Long-term outcome of patients with primary or secondary tumors of the proximal femur treated by bipolar modular tumor prosthesis.

PURPOSE: The proximal femur is a common area for primary and also metastatic bone tumors. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term functional and oncological outcomes of patients with malignant primary or secondary tumors of the proximal femur, who underwent proximal femoral resection then reconstruction using bipolar modular tumor prosthesis. METHODS: Sixty patients with proximal femoral malignant tumors underwent resection and bipolar modular prosthesis between 2000 and 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Based on diagnosis and presence or absence of pathological fracture, patients were divided into groups. The functional outcome of the patients was evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional scoring system for the lower extremities. RESULTS: The mean age was 38 (9-80) years at the time of primary surgery. Pathological fracture was the presentation in 28 patients. The study included 44 patients with primary bone tumor and 16 patients with a secondary bone tumor. The mean MSTS functional score of the patients was 24.3 (range, 18-30) points with no significant difference in patients with primary or secondary tumors. The rate of complications in the present series was 45%. The most frequent complication was an infection in 10 patients (16.7%), followed by aseptic loosening in 7 patients (11.7%). Local recurrence of primary bone tumors occurred in three out of 44 patients (6.8%). CONCLUSION: Modular bipolar tumor prosthesis has a good long-term functional result in both primary and secondary tumors of the proximal femur, with no significant effect of age, presence or absence of pathological fracture or femoral resection length on the functional outcome. It was found that the only statistically significant variable regarding the risk of infection is previous surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Reduction of metal artifacts from knee tumor prostheses on CT images: value of the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm with a multidetector CT (MDCT) for knee tumor prostheses. METHODS: First, a phantom of knee tumor prosthesis underwent a MDCT scan. The raw data was reconstructed by iterative reconstruction (IR) alone and IR plus SEMAR. The mean value of the CT number and the image noise were measured around the prosthesis at the stem level and articular level. Second, 95 consecutive patients with knee tumor prostheses underwent MDCT scans. The raw data were also reconstructed by the two methods. Periprosthetic structures were selected at the similar two levels. Four radiologists visually graded the image quality on a scale from 0 to 5. Additionally, the readers also assessed the presence of prosthetic complication and tumor recurrence on a same scale. RESULTS: In the phantom, when the SEMAR was used, the CT numbers were closer to normal value and the noise of images using soft and sharper kernel were respectively reduced by up to 77.1% and 43.4% at the stem level, and by up to 82.2% and 64.5% at the articular level. The subjective scores increased 1 ~ 3 points and 1 ~ 4 points at the two levels, respectively. Prosthetic complications and tumor recurrence were diagnosed in 66 patients. And the SEMAR increased the diagnostic confidence of prosthetic complications and tumor recurrence (4 ~ 5 vs. 1 ~ 1.5). CONCLUSIONS: The SEMAR algorithm can significantly reduce the metal artifacts and increase diagnostic confidence of prosthetic complications and tumor recurrence in patients with knee tumor prostheses.

Clinical outcomes of endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal femoral resection.

INTRODUCTION: The proximal femur is a common site for primary sarcomas and metastatic lesions. Although the early results of tumor prostheses are promising, the long-term results of reconstruction are unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting prosthesis survival and complications after proximal femoral resection and reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed the results of 68 patients who underwent proximal femoral resection and reconstruction with a modular bipolar-type tumor prosthesis between 2005 and 2017. The mean follow-up was 55.6 months (range 6-172 months). There were 50 male and 18 female patients with a mean age of 41.5 years (range 11-80 years). Cumulative survival analysis was performed to analyze the risk factors of prosthesis survival. We also evaluated the complications after operation. RESULTS: Fourteen (21%) patients required further surgery at a mean 37 months post-operatively (range 5-125 months). There were three cases of infection (4%), six of local recurrence (9%), three of acetabular erosion (4%) and two of stem loosening (3%). The implant survival rates were 83.9% at 5 years and 59.8% at 10 years. Prosthesis survivals did not differ based on fixation method (P = 0.085), age (P = 0.329) or resection length (P = 0.61). Acetabular chondrolysis was identified in 18 (26%) patients and longer resection length (≥20 cm) showed a trend for risk of acetabular wear (P = 0.132). CONCLUSION: The results of proximal femoral resection and reconstruction with a modular bipolar-type prosthesis were found to be acceptable with infection and local recurrence as short-term complications and loosening and acetabular erosion as long-term complications.

Management of Large Segmental Bone Defects at the Knee With Intramedullary Stabilized Antibiotic Spacers During Two-Stage Treatment of Endoprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Following debridement of infected prostheses that require reconstruction with an endoprosthetic replacement (EPR), instability related to segmental residual bone defects present a challenge in management with 2-stage reimplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for revision total joint or endoprosthetic infection at the knee from 1998 to 2018. At our institution, patients with skeletal defects >6 cm following explant of prosthesis and debridement (stage 1) were managed with intramedullary nail-stabilized antibiotic spacers. Following stage 1, antimicrobial therapy included 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics and a minimum of 6 weeks of oral antibiotics. Following resolution of inflammatory markers and negative tissue cultures, reimplantation (stage 2) of an EPR was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients at a mean age of 54 ± 21 years were treated for prosthetic joint infection at the knee. Polymicrobial growth was detected in 38% of cases, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (24%) and Staphylococcus aureus (19%). Mean residual skeletal defect after stage 1 treatment was 20 cm. Prosthetic joint infection eradication was achieved in 18 (86%) patients, with a mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 77% and mean knee range of motion of 100°. Patients with polymicrobial infections had a greater number of surgeries prior to infection (P = .024), and were more likely to require additional debridement prior to EPR (odds ratio 12.0, P = .048). CONCLUSION: Management of large segmental skeletal defects at the knee following explant using intramedullary stabilized antibiotic spacers maintain stability and result in high rates of limb salvage with conversion to an endoprosthesis.

Reverse shoulder-allograft prosthesis composite, with or without tendon transfer, for the treatment of severe proximal humeral bone loss.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of severe proximal humeral bone loss (PHBL) secondary to tumor resection or failed arthroplasty is challenging. We evaluated the outcomes and complications of reconstruction with reverse shoulder-allograft prosthesis composite (RS-APC), performed with or without tendon transfer. METHODS: An RS-APC procedure was performed in 25 consecutive patients with severe PHBL (>4 cm): 12 after failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty, 5 after failed hemiarthroplasty for fracture, 6 after failed mega-tumor prosthesis placement, and 2 after tumor resection. The median length of humeral bone loss or resection was 8 cm (range, 5-23 cm). Humeral bone graft fixation was obtained with a long monobloc reverse stem and a "mirror step-cut osteotomy," without plate fixation. Nine infected shoulders underwent a 2-stage operation with a temporary cement spacer. In addition, 9 patients (36%) underwent an associated L'Episcopo procedure. The median follow-up duration was 4 years (range, 2-11 years). RESULTS: Overall, 76% of patients (19 of 25) were satisfied. In 8 patients (32%), a reoperation was needed. At last follow-up, we observed incorporation at the allograft-host junction in 96% of the cases (24/25); partial graft resorption occurred in 3 cases and severe in 1. The median adjusted Constant score was 53% (range 18-105); Subjective Shoulder Value, 50% (range 10%-95%). Additional tendon transfers significantly improved active external rotation (20° vs. 0°, P < .001) and forward elevation (140° vs. 90°, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Shoulder reconstruction with RS-APC provides acceptable shoulder function and high rates of graft survival and healing. (2) Additional L'Episcopo tendon transfer (when technically possible) improves active shoulder motion. (3) The use of a long monobloc (cemented or uncemented) humeral reverse stem with mirror step-cut osteotomy provides a high rate of graft-host healing, as well as a limited rate of graft resorption, and precludes the need for additional plate fixation. (4) Although rewarding, this reconstructive surgery is complex with a high risk of complications and reoperations. The main advantages of using an allograft with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (compared with other reconstruction options) are that this type of reconstruction (1) allows restoration of the bone stock, thus improving prosthesis fixation and stability, and (2) gives the possibility to perform a tendon transfer by fixing the tendons on the bone graft to improve shoulder motion.

Predictive Value of the Nomogram Model in Patients With Megaprosthetic Failure Around the Knee: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Megaprosthetic replacement is one of the main methods for reconstructing mega bone defects after tumor resection. However, the incidences of complication associated with tumor prostheses were 5-10 times higher than that of conventional total knee arthroplasty. The objective of this study is to establish and validate a nomogram model which can assist doctors and patients in predicting the prosthetic survival rates. METHODS: Data on cancer patients treated with tumor prosthesis replacements at our institution from November 2001 to November 2017 were collected. The potential risk factors which were well-studied and shown to be associated with megaprosthetic failure were analyzed. A nomogram model was established using independent risk factors screened out by multivariate regression analysis. The concordance index and calibration curve were selected for internal validation of the predictive accuracy of nomogram. RESULTS: The 3-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year prosthetic survival rates were 92.8%, 88.6%, 74.1%, and 48.3%, respectively. The prosthetic motion mode, body mass index, type of reconstruction, type of prosthesis, and length of bone resection were independent risk factors for tumor prosthetic failure. A nomogram model was established using these significant predictors, with a concordance index of 0.77 and a favorable consistency between predicted and actual prosthetic failure rate according to the internal validation, indicating that the nomogram model had acceptable predictive accuracy. CONCLUSION: The prediction model identifies high-risk patients for whom attached preventive measures are required. Future studies regarding reduction in incidence of prosthetic failure should attach importance to these high-risk patients.

Midterm Success of a Custom, Non-Fluted, Diaphyseal, Press-Fit Stem Used With a Tumor Megaprosthesis System.

BACKGROUND: High rates of aseptic loosening with cemented prostheses have led to increased utilization of uncemented stems in the setting of megaprosthetic reconstruction. Theoretic concerns of rotational instability resulted in early stem designs with de-rotational mechanisms such as flutes or side plates. However, these designs have their own associated complications, and mechanical data suggest they are unnecessary. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes and survivorship of an unfluted diaphyseal press-fit stem in the setting of megaprosthetic reconstruction. METHODS: Forty-five patients (46 stems), with a minimum 3-year follow-up, underwent reconstruction using 1 of 2 fully porous coated, unfluted, press-fit stems between 2005 and 2013: revision stem with adapter to the megaprosthesis (revision stem), or custom megaprosthesis stem (custom stem). Complications were described using the Henderson classification system, and subanalyses evaluated stem-related failures and survival. Radiographic evaluation of stem fixation was determined via evidence of bone bridging, spot welding, resorption, subsidence, and pedestal formation. Four patients had early stem removal for local recurrence or infection and were thus excluded from the radiographic analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-eight femoral (15 revision stem, 13 custom stem) and 14 tibial (6 revision stem, 8 custom stem) stems were reviewed. Average follow-up was 81 months (range, 42-140 months). Revision for implant-related complications occurred in 7 of 41 (17%), all in revision stems (3 adapter failures, 4 polyethylene wear). At final follow-up, all stems were retained without evidence of aseptic loosening, although 7 of 41 (17%) exhibited mild stress shielding. CONCLUSION: A non-fluted, press-fit stem used with a tumor prosthesis provided a stable bone-prosthesis interface at midterm follow-up.

Long-term results of the Global Modular Replacement System tumor prosthesis for reconstruction after limb-sparing bone resections in orthopedic oncologic conditions: Results from a national cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated implant revision, implant failure, and amputation risk after limb-sparing bone tumor surgery using the Global Modular Replacement System (GMRS) tumor prosthesis in patients suffering from bone sarcomas (BS), giant cell tumors (GCT), or metastatic bone disease (MBD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of a nationwide consecutive cohort (n = 119, 47 [12-81] years, M/F = 65/54) having limb-sparing surgery and reconstruction using the GMRS tumor prosthesis due to bone tumors (BS/GCT/MBD = 70/8/41) from 2005 to 2013. Anatomical locations were as followed: distal femur (n = 49), proximal femur (n = 41), proximal tibia (n = 26), or total femur (n = 3). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and competing risk analysis with death as a competing risk were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: For BS and GCT patients, 5-year patient survival was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59-85%) and for MBD 33% (95% CI: 19-48%). Thirty-two patients underwent revision surgery (5-year revision incidence 14%; 95% CI: 8-21%). Twelve patients had revision of bone-anchored parts (implant failure) with a 5-year revision incidence 6% (95% CI: 2-10%). Ten amputations were performed due to local relapse (n = 9) or recurrent infections (n = 1) with a 5-year incidence of amputation: 8% (95% CI: 3-13%). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a low risk of revision and amputation when using the GMRS tumor prosthesis for limb-sparing bone tumor.

Modular tumor prostheses: are current stem designs suitable for distal femoral reconstruction? A biomechanical implant stability analysis in Sawbones.

INTRODUCTION: High loosening rates after distal femoral replacement may be due to implant design not adapted to specific anatomic and biomechanical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modular tumor system (MUTARS®, Implantcast GmbH) was implanted with either a curved hexagonal or a straight tapered stems in eight Sawbones® in two consecutively generated bone defect (10 cm and 20 cm proximal to knee joint level). Implant-bone-interface micromotions were measured to analyze main fixation areas and to characterize the fixation pattern. RESULTS: Although areas of highest relative micromotions were measured distally in all groups, areas and lengths of main fixation differed with respect to stem design and bone defect size. Regardless of these changes, overall micromotions could only be reduced with extending bone defects in case of tapered stems. CONCLUSIONS: The tapered design may be favorable in larger defects whereas the hexagonal may be advantageous in defects located more distally.

Reconstruction using a constrained-type hip tumor prosthesis after resection of malignant periacetabular tumors: A study by the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group (JMOG).

BACKGROUND: We conducted a nationwide survey of prosthetic reconstruction using a constrained-type hip tumor prosthesis (C-THA) following resection of periacetabular tumors. METHODS: Eighty patients with periacetabular tumors underwent wide resection and prosthetic reconstruction using C-THA at JMOG-affiliated institutions (39 males and 41 females; mean age, 46.7 years; mean follow-up period, 65 months). Primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma accounted for 75% of the cases. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy were performed for 12 and 37 patients, respectively. RESULTS: There were 21 local recurrences (26%), necessitating amputation in 2 patients. Other postoperative complications included deep infection in 31 patients (39%), delayed wound healing in 25 (31%), and prosthesis-related complications requiring surgery in 7 (9%). Removal of the prosthesis was required in 23 patients (29%) (deep infection (n = 20), local recurrence resulting in amputation (n = 2), and outer cup displacement (n = 1). Patients whose abductor muscle was conserved or who underwent functional abductor muscle reconstruction showed significantly longer prosthesis survival. No postoperative wound complications occurred in three recent patients undergoing wound management with a RAM flap. The mean MSTS score was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: We analyzed the outcome of 80 patients with periacetabular tumors undergoing C-THA reconstruction. The rates of postoperative complication were still high, but comparable to those in previous studies. Our results suggest wound management using a RAM flap is useful for reducing wound complications.

[Metastatic disease in long bones : Review of surgical treatment options]. / Metastasen der Extremitäten : Übersicht über operative Versorgungsstrategien.

Surgery in metastatic bone disease is currently the most frequent type of surgery in orthopedic oncology. Improved survival rates and an increasing incidence of bone metastasis have led to an increase in complications caused by metastatic disease, such as pathological fractures or hardware failure after operative treatment. Although surgery of metastatic lesions remains a palliative therapy concept, because of sufficient therapy for the primary carcinomas, tumor-specific-oriented follow-up protocols and a variation in the prognosis for the individual entities, an individually adapted treatment strategy is necessary. Depending on the life expectancy, more aggressive surgical procedures with the goal of adequate local tumor control have come into focus. Therefore, prognosis-tailored treatment requires an experienced team and should be performed in a multidisciplinary tumor center. The current article provides an overview of recent therapy concepts for the surgical treatment including endoprosthetic reconstruction, internal fixation with either intramedullary nailing or plate fixation devices, often augmented with bone cement.

Two Revision Surgeries on Cemented Custom-made Tumor Prostheses.

We performed revision surgery in 2 patients for stem fracture of a cemented tumor prosthesis that occurred more than 25 years after the initial surgery. For revision, the global modular replacement system (GMRS) was used. However, as bone cement in the bone could not be adequately removed, stems with respective diameters of 11 and 12.5 mm were used. In revision surgery for cemented tumor prostheses, adequate removal of residual bone cement is optimal. However, when there is a risk of fracture, it may be appropriate to insert a thicker stem after reaming the femoral canal as much as possible, and then fix the stem using the cement-in-cement method.

Adaptive Bone Remodeling of the Femoral Bone After Tumor Resection Arthroplasty With an Uncemented Proximally Hydroxyapatite-Coated Stem.

Loss of bone stock and stress shielding is a significant challenge in limb salvage surgery. This study investigates the adaptive bone remodeling of the femoral bone after implantation of a tumor prosthesis with an uncemented press fit stem. We performed a prospective 1 yr follow-up of 6 patients (mean age: 55 (26-78) yr, female/male=3/3) who underwent bone tumor resection surgery of the proximal femur (n=3) or distal femur (n=3). Reconstruction was done using a Global Modular Replacement System (Stryker® Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) tumor prosthesis, and all patients received a straight-fluted 125-mm uncemented press-fit titanium alloy stem with hydroxyapatite coating of the proximal part of the stem. Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm2) were done postoperatively and after 3, 6, and 12 mo in the part of the femur bone containing the Global Modular Replacement System stem using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD was measured in 3 regions of interest (ROIs) in the femur bone. Nonparametric analysis of variance (Friedman test) for evaluation of changes in BMD over time. BMD decreased in all 3 ROIs with time. In ROI 1 (p=0.01), BMD decreased by 10% after 3 mo and ended with a total decrease of 14% after 1 yr. In ROI 2 (p=0.006), BMD was decreased by 6% after 3 and 6 mo; after 1 yr of follow-up, BMD was 9% below the postoperative value. In ROI 3 (p=0.009), BMD decreased by 6% after 3 and 6 mo; after 1 yr of follow-up, BMD was 8% below the postoperative value. A bone loss of 8%-9% during the first postoperative year was seen along the femoral stem, but in the bone containing the hydroxyapatite-coated part of the stem, the decrease in BMD was 14%, thus indicating that stress shielding of this part of the bone may play a role for the adaptive bone remodeling.

Functional outcome of reverse shoulder tumor prosthesis in the treatment of proximal humerus tumors.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of proximal humerus tumors with reverse shoulder arthroplasty with allograft augmentation is still controversial. A tumor prosthesis represents a proven solution for such osseous defects. We investigated the functional results of patients who underwent reverse shoulder tumor prosthesis (RSTP) without the use of allograft after resection of a proximal humerus tumor. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 10 patients with malignant proximal humerus tumors who had undergone RSTP, with a mean follow-up period of 18.2 months (range, 6-27 months). The average age of the patients was 49.4 years. The mean resection length was 10.2 cm (range, 6-16 cm). The tumor prosthesis was preferred for the humeral component. Released rotator cuff muscles were reattached to the prosthesis with nonabsorbable sutures. RESULTS: The mean active forward flexion was 96° (range, 30°-160°), the mean active abduction was 88° (range, 30°-160°), and the mean active external rotation was 13° (range, 0°-20°). The mean Constant-Murley score was 53.7%. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 26.2. The mean visual analog scale score was 1.3. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 78.1%. None of our patients have shown local recurrence or infection signs in the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Functionally satisfying results and a stable shoulder can be achieved by reverse shoulder arthroplasty without the need for an allograft. An intact abductor mechanism with a shorter resection humerus length produced good results. The treatment of malignant proximal humerus tumors with RSTP is an alternative that minimizes surgery time and complexity.

Uncemented Customized Hollow Stems in Tumor Endoprosthetic Replacement-A Good Opportunity to Protect the Adjacent Joint in Children?

This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the follow-up results of cases in which the adjacent joint was preserved using a custom-made uncemented short-stem design (hollow stem) with optional external flanches in tumor endoprosthetic replacement due to bone sarcomas in 13 patients (with an average age of 9.6 years) between 2017 and 2023. Reconstructions were proximal femur (n = 6), intercalary femur (n = 4), intercalary tibia (n = 2), and proximal humerus (n = 1) tumor prostheses. The hollow body was used distally in 10 of the megaprotheses, proximally in 1, and both proximally and distally in 2 of them. The average distance from the joints was 6 cm in stems with flanches and 11.8 cm in stems without flanches. No aseptic loosening or deep infection was observed during an average follow-up of 34 months. Except for one case with a tibial intercalary prosthesis that needed a revision, all cases were well osteointegrated and all lower extremity cases could bear full weight without pain. In cases where the remaining bone stock after bone resection is insufficient for a standard stem implantation, reconstruction with a patient-specific short hollow-stem design appears to be a good alternative to protect healthy joints with high prosthesis survival and low revision rates in the short-term follow-up.

Endoprosthetic Reconstruction of the Proximal Humerus with an Inverse Tumor Prosthesis.

Reconstructing the proximal humerus after tumor removal is challenging due to muscle and bone loss. The current methods often result in poor shoulder function. This study assessed the long-term functional and oncological outcomes of using an inverse proximal humerus prosthesis in 46 patients with bone tumors. The results showed a mean range of motion of 62° in anteversion, 28° in retroversion, and 55° in abduction. Notably, 23 patients achieved over 90° of shoulder abduction, with an average of 140°. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score was 25. Complications included infection in two radiotherapy patients and single dislocations in seven patients. One patient with recurrent dislocations needed revision surgery. In conclusion, the use of the inverse proximal humerus prosthesis in bone tumor treatment yields excellent shoulder function and high patient satisfaction. This approach is especially beneficial for those with metastatic disease.

Risk Factors and Management of Prosthetic Joint Infections in Megaprostheses-A Review of the Literature.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common mode of failure of megaprostheses, yet the literature on the topic is scarce, and studies report conflicting data regarding the optimal treatment strategy. Patients with megaprostheses PJI are often immunosuppressed, and surgeons must balance the trade-off between treatment efficacy and morbidity associated with the surgery aiming for infection eradication. Our review on megaprostheses PJI focuses on two axes: (1) risk factors and preventative strategies; and (2) surgical strategies to manage this condition. Risk factors were classified as either unmodifiable or modifiable. Attempts to decrease the risk of PJI should target the latter group. Strategies to prevent PJI include the use of silver-coated implants, timely discontinuation of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and adequate soft tissue coverage to diminish the amount of dead space. Regarding surgical treatment, main strategies include debridement, antibiotics, implant retention (DAIR), DAIR with modular component exchange, stem retention (DAIR plus), one-stage, and two-stage revision. Two-stage revision is the "gold standard" for PJI in conventional implants; however, its success hinges on adequate soft tissue coverage and willingness of patients to tolerate a spacer for a minimum of 6 weeks. DAIR plus and one-stage revisions may be appropriate for a select group of patients who cannot endure the morbidity of two surgeries. Moreover, whenever DAIR is considered, exchange of the modular components should be performed (DAIR plus). Due to the low volume of megaprostheses implanted, studies assessing PJI should be conducted in a multi-institutional fashion. This would allow for more meaningful comparison of groups, with sufficient statistical power. Level of evidence: IV.

Treatment of Bifocal Periprosthetic Fractures above and below a Knee after Tumor using Spanning Ilizarov Device: A Case Report.

Introduction: Multiple treatment options and internal and external devices have been recommended for periprosthetic fractures management around total knee arthroplasty. Case Report: We present the case of the high-energy bifocal periprosthetic fractures of the femur and the tibia after total knee prosthesis following excision of a tumor. One of the fractures was an open tibial fracture Gustilo Type IIIB and the other - comminuted subtrochanteric fracture of the femur with extrusion of periprosthetic cement pieces out from the bone defect. The Ilizarov circular external fixator was used for the skeletal stabilization and early functional treatment in this compound case. Conclusion: The use of Ilizarov external fixator for patients with complex periprosthetic fractures, who present severe technical difficulties in bone stabilization, especially by concomitant severe soft-tissue damage after high-energy injuries, is a good surgical alternative.

Nickel-titanium shape memory alloy embracing fixator benefits the determination of the implantation angle of prosthesis stem in tumor-type artificial joint replacement.

BACKGROUND: Hip tumors often require tumor-type artificial joint replacement. The selection of the prosthesis stem (hip tumor prosthesis stem) implantation angle during the operation is important to prevent the complication of postoperative prosthesis dislocation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of a nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) shape memory alloy embracing fixator in determination of the implantation angle of a hip tumor prosthesis stem and analyze its efficacy. METHODS: 36 patients with proximal femur tumor were treated with extended tumor resection and prosthetic replacement. 14 patients received prosthetic replacements with the embracing fixators fixing between the junction of the prosthesis stem and the femur temporarily, while the other 22 patients received the same replacements but without the fixators. The two groups were compared regarding occurrence of complications, limb function, and active hip range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: There was no case of hip dislocation in the group that received prosthetic replacements with the use of embracing fixators. Occurrence of deep infection had no difference between the two groups. However, better limb function and higher active (ROM) on abduction or flexion were observed in the group using embracing fixators. CONCLUSION: Ni-Ti shape memory alloy embracing fixator plays a key role in assisting the accurate implantation angle of the prosthesis stem in prosthetic replacement. The prosthesis stem can be adjusted to the optimal angle with the help of the embracing fixator. Patients have a lower risk of dislocation, better limb function, and higher active hip ROM.

The Use of Tumor Prostheses for Primary or Revision Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With Proximal Humeral Bone Loss.

Background: During shoulder arthroplasty with substantial bone and soft tissue loss, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with a tumor prosthesis may restore function, reduce pain, and improve implant fixation. Methods: Thirteen adult patients undergoing RSA using a tumor prosthesis system were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative visual analog score (VAS), single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, simple shoulder test (SST), and forward flexion were compared to latest follow up. Postoperative radiographs and complications were recorded. Results: Mean age at surgery was 68.4 years. Eight patients had undergone at least 1 prior operation on the indicated shoulder. Six patients required wide excision of proximal humerus tumor. At mean of 34 months postoperatively, significant improvements were noted in VAS (P = .03) and ASES score (P = .04). Active forward elevation was 81.1 degrees. For all patients, postoperative radiographs demonstrated satisfactory alignment. Complications occurred in 38% of patients, with 31% requiring reoperation. Conclusion: In cases of failed shoulder arthroplasty with excessive bone and soft tissue loss or substantial tumor burden, RSA with a tumor prosthesis can reduce pain levels and improve functional outcomes. However, forward elevation remains limited, and postoperative complications are a concern.