A modified vertebroplasty technique for intraoperative thoracic spine localisation: a technical report.

The aim is to illustrate the modified vertebroplasty technique as a fixed marker for intraoperative thoracic spine localisation. Open and minimally invasive surgery in the thoracic spine has been correlated with a disproportionately high rate of wrong-level spinal surgery in pathologies where a focal deformity or fracture is absent. Spinal markers have evolved with time, and vertebroplasty as a spinal marker was initially described in 2008. A significant disadvantage is that the cement in the vertebral body and pedicle may preclude a more extensive osteotomy or subsequent instrumentation at the level of interest. We demonstrate the modified vertebroplasty technique, which introduces percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate cement two levels below the thoracic disc herniation on the contralateral side to the surgical approach using standard vertebroplasty methods. The vertebroplasty was performed as an outpatient procedure, and the radiopaque cement was instantaneously located on intraoperative fluoroscopy, identifying the correct level above. The modified vertebroplasty technique is a quick, safe and accurate method of thoracic spine localisation, facilitating the room required for the bony exposure and instrumentation if needed.

Intra-operative imaging for spinal level localisation in lumbar surgery.

Study Design: Retrospective review of the practice of 3 surgeons in a single centre during a 1-year period. Objective: We aimed to investigate our adherence to the Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) guidelines regarding intra-operative imaging during lumbar surgery and to determine if this has any impact on length of surgery or complications rates, in particular rates of wrong-level surgery. Background: The SBNS recommends three x-rays for intra-operative spinal localisation - one prior to incision, the second after exposure of the laminae and before the commencement of decompression, and the third at the end of the operation to confirm the adequacy of decompression. At our centre, surgeon A performs x-rays 1 and 3 routinely, and x-ray 2 in cases where the anatomy is uncertain, surgeon B performs x-ray 2 only, and the practice of surgeon C varies depending on the complexity of cases. Method: We reviewed the surgical logbooks of 3 consultant neurosurgeons in our centre for the 1-year period between October 2015 and October 2016. Our study included 301 patients who had undergone lumbar decompression or lumbar discectomy during this period. Results: There were no cases of wrong-level surgery. The incorrect spinal level was initially exposed in 13 cases (4.3%). 10 of these had x-ray 2 only, 1 had x-ray 1, 1 had x-rays 1 and 2, and 1 had all 3 x-rays. Surgeon B performed 8 of these cases, four were performed by surgeon C, and 1 by surgeon A. The median duration of surgery was 80 minutes for lumbar decompression and 67.5 minutes for lumbar discectomy. The median duration of surgery in patients in whom the wrong level was initially exposed was 85 minutes for lumbar decompression and 80 minutes for lumbar discectomy. Conclusion: Performance of the 3 recommended x-rays may increase the identification of wrong-level exposures before the commencement of decompression and may reduce the length of surgery.

Localisation accuracy with iodine-125 seed versus wire guidance for breast cancer surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Impalpable breast lesions generally require image-guided localisation for breast-conserving surgery. A standard technique is to place a hook wire (HW) within the lesion. Radioguided occult lesion localisation using iodine seeds (ROLLIS) involves inserting a 4.5 mm iodine-125 seed (seed) into the lesion. We hypothesised that a seed could be more precisely positioned in relation to the lesion than a HW and that this may be associated with a lower re-excision rate. METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive participant data from three ROLLIS RCT (ACTRN12613000655741) sites. Participants underwent preoperative lesion localisation (PLL) with seed or HW between September 2013 and December 2017. Lesion and procedural characteristics were recorded. Distances between (1) any part of the seed or thickened segment of the HW ('TSHW') and the lesion/clip ('distance to device' DTD) and (2) centre of the TSHW/seed and centre of the lesion/clip (device centre to target centre 'DCTC') were measured on immediate postinsertion mammograms. Pathological margin involvement and re-excision rates were compared. RESULTS: A total of 390 lesions (190 ROLLIS and 200 HWL) were analysed. Lesion characteristics and guidance modality used were similar between groups. Ultrasound-guided DTD and DCTC for seed were smaller than for HW (77.1% and 60.6%, respectively, P-value < 0.001). Stereotactic-guided DCTC for seeds was 41.6% smaller than for HW (P-value = 0.001). No statistically significant difference in the re-excision rates was found. CONCLUSION: Iodine-125 seeds can be more precisely positioned for preoperative lesion localisation than HW, however, no statistically significant difference in re-excision rates was detected.

The utility of internal spinal marking for intraoperative localisation: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Incorrect level spinal surgery is an avoidable complication, with significant ramifications. Several pre-operative spinal marking techniques have been described to aid intraoperative localisation. METHODS: A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE was performed from inception to July 2022. All publications describing cases of internal spinal marking were included for further analysis. 22 articles describing 503 patients satisfied our eligibility criteria. RESULTS: A number of localisation techniques, including endovascular coiling (n = 16), fiducials (n = 177), dye (n = 109), needle/fixed wire (n = 199), cement (n = 4), and gadolinium tubes (n = 1) were described. The highest rates of technical success were observed with endovascular coiling, fiducials, cement and dye (100 %), and complication rates were lowest with endovascular coiling, fiducials and cement (0 %). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, internal spinal marking was effective and safe. When considering practicality and efficacy, fiducial marking appears the optimal technique, as it can be performed in the outpatient setting under local anaesthesia. This review demonstrates the need for more targeted investigation into localisation methods in spinal surgery.

Fallibility of tattooing colonic neoplasia ahead of laparoscopic resection: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Precise geographical localisation of colonic neoplasia is a prerequisite for proper laparoscopic oncological resection. Preoperative endoscopic peri-tumoural tattoo practice is routinely recommended but seldom scrutinised. METHODS: A retrospective review of recent consecutive patients with preoperative endoscopic lesional tattoo who underwent laparoscopic colonic resection as identified from our prospectively maintained cancer database with supplementary clinical chart and radiological, histological, endoscopic and theatre database/logbook interrogation. RESULTS: Some 210 patients with 'tattooed' colonic neoplasia were identified, of whom 169 underwent laparoscopic surgery (mean age 68 years, median BMI 27.8kg/m2, male-to-female ratio 95:74). The majority of tumours were malignant (149; 88%), symptomatic (133; 79%) and proximal to the splenic flexure (92; 54%). Inaccurate colonoscopist localisation judgement occurred in 12% of cases, 60% of which were corrected by preoperative staging computed tomography scan. A useful lesional tattoo was absent in 11/169 cases (6.5%) being specifically stated as present in 104 operation notes (61%) and absent in 10 (5.9%). Tumours missing overt peritumoral tattoos intraoperatively were more likely to be smaller, earlier stage and injected longer preoperatively (p=0.006), although half had histological ink staining. Eight lesions missing tattoos were radiologically occult. Four (44%) of these patients had on-table colonoscopy, and five (55%) needed laparotomy (conversion rate 55% vs 23% overall, p<0.005) with one needing a second operation to resect the initially missed target lesion. Mean (range) operative duration and postoperative length of stay of those missing tattoos compared with those with tattoos was 200 (78-300) versus 188 (50-597) min and 15.5 (4-22) versus 12(4-70) days (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tattoo in advance of attempting laparoscopic resection is vital for precision cancer surgery especially for radiologically unseen tumours to avoid adverse clinical consequence.

Preoperative localisation techniques in breast conservative surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The preoperative localisation of non-palpable lesions guided by breast imaging is an important and required procedure for breast-conserving surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the comparative impact of different techniques for guided surgical excision of non-palpable breast lesions from reports of clinical or patient-reported outcomes and costs. A literature search of PubMed, ISI, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases was conducted for relevant publications and their references, along with public documents, national and international guidelines, conference proceedings and presentations. From 5720 retrieved articles screened through title and abstract, 5346 were excluded and 374 assessed for full-text eligibility. For data extraction and quality assessment, 49 studies were included. Results of this review demonstrate that Radioactive Seed Localisation (RSL) and Radioactive Occult Lesion Localisation (ROLL) outperform Wire in terms of involved margins and reoperations. Between RSL and ROLL, there is a tendency to favour RSL. Similarly, Clip-guided localisation seems preferred when compared to ROLL, however further studies are needed. In summary, there seems to exist evidence that RSL and ROLL are better than Wire, representing potential alternatives, with a quick learning curve, better scheduling and management issues. Although, for recent techniques, more research is needed in order to achieve the same level of evidence.

Radioactive seed localisation of non-palpable lymph nodes - A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Radioactive seed localisation (RSL) is a preoperative localisation method using a small titanium seed containing iodine-125. The method is increasingly applied for localising non-palpable lesions in the treatment of breast cancer. We believe that RSL has the potential to be used in various surgical specialties. The aim of this feasibility study was to test RSL as a preoperative localisation of non-palpable lymph nodes. METHODS: Between November 24, 2015 and October 26, 2016, 15 patients with suspicious lymph nodes on imaging were included in the study. The lymph nodes were located in the axillary region (n = 9), the head and neck region (n = 5) and the inguinal region (n = 1). The seeds were placed in the centre of the lymph node, in the capsule or just outside the capsule guided by ultrasound. During surgery, incision and localisation of the lymph nodes were performed based on the auditory signal of the gamma probe. After excision, lymph nodes including iodine seeds were sent for pathologic examination and the seeds were returned to the Department of Nuclear Medicine. RESULTS: The non-palpable lymph nodes were all successfully marked using ultrasound. The lymph nodes were successfully localised and excised during surgery, and the procedure was performed without complications in the majority of the cases. CONCLUSION: Localisation of suspicious non-palpable lymph nodes using RSL is feasible. RSL may ease the surgical procedure, minimise trauma to the surrounding tissue and ultimately benefit the patient. Future prospective studies are necessary to determine the further use of RSL within different surgical specialties.