Surgical procedures and complications in placement of totally implantable venous access port in pediatric hemophilia patients: A retrospective analysis.

This retrospective study at Beijing Children's Hospital (2020-2023) analyzed surgical procedures and complications in 24 pediatric hemophilia patients undergoing Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) insertion, primarily in the right jugular vein (RJV). We detailed the surgical process, including patient demographics and intraoperative imaging use. The choice of the RJV for TIVAP placement was influenced by its larger diameter and superficial anatomical position, potentially reducing risks like thrombosis and infection. Our findings support the RJV as a safer alternative for port placement in pediatric patients, aligning with current literature. Statistical analysis revealed no significant correlation between complications and baseline characteristics like weight and diagnosis type. However, the length of hospital stay and implant brand were significant risk factors for catheter or port displacement and removal. The limited patient number may introduce bias, suggesting a need for further studies with larger samples. Despite a 14.7 %-33 % complication rate and 5 port removals, the advantages of TIVAP, including reliable venous access, reduced discomfort, and treatment convenience, were evident. Most complications improved with symptomatic treatment, and there were no deaths due to port-related complications, underscoring the impact of TIVAP on improving pediatric hemophilia treatment.

Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Lack of agreed terminology and definitions in healthcare compromises communication, patient safety, optimal management of adverse events, and research progress. The purpose of this scoping review was to understand the terminologies used to describe central venous access devices (CVADs), associated complications and reasons for premature removal in people undergoing cancer treatment. It also sought to identify the definitional sources for complications and premature removal reasons. The objective was to map language and descriptions used and to explore opportunities for standardisation. METHODS: A systematic search of MedLine, PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL Complete and Embase databases was performed. Eligibility criteria included, but were not limited to, adult patients with cancer, and studies published between 2017 and 2022. Articles were screened and data extracted in Covidence. Data charting included study characteristics and detailed information on CVADs including terminologies and definitional sources for complications and premature removal reasons. Descriptive statistics, tables and bar graphs were used to summarise charted data. RESULTS: From a total of 2363 potentially eligible studies, 292 were included in the review. Most were observational studies (n = 174/60%). A total of 213 unique descriptors were used to refer to CVADs, with all reasons for premature CVAD removal defined in 84 (44%) of the 193 studies only, and complications defined in 56 (57%) of the 292 studies. Where available, definitions were author-derived and/or from national resources and/or other published studies. CONCLUSION: Substantial variation in CVAD terminology and a lack of standard definitions for associated complications and premature removal reasons was identified. This scoping review demonstrates the need to standardise CVAD nomenclature to enhance communication between healthcare professionals as patients undergoing cancer treatment transition between acute and long-term care, to enhance patient safety and rigor of research protocols, and improve the capacity for data sharing.

Prehospital central venous catheters.

The use of whole blood in the prehospital setting is increasing. Currently available intraosseous and peripheral venous catheters limit the flow of blood products and fluid during resuscitation. Central venous catheters can be effectively placed in the prehospital environment. Rapid, high-volume infusion of blood products can be lifesaving.

Suture closure AFtEr large bore vein access (SAFE-VEIN): A randomized, prospective study of the efficacy and safety of venous closure device.

BACKGROUND: Perclose ProGlide (PPG) Suture-Mediated Closure System™ is safe and can reduce time to hemostasis following procedures requiring arterial access. AIMS: We aimed to compare PPG to figure of 8 suture in patients who underwent interventional catheter procedures requiring large bore venous access (LBVA) (≥13 French). METHODS: In this physician-initiated, randomized, single-center study [clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04632641], single-stick venous access was obtained under ultrasound guidance. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1, and 100 subjects received allocated treatment to either PPG (n = 47) or figure of 8 suture (n = 53). No femoral arterial access was used in any patient. Primary outcomes were time to achieve hemostasis (TTH) and time to ambulation (TTA). Secondary outcomes were time to discharge (TTD) and vascular-related complications and mortality. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare TTH, TTA, and TTD. RESULTS: TTH (minutes) was significantly lower in PPG versus figure of 8 suture [median, (Q1, Q3)] [7 (2,10) vs. 11 (10,15) respectively, p < 0.001]. TTA (minutes) was significantly lower in PPG compared to figure of 8 suture [322 (246,452) vs. 403 (353, 633) respectively, p = 0.005]. TTD (minutes) was not significantly different between the PPG and figure of 8 suture arms [1257 (1081, 1544) vs. 1338 (1171,1435), p = 0.650]. There was no difference in minor bleeding or access site hematomas between both arms. No other vascular complications or mortality were reported. CONCLUSION: PPG use had lower TTH and TTA than figure of 8 suture in a population of patients receiving LBVA procedures. This may encourage same-day discharge in these patients.

The applicability of the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria for the evaluation of bacteremia episodes in pediatric oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in pediatric oncology patients. METHODS: Bacteremia episodes from 2020 to 2022 from a prospective cohort of pediatric oncology patients with a central venous catheter were included. Episodes were classified by three medical experts following the CLABSI criteria as either a CLABSI or non-CLABSI (i.e., contamination, other infection source, or mucosal barrier injury-laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI)). Subsequently, they were asked if and why they (dis)agreed with this diagnosis following the criteria. The primary outcome was the percentage of episodes where the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis given following the CLABSI criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 84 bacteremia episodes in 71 patients were evaluated. Following the CLABSI criteria, 34 (40%) episodes were classified as CLABSIs and 50 (60%) as non-CLABSIs. In 11 (13%) cases the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis following the CLABSI criteria. The discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and clinical diagnosis was significant; McNemar's test p < .01. Disagreement by the experts with the CLABSI criteria mostly occurred when the experts found an MBI-LCBI a more plausible cause of the bacteremia than a CLABSI due to the presence of a gram negative bacteremia (Pseudomonas aeruginosa n = 3) and/or mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and the evaluation of the experts was observed. Adding Pseudomonas aeruginosa as an MBI pathogen and incorporating the presence of mucositis in the MBI-LCBI criteria, might increase the applicability.

Central Venous Access Devices for the Delivery of Systemic Anticancer Therapy: An Economic Evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing long-term anticancer therapy typically require one of 3 venous access devices: Hickman-type device (HICK), peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), or implantable chest wall port (PORT). Recent evidence has shown PORT is safer and improves patient satisfaction. However, PORT did not show improvement in quality-adjusted life-years and was more expensive. Decisions regarding cost-effectiveness in the United Kingdom are typically informed by a cost-per-quality-adjusted life-year metric. However, this approach is limited in its ability to capture the full range of relevant outcomes, especially in the context of medical devices. This study assessed the potential cost-effectiveness of HICK, PICC, and PORT in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This is a cost-consequence analysis to determine the trade-offs between the following outcomes: complication, infection, noninfection, chemotherapy interruption, unplanned device removals, health utilities, device insertion cost, follow-up cost, and total cost, using data from the Cancer and Venous Access clinical trial. We conducted value of implementation analysis of a PORT service. RESULTS: PORT was superior in terms of overall complication rate compared with both HICK (incidence rate ratio 0.422; 95% CI 0.286-0.622) and PICC (incidence rate ratio 0.295; 95% CI 0.189-0.458) and less likely to lead to an unplanned device removal. There was no difference in chemotherapy interruption or health utilities. Total cost with device in situ was lower on PORT than HICK (-£98.86; 95% CI -189.20 to -8.53) and comparable with PICC -£48.57 (95% CI -164.99 to 67.86). Value of implementation analysis found that PORT was likely to be considered cost-effective within the National Health Service. CONCLUSION: Decision makers should consider including PORT within the suite of venous access devices available within in the National Health Service.

Outcomes of tunnelled cuffed centrally inserted central catheter removal: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Most children with cancer will require a central venous access device (CVAD) to administer cancer treatment. A commonly used CVAD is a tunnelled cuffed centrally inserted central catheter (TC-CICC). There is little information available to guide best practice when removing this type of CVAD. At our institution, TC-CICCs are removed by using either the traction or dissection methods. This study will describe the outcomes associated with each technique. METHODS/RESULTS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken at a quaternary children's hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Data related to characteristics of TC-CICC removal success, post-removal complications and an economic evaluation were carried out. There were 149 patients who underwent traction removal and 100 who had their TC-CICC removed using the dissection technique. In the traction group, 136/149 (91%) patients had their device successfully removed on the first attempt, whereas 99/100 (99%) were removed on the first attempt with dissection. Of the 136 successful traction removals, cuff status was documented in 72 cases. The cuff remained in situ in 46/72 (64%) cases, and six of 72 (8%) patients experienced a complication. There were no documented cases of cuff retention in the dissection group. In the 2019-2020 financial year, the estimated average cost of traction removal was A$387, whereas the estimated average cost of day case surgery was A$2560. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted that the traction technique is a safe, efficient and cost-effective approach to TC-CICC removal. Further research is required to understand the patient and family experience of TC-CICC removal.

Ultrasound-guided versus Fluoro-guided Axillary Venous Access for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Patient-Based Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The use of ultrasound (US)-guided venous puncture for cardiac pacing/defibrillation lead placement may minimize the risk of peri-procedural complications and radiation exposure. However, none of the published studies have been sufficiently powered to recommend this approach as the standard of care. We compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary venous puncture (US-AVP) versus fluoroscopy-guided access for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) by performing an individual patient data meta-analysis based on previously published studies. METHODS: We conducted a thorough literature search encompassing longitudinal investigations (five randomized and one prospective studies) reporting data on Xray-guided and US-AVP for CIED procedures. The primary endpoint was to compare the safety of the two techniques. Secondary endpoints included the success rate of each technique, the necessity of switching to alternative methods, the time needed to obtain venous access, Xray exposure and the occurrence of peri-procedural complications. RESULTS: Six longitudinal eligible studies were identified including 700 patients (mean age 74.9 ±12.1 years, 68.4% males). The two approaches for venous cannulation showed a similar success rate. The use of a Xray guided approach significantly increased the risk of inadvertent arterial punctures (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 2.10-2.21, p=0.003), after adjustment for potential confounders. Conversely, an US-AVP approach reduces time to vascular access, radiation exposure and the number of attempts to vascular access. CONCLUSIONS: The US-AVP enhances safety by reducing radiation exposure and time to vascular access while maintaining a low rate of major complications compared to the x-ray-guided approach.

Difficult Intravascular Access in Pediatric Emergency Department: The Ultrasound-Assisted Strategy (DIAPEDUS Study).

Vein line positioning represents one of the first diagnostic and therapeutic steps in Pediatric Emergency Department (PED); however, the outcome of this maneuver is frequently not as expected, especially for difficult-to-access (DIVA) patients. The standard technique (visual-palpatory) has a low success rate; hence ultrasound (US) assistance has been suggested for DIVA patients, although controversial results have been obtained. Our study compared the success rate of an intravascular (IV) access procedure at the first attempt, with and without ultrasound assistance, in pediatric DIVA patients. Secondary objectives were the global success rate, the mean procedural time, the IV device's life span, and the complications rate. We conducted an observational, prospective, monocentric, no-profit cohort study enrolling 110 patients presenting to our ED, aged 0-21 years. All the patients were considered difficult-to-access patients according to the DIVA score (≥4) or history of previous difficult intravascular access. They were randomized into two homogeneous groups: 50 patients with the standard and 60 with the US-assisted technique. We obtained a significantly higher success rate at first attempt with the US-guided technique (90% vs 18%, p ≤ .00001). Moreover, the overall success rate was higher in the US group (95% vs 46%, p < .00001). The mean procedural time resulted significantly less in the US group (2.7 ± 2.2 min vs 10 ± 6.4 min, p < .0001), as well as the overall number of attempts to obtain a stable IV line (1.09 ± 0.34 attempts vs 2.38 ± 1.09 attempts, p < .0001). We experienced some post-procedural complications without differences in the two groups, although none were severe. Our study showed that bedside ultrasound assisting implantation of peripheral venous access in pediatric DIVA patients improves first-time success rate, overall success rate, procedural time, and patient comfort, reducing the number of attempts to obtain a stable IV line.

Construction and validation of a nomogram prediction model for the catheter-related thrombosis risk of central venous access devices in patients with cancer: a prospective machine learning study.

Central venous access devices (CVADs) are integral to cancer treatment. However, catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) poses a considerable risk to patient safety. It interrupts treatment; delays therapy; prolongs hospitalisation; and increases the physical, psychological and financial burden of patients. Our study aims to construct and validate a predictive model for CRT risk in patients with cancer. It offers the possibility to identify independent risk factors for CRT and prevent CRT in patients with cancer. We prospectively followed patients with cancer and CVAD at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2021 to December 2022 until catheter removal. Patients with CRT who met the criteria were taken as the case group. Two patients with cancer but without CRT diagnosed in the same month that a patient with cancer and CRT was diagnosed were selected by using a random number table to form a control group. Data from patients with CVAD placement in Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital and Hainan Provincial People's Hospital (January 2023 to June 2023) were used for the external validation of the optimal model. The incidence rate of CRT in patients with cancer was 5.02% (539/10 736). Amongst different malignant tumour types, head and neck (9.66%), haematological (6.97%) and respiratory (6.58%) tumours had the highest risks. Amongst catheter types, haemodialysis (13.91%), central venous (8.39%) and peripherally inserted central (4.68%) catheters were associated with the highest risks. A total of 500 patients with CRT and 1000 without CRT participated in model construction and were randomly assigned to the training (n = 1050) or testing (n = 450) groups. We identified 11 independent risk factors, including age, catheterisation method, catheter valve, catheter material, infection, insertion history, D-dimer concentration, operation history, anaemia, diabetes and targeted drugs. The logistic regression model had the best discriminative ability amongst the three models. It had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.868 (0.846-0.890) for the training group. The external validation AUC was 0.708 (0.618-0.797). The calibration curve of the nomogram model was consistent with the ideal curve. Moreover, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a good fit (P > 0.05) and high net benefit value for the clinical decision curve. The nomogram model constructed in this study can predict the risk of CRT in patients with cancer. It can help in the early identification and screening of patients at high risk of cancer CRT.

Feasibility of a new ultrasound guided procedure to ensure the correct position of the central venous catheter tip.

BACKGROUND: Safety of central venous catheter (CVC) placement relies on some general aspects, including selection of the right vessel, correct lumen targeting while inserting the needle, check the position of catheter tip, and post-procedure check for complications. All these four points can be guided by bedside ultrasound, but the best technique to ensure the position of the CVC tip is still uncertain. METHODS: We investigated feasibility of a novel ultrasound technique consisting of focused view of guidewire tip in the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) to calculate the CVC depth in adult patients needing CVC placement in emergency. Direct visualization of the guidewire in the CAJ was used to calculate how deep the CVC needed to be inserted. In those patients without a valid CAJ window, a bubble test in the right atrium was performed to position the CVC tip. In all cases chest radiography confirmed the CVC position. RESULTS: The procedure was performed in 37 patients and CVC was correctly placed in all cases. Within the group, in 25 patients the CVC depth (21.5 ± 6.0 cm) was successfully measured. In other 11 patients the correct CVC tip position was confirmed by the bubble test. In only one case it was not possible to use ultrasound for incomplete CAJ and right atrium views. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of a new ultrasound method to ensure the correct CVC tip position. This protocol could potentially become a standard method reducing costs, post-procedural irradiation, and time of CVC placement in emergency.

Use of a novel configuration of ports for patients needing intermittent long-term apheresis.

PURPOSE: In patients with a need for frequent but intermittent apheresis, vascular access can prove challenging. We describe the migration of the use of a Vortex LP dual lumen port (Angiodynamics, Latham, NY) to one Powerflow and one ClearVUE power injectable port (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) in a series of patients undergoing intermittent apheresis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients had a need for long-term intermittent apheresis. Eight had double lumen Vortex port (pre) and were exchanged for one Powerflow port and one conventional subcutaneous venous port with 90° needle entry (post) while 12 did not have any port in place and received the same configuration. IRB approval was granted. We recorded the treatment time, flow rate, and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) use for five treatment sessions after placement. When available, we compared five treatments with the Vortex port and the new configuration. RESULTS: The mean treatment time is reduced with the new configuration (P = 0.0033). The predicted mean treatment time, adjusting for gender, race, BMI and age and accounting for correlations within a patient is 91.18 min pre and 77.96 min post. The flow rate is higher with the new configuration (P < 0.0001). The predicted mean flow rate in mL/min is 61.59 for the Vortex port and 71.89 for the new configuration. tPA use was eliminated in the population converted from Vortex ports and had a 48% reduction when compared to all other configurations in the study. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a novel device configuration of venous access ports for intermittent apheresis resulted in higher flow rates and less total time for treatment. Use of tPA was greatly reduced. These results suggest that the new configuration could result in less expense for the hospital and better throughput in a busy pheresis practice. Clinical trial registration with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04846374.

Impact of arm position compared to tourniquet and general anesthesia on peripheral vein width in supine adult patients: a prospective, monocentric, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: IV access is a commonly performed procedure that is often taught based on tradition rather than evidence. The effect of arm retroflexion on vein width, either alone or in combination with a tourniquet or general anesthesia (GA), remains unclear. In this case, the sonographically measured vein width is a surrogate parameter for the success of the puncture. METHODS: Prospective, cross-sectional study involving 57 patients scheduled for surgery in general anesthesia. We analyzed the impact of arm retroflexion, tourniquet, general anesthesia, and their combinations on the antebrachial veins in supine patients by ultrasound. Measurements were taken awake and during general anesthesia, each with and without the application of a tourniquet, and in three different arm positions (0°, 30°, and max° retroflexion) each. Data are presented as median and interquartile range [IQR]. RESULTS: Tourniquet application (AT) had the greatest single effect on Cubital vein outer diameter compared to the baseline value of all measures (3.9 mm [3.4-5.1]; 4.8 mm [4.1-5.7], P = 0.001, r = 0.515). This effect was surpassed by the combination of AT and GA (5.1 mm [4.6-6.6], P = 0.001, r = 0.889). In contrast, retroflexion alone did not result in an increase at either 30° (4.2 mm [3.7-5.1], p = 1.0, r = 0.12) or max° (4.2 mm [3.6-4.9], p = 0.72, r = 0.23). With GA and AT, no further enlargement was measurable by 30° (5.4 mm [4.6-6.6], p = 1.0, r = 0.15) or max° (5.4 mm [4.6-6.6], p = 1.0, r = 0.07) retroflexion compared to GA-AT-0° (5.1 mm [4.6-6.6], p = 1.0, r = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that retroflexion of the arm in supine patients, whether alone or in addition to a tourniquet or general anesthesia, does not have any additional effect on vein width as a surrogate parameter for successful IV success. It shows for the first time that general anesthesia effectively increases vein diameter. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00029603 (date of registration 07.07.2022).

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Central Venous Access Device-Associated Skin Impairment Classification Tool Using Modified Delphi and Clinimetric Methods.

BACKGROUND: An evidence and consensus-based instrument is needed to classify central venous access device-associated skin impairments. AIM: The aim of this study was to design and evaluate the central venous access device-associated skin impairment classification tool. DESIGN: A two-phase modified Delphi study. METHODS: This two-phase study consisted of a literature review, followed by the development and validation of a classification instrument, by experts in the fields of central venous access devices and wound management (Phase 1). The instrument was tested (Phase 2) using 38 clinical photographs of a range of relevant skin impairments by the same expert panel. The expert panel consisted of registered nurses who were clinical researchers (n = 4) and clinical experts (n = 3) with an average of 24 years of nursing and research experience and 11 years of experience in wound management. Measures to assess preliminary content validity and inter-rater reliability were used. RESULTS: The instrument consists of five overarching aetiological classifications, including contact dermatitis, mechanical injury, infection, pressure injury and complex clinical presentation, with 14 associated subcategory diagnoses (e.g., allergic dermatitis, skin tear and local infection), with definitions and signs and symptoms. High agreement was achieved for preliminary scale content validity and item content validity (I-CVI = 1). Inter-rater reliability of aetiologies was high. The overall inter-rater reliability of individual definitions and signs and symptoms had excellent agreement. CONCLUSION: The development and preliminary validation of this classification tool provide a common language to guide the classification and assessment of central venous access device-associated skin impairment. IMPACT: The comprehensive and validated classification tool will promote accurate identification of central venous access device-associated skin impairment by establishing a common language for healthcare providers. The availability of this tool can reduce clinical uncertainty, instances of misdiagnosis and the potential for mismanagement. Consequently, it will play a pivotal role in guiding clinical decision-making, ultimately enhancing the quality of treatment and improving patient outcomes. REPORTING METHOD: The Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES) was adhered to. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Complications associated with the removal of totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs): a retrospective analysis of 4,954 breast cancer patients in a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) have been widely used for many years in the management of cancer patients. However, previous studies have rarely focused on the period surrounding TIVAD removal, which is a critically important phase for these devices. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the surgical approaches, timing, and associated complications related to the removal of TIVADs, thereby enhancing the management of these devices. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 4,954 TIVAD extraction procedures performed at the Breast Center of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 1, 2016, and August 1, 2023. RESULTS: Among 4,954 cases, the indwelling time of TIVADs for included patients ranged from 2 to 60 months. 4,882(98.5%) cases removed their TIVADs after completion of cancer treatment, while 72 cases (1.5%) were unplanned removal due to TIVADs related complications. Two surgical techniques were observed for port removal: in 20% of cases, the injection port was removed first, followed by the catheter; in 80% of cases, the catheter was removed first, followed by the injection port. Complications during TIVADs removal were observed in 13 cases (0.3%) including 2 cases of bleeding, 5 cases difficulty in removal of the port and catheter, and 6 cases representing of delayed wound healing. Longer indwelling time tended to have higher risk of developing catheter rupture and fracture. CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable insights into the removal of TIVADs in cancer patients. Complications during removal were uncommon but included bleeding, difficulty in removing the port and catheter, and delayed wound healing. Additionally, longer indwelling times were associated with an increased risk of catheter rupture and fracture, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and timely removal of TIVADs to minimize potential complications. The findings of the study underscore the importance of optimizing TIVAD management, particularly during the removal phase, to improve patient outcomes.

Incidence of medical adhesive-related skin injury: a reduction by changing posture.

OBJECTIVE: Medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSI), defined as skin damage associated with the use of medical adhesive products or devices, are a common and under-reported condition that compromises skin integrity. The prevention and management of MARSI that can occur around the needle insertion site of a chest wall implantable port in hospitalised patients with a tumour remain challenging issues. The aim of this study was to explore whether the incidence of MARSI could be reduced by changing the body position during dressing changes. METHOD: Participants were recruited between May 2019 and November 2020 in the oncology department of a tertiary hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to Group AB (supine followed by semi-recumbent position) and Group BA (semi-recumbent followed by supine position) with a standard intervening recovery interval of 21-28 days. Assessments for typical MARSI included itching, the combination of erythema and oedema, and blisters in the port area, and were graded according to the level of severity. RESULTS: The itch intensity was significantly lower in phase B (semi-recumbent) compared to phase A (supine) (2.35±1.985 versus 5.31±1.332, respectively; p<0.01). Similarly, the severity of erythema and oedema was less severe when comparing phase B to phase A: grade 0 (64.9% versus 10.5%, respectively); grade 1 (28.1% versus 19.3%, respectively); grade 2 (3.5% versus 7.0%, respectively); grade 3 (1.8% versus 45.6%, respectively); and grade 4 (1.8% versus 17.5%, respectively) (Z=5.703; p<0.01). Blisters were found far less frequently in phase B than phase A (1.8% versus 56.1%, respectively; p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The study provided statistically significant evidence that patients in a semi-recumbent position receiving dressing at a chest wall implantable port had fewer and less severe injection site MARSI than when in a supine position. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Effect of a musical toy used during peripheral venous access on children's pain, fear and parental satisfaction: Randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This research was completed to determine the effect of a musical toy (xylophone) on pain and fear in children and parental satisfaction during peripheral venous access in children. DESIGN AND METHODS: This research was completed as a randomized controlled trial study. The sample for the research comprised 70 children (control: 35, experiment: 35) aged 3-6 years with peripheral venous access who were admitted to the Pediatric ward and their parents abiding with case selection criteria. RESULTS: The mean Children's Emotional Manifestation Scale score for children in the experiment group was found to be statistically significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.05). Children in the experiment group had statistically significantly different mean Children's Fear Scale scores, which were found to be low (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the pain scores of the experimental and control groups (p > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference present for patient cooperation with the nurse in the experiment group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Though the use of a musical toy during the peripheral venous access procedure had positive impacts on fear and emotional symptoms in the child, it did not appear to have any effect on the child's pain level or parental satisfaction. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The use of a xylophone during painful procedures performed on children is recommended in terms of reducing the negative impact of the procedure on children by ensuring the child and parent focus on each other during the procedure and the parent contributes to care.

Evolution of the use of intraosseous vascular access in prehospital advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation: The IOVA-CPR study.

INTRODUCTION: Obtaining vascular access is crucial in critically ill patients. The EZ-IO® device is easy to use and has a high insertion success rate. Therefore, the use of intraosseous vascular access (IOVA) has gradually increased. AIM: We aim to determine how IOVA was integrated into management of vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation. METHODS: Analysing the data from the OHCA French registry for events occurring between 1 January 2013 and 15 March 2021, we studied: demography, circumstances of occurrence and management including vascular access, delays and evolution. The primary outcome was the rate of IOVA implantation. RESULTS: Among the 7156 OHCA included in the registry, we analysed the 3964 (55%) who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The vascular access was peripheral in 3122 (79%) cases, intraosseous in 775 (20%) cases and central in 12 (<1%) cases. The use of IOVA has increased linearly (R2 = 0.61) during the 33 successive trimesters studied representing 7% of all vascular access in 2013 and 33% in 2021 (p = 0.001). It was significantly more frequent in traumatic cardiac arrest: 12% versus 5%; p < 0.0001. The first epinephrine bolus occurred significantly later in the IOVA group, at 6 (4-10) versus 5 (3-8) min; p < 0.0001. Survival rate in the IOVA group was significantly lower, at 1% versus 7%; p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: The insertion rate of IOVA significantly increased over the studied period, to reach 30% of all vascular access in the management OHCA patients. The place of the intraosseous route in the strategy of venous access during the management of prehospital cardiac arrest has yet to be determined.

Evidence-based summary of preventive care for central venous access device-related thrombosis in hospitalized children.

PURPOSE: This study aims to summarize the latest and best evidence on central venous access device-related thrombosis (CRT) in hospitalized children, which provides theoretical support for standardizing the preventive care practice of CRT in hospitalized children. METHODS: Relevant guidelines, systematic reviews and expert consensuses were reviewed through ten guideline websites, six professional association websites and seven databases. The literature evaluation was conducted, and the best evidence from qualified studies was extracted and summarized. Furthermore, the best evidence was summarized through expert consultation and localized for the preventive care practice of CRT in hospitalized children in China. RESULTS: A total of 14 topics and 68 best evidence were collected, including personnel qualification and quality management, pediatric patient selection, risk assessment, central venous access device (CVAD) selection and use, tip position, catheter maintenance, basic prevention, drug prevention, imaging examination, health education, nursing records, follow-up, CVAD removal and others. CONCLUSION: In this study, the best evidence based on evidence-based nursing was summarized, and expert consultation was adopted to localize the best evidence collected. It is of great significance to standardize the clinical practice of pediatric nurses and ensure the effectiveness of CRT preventive care for hospitalized children, thus guaranteeing the safety of hospitalized children with CVAD catheterization.

Study draft: "UVC-You Will See" study: longer vs. shorter umbilical venous catheter (UVC) dwell time (6-10 vs. 1-5 days) in very premature infants with birth weight < 1250 g and/or gestational age < 30 weeks.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) are often used in preterm infants. Their use is associated with complications (infections, clot formation, organ injury). Very preterm infants with acquired bloodstream infection are at a higher risk for death and important morbidities (e.g., adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes). It is standard clinical practice to remove UVCs in the first days of life. Replacement of intravenous access is often performed using percutaneously inserted central catheters (PICCs). It is unclear whether serial central line use affects the rates of catheter-related complications. METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled trial (random group assignment) was performed in 562 very premature (gestational age < 30 weeks) and/or very low birth weight infants (< 1250 g) requiring an UVC for administration of parenteral nutrition and/or drugs. Group allocation was random. HYPOTHESIS: A UVC dwell time of 6-10 days (281 infants) is not associated with an increased rate of central venous catheter (UVC, PICC)-related complications compared to 1-5 days (281 infants), and a longer UVC dwell time will significantly reduce the number of painful, invasive procedures associated with the need for vascular access as well as radiation exposure, use of antibiotics, and medical costs. PRIMARY OUTCOME PARAMETER: The number of catheter-related bloodstream infections and/or catheter-related thromboses and/or catheter-associated organ injuries related to the use of UVC/PICC was the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: Extending the UVC dwell time may significantly reduce the number of painful invasive procedures, with the potential to positively impact not only long-term pain perception but also important social competencies (attention, learning, and behavior). Thus, the "UVC-You Will See" study has the potential to substantially change current neonatal intensive care practice.