Comparative efficacy of cryoablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study utilizes a meta-analytic approach to investigate the effects of cryoablation and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy on perioperative outcomes, postoperative renal function, and oncological results in patients. METHODS: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database) were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published in English up to November 2023. The primary outcomes were perioperative results, complications, postoperative renal function and oncologic outcomes. Review Manager 5.4 was used for this analysis. RESULTS: This study included a total of 10 studies comprising 2,011 patients. Compared to RAPN (Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy), the CA (Cryoablation) group had a shorter hospital stay [MD -1.76 days; 95% CI -3.12 to -0.41; p = 0.01], less blood loss [MD -104.60 ml; 95% CI -152.58 to -56.62; p < 0.0001], and fewer overall complications [OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.86; p = 0.004], but a higher recurrence rate [OR 7.83; 95% CI 4.32 to 14.19; p < 0.00001]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, minor complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade 1-2), major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade 3-5), changes in renal function at 12 months post-operation, RFS (Recurrence-Free Survival), and OS (Overall Survival). CONCLUSION: The evidence provided by this meta-analysis indicates that the therapeutic effects of Cryoablation (CA) are similar to those of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) in terms of perioperative outcomes and renal function. However, the recurrence rate of tumors treated with CA is significantly higher. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The study has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023465846).

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in younger versus older adults with renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between younger and older patients after adjusting for their background differences. We particularly assessed RAPN outcomes and safety in older patients. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 559 patients clinically diagnosed with T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and treated with RAPN between 2013 and 2022 at five institutions in Japan. The patients were classified into two groups according to their age during surgery (younger group: < 75 years, older group: ≥ 75 years). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for the differences in the backgrounds between younger and older patients, and surgical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Among the 559 patients, 422 (75.5%) and 137 (24.5%) were classified into the younger and older groups, respectively; 204 and 102 patients from the younger and older groups were matched according to PSM, respectively. Subsequently, patient characteristics other than age were not significantly different between the two groups. In the matched cohort, the older group had more patients with major complications (younger, 3.0%; older, 8.8%; P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Surgical outcomes of RAPN in older patients with RCC were comparable with those in younger patients, although older patients experiencedsignificantly more complications than younger patients. These results suggest the need for further detailed preoperative evaluation and appropriate postoperative management in older patients receiving RAPN.

Comparison of renal function between the artery and vein clamp and artery-only clamp in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for moderate- to high-complexity renal masses: A propensity-matched study.

OBJECTIVE: Artery and vein (AV) clamps can control venous bleeding in the surgical field and prevent carbon dioxide embolism, especially when large veins are expected to open. However, whether AV clamps cause more renal damage than artery-only (AO) clamps remains unclear. This study aimed to compare renal function and blood loss in surgeries using AO and AV clamps based on high RENAL nephrometry scores (RNS) in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 500 patients who underwent RAPN between March 2016 and December 2021. We performed 1:1 propensity matching for these patients. RESULTS: A total of 340 patients with pathological malignancies who were followed up for at least 12 months were included in this analysis. A total of 291 patients with AO clamping and 49 patients with AV clamping were included. Overall, the AV clamp group had higher total RNSs and larger diameters than the AO clamp group. Propensity score-matched analysis included 37 patients in each clamp group. The median warm ischemia times of the AV and AO clamps were 25 and 22 min, respectively, with no significant difference. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the amount of blood loss, rate of acute kidney injury (AKI), or renal function at 1, 3, or 12 months post-RAPN. CONCLUSION: Compared with the AO clamp, the AV clamp did not have a detrimental impact on blood loss or renal dysfunction. Consequently, AV clamps may be considered for patients presenting with moderate-to-high-complexity RNSs.

Nurse-led coordinated surgical care pathways for cost optimization of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: medico-economic analysis of the UroCCR-25 AMBU-REIN study.

PURPOSE: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) reduces morbidity, enabling development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and day-case protocols. Additional financial costs limit its integration into clinical practice. We evaluated the medico-economic impact of RAPN using a nurse-led coordinated pathway of care (NLC-RAPN). METHODS: All tumor RAPNs performed in 2017 were prospectively included in nurse-led protocols: NP-RAAC (ERAS) or Ambu-Rein (day case). Clinico-biological and pathological data were prospectively collected within the French Research Network for Kidney Cancer database (NCT03293563). Estimated costs were compared to "average" patients at the national level operated by open partial nephrectomy (OPN) or RAPN, using data from the 2017 French hospital discharge database and the national cost scale. RESULTS: The NLC-RAPN cohort (n = 151) included 27 (18%) outpatients and the average hospital length of stay (LOS) was 2.4 days. In the national control cohorts for OPN (n = 2475) and RAPN (n = 3529), the average LOS were 8.0 and 5.2 days, respectively. The mean incomes per group were €7607 for NLC-RAPN, €9813 for OPN, and €8215 for RAPN. The mean daily cost of stay was €659 for NLC-RAPN, €838 for OPN, and €725 for RAPN. The overall cost for NLC-RAPN was €6594, €8733 for OPN, and €8763 for RAPN. The best operational margin was obtained for day-case NLC-RAPN (€1967). CONCLUSION: Combining RAPN with nurse-led coordinated pathways of care led to a shorter hospital stay and reduced costs versus OPN. This may facilitate the economic sustainability of robotic assistance for hospitals where the extra cost is not covered by the healthcare system.

Initial experience of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with Hugo™ RAS system: implications for surgical setting.

PURPOSE: Hugo™ RAS system is one of the most promising new robotic platforms introduced in the field of urology. To date, no data have been provided on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) performed with Hugo™ RAS system. The aim of the study is to describe the setting and report the performance of the first series of RAPN performed with Hugo™ RAS system. METHODS: Ten consecutive patients who underwent RAPN at our Institution between February and December 2022 were prospectively enrolled. All RAPN were performed transperitoneally with a modular four-arm configuration. The main outcome was to describe the operative room setting, trocar placement and the performance of this novel robotic platform. Pre, intra and post-operative, variables were recorded. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent RAPN for right-side and three for left-side masses. Median tumor size and PADUA score were 3 (2.2-3.7) cm and 9 (8-9), respectively. Median docking and console time were 9.5 (9-14) and 138 (124-162) minutes, respectively. Median warm ischemia time was 13 (10-14) minutes, and one case was performed clamp-less. Median estimated blood loss was 90 (75-100) mL. One major complication (Clavien-Dindo 3a) occurred. No case of positive surgical margin was recorded. CONCLUSION: This is the first series to prove the feasibility of Hugo™ RAS system in the setting of RAPN. These preliminary results may help new adopters of this surgical platform to identify critical steps of robotic surgery with this platform and explore solutions before in-vivo surgery.

Holographic 3D renal segments reconstruction protects renal function by promote choice of selective renal artery clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of selective artery clamping (SAC) and main artery clamping (MAC) during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) on renal function and the influence of holographic three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of renal segments on the selection between SAC and MAC. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent RAPN at First Hospital Affiliated to the Army Medical University between December 2016 and July 2022. According to the clamping methods, the patients were divided into the SAC group and the MAC group. The primary outcome was renal function. RESULTS: A total of 422 patients (194 in the SAC group and 228 in the MAC group) were included. The RAPN procedures were all completed successfully. The patients in SAC group had less glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline in the affected kidney (8.6 ± 7.0 ml/min vs. 18.7 ± 10.9 ml/min, P < 0.001) and minor estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease (4.3 ± 10.5 ml/min vs. 12.6 ± 12.1 ml/min, P < 0.001) than those in MAC group. Among 37 patients with baseline renal insufficiency, the GFR decline of the affected kidney in the SAC subgroup was significantly lower than in the MAC subgroup (5.5 ± 6.5 ml/min vs. 14.3 ± 9.2 ml/min, P = 0.002). The proportion of patients who underwent 3D reconstruction was significant higher in the SAC group than in the MAC group. (65.46% vs. 28.07%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SAC technique during RAPN may serve as a protective measure for renal function, while the implementation of holographic 3D renal segment reconstruction technique may facilitate optimal selection of SAC.

Transitioning from Da Vinci Si to Xi: assessing surgical outcomes at a high-volume robotic center.

PURPOSE: In the emerging field of robotics, only few studies investigated the transition between different robotic platforms in terms of surgical outcomes. We aimed at assessing surgical outcomes of patients receiving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at a high-volume robotic center during the transition from Si to Xi Da Vinci surgical systems. METHODS: We analyzed data of 1884 patients undergoing RARP (n = 1437, 76%) and RAPN (n = 447, 24%) at OLV hospital (Aalst, Belgium) between 2011 and 2021. For both procedures, we assessed operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and positive surgical margins. For RARP, we investigated length of catheterization and PSA persistence after surgery, whereas warm ischemia time, clampless surgery, and acute kidney injury (AKI) were assessed for RAPN. Multivariable analyses (MVA) investigated the association between robotic platform (Si vs. Xi) and surgical outcomes after adjustment for patient- and tumor-related factors. RESULTS: A total of 975 (68%) and 462 (32%) patients underwent RARP performed with the Si vs. Xi surgical system, respectively. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. On MVA, we did not find evidence of a difference between the groups with respect to operative time (estimate: 1.07) or estimated blood loss (estimate: 32.39; both p > 0.05). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) length of stay was 6 (3, 6) and 4 (3, 5) days in the Si vs. Xi group, respectively (p < 0.0001). On MVA, men treated with the Xi vs. Si robot had lower odds of PSM (Odds ratio [OR]: 0.58; p = 0.014). A total of 184 (41%) and 263 (59%) patients received RAPN with the Si and Xi robotic system, respectively. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, functional data, and tumor-related features did not differ between the groups. On MVA, operative time was longer in the Xi vs. Si group (estimate: 30.54; p = 0.006). Patients treated with the Xi vs. Si system had higher probability of undergoing a clampless procedure (OR: 2.56; p = 0.001), whereas the risk of AKI did not differ between the groups (OR: 1.25; p = 0.4). On MVA, patients operated with the Xi robot had shorter length of stay as compared to the Si group (estimate: - 0.86; p = 0.003), whereas we did not find evidence of an association between robotic system and PSM (OR: 1.55; p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: We found that the Xi robot allowed for improvements in peri-operative outcomes as compared to the Si platform, with lower rate of positive margins for RARP and higher rate of off-clamp procedures for RAPN. Hospital stay was also shorter for patients operated with the Xi vs. Si robot, especially after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Awaiting future investigations-in particular, cost analyses-these results have important implications for patients, surgeons, and healthcare policymakers.

Impact of tumor contact surface area on collecting system entry in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Collecting system entry in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy may occur even in cases showing a low N factor in the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score. Therefore, in this study, we focused on the tumor contact surface area with the adjacent renal parenchyma and attempted to construct a novel predictive model for collecting system entry. METHODS: Among 190 patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution from 2015 to 2021, 94 patients with a low N factor (1-2) were analyzed. Contact surface was measured with three-dimensional imaging software and defined as the C factor, classified as C1, < 10 cm [2]; C2, ≥ 10 and < 15 cm [2]; and C3: ≥ 15 cm [2]. Additionally, a modified R factor (mR) was classified as mR1, < 20 mm; mR2, ≥ 20 and < 40 mm; and mR3, ≥ 40 mm. We discussed the factors influencing collecting system entry, including the C factor, and created a novel collecting system entry predictive model. RESULTS: Collecting system entry was observed in 32 patients with a low N factor (34%). The C factor was the only independent predictive factor for collecting system entry in multivariate regression analysis (odds ratio: 4.195, 95% CI: 2.160-8.146, p < 0.0001). Models including the C factor showed better discriminative power than the models without the C factor. CONCLUSIONS: The new predictive model, including the C factor in N1-2 cases, may be beneficial, considering its indication for preoperative ureteral catheter placement in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Can retroperitoneal approach suit for renal tumors of all locations?-A large retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the appropriate location of renal tumors for retroperitoneal approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1040 patients with renal tumor who were treated at our institution from Janurary 2015 to June 2020 and had underwent retroperitoneal robotic assisted-laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (rRAPN). Clinical features and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients with incomplete data were excluded, and we included 896 patients in total. The median tumor size was 3.0 (range: 0.8-10.0) cm. The median RENAL Nephrometry Score was 7 (range: 4-11), and the median PADUA Nephrometry Score was 8 (range: 6-14). The median surgical time was 120 min, and the median warm ischemia time was 18 min. The median estimated blood loss was 50 ml. The follow-up time was 20.2 (range: 12-69) months. The mean change of eGFR 1 year after operation was 14.6% ± 19.0% compared with preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). When compared the tumor at different locations, as superior or inferior pole, anterior of posterior face of kidney, there were no significant differences of intra- and post-operative outcomes such as surgical time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, removal time of drainage tube and catheter, postoperative feeding time and hospital stay, and changes of eGFR one year after surgery. We also compared tumors at special locations as endophytic or exophytic, anterior of posterior hilus of kidney, there were no significant differences in surgical time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss and changes of eGFR. There was no significant difference in intraoperative features and postoperative outcomes when tumor larger than 4 cm was located at different positions of kidney. Though the surgical time was longer when BMI ≥ 28 (132.6 min vs. 122.5 min, p = 0.004), no significant differences were observed in warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, changes in eGFR. Twenty-seven patients (3.0%) had tumor progression, including 8 (0.9%) recurrence, 19 (2.1%) metastasis, and 9 (1.0%) death. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal approach for RAPN has confirmed acceptable intra- and postoperative outcomes and suits for renal tumors of all different locations. Large tumor size and obesity are not contraindications for rRAPN.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: This study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the 'E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared. RESULTS: Of 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long-term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required.

The Impact of Postoperative Renal Function Recovery after Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Background and objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the association between warm ischemic time (WIT) and postoperative renal function using Trifecta achievement in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent robotic (RAPN) or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with RCC who underwent RAPN (RAPN group) or LPN (LPN group) at three institutions in Japan between March 2012 and October 2021. The primary endpoints were the rate of trifecta achievement in both surgical techniques and the association between WIT and recovery of postoperative renal function surgical outcomes. Results: The rate of trifecta achievement was significantly lower in patients with LPN than in those with RAPN (p < 0.001). WIT ≥ 25 min were 18 patients (18%) in the RAPN group and 89 (52.7%) in the LPN group. The postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was almost the same. However, 13 patients (7.7%) had a decreased in eGFR ≥ 15% at 3 months after LPN compared with the preoperative eGFR. Conclusions: The rate of trifecta achievement in the RAPN group was significantly higher than that in the LPN group. However, eGFR was identified as relatively better preserved after PN in both groups.

[Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with selective ischemia].

INTRODUCTION: Clamping of the renal artery during partial nephrectomy leads to renal ischemia and a deterioration of its function. An alternative to total ischemia is to isolate and clamp the segmental branch of the renal artery supplying the tumor. AIM: To evaluate the efficiency of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with selective renal ischemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients with renal tumors of stage T1a (n=34) and T1b (n=8) undergoing RAPN were included in the study. There were 25 men (59.5%) and 17 women. The mean age was 56.0 +/- 7.5 years, the tumor size ranged from 2.5 to 6.8 cm. Patients with a solitary kidney, multiple tumors, and those who underwent partial nephrectomy with clamping of the renal artery were excluded from the study. CT angiography with 3D reconstruction were used to detect the segmental branches of the renal artery, that supply the tumor. To determine the complexity of renal tumors, the RENAL nephrometric scale was used. Complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. In addition, mean operative time and volume of blood loss, warm ischemia time, pre- and postoperative renal function, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. The RAPN was considered successful if it was performed with selective clamping of the artery. RESULTS: RAPN with selective ischemia was effective in 38 (90.5%) of 42 patients. In 4 (9.5%) cases with tumors of T1b stage and high RENAL scores (> 8), total ischemia was eventually used in order to control bleeding. According to CT angiography, these patients had more or equal 2 branches of renal artery, supplying the tumor. Mean operation time, volume of blood loss and warm ischemia time were 130.0+/-35 min, 185.0+/-80.0 ml and 14.0+/-3.2 min, respectively. In one case, there was an injury to the renal vein, which was sutured. Postoperative complications were observed in 5 (12.0%) patients. The glomerular filtration rate pre- and postoperatively was 76.5 and 72.0 ml/min/1.73 m2, and its decrease 1 month after RAPN was not significant (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Preoperative evaluation of renal arterial anatomy allows to detect the segmental branch that supplies the tumor. By its clamping, it is possible to perform efficient and safe robot-assisted partial nephrectomy without total ischemia.

Retroperitoneal versus transepritoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for postero-lateral renal masses: an international multicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (r-RAPN) in a large cohort of patients with postero-lateral renal masses comparing to those of transperitoneal RAPN (t-RAPN). METHODS: Patients with posterior (R.E.N.A.L. score grading P) or lateral (grading X) renal mass who underwent RAPN in six high-volume US and European centers were identified and stratified into two groups according to surgical approach: r-RAPN ("study group") and t-RAPN ("control group"). Baseline characteristics, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected and compared. RESULTS: Overall, 447 patients were identified for the analysis. 231 (51.7%) and 216 (48.3%) patients underwent r-RAPN and t-RAPN, respectively. Baseline characteristics were not statistically significantly different between the groups. r-RAPN group reported lower median operative time (140 vs. 170 min, p < 0.001). No difference was found in ischemia time, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative complications. Overall, 47 and 54 postoperative complications were observed in r-RAPN and t-RAPN groups, respectively (20.3 vs. 25.1%, p = 0.9). 1 and 2 patients reported major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III grade) in the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal groups (0.4 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.9). There was no difference in hospital re-admission rate, median length of stay, and PSM rate. Trifecta criteria were achieved in 90.3 and 89.2% of r-RAPN and t-RAPN, respectively (p = 0.7). CONCLUSION: r-RAPN and t-RAPN offer similar postoperative, functional, and oncological outcomes for patients with postero-lateral renal tumors. Our analysis suggests an advantage for r-RAPN in terms of shorter operative time, whereas it does not confirm a difference in terms of length of stay, as suggested by previous reports.

Retroperitoneal Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (rRAPN): Surgical Technique and Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We aim to offer a description of the surgical technique and to review the current state retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (rRAPN). RECENT FINDINGS: Partial nephrectomy is the standard treatment for localized kidney tumours. rRAPN is especially useful for kidney tumours of posterior location. It offers advantages such as direct access to the renal artery and no need for bowel mobilization. The disadvantages are the small working space and the less familiar anatomical landmarks. It is a reproducible technique that achieves similar oncological and functional results to the more traditional transperitoneal route (tRAPN). High-quality randomized studies are needed to ascertain the role of new technologies as modern high-flow insufflation systems, intracavitary ultrasound, 3D planning, and augmented reality (AR), in the performance of this operation. rRAPN is especially useful for kidney tumours of posterior location. Robotic surgeons ideally should become familiar with both approaches, transperitoneal or retroperitoneal.

Open Partial Nephrectomy vs. Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for a Renal Tumor Larger than 4 cm: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: To compare open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the management of renal tumors larger than 4 cm. METHODS: Clinical records of 220 patients who underwent OPN or RAPN for a single renal tumor ≥ 4.0 cm with a normal contralateral kidney were reviewed. After determining the propensity score, surgical parameters, functional outcomes, and oncological outcomes were compared between OPN (n = 67) and RAPN (n = 67) groups of patients. RESULTS: The RAPN group had longer operation time (149.0 min vs. 173.3 min, P = 0.030) and longer ischemic time (20.3 min vs. 29.4 min, P = 0.001), but shorter hospital stay (8.2 days vs 6.0 days, P = 0.001) than the OPN group. Estimated blood loss (P = 0.053), pain visual analog score at 1 day postoperatively (P = 0.194), and complications of grade III or higher (P = 0.403) were similar between OPN and RAPN groups. There was no radical conversion or positive surgical margin in either group. Mean change in 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly better in the RAPN group (-8.2 vs. -3.1, P = 0.027). There was no statistical difference in recurrence-free survival (P = 0.970) or cancer-specific survival (P = 0.345) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: RAPN is a safe and feasible surgical modality comparable to OPN for managing renal tumors larger than 4 cm in terms of surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes.

Comparison of postoperative recovery after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy of T1 renal tumors through retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach: A Japanese single institutional analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of recovery in patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and to compare the outcomes of the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. METHODS: This study included 121 patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy under general anesthesia from April 2019 to September 2019 at Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. Quality of recovery was defined according to the QoR-40 Japanese version. The participants responded to the QoR-40 Japanese version on three designated days. The patients were assigned to two groups according to the surgical approach: transperitoneal or retroperitoneal. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify independent factors associated with better quality of recovery. RESULTS: Out of the 121 patients, 56 (46%) and 65 (54%) patients were included in the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal group, respectively. Although the QoR-40 Japanese version scores were not different between the two groups at admission, a better quality of recovery was observed in the retroperitoneal group than in the transperitoneal group at discharge based on the total score: physical comfort, emotional state, physical independence and pain. A multivariate analysis showed that the retroperitoneal approach and male sex were associated with a better QoR-40 Japanese version score at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: A retroperitoneal approach offers better quality of recovery than a transperitoneal approach, and therefore it might represent the optimal approach in selected patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Trends and safety of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2-year period after government approval in Japan: A nationwide database study from 2016 to 2018.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the trends and safety of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy during the initial 2-year period after government approval for this type of procedure in April 2016. METHODS: This nationwide retrospective study included 3722 received robot-assisted partial nephrectomy cases carried out from April 2016 to March 2018 in 124 participating institutions. The institutions were divided into lower- and higher-volume institutions according to the median of 19 robot-assisted partial nephrectomy cases during the study period. Surgical outcomes between 616 cases from lower-volume institutions and 3106 cases from higher-volume institutions were compared using propensity score matching. RESULTS: During the study period, both the number of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy surgeries and the number of institutions in which the surgery was carried out steadily increased. Overall, the median anesthesia time was 217 min, the median postoperative length of stay was 9 days, and the proportion of blood transfusions, complications and readmissions were 0.8%, 5.1% and 1.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences in anesthesia time, incidence of blood transfusions, and complication rates between the lower-volume and higher-volume institutions. However, a slightly, but significantly, longer postoperative length of stay and a lower incidence of readmission were observed in lower-volume institutions both before and after propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has become widespread during the initial 2-year period after government approval with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of the institutional caseloads. This technique has become a standard of care for stage 1 renal cancer patients in Japan.

[Comparative analysis of clinical features of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy].

INTRODUCTION: Kidney cancer (mostly renal cell carcinoma) is one of the ten most commonly diagnosed malignant tumors among men and women. Due to the widespread use of computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, the proportion of early-stage kidney cancers has increased. Currently, treatment options for stage 1 kidney cancer are radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, and active surveillance. Among organ-preserving intervention, three main techniques can be distinguished: open surgery, minimally invasive surgery and ablation methods. To date, robotic-assisted procedures have occupied their place among minimally invasive interventions. AIM: To carry out a comparative analysis of two methods of organ-preserving treatment of kidney tumors, namely robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective comparative analysis of two groups of patients with kidney tumors who underwent robotic-assisted or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy during the period from 2012 to 2019 was performed. RESULTS: There were no differences between two groups in age, mean score on the RENAL nephrometry scale, preoperative creatinine levels, tumor size, and duration of warm ischemia. However, duration of surgery, the volume of blood loss, serum creatinine after surgery, the length of stay, the use of the technique of early unclamping of the renal artery, the use of technique "off-clamp" and the proportion of exophytic tumors with growth were significantly different between patients of two groups. CONCLUSION: We believe that the robotic system is intuitively convenient for performing partial nephrectomy, allowing the treatment of potentially more complex cases and expanding the indications for organ-preserving procedures.

Robotic partial nephrectomy vs minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass: a propensity score-matched comparison from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (MIS-RN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in clinical T2a renal mass (cT2aRM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, multicentre, propensity score-matched (PSM) comparison of RAPN and MIS-RN for cT2aRM (T2aN0M0). Cohorts were PSM for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, clinical tumour size, and R.E.N.A.L. score using a 2:1 ratio for RN:PN. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), complication rates, and de novo estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Multivariable (MVA) and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses (KMSA) were conducted. RESULTS: In all, 648 patients (216 RAPN/432 MIS-RN) were matched. There were no significant differences in intraoperative complications (P = 0.478), Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥III complications (P = 0.063), and re-admissions (P = 0.238). The MVA revealed high ASA class (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, P = 0.044) and sarcomatoid (HR 5.3, P = 0.001), but not surgery type (P = 0.601) to be associated with all-cause mortality. Increasing R.E.N.A.L. score (HR 1.31, P = 0.037), high tumour grade (HR 2.5, P = 0.043), and sarcomatoid (HR 2.8, P = 0.02) were associated with recurrence, but not surgery (P = 0.555). Increasing age (HR 1.1, P < 0.001) and RN (HR 3.9, P < 0.001) were predictors of de novo eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Comparing RAPN and MIS-RN, KMSA revealed no significant differences for 5-year OS (76.3% vs 88.0%, P = 0.221) and 5-year DFS (78.6% vs 85.3%, P = 0.630) for pT2 RCC, and no differences for 3-year OS (P = 0.351) and 3-year DFS (P = 0.117) for pT3a upstaged RCC. The 5-year freedom from de novo eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 91.6% for RAPN vs 68.9% for MIS-RN (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RAPN had similar oncological outcomes and morbidity profile as MIS-RN, while conferring functional benefit. RAPN may be considered as a first-line option for cT2aRM.

Predicting intra-operative and postoperative consequential events using machine-learning techniques in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a Vattikuti Collective Quality Initiative database study.

OBJECTIVE: To predict intra-operative (IOEs) and postoperative events (POEs) consequential to the derailment of the ideal clinical course of patient recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Vattikuti Collective Quality Initiative is a multi-institutional dataset of patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephectomy for kidney tumours. Machine-learning (ML) models were constructed to predict IOEs and POEs using logistic regression, random forest and neural networks. The models to predict IOEs used patient demographics and preoperative data. In addition to these, intra-operative data were used to predict POEs. Performance on the test dataset was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC). RESULTS: The rates of IOEs and POEs were 5.62% and 20.98%, respectively. Models for predicting IOEs were constructed using data from 1690 patients and 38 variables; the best model had an AUC-ROC of 0.858 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.762, 0.936) and a PR-AUC of 0.590 (95% CI 0.400, 0.759). Models for predicting POEs were trained using data from 1406 patients and 59 variables; the best model had an AUC-ROC of 0.875 (95% CI 0.834, 0.913) and a PR-AUC 0.706 (95% CI, 0.610, 0.790). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the ML models in the present study was encouraging. Further validation in a multi-institutional clinical setting with larger datasets would be necessary to establish their clinical value. ML models can be used to predict significant events during and after surgery with good accuracy, paving the way for application in clinical practice to predict and intervene at an opportune time to avert complications and improve patient outcomes.