Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 62
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 58(5): 416-424, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38332613

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: ICD-11 complex post-traumatic stress disorder is a more severe condition than post-traumatic stress disorder, and recent studies indicate it is more prevalent among military samples. In this study, we tested the psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire, assessed the relative prevalence rates of post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder in the sample population and explored relationships between complex post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder and a range of risk factors. METHODS: Survey participants (N = 189) were mental health support-seeking former-serving veterans of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) recruited from primary care. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factorial validity of the International Trauma Questionnaire. RESULTS: The latent structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire was best represented by a two-factor second-order model consistent with the ICD-11 model of complex post-traumatic stress disorder. The International Trauma Questionnaire scale scores demonstrated excellent internal reliability. Overall, 9.1% (95% confidence interval = [4.8%, 13.5%]) met diagnostic requirements for post-traumatic stress disorder and an additional 51.4% (95% confidence interval = [44.0%, 58.9%]) met requirements for complex post-traumatic stress disorder. Those meeting diagnostic requirements for complex post-traumatic stress disorder were more likely to have served in the military for 15 years or longer, had a history of more traumatic life events and had the highest levels of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms. CONCLUSION: The International Trauma Questionnaire can effectively distinguish between post-traumatic stress disorder and complex post-traumatic stress disorder within primary care samples of Australian Defence Force veterans. A significantly greater proportion of Australian Defence Force veterans met criteria for complex post-traumatic stress disorder than post-traumatic stress disorder. Australian military mental health services should adopt the International Trauma Questionnaire to routinely screen for complex post-traumatic stress disorder and develop complex post-traumatic stress disorder specific interventions to promote recovery in Australian Defence Force veterans with complex post-traumatic stress disorder.


Subject(s)
International Classification of Diseases , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Veterans , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Male , Australia/epidemiology , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Reproducibility of Results , Prevalence
2.
J Clin Psychol ; 80(4): 824-835, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37058521

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) is a classification within the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11) that, besides the DSM-5 symptom clusters of post-post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), includes the presence of negative self-concept, difficulties in regulating emotions and relationship skills. The purpose of the present study was to provide guidance on how to deliver Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in the context of CPTSD, based on current clinical knowledge and the latest scientific research findings. METHOD: This paper describes the treatment of a 52-year-old woman with CPTSD and borderline personality disorder for which immediate trauma-focused EMDR therapy was used. RESULTS: First, a description of what EMDR therapy entails and some important treatment strategies that the therapist may employ to assist in trauma-focused treatment of clients with CPTSD using EMDR therapy are outlined. CONCLUSION: The treatment results are in line with mounting evidence supporting the notion that EMDR therapy is a safe and potentially effective treatment alternative for individuals with CPTSD or personality problems.


Subject(s)
Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing/methods , Treatment Outcome , Comorbidity , Emotions
3.
J Clin Psychol ; 80(4): 900-911, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38111153

ABSTRACT

Dance Movement Therapy is gradually becoming recognized as a treatment option in Mental Health Care. However, the working mechanisms can be difficult to comprehend without experiential knowledge of this therapy form. This article aims to offer insight into the clinical application of Dance Movement Therapy for Sanne, a woman with a history of interpersonal relationship difficulties, problems with self-regulation, low self-efficacy and diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder and co-morbid Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. This case illustration describes treatment interventions during two months of bi-monthly Dance Movement Therapy as an additional treatment alongside weekly group therapy and bi-monthly individual Psychotherapy. Post treatment, Sanne demonstrates improvements in self-regulatory behavior, interpersonal relationships and self-efficacy as well as an experience she describes as being whole. This article highlights the implications for practitioners of embodied forms of therapy as well as multidisciplinary teams who wish to better understand how the use of opposites within Dance Movement Therapy may be used as an additional intervention for people with Borderline Personality Disorder and co-morbid complex Post Traumatic stress Disorder.


Subject(s)
Borderline Personality Disorder , Dance Therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Female , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Borderline Personality Disorder/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Psychotherapy
4.
Clin Psychol Psychother ; 31(3): e3012, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38894553

ABSTRACT

Complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) was introduced in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 11 in 2013 to simplify diagnosis and increase clinical utility. Given the recent ICD-11 conceptualisation, there is no standard approach for its assessment, and a review of research is necessary. This systematic review focuses on ICD-11 CPTSD assessment in young people aged 7 to 17 and adults aged 18 and above, examining measures, differentiating features and clinical considerations. Data from five databases are reviewed using a narrative synthesis approach and the quality of evidence is assessed and discussed. A total of 36 studies involving 5901 participants recruited from clinical settings and 1458 professionals with CPTSD assessment experience were included. Studies predominantly focused on adults, and the most used measure for assessment was the International Trauma Questionnaire. Papers focusing on differentiating features highlighted increased symptom severity, impairment and difficulties in individuals with CPTSD, compared to those with PTSD across various characteristics in both young people and adults. This review also identified the importance of a sensitive clinical approach with adaptations based on culture and age. Although gold-standard recommendations cannot be made, this paper offers tentative clinical practice recommendations and considerations regarding ICD-11 CPTSD assessment.


Subject(s)
International Classification of Diseases , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/classification , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Child , Female , Male
5.
J Trauma Dissociation ; 25(2): 279-296, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38124492

ABSTRACT

The association and overlap between psychotic and dissociative phenomena have been increasingly recognized. Previous studies found that psychotic symptoms are closely associated with post-traumatic and dissociative symptoms and that these trauma-related phenomena may mediate the relationship between trauma and psychotic symptoms. It remained less explored which specific post-traumatic and dissociative symptom clusters are particularly associated with psychotic symptoms. This cross-sectional study used a data-driven approach (network analysis) to explore the associations among different psychotic and post-traumatic/dissociative symptom clusters in an online convenience predominantly female sample (N = 468)(59.2% had ever seen a psychiatrist). Participants completed well-established multidimensional measures that assessed different symptom clusters of psychosis, dissociation, and PTSD. In addition, multiple mediation analysis was conducted to examine which post-traumatic/dissociative symptoms could mediate the relationship between childhood and adulthood trauma and different psychotic symptoms. Our results confirmed previous findings that PTSD and dissociative symptoms are closely associated with psychotic symptoms. More importantly, both data-driven and multiple mediation analysis results indicated that identity dissociation was particularly associated with perceptual anomalies and bizarre experiences, while emotional constriction was particularly associated with negative symptoms. It is important to screen for trauma and dissociation and provide trauma-and dissociation-informed care when working with people at risk of or experiencing psychosis. Further longitudinal studies using more representative samples are needed.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Female , Child , Male , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Syndrome , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Dissociative Disorders/psychology
6.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 26(3): 295-309, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37079042

ABSTRACT

Perinatal borderline personality disorder (BPD) and complex post-traumatic stress disorder (cPTSD) are associated with significant impairment to interpersonal functioning, and risk of intergenerational transmission of psychopathology. Evaluation of interventions, however, is scarce. To date, no systematic review has addressed interventions for perinatal BPD, cPTSD, and associated symptomatology. Given the modest evidence to support informed clinical guidelines, the objective of this systematic review is to synthesise the literature on interventions for perinatal BPD and cPTSD, and to generate future directions for research. A comprehensive literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted in PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Emcare, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global databases. Seven original studies were included, of which only two were randomised controlled trials, using less intensive comparison conditions. Results suggest an association between Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT) group skills training, a multimodal therapeutic approach at a Mother-Baby Unit (MBU), and Child-Parent Psychotherapy with improved perinatal mental health outcomes and remission of symptoms. MBU admission and home-visiting programs were associated with healthy postpartum attachment relationships. Home-visiting programs and DBT group skills were additionally associated with improved maternal parenting capabilities. Conclusions to inform clinical guidelines are limited by a lack of credible comparison conditions, and low quantity and quality of evidence. The feasibility of implementing intensive interventions in real-world settings is dubious. Hence, it is suggested that future research considers utilising antenatal screening to identify at-risk mothers, and the implementation of early intervention, using robust designs that can inform robust conclusions.


Subject(s)
Borderline Personality Disorder , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Borderline Personality Disorder/therapy , Psychotherapy/methods , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Mothers , Psychopathology
7.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract ; 27(3): 292-300, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37067395

ABSTRACT

Appropriate screening tools are required to accurately detect complex post traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). This systematic review aimed to assess and compare measurement tools. A literature search using key words 'complex post traumatic stress disorder', 'PTSD', and 'assessment' was undertaken on Embase and PsychINFO during February 2022 by two reviewers. Inclusion criteria included full text papers between 2002-2022 which evaluated CPTSD using assessment tools. Exclusion criteria included reviews, editorials, meta-analyses, or conference abstracts. Twenty-two papers met selection criteria. Thirteen studies used the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ). Two studies each evaluated CPTSD with the International Trauma Interview (ITI) or Symptoms of Trauma Scale (SOTS). The Developmental Trauma Inventory (DTI), Cameron Complex Trauma Interview (CCTI), Complex PTSD Item Set additional to the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (COPISAC), Complex Trauma Questionnaire (ComplexTQ), and Scale 8 of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Scale (MMPI) were used by a single study each. The ITQ was the most thoroughly investigated, validated across different populations, and is a convenient questionnaire for screening within the clinical setting. Where self-report measures are inappropriate, the ITI, SOTS, and COPISAC are interview tools which detect CPTSD. However, they require further validation and should be used alongside clinical history and examination.


Validated and reliable screening tools are required to accurately detect and manage complex post traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD)The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is the most thoroughly investigated, validated across different populations, and is a freely available and convenient tool for screening within clinical settingsIn circumstances where self-report measures are inappropriate, the ITI, SOTS, and COPISAC are interview tools which detect CPTSD, but require further validation and should be used alongside clinical history and examinationFurther research is needed to ensure appropriate assessment tools for the detection and diagnosis of CPTSD are available.


Subject(s)
Psychological Tests , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Interview, Psychological , MMPI , Patient Health Questionnaire , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology
8.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 146(3): 258-271, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35752949

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To establish factors associated with ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) in a large sample of adults with lived experience of psychiatric disorder and examine the psychiatric burden associated with the two disorders. METHODS: One thousand three hundred and five adults were recruited from the National Centre for Mental Health (NCMH) cohort. ICD-11 PTSD/CPTSD were assessed with the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ). Binary logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with both PTSD and CPTSD. One-way between-groups analysis of variance was conducted to examine the burden associated with the two disorders in terms of symptoms of anxiety, depression, and psychological wellbeing. For post-hoc pairwise comparisons, the Tukey HSD test was used, and the magnitude of between-group differences assessed using Cohen's d. RESULTS: Probable ICD-11 CPTSD was more common than PTSD within the sample (PTSD 2.68%; CPTSD 12.72%). We found evidence that PTSD was associated with interpersonal trauma and household income under £20,000 a year. CPTSD was also associated with interpersonal trauma, higher rates of personality disorder, and lower rates of bipolar disorder. Those with probable-CPTSD had higher levels of current anxiety and depressive symptoms and lower psychological wellbeing in comparison to those with probable-PTSD and those with neither disorder. CONCLUSIONS: CPTSD was more prevalent than PTSD in our sample of people with lived experience of psychiatric disorder. Our findings indicate a need for routine screening for trauma histories and PTSD/CPTSD in clinical settings and a greater focus on the need for interventions to treat CPTSD.


Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Health Expect ; 24 Suppl 1: 62-69, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31868308

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A new diagnosis of complex post-traumatic stress disorder, CPTSD, has been agreed by the World Health Organization, WHO, and evidence is needed for what psychological treatment might be effective, particularly from those with experience of the disorder. We used a novel participatory approach to explore patient views and simultaneously studied the impact on the patient researchers of the research process itself. In this paper, we report on the latter section of the study how the involvement in research of patients with CPTSD affected their mental health. Symptoms of CPTSD may include emotional dysregulation, feelings of self-worthlessness and difficulties in relationships. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study section was to explore whether patients' mental health could be promoted through empowering them to participate in research on CPTSD. DESIGN: The study had a qualitative, participatory design. The clinician who led the research (first author) held group meetings with patient researchers to explore the impact of the research process. The clinician also kept notes on the process in a reflective log. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Six patient researchers participated in research with other patients with lived experience of CPTSD in an NHS outpatient unit in a London hospital. INTERVENTION STUDIED: The research process itself was analysed in group meetings with researchers which the clinician recorded and transcribed. FINDINGS: Participation in research may promote increased self-confidence and social inclusion for those with CPTSD. CONCLUSION: Involvement in research may be seen as an empowering intervention because patients felt it contributed to recovery.


Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Emotions , Humans , London , Patient Participation , Self Concept , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy
10.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 141(5): 421-431, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32049369

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the frequency of traumatic experiences, prevalence rates of ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD), and overlap with ICD-10 classified disorders in outpatient psychiatry. METHOD: Overall, 165 Danish psychiatric outpatients answered the International Trauma Questionnaire, the Life Event Checklist, and the World Health Organization Well-being Index. ICD-10 diagnoses were extracted from the hospital record. Chi-square analysis, t-tests, and conditional probability analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Nearly, all patients (94%) had experienced at least one traumatic event. CPTSD (36%) was more common than PTSD (8%) and had considerable overlap with ICD-10 affective, anxiety, PTSD, personality, adjustment and stress-reaction disorders, and behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence. ICD-11 PTSD overlapped with ICD-10 anxiety, PTSD, adjustment and stress-reaction disorders, and behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence. A subgroup of patients with ICD-10 PTSD (23%) did not meet criteria for ICD-11 PTSD or CPTSD. CONCLUSION: Traumatic experiences are common. ICD-11 CPTSD is a highly prevalent disorder in psychiatric outpatients. One quarter with ICD-10 PTSD did not meet criteria for either ICD-11 PTSD or CPTSD. PTSD and CPTSD had considerable overlap with ICD-10 disorders.


Subject(s)
International Classification of Diseases , Psychological Trauma/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
11.
Br J Psychiatry ; 214(6): 361-368, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30621797

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ICD-11 includes a new disorder, complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). A network approach to CPTSD will enable investigation of the structure of the disorder at the symptom level, which may inform the development of treatments that target specific symptoms to accelerate clinical outcomes.AimsWe aimed to test whether similar networks of ICD-11 CPTSD replicate across culturally different samples and to investigate possible differences, using a network analysis. METHOD: We investigated the network models of four nationally representative, community-based cross-sectional samples drawn from Germany, Israel, the UK, and the USA (total N = 6417). CPTSD symptoms were assessed with the International Trauma Questionnaire in all samples. Only those participants who reported significant functional impairment by CPTSD symptoms were included (N = 1591 included in analysis; mean age 43.55 years, s.d. 15.10, range 14-99, 67.7% women). Regularised partial correlation networks were estimated for each sample and the resulting networks were compared. RESULTS: Despite differences in traumatic experiences, symptom severity and symptom profiles, the networks were very similar across the four countries. The symptoms within dimensions were strongly associated with each other in all networks, except for the two symptom indicators assessing aspects of affective dysregulation. The most central symptoms were 'feelings of worthlessness' and 'exaggerated startle response'. CONCLUSIONS: The structure of CPTSD symptoms appears very similar across countries. Addressing symptoms with the strongest associations in the network, such as negative self-worth and startle reactivity, will likely result in rapid treatment response.Declaration of interestA.M. and M.C. were members of the World Health Organization (WHO) ICD-11 Working Group on the Classification of Disorders Specifically Associated with Stress, reporting to the WHO International Advisory Group for the Revision of ICD-10 Mental and Behavioural Disorders. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the official policies or positions of the International Advisory Group or the WHO.


Subject(s)
Models, Psychological , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Israel , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Symptom Assessment , United Kingdom , United States , Young Adult
12.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 269(2): 147-159, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28712089

ABSTRACT

A neurocircuitry model of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) suggests increased amygdala responses to emotional stimuli, coupled with hypoactivation of prefrontal regions associated with cognitive control. However, results are heterogenous across different subsamples of PTSD as well as different paradigms. We investigated cognitive control in a classic and emotional Stroop task in 28 female patients with complex PTSD (cPTSD), 28 female trauma-exposed healthy controls (TCs) and 28 female non-trauma-exposed healthy controls (HCs) using functional neuroimaging. Afterwards, we assessed memory function in a spontaneous free recall and recognition task. Patients with cPTSD displayed significantly greater Stroop interference with trauma-related words (as reflected in slower reaction times and increased errors) compared to the other conditions and compared to the TC and HC groups. Moreover, patients with cPTSD showed increased activation in the context of trauma-related words in brain regions associated with cognitive control (dlPFC, vmPFC, dACC) compared to both control groups, and a trend for increased activation in the insula compared to the HC group. Increased recruitment of regions contributing to cognitive control in patients with cPTSD, together with a lack of amygdala response may point to efforts to compensate for emotional distraction caused by the trauma-related words.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Executive Function/physiology , Functional Neuroimaging/methods , Mental Recall/physiology , Psychological Trauma/physiopathology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Recognition, Psychology/physiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/physiopathology , Adult , Cerebral Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Psychological Trauma/diagnostic imaging , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnostic imaging , Stroop Test , Young Adult
13.
BMC Psychiatry ; 18(1): 392, 2018 12 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30567517

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases, a new stress related diagnosis has been proposed: complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). It is described as a chronic condition with several severe and concurrent symptoms. In the literature, these symptoms are discussed as a common reason for seeking psychiatric treatment as they can influence and impair the quality of life not only for affected persons but also for their social and familial system. AIM: This research studies symptom management in everyday life by exploring and reconstructing the views, perceptions, experiences, facilitators and barriers of adults with CPTSD. METHODS: A theoretical sampling was used to recruit 18 to 65 years old patients diagnosed with CPTSD from an inpatient setting. The 17 semi-structured interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcriptions were uploaded into MAXQDA, and a Grounded Theory method based on Corbin and Strauss was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: We provide a process model with 5 interacting phases: trauma experience, emotional ignorance, overcompensation, paroxysm, and perspectives. Each phase is specified with subcategories. CONCLUSIONS: The participants did not recognise their symptoms as such and were unaware of their diagnosis for many years. Nevertheless, they used various resources and were able to develop skills and techniques to deal with their symptoms and to function on a day-to-day basis. Overall, the process of symptom management was extremely exhausting for the participants and they felt left alone with it. The participants were eager to gain support from healthcare professionals and, when necessary, financial support from the government. Thus, these results indicate an essential need to develop support and tailored interventions for the symptom management of persons with a CPTSD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Swiss Cantonal Ethic Commission (Nr 201,500,096). This research was also registered at the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Search Portal through the German Clinical Trial Register, Trial DRKS00012268 .


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Psychotherapy/methods , Quality of Life , Social Adjustment , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Adult , Community Mental Health Services/methods , Female , Grounded Theory , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy
14.
Br J Clin Psychol ; 57(2): 177-185, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29355986

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We set out to investigate the association between negative trauma-related cognitions, emotional regulation strategies, and attachment style and complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). As the evidence regarding the treatment of CPTSD is emerging, investigating psychological factors that are associated with CPTSD can inform the adaptation or the development of effective interventions for CPTSD. METHOD: A cross-sectional design was employed. Measures of CPTSD, negative trauma-related cognitions, emotion regulation strategies, and attachment style were completed by a British clinical sample of trauma-exposed patients (N = 171). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictive utility of these psychological factors on diagnosis of CPTSD as compared to PTSD. RESULTS: It was found that the most important factor in the diagnosis of CPTSD was negative trauma-related cognitions about the self, followed by attachment anxiety, and expressive suppression. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting negative thoughts and attachment representations while promoting skills acquisition in emotional regulation hold promise in the treatment of CPTSD. Further research is required on the development of appropriate models to treat CPTSD that tackle skills deficit in these areas. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Results suggest that cognitive-behavioural interventions might be useful for the treatment of CPTSD. Targeting negative thoughts and attachment representations while promoting skills acquisition in emotional regulation hold promise in the treatment of CPTSD.


Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Emotions/physiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Young Adult
15.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 136(3): 313-322, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28696531

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) has proposed two related trauma diagnoses: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD). Using a newly developed, disorder-specific measure of PTSD and CPTSD called the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) the current study will (i) assess the factorial validity of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD; (ii) provide the first test of the discriminant validity of these constructs; and (iii) provide the first comparison of ICD-11, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), PTSD diagnostic rates using disorder-specific measures. METHOD: ICD-11 and DSM-5 PTSD-specific measures were completed by a British clinical sample of trauma-exposed patients (N = 171). The structure and validity of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD were assessed by means of factor analysis and assessing relationships with criterion variables. RESULTS: Diagnostic rates under ICD-11 were significantly lower than those under DSM-5. A two-factor second-order model reflecting the distinction between PTSD and CPTSD best represented the data from the ITQ; and the PTSD and CPTSD factors differentially predicted multiple psychological variables. CONCLUSION: The factorial and discriminant validity of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD was supported, and ICD-11 produces fewer diagnostic cases than DSM-5.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , International Classification of Diseases , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychological Trauma/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
16.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 135(5): 419-428, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28134442

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although there is emerging evidence for the factorial validity of the distinction between post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) proposed in ICD-11, such evidence has been predominantly based on using selected items from individual scales that describe these factors. We have attempted to address this gap in the literature by testing a range of alternative models of disorders of traumatic stress using a broader range of symptoms and standardized measures. METHOD: Participants in this cross-sectional study were a sample of individuals who were referred for psychological therapy to a National Health Service (NHS) trauma centre in Scotland (N = 195). Participants were recruited over a period of 18 months and completed measures of stressful life events, DSM-5 PTSD, emotion dysregulation, self-esteem and interpersonal difficulties. RESULTS: Overall, results indicate that a structural model incorporating six first-order factors (re-experiencing, avoidance of traumatic reminders, sense of threat, affective dysregulation, negative self-concept and disturbances in relationships) and two second-order factors (PTSD and disturbances in self-organization [DSO]) was the best fitting. The model presented with good concurrent validity. Childhood trauma was found to be more strongly associated with DSO than with PTSD. CONCLUSION: Our results are in support of the ICD-11 proposals for PTSD and CPTSD.


Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Life Change Events , Male , Models, Psychological , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
17.
Psychiatry Res ; 339: 116076, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38996630

ABSTRACT

The extent to which complex post-traumatic stress disorder (C-PTSD) can be conceptualized as a dissociative disorder remains an ongoing debate. This study investigated the prevalence and correlates of dissociative symptoms in people with C-PTSD. We analyzed baseline data from an international randomized controlled trial. A total of 165 intervention seekers who met the ICD-11 criteria for C-PTSD completed standardized self-report measures of trauma, C-PTSD symptoms, dissociative symptoms, depressive symptoms, and work and social impairments. In this sample, only 42.3 % of participants exhibited clinically significant dissociative symptoms. Dissociative symptoms had a unique association with depressive symptoms and work and social impairments in our participants with C-PTSD, even after controlling for trauma exposure and C-PTSD symptoms. The data does not support the theory that C-PTSD is a dissociative disorder. However, the findings highlight the importance of recognizing dissociation in people with C-PTSD.


Subject(s)
Dissociative Disorders , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Dissociative Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Male , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Adult , Prevalence , Middle Aged , Depression/epidemiology , Young Adult , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
18.
Trauma Violence Abuse ; 25(4): 3377-3387, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38651819

ABSTRACT

Serving military personnel and veterans are known to be at elevated risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and some veterans have been shown to respond poorly to current standard treatments. Evidence so far suggests that according to the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems guidelines, complex PTSD (CPTSD) may be of higher prevalence in the general population than PTSD. The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence of CPTSD compared to PTSD in serving and ex-serving military populations. A systematic review was conducted with the search criteria set to peer-reviewed English language journal articles, focusing on serving military or veteran populations, reporting on the prevalence of CPTSD, not restricted by year. Four comprehensive databases (Psycinfo, Pubmed, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched. Of the 297 identified articles, 16 primary studies were eligible for inclusion. The review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023416458), and results were reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Of the 16 studies, 13 demonstrated higher prevalence of CPTSD than PTSD. Studies were predominantly veteran focused. Prevalence of CPTSD ranged from 5% to 80.63%, while prevalence of PTSD ranged from 3.8% to 42.37%. There was high heterogeneity in study populations, preventing meta-analysis. This is the first systematic review to assess the prevalence of CPTSD in serving military and veteran populations, with the findings demonstrating a higher rate of CPTSD compared to PTSD. It is hoped that the review will assist clinicians and military and veteran health services with appropriate assessment, diagnosis, and intervention for those affected by CPTSD, as well as PTSD.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Veterans , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Veterans/psychology , Military Personnel/psychology , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Male , Female
19.
J Psychiatr Res ; 178: 283-290, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39180987

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess the validity and internal reliability of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) among patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) and to explore the network structure of Complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) among MDD patients in China. METHODS: Eligible individuals were recruited from a large tertiary hospital in Guangdong Province. Trained researchers conducted in-person interviews and administered self-report questionnaires, including demographics, medical information, and psychological assessments. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and network analysis were performed, with calculations of Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Cronbach's α, and composite reliability. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients with MDD participated in this study. The correlated six-factor one-order model was a good representation of the latent structure of ITQ (χ2= 60.114, df = 39, P = 0.017, SRMR = 0.070, RMSEA = 0.050, TLI = 0.952, CFI = 0.972, BIC = 175.508). All ITQ subscales possessed acceptable convergent validity and internal reliability, except for affective dysregulation and re-experiencing. The square root of AVE for affective dysregulation was lower than its correlations with other clusters. Network analysis revealed that node C4 ('I feel worthless'), as a core symptom, was significantly associated with the development of CPTSD. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical applicability of the ITQ was demonstrated by its overall validity and reliability among patients with MDD. However, the affective dysregulation and re-experiencing clusters still need to be revised and enhanced. Timely screening, recognition, and diagnosis are critical due to the worse clinical outcomes seen in comorbid patients.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Psychometrics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Psychometrics/standards , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Middle Aged , China , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Factor Analysis, Statistical , East Asian People
20.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 15(1): 2320994, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38506757

ABSTRACT

Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) prevalence and clinical presentation reportedly vary with gender and/or sex. Equivalent complex PTSD (CPTSD) research is in its relative infancy and to date no systematic review has been conducted on this topic.Objective: To systematically review the literature and provide a narrative addressing the question of whether gender and/or sex differences exist in CPTSD prevalence and clinical presentation.Method: Embase, PsycINFO, PTSDpubs, PubMed, Web of Science, EThOS and Google Scholar were searched. Twelve papers were eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively.Results: Four themes were identified: (i) the reporting of gender and/or sex; (ii) index trauma; (iii) CPTSD prevalence rates; and (iv) CPTSD clinical presentation. Findings were mixed. Nine papers reported prevalence rates: eight found no gender and/or sex differences; one found higher diagnostic rates among women and/or females. Four papers reported clinical presentation: one reported higher cluster-level scores among women and/or females; two used single gender and/or sex samples; and one found higher scores in two clusters in men and/or males. Most papers failed to report in gender- and/or sex-sensitive ways.Conclusions: Gender- and sex-sensitive research and clinical practice is needed. Awareness in research and clinical practice is recommended regarding the intersect between identity and the experience and expression of complex trauma.


This narrative review aims to establish whether gender and/or sex differences exist in complex post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis rates and clinical presentation.Most papers adopted a binary approach to sex and gender.Most papers reported no difference in overall diagnosis rates, and few papers reported mixed findings regarding CPTSD presentation.


Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Female , Sex Factors , Male , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL