ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The optimization of intensive care unit (ICU) care impacts clinical outcomes and resource utilization. In 2017, our surgical ICU (SICU) adopted a "closed-collaborative" model. The aim of this study is to compare patient outcomes in the closed-collaborative model versus the previous open model in a cohort of trauma surgical patients admitted to our adult level 1 trauma center. METHODS: A retrospective review of trauma patients in the SICU from August 1, 2015 to July 31, 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into those admitted prior to August 1, 2017 (the "open" cohort) and those admitted after August 1, 2017 (the "closed-collaborative" cohort). Demographic variables and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Trauma severity was assessed using injury severity score (ISS). RESULTS: We identified 1669 patients (O: 895; C: 774). While no differences in demographics were observed, the closed-collaborative cohort had a higher overall ISS (O: 21.5 ± 12.14; C: 25.10 ± 2.72; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in the incidence of strokes (O: 1.90%; C: 2.58%, P = 0.3435), pulmonary embolism (O: 0.78%; C: 0.65%; P = 0.7427), sepsis (O: 5.25%; C: 7.49%; P = 0.0599), median ICU charges (O: $7784.50; C: $8986.53; P = 0.5286), mortality (O: 11.40%; C: 13.18%; P = 0.2678), or ICU length of stay (LOS) (O: 4.85 ± 6.23; C: 4.37 ± 4.94; P = 0.0795). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the closed-collaborative cohort had similar clinical outcomes despite having a sicker cohort of patients. We hypothesize that the closed-collaborative ICU model was able to maintain equivalent outcomes due to the dedicated multidisciplinary critical care team caring for these patients. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal model of ICU care for trauma patients.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Trauma Centers , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Length of Stay , Critical CareABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has a high negative predictive value (NPV). We aimed to understand if there was a difference in the NPV of the MRSA screen in surgical intensive care units (ICUs) and to determine its role in antibiotic de-escalation. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adults with a positive respiratory culture and MRSA nasal PCR admitted to a surgical ICU from 2016 to 2019. Patients were stratified by surgical ICU: cardiothoracic/cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) or transplant/acute care surgery intensive care unit (ACS-ICU). Our primary outcome was the NPV of MRSA screen. Secondary outcome was the duration of empiric MRSA-targeted therapy. RESULTS: We analyzed 61 patients: 42.6% (n = 26) ACS-ICU and 57.4% (n = 35) CVICU. There were no differences in age, comorbidities, prior MRSA infection, recent antibiotic use, immunocompromised status, or renal replacement therapy. At pneumonia diagnosis, more patients in the ACS-ICU were hospitalized ≥5 d (65.4% versus 8.6%, P < 0.0001) and more patients in the CVICU were in septic shock (88.6% versus 34.5%, P < 0.0001) and thrombocytopenic (40% versus 11.5%, P = 0.02). NPV of the PCR was similar (ACS-ICU: 0.92 [0.75-0.98], CV-ICU 0.89 [0.73-0.96]). On multivariable linear regression, the CVICU was associated with longer empiric therapy (ß 1.5, 95% CI 0.8-2.3, P < 0.0001), as was hospitalization for ≥5 d (ß 0.73, 95% CI 0.06-1.39, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The MRSA nasal PCR screen has a high NPV for ruling out MRSA pneumonia in critically ill surgical patients. However, patients in the CVICU and patients hospitalized ≥5 d had a longer time to de-escalation of MRSA-targeted therapy, potentially due to higher clinical risk profile.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Pneumonia , Staphylococcal Infections , Adult , Humans , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Intensive Care Units , Critical CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections or hospital-acquired infections are a growing public health threat that increases patient morbidity and mortality. Patients at the highest risk are those in intensive care units. Therefore, our objective was to provide a pattern analysis of nosocomial infections that occurred in an adult surgical intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This study was a retrospective observational study conducted in a 6-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) at An-Najah National University Hospital (NNUH) to detect the incidence of nosocomial infections from January 2020 until December 2021. The study group included 157 patients who received antibiotics during their stay in the SICU. RESULTS: The incidence of nosocomial infections, either suspected or confirmed, in the SICU was 26.9% (95 out of 352 admitted patients). Pneumonia (36.8%) followed by skin and soft tissue infections (35.8%) were the most common causes. The most common causative microorganisms were in the following order: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (26.3%), Acinetobacter baumannii (25.3%), extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL)-Escherichia coli (23.2%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (15.8%). The average hospital stay of patients with nosocomial infections in the SICU was 18.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of nosocomial infections is progressively increasing despite the current infection control measures, which accounts for an increased mortality rate among critically ill patients. The findings of this study may be beneficial in raising awareness to implement new strategies for the surveillance and prevention of hospital-acquired infections in Palestinian hospitals and health care centers.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Pneumonia , Adult , Humans , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Arabs , Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia/complications , Escherichia coli , Critical CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This risk analysis aimed to explore all modifiable factors associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (lasting > 24 h) after liver transplantation, based on prospectively collected data from a clinical trial. METHODS: We evaluated 306 candidates. Ninety-three patients were excluded for low risk for transfusion (preoperative haemoglobin > 130 g.l-1), and 31 patients were excluded for anticoagulation therapy, bleeding disorders, familial polyneuropathy, or emergency status. Risk factors were initially identified with a log-binomial regression model. Relative risk was then calculated and adjusted for age, sex, and disease severity (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] score). RESULTS: Early tracheal extubation was performed in 149 patients (84.7%), and 27 patients (15.3%) required prolonged mechanical ventilation. Reoperations were required for 6.04% of the early extubated patients and 44% of patients who underwent prolonged ventilation (p = 0.001). A MELD score > 23 was the main risk factor for prolonged ventilation. Once modifiable risk factors were adjusted for MELD score, sex, and age, three factors were significantly associated with prolonged ventilation: tranexamic acid (p = 0.007) and red blood cell (p = 0.001) infusion and the occurrence of postreperfusion syndrome (p = 0.004). The median (IQR) ICU stay was 3 (2-4) days in the early extubation group vs. 5 (3-10) days in the prolonged ventilation group (p = 0.001). The median hospital stay was also significantly shorter after early extubation, at 14 (10-24) days, vs. 25 (14-55) days in the prolonged ventilation group (p = 0.001). Eight patients in the early-extubation group (5.52%) were readmitted to the ICU, nearly all for reoperations, with no between-group differences in ICU readmissions (prolonged ventilation group, 3.7%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that bleeding and postreperfusion syndrome are the main modifiable factors associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay, suggesting that trials should explore vasopressor support strategies and other interventions prior to graft reperfusion that might prevent potential fibrinolysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2018-002510-13,) and on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01539057).
Subject(s)
End Stage Liver Disease , Liver Transplantation , Humans , Hemorrhage , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Clinical Trials as Topic , Male , FemaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) often suffer from multi-organ dysfunction and have a high mortality rate. Therefore, finding a simple but effective clinical indicator to predict the prognosis of patients is essential to improve their survival. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between blood urea nitrogen to serum albumin ratio (B/A) and short-term mortality among patients from the SICU. METHODS: All eligible adult patients admitted to the SICU from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database were recruited for this study. Participants were divided into a death group (n = 638) and a survival group (n = 2,048) based on the 90-day prognosis, and then grouped by B/A quartiles. We used restricted cubic splines (RCS) to visually analyze the correlation of B/A with 30- and 90-day risk of death. Cumulative survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to B/A quartiles and evaluated using the log-rank test. Cox proportional risk models were developed and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore whether B/A was independently associated with short-term outcomes in SICU patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed to ascertain the value of B/A for prognosticating 90-day outcome. RESULTS: A total of 2686 participants were included in the final study, and their 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality rates were 17.61% and 23.75%, respectively. The differences in 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were statistically significant among the four groups of patients (all p < 0.001). RCS curves showed that B/A was linearly associated with the risk of 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality in SICU patients (χ2 = 0.960, p = 0.811; χ2 = 1.940, p = 0.584). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 90-day cumulative survival rate gradually decreased as B/A increased, with patients in the highest quartile of B/A having the lowest survival rate (p < 0.001). Cox regression indicated that elevated B/A (> 9.69) was an independent risk factor for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality in SICU patients. The analysis of ROC curves demonstrated that B/A exhibited a significant predictive ability for 90-day mortality, with an optimal threshold of 6.587, a sensitivity of 56.9%, and a specificity of 64.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated B/A (> 9.69) on admission was an independent risk factor for short-term mortality in SICU patients, and clinicians should pay more attention to this group of patients and intervene clinically at an early stage to reduce mortality.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Serum Albumin , Adult , Humans , Blood Urea Nitrogen , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Critical CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are few widely accepted and operationally feasible models for predicting the mortality risk of patients in surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Although serum anion gap (AG) is known to be correlated with severe metabolic acidosis, no investigations have been reported about the association between AG level and the outcome during hospitalization in SICU. This study aimed to explore the predictive power of AG for 90-day all-cause mortality in SICU. METHODS: Data of the eligible patients in SICU from 2008 to 2019 was obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV version 2.0 (MIMIC-IV v2.0) database. Baseline clinical data of the selected patients was compared in different groups stratified by the outcome during their admission via univariate analysis. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) was drawn to confirm the relationship of AG and the short-term mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was plotted in different AG level groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed, and Cox proportional-hazards models were built to investigate an independent role of AG to predict 90-day all-cause mortality risk in SICU. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of AG on the 90-day prognosis of patients. RESULTS: A total of 6,395 patients were enrolled in this study and the 90-day all-cause mortality rate was 18.17%. Univariate analysis showed that elevated serum AG was associated with higher mortality (P < 0.001). RCS analysis indicated a positively linear relationship between serum AG and the risk of 90-day all-cause mortality in SICU (χ2 = 4.730, P = 0.193). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that low-AG group (with a cutoff value of 14.10 mmol/L) had a significantly higher cumulative survival rate than the counterpart of high-AG group (χ2 = 96.370, P < 0.001). Cox proportional-hazards models were constructed and confirmed the independent predictive role of AG in 90-day all-cause mortality risk in SICU after adjusting for 23 confounding factors gradually (HR 1.423, 1.246-1.625, P < 0.001). In the further subgroup analyses, a significant interaction was confirmed between AG and sepsis as well as surgery on the risk for the 90-day mortality. The ROC curve showed that the optimal cut-off value of AG for predicting 90-day mortality was 14.89 with sensitivity of 60.7% and specificity of 54.8%. The area under curve (AUC) was 0.602. When combined with SOFA score, the AUC of AG for predicting 90-day prognosis was 0.710, with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 62.5% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated AG (≥ 14.10 mmol/L) is an independent risk factor for predicting severe conditions and poor prognosis of critical ill surgical patients.
Subject(s)
Acid-Base Equilibrium , Critical Illness , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , ROC Curve , Prognosis , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Serum chloride (Cl-) is one of the most essential extracellular anions. Based on emerging evidence obtained from patients with kidney or heart disease, hypochloremia has been recognized as an independent predictor of mortality. Nevertheless, excessive Cl- can also cause death in severely ill patients. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between hyperchloremia and high mortality rate in patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). METHODS: We enrolled 2131 patients from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III database version 1.4 (MIMIC-III v1.4) from 2001 to 2012. Selected SICU patients were more than 18 years old and survived more than 72 h. A serum Cl- level ≥ 108 mEq/L was defined as hyperchloremia. Clinical and laboratory variables were compared between hyperchloremia (n = 664) at 72 h post-ICU admission and no hyperchloremia (n = 1467). The Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (Lowess) approach was utilized to investigate the correlation between serum Cl- and the thirty-day mortality rate. The Cox proportional-hazards model was employed to investigate whether serum chlorine at 72 h post-ICU admission was independently related to in-hospital, thirty-day and ninety-day mortality from all causes. Kaplan-Meier curve of thirty-day and ninety-day mortality and serum Cl- at 72 h post-ICU admission was further constructed. Furthermore, we performed subgroup analyses to investigate the relationship between serum Cl- at 72 h post-ICU admission and the thirty-day mortality from all causes. RESULTS: A J-shaped correlation was observed, indicating that hyperchloremia was linked to an elevated risk of thirty-day mortality from all causes. In the multivariate analyses, it was established that hyperchloremia remained a valuable predictor of in-hospital, thirty-day and ninety-day mortality from all causes; with adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for hyperchloremia of 1.35 (1.02 ~ 1.77), 1.67 (1.28 ~ 2.19), and 1.39 (1.12 ~ 1.73), respectively. In subgroup analysis, we observed hyperchloremia had a significant interaction with AKI (P for interaction: 0.017), but there were no interactions with coronary heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus (P for interaction: 0.418, 0.157, 0.103, respectively). CONCLUSION: Hyperchloremia at 72 h post-ICU admission and increasing serum Cl- were associated with elevated mortality risk from all causes in severely ill SICU patients.
Subject(s)
Chlorides/blood , Critical Illness/mortality , Intensive Care Units , Water-Electrolyte Imbalance/mortality , Aged , Boston/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Frailty scores are increasingly utilized to predict postoperative complications. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the administrative risk analysis index (RAI-A) can be used to predict reintervention or mortality within 30 days in patients who undergo elective open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to query data from elective open or endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs from 2011 to 2018. The administrative risk analysis index (RAI-A) score was calculated for each patient using two approaches (conservative versus liberal) due to discrepancies in NSQIP data categorization. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine whether there were statistical or clinical significance for incremental increases of RAI-A for both the open and endovascular repair group. Outcome measures were re-intervention or death within 30 days. RESULTS: Data from 4106 and 11,733 patients who underwent open and endovascular repair, respectively, were included in the analysis. The number of reinterventions within 30 days was 9.1% (375 out of 4106 patients) in the open repair group and 4.0% (463 out of 11,685 patients) in the endovascular group. Thirty-day mortality was 4.7% (192 out of 4106 patients) in the open repair group, and 0.9% (109 out of 11,685 patients) in the endovascular group. In the conservative calculation of RAI-A scores, the open and endovascular repair groups had median RAI-A scores of 7 (mean 8.31) and 9 (mean 9.51), respectively. There was no significant association between RAI-A scores and outcome measures in either group. For predicting 30 d reintervention, the C statistic was 0.535 (OR 1.02) for the open repair group and 0.532 (OR 1.02) for endovascular repair. For predicting 30-day mortality, the C statistic was 0.626 (OR 1.07) in the open repair group and 0.701 (OR 1.09) in the endovascular repair group. In the liberal calculation of RAI-A scores, the open and endovascular repair groups had median RAI-A scores of 6 (mean 6.19) and 7 (mean 7.65), respectively. There was no significant association between RAI-A scores and outcome measures in either group. For predicting 30 d reintervention, the C statistic was 0.527 (OR 1.02) for open repair and 0.529 (OR 1.02) for endovascular repair. For predicting 30-day mortality, the C statistic was 0.625 (OR 1.07) in the open repair group and 0.695 (OR 1.08) in the endovascular repair group. CONCLUSIONS: The RAI-A is not useful in predicting 30 d reintervention or mortality in patients who undergo elective open or endovascular AAA repair.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Frailty/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Comorbidity , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Endovascular Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Feasibility Studies , Frailty/complications , Geriatric Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Protocols are common in intensive care, however the association between protocol prevalence and outcomes in surgical ICU patients is unclear. We hypothesized that ICUs in a multicenter database using more protocols had better outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a 2-d prevalence study with 30-d follow up, on surgical and trauma patients in ICUs at 42 trauma centers. Use of forty clinical protocols was queried. Protocol prevalence was categorized by quartile into Low (first), Moderate (second and third), or High (fourth) use ICUs. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were ventilator, ICU, and hospital days, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, renal replacement, transfusion, and hospital-acquired infections. RESULTS: Data from 1044 surgical and trauma patients were analyzed. Protocol use was not different for "closed" (n = 20), "open" (n = 9), or "semi-open" (n = 13) ICUs (P= 0.20). Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 8.4%, and not associated with number of protocols (OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.98-1.03], P= 0.65). There was no statistically significant difference between High and Low use ICUs for ventilator days (OR 0.86; 0.52-1.43), tracheostomy (OR 0.8; 0.47-1.38), renal replacement therapy (OR 0.66; 0.04-9.82), transfusion (OR 0.95; 0.58-1.57), or hospital-acquired infections (OR 1.07; 0.67-1.7). Higher mortality was seen in open (versusclosed; OR 1.74 [1.05-2.89], P= 0.033), and surgical/trauma (versustrauma; OR 1.86 [1.33-2.61]; P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter observational study of surgical ICU patients, no association was found between the number of protocols used and patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols/standards , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Care/standards , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Trauma Centers/standards , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is associated with a high risk of in-hospital mortality and higher health care costs. Previously published tools to predict ICU readmission in surgical ICU patients have important limitations that restrict their clinical implementation. We sought to develop a clinically intuitive score that can be implemented to predict readmission to the ICU after surgery or trauma. We designed the score to emphasize modifiable predictors. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included surgical patients requiring critical care between June 2015 and January 2019 at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA. We used logistic regression to fit a prognostic model for ICU readmission from a priori defined, widely available candidate predictors. The score performance was compared with existing prediction instruments. RESULTS: Of 7,126 patients, 168 (2.4%) were readmitted to the ICU during the same hospitalization. The final score included 8 variables addressing demographical factors, surgical factors, physiological parameters, ICU treatment and the acuity of illness. The maximum score achievable was 13 points. Potentially modifiable predictors included the inability to ambulate at ICU discharge, substantial positive fluid balance (>5 liters), severe anemia (hemoglobin <7 mg/dl), hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dl), and long ICU length of stay (>5 days). The score yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% CI 0.74-0.82) and significantly outperformed previously published scores. The performance of the underlying model was confirmed by leave-one-out cross-validation. CONCLUSION: The RISC-score is a clinically intuitive prediction instrument that helps identify surgical ICU patients at high risk for ICU readmission. The simplicity of the score facilitates its clinical implementation across surgical divisions.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Patient Readmission , Critical Care , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: It is a challenge for the primary hospitals to manage multiple trauma patients. In this article, we explored the advantage of establishing a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) predominant by cardiothoracic surgeons in the early management of multiple trauma. METHODS: This was a retrospective study and patients with multiple trauma in our hospital were collected and divided into two groups, based on time period and treat modes: group A (retrospective observation group) where patients were treated with the traditional treatment mode from January 2017 to December 2017 and group B (study group) where patients were treated in the SICU predominant by cardiothoracic surgeons from January 2018 to December 2018. Clinical data including demographics, injury severity score (ISS), causes of injury, time intervals from reception to entering SICU or operating room and mortality three days after injuries were collected. Data were analyzed by SPSS 20.0 software. Categorical variables were presented as number and/or frequency and continuous variables as mean ± SD. RESULTS: Altogether 406 patients were included in this study, including 217 patients in group A and 189 patients in group B. General data between the two groups revealed no significant difference: mean age (years) (35.51 ± 12.97 vs. 33.62 ± 13.61, p = 0.631), gender distribution (mean/female, 130/87 vs. 116/73, p = 0.589) and ISS (15.92 ± 7.95 vs. 16.16 ± 6.89, p = 0.698). Fall from height were the dominant mechanism of injury, with 135 cases in group A (71.4%) and 121 cases in group B (55.8%), followed by traffic accidents. Injury mechanism showed no significant differences between two groups (p = 1.256). Introduction of the SICU significantly improved the care of trauma patients, regarding speed and mortality. Time intervals between reception and entering SICU or operating room was (108.23 ± 6.72) min and (45.67 ± 7.96) min in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.001). Mortality three days after injuries was 13.89% and 5.53% in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Establishing a SICU predominant by cardiothoracic surgeons can reduce the early mortality rates in multiple trauma patients.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Surgeons , Thoracic Surgery , Trauma Centers , Adult , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Trauma Severity Indices , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This secondary analysis compared antimicrobial utilization among surgical intensive care unit patients randomized to every other day chlorhexidine bathing (chlorhexidine) versus daily soap and water bathing (soap-and-water) using data from the CHlorhexidine Gluconate BATHing trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Antimicrobial utilization was quantified using defined daily dose (DDD)/100 patient-days and agent-days/100 patient-days for systemic antimicrobials. Antivirals (except oseltamivir), antiparasitics, and prophylaxis agents were excluded. The 2018 anatomic therapeutic chemical/DDD index was used to calculate DDD. Agent-days were calculated as the sum of calendar days where antimicrobials were administered. Patient-days were defined as time patients were at risk for health care-acquired infections plus up to 14 d. Primary analyses were conducted using linear regression adjusted for baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores. RESULTS: Of 325 CHlorhexidine Gluconate BATHing trial patients, 312 (157 in soap-and-water and 155 in chlorhexidine) were included. The median (interquartile range) of total antimicrobial DDD/100 patient-days was 135.4 (75.2-231.8) for soap-and-water and 129.9 (49.2-215.3) for chlorhexidine. The median (interquartile range) of total antimicrobial agent-days/100 patient-days was 155.6 (83.3-243.2) for soap-and-water and 146.7 (66.7-217.4) for chlorhexidine. After adjusting for Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, chlorhexidine bathing was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in total antimicrobial DDD/100 patient-days (-3.9; 95% confidence interval, -33.9 to 26.1; P = 0.80) and total antimicrobial agent-days/100 patient-days (-10.3; 95% confidence interval, -34.7 to 14.1; P = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with daily soap and water bathing, every other day chlorhexidine bathing did not significantly reduce total antimicrobial utilization in surgical intensive care unit patients.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Baths/methods , Critical Care/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Soaps/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outbreak began in December 2019 in China and has spread rapidly across the world. The healthcare system of each country has been affected from this situation. Undoubtedly, during this period several ethical issues have been raised. In this commentary, we aimed to make a discussion regarding the ethical issues that could be raised in the treatment of patients in the intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this article is to contribute to the wide current discussion regarding the appropriate measures that should be taken to protect the health and ensure the safety of the staff that comes in close contact with patients who are suspected or confirmed of having COVID-19. How to cite this article: Karampelias V, Spanidis Y, Roussakou E. Ethical Issues in Intensive Care Units during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(9):855-856.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ketamine at subanesthetic doses has been shown to provide analgesic effects without causing respiratory depression and may be a viable option in mechanically ventilated patients to assist with extubation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-dose ketamine on opioid consumption in mechanically ventilated adult surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of mechanically ventilated adult patients receiving low-dose ketamine continuous infusion (1-5 µcg/kg/min) for adjunctive pain control admitted to surgical ICUs was conducted. Patients were included if they met an ICU safety screen for a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) implying extubation readiness pending SBT results. The primary end point was the slope of change in morphine equivalents (MEs) 12 hours pre- and postketamine infusion. We hypothesized that low-dose ketamine would increase the slope of opioid dose reduction. RESULTS: Forty patients were analyzed. The median dose of ketamine was 5 µg/kg/min (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.5-5) and the treatment duration was 1.89 days (IQR: 0.96-3.06). Prior to ketamine, the majority of patients received volume-controlled or pressure-supported ventilation with a median duration of 2.05 days (IQR: 1.38-3.61). The median time from the initiation of ketamine to extubation was 1.44 days (IQR: 0.58-2.66). For the primary outcome, there was a significant difference in the slope of ME changes from 1 to -0.265 mg/h 12 hours pre- and postketamine initiation (P < .001). For the secondary outcomes, ketamine was associated with a decrease in vasopressor requirements (phenylephrine equivalent 70 vs 40 mg/h; P = .019). CONCLUSION: Low-dose continuous infusion ketamine in mechanically ventilated adult patients was associated with a significant increase in the rate of opioid dose reduction without adverse effects on hemodynamic stability.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Critical Care/methods , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Adult , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Intensive Care Units , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Morphine/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular rate (RVR; heart rate >100) in noncardiac postoperative surgical patients is associated with poor outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the practice patterns of AF management in a surgical intensive care unit to determine practices associated with rate and rhythm control and additional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients (≥18 y) admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) from June 2014 to June 2015 were retrospectively screened for the development of new-onset AF with RVR. Demographics, hospital course, evaluation and treatment of AF with RVR, and outcome were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS: Thousand seventy patients were admitted to the SICU during the study period; 33 met inclusion criteria (3.1%). Twenty-six patients (79%) had rate and rhythm control within 48 h of AF with RVR onset. ß-Blockers were the most commonly used initial medication (67%) but were successful at rate and rhythm control in only 27% of patients (6/22). Amiodarone had the highest rate of success if used initially (5/6, 83%) and secondarily (11/13, 85%). Failure to control rate and rhythm was associated with a greater likelihood of comorbidities (100% versus 57%; P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: New-onset AF with RVR in the noncardiac postoperative patient is associated with a high mortality (21%). Amiodarone is the most effective treatment for rate and rhythm control. Failure to establish rate and rhythm control was associated with cardiac comorbidities. These results will help to form future algorithms for the treatment of AF with RVR in the SICU.
Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amiodarone/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Critical Pathways , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile is the most common causative pathogen for hospital-acquired infections in the intensive care unit. This study evaluated the effect of chlorhexidine bathing every other day in preventing hospital-acquired C. difficile infection (CDI) using data from the CHlorhexidine Gluconate BATHing (CHG-BATH) randomized trial. METHODS: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients acquiring CDIs among patients at risk for incident CDIs. Infections detected >48 h after randomization were classified as incident CDIs. Infections detected before or within 48 h of randomization were classified as prevalent CDIs. RESULTS: Of 38 patients (11.7%) who met criteria for potential CDI and underwent adjudication, 24 (7.4%) received oral or enema vancomycin, 18 (5.5%) had a positive C. difficile molecular assay, 14 (4.3%) received an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code for CDI, and 2 (0.6%) had possible pseudomembranous colitis on histopathology reports. The prevalence of CDI was 3.7% (6 of 164) in the soap and water arm and 4.3% (7 of 161) in the chlorhexidine arm. Compared with daily soap and water bathing, 2% chlorhexidine bathing every other day was not associated with the prevention of hospital-acquired CDI (1.3% [2 of 152] soap and water versus 2.0% [3 of 148] chlorhexidine, P = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: It is inconclusive if there was an association between chlorhexidine bathing and incidence of CDI among surgical intensive care unit patients in this study as statistical power was limited. There are limited published data evaluating the association between chlorhexidine bathing and CDI, and this study provides data for future systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Baths/methods , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Critical Care/methods , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Humans , Incidence , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , SoapsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct an audit of Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) for identifying the admission risk factors and evaluating the outcomes of postoperative surgical patients. DESIGN: This was a prospective, observational study. SETTING: This study was conducted at SICU of a 1500-bedded tertiary care university hospital in Western India. SUBJECT AND METHODS: Two hundred and forty patients admitted to the SICU postoperatively over a period of 15 months. RESULTS: Planned and unplanned postoperative SICU admission rate was 4.45% and 0.09% of the 5284 patients operated. Indications for planned admissions included preoperative medical illnesses, anticipated blood loss, and anticipated mechanical ventilation while unpredicted intraoperative hypotension was the principal cause of unplanned admittance. Univariate analysis for two groups of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status indicated that advanced age, high American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) surgical risk, emergency surgery, planned admissions, and mortality were related to high ASA class. Analysis for ACC/AHA surgical risk showed association of high ACC/AHA surgical risk with advanced age, male gender, high ASA physical status, emergency surgery, planned admissions, and mortality. High mortality was observed in patients with SICU stay of >7 days (75.86%) and readmitted cases (72.73%). CONCLUSION: The need for postoperative critical care is significantly higher in males, elderly, patients with poor preoperative risk stratification scores, preexisting medical illness, major intraoperative hemorrhage, hypotension requiring inotropic support, perioperative respiratory problems and patients undergoing abdominal, trauma, and emergent surgeries. A larger study inclusive of other surgical subspecialties would aid in optimal decision-making for admissions to the SICU.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There have been isolated case reports and reports of outbreak of colistin-resistant Klebsiella from various parts of the world but only two from India and that too from oncology centers. We report cluster of colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia bloodstream infection cases from our surgical trauma Intensive Care Unit. METHODOLOGY: The study was carried out in surgical ICU of Level-I trauma center. Retrospective analysis of all the five patients with CRK was done. Demographic data, antibiotic exposure throughout the hospital stay, hospital course, and clinical outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 5 patients, 4 were young males (mean age of 23.5 years) without comorbidities and had undergone exploratory laparotomy following blunt trauma abdomen. 3 patients were chronic patients and had been on carbapenem and colistin 11-20 days before isolation whereas 2 patienst had isolation of CRK just within 7 days of admission. Out of the five patients, 3 patients survived and 2 had fatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: CRK is an emerging and challenging pathogen in polytrauma victims. There was an outbreak of CRK in our ICU that could be contained with infection control measures.
ABSTRACT
A major challenge in the era of shared medical decision making is the navigation of complex relationships between the physicians, patients, and surrogates who guide treatment plans for critically ill patients. This review of ethical issues in adult surgical critical care explores factors influencing interactions among the characters most prominently involved in health care decisions in the surgical intensive care unit: the patient, the surrogate, the surgeon, and the intensivist. Ethical tensions in the surgeon-patient relationship in the elective setting may arise from the preoperative surgical covenant and the development of surgical complications. Unlike that of the surgeon, the intensivist's relationship with the individual patient must be balanced with the need to serve other acutely ill patients. Due to their unique perspectives, surgeons and intensivists may disagree about decisions to pursue life-sustaining therapies for critically ill postoperative patients. Finally, although surrogates are asked to make decisions for patients on the basis of the substituted judgment or best interest standards, these models may underestimate the nuances of postoperative surrogate decision making. Strategies to minimize conflicts regarding treatment decisions are centered on early, honest, and consistent communication between all parties.
Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making/ethics , Critical Care/ethics , Critical Illness/therapy , Intensive Care Units , Interpersonal Relations , Patient Care Planning/ethics , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Surgical Procedures, Operative/ethics , Attitude of Health Personnel , Communication , Critical Illness/psychology , Family/psychology , Humans , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Third-Party Consent/ethicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: End-of-life decisions (EOLDs) are common in the intensive care unit (ICU). EOLDs underlie a dynamic process and limitation of ICU-therapies is often done sequentially. Questionnaire-based and observational studies on medical ICUs and in palliative care reveal blood transfusions as the first therapy physicians withhold as an EOLD. METHODS: To test whether this practice also applies to surgical ICU-patients, in an observational study, all deceased patients (n = 303) admitted to an academic surgical ICU in a three-year period were analyzed for the process of limiting ICU-therapies. RESULTS: Restriction of further surgery (85.4%) and limiting doses of vasopressors (75.8%) were the most frequent forms of limitations in surgical ICU therapies. Surgical patients, who had blood transfusions withheld (44.6%), had more ICU-therapies withheld or withdrawn simultaneously than patients who had transfusions maintained (5 ± 2 vs. 2 ± 1, p < 0.001). Secondary EOLDs and subsequent limitations occurred less frequently in patients who had transfusions withheld with their first EOLD (17.1% vs. 35.6%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Limitation orders for blood transfusions are not a prioritized decision in EOLDs of surgical ICU patients. Withholding blood transfusions correlates with discontinuation of further significant life-support therapies. This suggests that EOLDs to withhold blood transfusions are part of the most advanced limitations of therapy on the surgical ICU.