (P = 0.60). Postoperative Aa, Ba, Ap, Bp, and D were not different from post-surgical measurements. In contrast, postoperative Gh at rest (2.3 ± 0.7 cm) and with Valsalva (2.4 ± 0.8 cm) were both narrower than post-surgical Gh (2.8 ± 0.6 cm) (P < 0.05). Gh was also narrowed after apical suspension (3.6 ± 1.0 cm, P = 0.005) prior to posterior repair. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should rely on preoperative POP-Q for surgical decisions. Gh should be reassessed after apical suspension, and further correction should consider that Gh may be exaggerated compared to the measurement postoperatively when the patient is awake.

The distribution of pelvic organ support defects in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery and compartment specific risk factors.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of our study was to describe the distribution of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in a population of women undergoing POP reconstructive surgery and to identify compartment-specific risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study in a cohort of 326 women who underwent POP repair and had a standardized preoperative POP assessment using the Baden-Walker classification. The distribution of POP grade was described for each vaginal compartment. The association between the involvement of each specific compartment and predictors was evaluated with a logistic regression model. RESULTS: The frequency of significant POP (grade ≥ 2) was 79% in the anterior compartment, 49% in the middle/apical compartment and 31% in the posterior compartment. Combined significant anterior and apical defects were present in 25% of women. Increasing age was a significant risk factor for apical defect (between 60 and 70 years OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.6; > 70 years OR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.7-6.6). Previous hysterectomy (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.6) was a significant risk factor for posterior defect. CONCLUSIONS: In a population undergoing POP surgery, anterior compartment involvement is the most common and serious defect and can often be associated with an apical defect, especially in older women. In case of previous hysterectomy, the posterior compartment may be weakened. These findings may help surgeons to select the appropriate POP reconstructive surgery, which often should address both anterior and apical defects.

Laparoscopic lateral suspension for anterior and apical prolapse: a prospective cohort with standardized technique.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) for anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair is a recent approach. Previous studies used various meshes or sutures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of a standardized LLS technique. METHODS: From January 2010 until December 2014, we performed POP repair by LLS with mesh on 88 women with anterior and apical POP ≥ stage 2. We used a polypropylene titanized mesh fixed to the vesico-vaginal fascia with absorbable sutures and treated posterior compartment defect by vaginal approach with native tissue repair if required. Between July 2013 and December 2018, all women were assessed by gynecological examination including the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. Subjective outcome was evaluated by the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-nine women (89.8%) were available for follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.4 years (SD 1.6). Mean age was 59.6 (SD 11.1) years and mean BMI 25.8 (SD 4.0) kg/m2. Ten patients (12.7%) had previous POP surgery. Fifty-two women (65.8%) required posterior colporraphy for associated posterior defect and 21 (26.6%) had associated urinary incontinence (UI) surgery. There were no perioperative complications. The objective cure rate (no prolapse beyond the hymen and no reoperation for POP recurrence) was 87.3%. The reoperation rate for recurrence was 5.1%. The subjective success rate (PGI ≤ 2) was 96.2%. There were no mesh exposures or extrusions. CONCLUSIONS: This standardized LLS is safe and effective with no mesh complications after 3-year follow-up.

Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and overactive bladder symptoms-a population-based cohort (FINPOP).

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: It is unclear how compartment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) impacts overactive bladder (OAB) symptom severity or improvement after POP surgery. We hypothesized that anterior and apical prolapse are more strongly associated with OAB symptoms than posterior compartment prolapse. METHODS: A total of 2933 POP surgeries from a prospective population-based cohort were divided into two groups: (1) anterior and/or apical compartment surgery (± posterior repair), N = 2091; (2) posterior repair only, N = 478. Urinary frequency and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) were evaluated using PFDI-20 (bothersome symptom: score 3-4) at baseline, 6, and 24 months. Association between degree of POP in specific compartments and symptoms at baseline was estimated with generalized linear models and between compartment of surgery and symptom improvement with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: At least one bothersome symptom was reported by 40% at baseline, 14% at 6, and 19% at 24 months. At baseline, urinary frequency was associated with degree of anterior and apical and UUI with anterior compartment prolapse. Women undergoing surgery for anterior/apical compartment started with worse symptoms and experienced greater improvement than women undergoing posterior compartment surgery. Bothersome frequency resolved in 82% after anterior/apical and in 63% after posterior compartment surgery. Bothersome UUI resolved in 75% after anterior/apical and in 61% after posterior compartment surgery. After surgery, symptom severity was comparable between groups. Bothersome de novo symptoms occurred in 1-3%. CONCLUSIONS: OAB symptoms are more strongly related to anterior and apical than to posterior compartment prolapse, but improvement is seen after surgery for any vaginal compartment.

Review of Vaginal Approaches to Apical Prolapse Repair.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent literature and provide up-to-date knowledge on new and important findings in vaginal approaches to apical prolapse surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Overall prolapse recurrence rates following transvaginal apical prolapse repair range from 13.7 to 70.3% in medium- to long-term follow-up, while reoperation rates for prolapse recurrence are lower, ranging from 1 to 35%. Subjective prolapse symptoms remain improved despite increasing anatomic failure rates over time. The majority of studies demonstrated improvement in prolapse-related symptoms and quality of life in over 80% of patients 2-3 years after transvaginal repair, with similar outcomes with and without uterine preservation. Contemporary studies continue to demonstrate the safety of transvaginal native tissue repair with most adverse events occurring within the first 2 years. Transvaginal apical prolapse repair is safe and effective. It is associated with long-term improvement in prolapse-related symptoms and quality of life despite increasing rates of prolapse recurrence over time. Subjective outcomes do not correlate with anatomic outcomes.

External validation of a model predicting de novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

AIMS: De novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may develop after surgical correction of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in otherwise continent women. Prediction of which women with POP will develop SUI after the prolapse is corrected is difficult. We aimed to externally validate a previously described prediction model for de novo SUI after performing vaginal surgery for POP and to assess its clinical performance when used as a diagnostic test. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all continent women with ≥ stage 2 POP according to the POP-Quantification System who underwent reconstructive surgery for symptomatic POP. Surgical correction for prolapse of the anterior and/or apical compartment was performed using native tissue or vaginal mesh repair. Seven parameters of the prediction model including age at surgery, number of vaginal births, body mass index, preoperative stress test, previous continence procedure history, urine leakage associated with a feeling of urgency, and diagnosis of diabetes for each patient was provided from the medical records, and the predicted probability of de novo SUI after POP surgery was calculated. The primary outcome used to validate the prediction model was the presence of SUI 1 year after surgery. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to evaluate the predictive accuracy. A cut-off point of ≥ 50% was used to evaluate its clinical performance as a diagnostic test. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five women were suitable for analysis. The rate of de novo SUI was 5.3%. The predictive accuracy of the model in our population using the area under the ROC curve was 0.56 (95% confidence interval = 0.35-0.77). Its performance as a diagnostic test was poor (positive likelihood ratio = 1.20 and negative likelihood ratio = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical validation of this model showed that it did not have good clinical performance. We need future prospective studies to identify and incorporate additional markers of de novo SUI to improve the prediction capacity.

Can we predict the evolution of untreated first stage posterior vaginal wall prolapse in women operated for anterior or apical prolapse?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between pre-existing conditions and worsening of Stage I untreated posterior vaginal wall prolapse (PVWP) after vaginal hysterectomy and anterior repair at 12-month follow-up. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study. Women with symptomatic (vaginal bulging and low back pain) anterior and/or apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and I stage PVWP were enrolled. Patients were submitted to vaginal hysterectomy and native-tissue anterior vaginal wall repair. Risk factors for POP development were collected for each woman before surgery. At 12 month-follow-up after surgery, women were evaluated and divided into two groups depending on the anatomical finding of the posterior vaginal wall according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System: women with Persistent I stage PVWP and patients with worsened PVWP more than or equal to II stage. Difference of distribution of risk factors for POP between the two groups was evaluated. Correlation between risk factors and development of PVWP more than I stage was assessed. RESULTS: Seventy women were submitted to POP surgery. Significant difference in constipation before surgery and degree of anterior and central vaginal compartments descent was observed (p < .01) between the two groups. Constipation before surgery resulted as an independent factor in worsening of PVWP at 12-month follow-up (p value = .01; odds ratio 1.99 [1.49-2.33]). CONCLUSION: Untreated Stage I PVWP, not included in the first surgical repair, can significantly get worse in women complaining of constipation at 12-month follow-up.

Incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in older women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), a transient impairment of memory, concentration, and information processing, has been reported after 7-26% of non-cardiac surgeries with associated increase in morbidity and death. Our primary aim was to determine the incidence of POCD 2 weeks after prolapse surgery in women ≥ 60 years old. Our secondary aim was to identify risk factors for POCD. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of women ≥ 60 years old scheduled for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Exclusion criteria included cognitive impairment history, major neurologic disorder, and abnormal cognition screen. A comprehensive neuropsychologic (NP) battery (eight tests), administered 2 weeks pre- and post-surgery, assessed premorbid IQ and domains of attention, memory, and executive function. The primary outcome was defined as decline of ≥ 1 SD on ≥ 2 NP tests or decline of ≥ 2 SD on ≥ 1 test. Raw scores were transformed to Z-scores. RESULTS: NP testing was completed by 72 women, median age 72 (IQR 69-77) years. Procedures included 16 (22.9%) laparoscopic sacrocolpopexies, 23 (32.9%) transvaginal reconstructions, and 29 (41.4%) obliterative surgeries, performed under general (63, 90%), regional (5, 7.1%), or sedation (2, 2.9%) anesthesia with a median hospital stay of 0.6 (IQR 0.6-0.75) days. POCD incidence was 33.3% (n = 24). POCD was associated with greater frailty (p = 0.006) and higher baseline depression (p = 0.05) but not with older age (p = 0.77) or inhalational gas use (p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, one in three women manifested POCD 2 weeks after prolapse surgery. Preoperative counseling should include discussions on POCD given its detrimental impact on postoperative recovery and independence.

Urinary incontinence before and after pelvic organ prolapse surgery-A national database study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To investigate how pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery affects symptoms of urinary incontinence (UI) in women with POP and concomitant UI. METHODS: Data from the Danish Urogynaecological Database were collected from 2013 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were urinary incontinent women who underwent POP surgery alone. Based on the preoperative results of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-short form (ICIQ-UI-sf), women were categorized with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Postoperatively, the women were categorized based on the postoperative ICIQ-UI-sf, except here, undefined urinary incontinence and urinary continence were added to the categories. Statistical analyses included multivariate logistic regression analyses, examining the odds of urinary continence in each category. The included parameters were preoperative POP stage (POP-Q), compartment, BMI, age and preoperative ICIQ-UI-sf total score. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 1657 women were included. Significantly more women with preoperative UUI achieved urinary continence (60%) compared to women with preoperative SUI (52%) and MUI (38%). More than 70% of all women achieved either urinary continence or an improvement in UI, regardless of subtype. For women with UUI, the likelihood of achieving urinary continence was higher if the anterior compartment was involved. Women with MUI were more likely to achieve urinary continence if they had POP-Q stage 3-4. CONCLUSIONS: Most women with symptomatic POP and concomitant UI find that their UI is either cured or improved after POP surgery alone.

Postoperative complications and recurrence rates after rectal prolapse surgery versus combined rectal prolapse and pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our primary objectives were to compare < 30-day postoperative complications and RP recurrence rates after RP-only surgery and combined surgery. Our secondary objectives were to determine preoperative predictors of < 30-day complications and RP recurrence. METHODS: A prospective IRB-approved cohort study was performed at a single tertiary care center from 2017 to 2020. Female patients with symptomatic RP underwent either RP-only surgery or combined surgery based on the discretion of the colorectal and FPMRS surgeons. Primary outcome measures were < 30-day complications separated into Clavien-Dindo (CD) classes and rectal prolapse on physical examination. RESULTS: Seventy women had RP-only surgery and 45 had combined surgery with a mean follow-up time of 208 days. Sixty-eight percent underwent abdominal RP repair, and 32% underwent perineal RP repair. Twenty percent had one or more complications, 14% in the RP-only group and 29% in the combined surgery group (p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, combined surgery patients had a 30% increased risk of complications compared to RP-only surgery patients (RR = 1.3). Most of these complications were minor (14/17, 82.4%) and categorized as CD I or II, including urinary retention and UTI. Twelve percent of this cohort had RP recurrence, 11% in the RP-only group and 13% in the combined surgery group (p = 0.76). Preoperative risk factors for RP recurrence included a primary complaint of rectal bleeding (RR 5.5) and reporting stools consistent with Bristol Stool Scale of 1 (RR 2.1). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing combined RP + POP surgery had a higher risk of complications and equivalent RP recurrence rates compared to patients undergoing RP-only surgery.

Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measures are fundamental tools when assessing effectiveness of treatments. The challenge lies in the interpretation: which magnitude of change in score is meaningful for the patients? The minimal important difference (MID) is defined as the smallest difference in score that patients perceive as important. The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) represents the value of score beyond which patients consider themselves well. We aimed to determine the MID and PASS for Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6) in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. METHODS: We used data from 2704 POP surgeries from a prospective, population-based cohort. MID was determined with three anchor-based and one distribution-based method. PASS was defined using two different methods. Medians of the estimates were identified. RESULTS: The MID estimates with (1) mean change, (2) receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, (3) 75th percentile, and (4) distribution-based method varied between 22.9-25.0 (median 24.2) points for PFDI-20 and 9.0-12.5 (median 11.3) for POPDI-6. The PASS cutoffs with (1) 75th percentile and (2) ROC curve method varied between 57.7-62.5 (median 60.0) for PFDI-20 and 16.7-17.7 (median 17.2) for POPDI-6. CONCLUSION: A mean difference of 24 points in the PFDI-20 or 11 points in the POPDI-6 can be used as a clinically relevant difference between groups. Postoperative scores ≤ 60 for PFDI-20 and ≤ 17 for POPDI-6 signify acceptable symptom state.

Does preoperative resting genital hiatus size predict surgical outcomes?

AIM: To determine whether preoperative genital hiatus at rest is predictive of medium-term prolapse recurrence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of women who underwent native tissue prolapse surgery from 2002 to 2017 with pelvic organ prolapse quantification data including resting genital hiatus at one of three time points: preoperatively, 6 weeks, and ≥1 year postoperatively. Demographics and clinical data were abstracted from the chart. Prolapse recurrence was defined by anatomic outcomes (Ba > 0, Bp > 0, and/or C ≥ -4) or retreatment. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 165 women included, 36 (21.8%) had prolapse recurrence at an average of 1.5 years after surgery. Preoperative resting genital hiatus did not differ between women with surgical success versus recurrence (3.5 cm [interquartile range, IQR 2.25, 4.0) vs 3.5 cm (IQR 3.0, 4.0), p = 0.71). Point Bp was greater in the recurrence group at every time point. Preoperative Bp (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, confidence interval [CI] [1.06-1.45], p = 0.01) and days from surgery (OR 1.001, CI [1.000-1.001], p < 0.01) were independently associated with recurrence. Preoperative genital hiatus at rest and strain were significantly larger among women who underwent a colpoperineorrhaphy (rest: 4.0 [3.0, 4.5] cm vs 3.5 [3.0, 4.0] cm, p < 0.01; strain: 6.0 [4.0, 6.5] cm vs 5.0 [4.0, 6.0] cm, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative genital hiatus at rest was not associated with prolapse recurrence when the majority of women underwent colpoperineorrhaphy. Preoperative Bp was more predictive of short-term prolapse recurrence. For every 1 cm increase in point Bp, there is a 24% increased odds of recurrence.

The association of symptoms of overactive bladder with pelvic organ prolapse and its improvement after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study asseses the association of overactive bladder symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse severity and evaluates the effect of pelvic reconstructive surgery on overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). It also looks into any pre and post-operative factors responsible for persistent postoperative OAB symptoms. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi between 1st January 2014 and 31st December 2018. In this study women presenting with POP and concommitent OAB who underwent surgery for site specific defects, measured using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) staging system. OAB was defined as presence of urinary frequency, urinary urgency incontinence (UUI) and an affirmative response to item #15 and/or item #16 of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), which was used both pre and postoperatively. Primary outcome of the study was to find complete resolution or improvement of urinary frequency and UUI on the PFDI, 24 months after surgery. The secondary outcome was to see persistent OAB postoperatively and the factors associated with it. RESULTS: Overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms improved significantly regardless of the severity of prolapse at 24 months postoperative period. Body mass index (BMI) and postoperative constipation were the only statistically significant variables associated with persistent OAB symptoms postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction of POP results in significant improvement in symptoms of OAB, in all stages of POP and co-existing OAB. However women with high BMI and post-operative constipation may be prone to persistent frequency and/or UUI.

De novo urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery-a national database study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of de novo urinary incontinence (UI) after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. METHODS: Data from 2013 to 2016 were collected from the Danish Urogynecological Database, where registration for any urogynecological procedure performed in Denmark is mandatory. Inclusion criteria were urinary continent women who underwent POP surgery. A woman was urinary continent if her total score on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-short form (ICIQ-UI-sf) was 0 and she answered 'never' to 'When does urine leak?' Postoperatively, the women were categorized as continent or women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) or undefined UI. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses. The included parameters were preoperative POP stage (POP-Q), compartment, BMI and age. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We included 1198 women. The risk of de novo UI was 15%; 45% had SUI, 30% had UUI, 16% had MUI, and 10% had undefined UI. BMI was highly associated with de novo UI; the risk was 12% for women with BMI < 25, 16% for women with BMI 25 - < 30 and 23% for women with BMI ≥ 30. Age, compartment and POP stage were not associated with de novo UI. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of de novo UI is the same regardless of the involved compartment/s and POP stage. BMI is significantly associated with de novo UI; twice as many women with BMI ≥ 30 had de novo UI compared with women with BMI < 25.

Surgical approach, complications, and reoperation rates of combined rectal and pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to determine rectal prolapse (RP) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) reoperation rates and postoperative < 30-day complications after combined RP and POP surgery at a single institution. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of all female patients who received combined RP and POP surgery at a single tertiary care center from 2008 to 2019. Recurrence was defined as the need for subsequent repeat RP or POP surgery at any point after the index surgery. Surgical complications were separated into Clavien-Dindo classes. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were identified, and 18.3% (12/63) had < 30-day complications (55% Clavien-Dindo grade 1; 27% Clavien-Dindo grade 2; 18% Clavien-Dindo grade 4). Of patients undergoing combined abdominal RP and POP repair, no postoperative < 30-day complications were noted in the MIS group compared to 37.5% of those patients in the laparotomy group (p < 0.01). Overall, in those patients who underwent combined RP and POP surgery, the need for subsequent RP surgery for recurrent RP was 14% and the need for subsequent POP surgery for recurrent POP was 4.8% (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of women undergoing combined RP and POP surgery, a higher proportion required subsequent RP surgery compared to those requiring subsequent POP surgery, although this was not statistically significant. Almost one-fifth of patients undergoing combined RP and POP surgery experienced a < 30-day surgical complication, regardless of whether the approach was perineal or abdominal. For those patients undergoing abdominal repair, < 30-day complications were more likely in those patients who had a laparotomy compared to those who had a minimally invasive surgery.

Management of Postoperative Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) After Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Repair.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition for which approximately 200,000 US women annually undergo surgical repair [Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:108-115, 2003]. After surgical correction, persistent or new lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) can be present. We provide guidance on the current tools to predict, counsel, and subsequently handle postoperative LUTS. The current literature is reviewed regarding LUTS diagnosis and management in the setting of prolapse surgery with an emphasis on newer developments in this area. RECENT FINDINGS: 1. More severe stages of prolapse are positively correlated with obstructive symptoms [Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1332-1337, 2001], but not with other LUTS [Adv Urol 2013:5673753, 2013, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 177:141-145, 2014, Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:683, 2008, Int Urogynecol J 21:1143-1149, 2010]. 2. One-week ambulatory pessary trial is an effective way to approximate postoperative results-one study correctly predicted persistent urgency and frequency in addition to occult stress urinary incontinence in 20% of study population [Obstet Gynecol Int 2012:392027, 2012]. 3. No preoperative overactive bladder (OAB) symptom was the best predictor for the absence of de novo OAB symptoms postoperatively [Int Urogynecol J 21:1143-1149, 2010]. 4. Urge incontinence patients respond favorably to sacral neuromodulation [Neurourol Urodyn 26: 29-35, 2007], botulinum toxin, and anticholinergic therapy [Res Rep Urol 8:113-122, 2016 , N Engl J Med, 367:1803-1813, 2012]. 5. Primary bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) can be treated effectively with alpha antagonists or anticholinergics, timed voiding, and pelvic physiotherapy as first-line therapy. Counseling regarding postoperative LUTS is key when planning POP surgery. A thorough understanding of patient history is crucial to successful repair. Patients with significant preoperative symptoms, history of neurologic disease, pelvic floor dysfunction, bladder neck obstruction, or higher stages of anterior wall prolapse may be higher risk for postoperative LUTS. UDS with or without reduction and an ambulatory pessary trial can help prognosticate. Patients will likely maintain a positive therapeutic relationship postoperatively for LUTS if counseled preoperatively.

Mesh-related complications from reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in Chinese patients in Hong Kong.

INTRODUCTION: Mesh-related complications from reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse are of international concern. The present study aimed to review the incidence, management, and surgical outcomes of mesh-related complications in a Chinese population compared with existing studies involving Western populations. METHODS: This was an analysis of a prospectively collected cohort. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic hystercolposacropexy, or transvaginal mesh surgery were offered with or without concomitant vaginal hysterectomy or continence surgery. Patients were followed up and mesh-related complications were noted. RESULTS: Overall, 276 Chinese women who received mesh surgery were included for data analysis. There were 22 mesh-related complications found during a mean follow-up period of 40 months. Mesh exposure accounted for 20 these complications; significantly more occurred after transvaginal than after abdominal mesh surgery (16 vs 4; P=0.01). Median duration from primary operation to the time of mesh exposure detection was 12 months (interquartile range=4.8-32.8 months). Ten patients required surgical excisions of exposed mesh. The re-operation rate after mesh complications was 6.7% (9/134) for transvaginal mesh surgery and 1.4% (2/142) for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (P=0.03). All excisions were performed transvaginally and 95% remained well after surgery. Occurrence of mesh exposure was higher in transvaginal mesh surgery (adjusted odds ratio=6.1; P=0.008), in sexually active patients (adjusted odds ratio=5.4; P=0.002), and in obese patients (adjusted odds ratio=3.7; P=0.046). Over 90% were satisfied with the outcome, regardless of mesh complications. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of mesh exposure and re-operation were consistent with those reported in the literature, suggesting no significant differences in outcome between Chinese and Western patients for this type of surgery.

Native tissue repair versus mesh repair in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

In pelvic organ prolapse, the anatomical defects develop at the anterior (anterior vaginal wall), the posterior (posterior vaginal wall) and the apical (the uterus/cervix or the apex of the vagina, vaginal vault or cuff scar after hysterectomy) compartments. These defects occur in more than one compartment. Treatment of pelvic organ prolapse is commonly surgical, aiming to restore the anatomy of structures supporting the pelvic organs. The surgical repair techniques are classified as 'native tissue repair (NTR)' when only pelvic organ support tissues are used and 'augmented repair (AR)' when some other material (prosthesis or graft) is used to reinforce the defective support system. In this review, issues related to the basic science of meshes, and NTR versus mesh or graft AR procedures for pelvic organ prolapse are discussed while considering the varying risks and benefits according to the prolapsed compartment.