Anaplasia in Wilms tumor: A critical review.

Anaplasia in Wilms tumor is recognized as the most important prognostically unfavorable histological feature. It is subtyped as focal anaplastic Wilms tumor (FAWT) and diffuse anaplastic Wilms tumor (DAWT). Outcomes of patients with DAWT remain poor in patients with stage III and IV tumors. Important issues relevant to anaplasia in Wilms tumor, including prevalence, treatment, outcomes, biomarkers, anaplasia, and chemotherapy, and the concept of tumor aggressiveness, are reviewed and discussed here. We also consider the differences in clinical approaches to anaplasia in Wilms tumor between the two major renal tumor clinical research groups: the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) Renal Tumour Study Group and the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Renal Tumor Group. We emphasize the importance and implications of recognizing FAWT and DAWT as separate clinico-pathological entities.

Characteristics and outcomes of preoperatively treated patients with anaplastic Wilms tumors registered in the UK SIOP-WT-2001 and IMPORT study cohorts (2002-2020).

BACKGROUND: Since the International Society of Paediatric Oncology Wilms' Tumour 2001 (SIOP-WT-2001) study, focal anaplastic Wilms tumors (FAWTs) have been treated as intermediate-risk Wilms tumors (WTs), and diffuse anaplastic Wilms tumors (DAWTs) have been treated as high-risk tumors. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of preoperatively treated patients with FAWT or DAWT recruited in 2 consecutive UK Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group WT studies. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one of 1237 patients (10%) had an anaplastic WT confirmed by central pathology review (CPR): 93 (77%) had DAWT, and 28 (23%) had FAWT. The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-63%) for DAWT, 88% (95% CI, 76%-100%) for FAWT, and 84% (95% CI, 82%-87%) for intermediate-risk nonanaplastic Wilms tumor (IR-non-AWT). Overall survival (OS) was 58% (95% CI, 48%-70%) for DAWT, 95% (95% CI, 86%-100%) for FAWT, and 95% (95% CI, 93%-96%) for IR-non-AWT. In a multivariate analysis, the presence of DAWT was a significant prognostic factor for both EFS and OS in stages II, III, and IV. In a multivariate analysis of unilateral DAWT, stages III and IV remained the only significant prognostic factors for both EFS and OS. In 28% of the cases, there were discrepancies affecting the recognition of anaplasia, classification (DAWT vs FAWT), or the local pathologic stage. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperatively treated patients with FAWT had excellent outcomes in comparison with those with identically treated IR-non-AWT, whereas patients with DAWT showed significantly worse outcomes. All patients with stage I disease had comparable good outcomes, regardless of the presence/absence of anaplasia. In contrast, the presence of DAWT was associated with significantly worse outcomes for patients with stage II to V disease. Finally, significant diagnostic discrepancies emphasize the value of CPR. LAY SUMMARY: Anaplasia is an unfavorable feature in Wilms tumor (WT), and it is classified as focal (focal anaplastic Wilms tumor [FAWT]) or diffuse (diffuse anaplastic Wilms tumor [DAWT]). This study reports the outcomes of patients with FAWT and DAWT who were, for the first time, treated differently. Patients with FAWT received less intensive treatment, and their outcomes were comparable to the outcomes of patients with identically treated nonanaplastic WT. Patients with stage I DAWT also had good outcomes when they were treated without radiotherapy, whereas patients with stage II to V DAWT had poor outcomes despite more intensive treatment.

Is radiotherapy required in first-line treatment of stage I diffuse anaplastic Wilms tumor? A report of SIOP-RTSG, AIEOP, JWiTS, and UKCCSG.

BACKGROUND: As a significant proportion of relapses occurred in the tumor bed or abdomen on patients with the fifth National Wilms Tumor Study stage I anaplastic Wilms tumor (WT), flank radiotherapy was added for stage I anaplastic WT in the subsequent study of the Children's Oncology Group (AREN0321). Preliminary results revealed reduction of relapse rate and improved survival. In cases treated with preoperative chemotherapy, such as in International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP), the value of radiotherapy has never been studied. The aim of this observational study is to describe the pattern of recurrence and survival of patients with stage I diffuse anaplastic WT (DAWT) after induction chemotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of the pattern of relapse and survival of all patients with stage I DAWT were included in recent SIOP, L'Associazone Italiana Ematologica Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP), Japan Wilms Tumor Study Group (JWiTS), United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG) renal tumor registries. Postoperative treatment consisted of actinomycin D, vincristine, and doxorubicin for 28 weeks without local irradiation. RESULTS: One hundred nine cases with stage I DAWT were identified, of which 95 cases received preoperative chemotherapy. Of these, seven patients underwent preoperative true-cut biopsy. Sixteen of the 95 patients relapsed (17%), six locally, four at distant site, and six combined, and all treated according to SIOP 2001 relapse protocol, which resulted in a 5-year overall survival of 93%. CONCLUSION: Despite 13% locoregional relapse rate, an excellent rescue rate was achieved after salvage treatment, in patients with stage I DAWT whose first-line treatment comprised three-drug chemotherapy (including doxorubicin), without flank irradiation. Therefore, we continue not to advocate the use of radiotherapy in first-line treatment after preoperative chemotherapy in stage I DAWT in the next SIOP protocol.

Treatment of relapsed Wilms tumour (WT) patients: experience with topotecan. A report from the SIOP Renal Tumour Study Group (RTSG).

BACKGROUND: Topotecan has been variably incorporated in the treatment of patients with relapsed Wilms tumour (WT) who failed initial treatment with three or more effective drugs. Our objective was to describe outcome and to retrospectively investigate the potential role of topotecan in relapsed WT patients. METHODS: Children who were treated with topotecan as part of their chemotherapeutic regimens for relapsed WT were identified and included in our retrospective study. Patient charts were reviewed for general patient characteristics, histology and stage at initial diagnosis, number and type of relapse, salvage treatment schedules, toxicity, response to treatment and outcome. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2012, 30 children (median age at relapse 5.5 years, range 1.6-14.5 years) were identified to have received topotecan as part of their salvage regimens (primary progressive disease n = 3, first, second and third relapse n = 13, 9 and 2 respectively, partial response n = 3). Topotecan was administered as a single agent (12 patients) or in combination with other drugs (18 patients). Sixteen patients had high-risk histology according to the SIOP classification, 15 died within 12 months because of progressive disease. Fourteen patients had SIOP intermediate-risk histology of which four patients displayed objective responses to topotecan. Overall, 6 out of 14 intermediate-risk patients survived (median follow up of 6 years), however, three of whom (stage V) had bilateral nephrectomy after topotecan treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan does not seem to show effectiveness in the treatment of relapsed WT patients with initial high-risk histology. In patients with intermediate-risk histology, the role of topotecan might deserve further attention, to prove its efficacy.

Treatment of stage I anaplastic Wilms' tumour: a report from the Children's Oncology Group AREN0321 study.

BACKGROUND: In the fifth National Wilms Tumor Study (NWTS-5), the 4-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates for 29 patients with stage I focal (n = 10) or diffuse (n = 19) anaplastic Wilms' tumour (AWT) treated with vincristine and dactinomycin without flank radiation were 69.5% and 82.6%, respectively. The Children's Oncology Group AREN0321 study evaluated whether adding doxorubicin and flank radiation improves survival for these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumour histology and stage were confirmed by real-time central pathology, surgery and radiology review. The patients received 25 weeks of vincristine, dactinomycin and doxorubicin (cumulative dose 150 mg/m2) with flank radiation (1080 cGy). We retrospectively analysed outcomes of all patients with stage I AWT enrolled in NWTSs 1-5 and AREN0321 with respect to treatment regimens. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with stage I AWT (8 focal and 10 diffuse) were enrolled on AREN0321. With a median follow-up of 4.6 years, the 4-year EFS and OS were 100%. One patient with diffuse AWT had pulmonary relapse 4.12 years after diagnosis. In the 112 patients with stage I AWT treated in NWTSs 1-5 and AREN0321, the EFS was significantly improved with doxorubicin treatment (p = 0.01; 4-year EFS: 97.2% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 91.3-100] vs. 77.5% [95% CI: 67.6-87.4]) but not by flank radiation (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of stage I AWT with vincristine, dactinomycin, doxorubicin and flank radiation in AREN0321 yielded excellent survival outcomes. Retrospective analysis of AREN0321 and NWTS patients suggests that doxorubicin had a greater contribution to the excellent outcomes than radiation.